By Plenary Sessions: Timo Suslov

The rhetorical style is polite and constructive, addressing the minister directly and acknowledging the merit of the changes ("which are very good"). The focus is on logical argumentation and the demand for data, in order to highlight the economic impact more clearly.

The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on a concise, fact-based overview of the draft's procedural history. A logical structure is employed, referencing specific dates and the contributions of the ministries. Emotional or persuasive appeals are absent; this constitutes a purely informative report.

The speaking style is formal, fact-based, and neutral, focusing on the concise reporting of the steering committee's work and its consensus decisions. Emotional or rhetorical appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on procedural logic and brevity ("I will limit myself to that").

The rhetorical style is very formal, neutral, and fact-based, focusing exclusively on reporting the work of the Constitutional Committee and communicating procedural decisions. A logical and structured presentation is utilized, avoiding emotional appeals or personal viewpoints. The tone is explanatory and concise.

The style is highly formal and procedural, fitting the role of the commission's rapporteur. The speaker concentrates on logical and factual arguments, delivering the commission's decisions and the substance of the discussion in a neutral tone. It is repeatedly stressed that personal opinions must be avoided, and the focus must remain on the commission's official position to ensure the presentation's impartiality.

The speaking style is formal, neutral, and strictly procedural, fitting the role of the committee rapporteur. The emphasis is on a logical and fact-based summary, communicating the positions of the Ministry of the Interior and the committee's voting results. Emotional or personal appeals are entirely absent; the objective is to provide a concise overview of the discussion.

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and centers on summarizing procedural decisions and the proceedings within the commission. The speaker employs logical appeals, referencing specific voting results, government positions, and the existence of prior discussions. The presentation is brief and fact-based.

The style is formal and neutral, focusing on the presentation of facts, which is characteristic of a commission report. The speaker's objective is to provide a "quick overview" and a "short commission report," utilizing a logical structure, beginning with discussion and concluding with decisions, while avoiding emotional appeals.