Agenda Profile: Rain Epler
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Funded Pensions Act and Other Acts (464 SE)
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political stance focuses on the details of the draft bill concerning the flexibility of inheriting funded pensions. The speaker strongly opposes the ministry's decision to introduce excessive flexibility (the "fragmentation" or "slicing up" of the inheritance), citing the administrative burden and development requirements highlighted by the Pension Centre. The position is clearly policy-driven, emphasizing practical efficiency and the consideration of feedback.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding amendments to the Funded Pension Act and the specifics of inheritance, using terms like "fund units," "administrative burden," and "development needs." This knowledge is based directly on feedback from the Pension Centre and the content of the committee discussions, regarding which further clarification is being requested.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is interrogative and critical, employing direct questions to challenge the rationale behind the ministry's decisions. The second speech uses light sarcasm, referencing the minister's advanced age and the presenter's youth to highlight the themes of memory and diligence. The appeal is primarily logical, relying on facts presented by experts (the Pension Centre).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The course of action is restricted to two addresses during a single day's sitting of the Riigikogu, connected with the first reading of a specific draft bill (464 SE).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opposition is directed at the Ministry/Government, who are being criticized for disregarding feedback provided by the Pension Centre. The criticism targets a specific policy detail (excessive flexibility) and the resulting unnecessary administrative burden.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is direct and demanding, involving communication with both the minister and the rapporteur to gain clarity regarding the discussions held in the commission and the processing of feedback. The speaker is attempting to ascertain whether the merit of the proposed change was debated in the commission.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
No data available
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives stress the minimization of administrative burden and system efficiency, opposing changes that generate excessive development and operational costs for financial institutions (such as the Pension Centre). The preference is for solutions that meet the genuine interests of the public, rather than merely offering theoretical flexibility.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
No data available.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed at the draft Act amending the Funded Pensions Act (464 SE), where the speaker is acting as an opponent to the provision that increases the draft act's flexibility. The priority is to avoid legislative amendments that create excessive administrative burden and are rarely utilized in practice.
2 Speeches Analyzed