By Months: Timo Suslov
Total Months: 8
Fully Profiled: 8
10.2025
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, polite, and constructive, addressing the head (or director) and the minister in the form of a question. The speaker employs logical argumentation, focusing on practical outcomes (speed, investments) and demanding data rather than emotional appeals. The tone is supportive, yet demanding.
06.2025
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on conveying the progress of the draft bill and the substance of the proposed amendments to the Riigikogu. The speaker employs a logical structure and technical language, eschewing emotional or personal appeals, and remains concise and factual.
05.2025
1 Speeches
The address is formal, procedural, and fact-based, typical of a commission's report delivered to the plenary session. The tone is neutral and concise, focusing on relaying the discussion and consensual decisions. Emotional or personal appeals are avoided; the emphasis is placed solely on sharing logical and structured information.
04.2025
2 Speeches
The style is formal, informative, and procedural, focusing on the chronological presentation of events and decisions. The speaker uses a neutral tone and emphasizes logical and fact-based reporting concerning the committee’s work. Both the chairman and the Chancellor of Justice are thanked, which indicates a polite and respectful manner of communication.
03.2025
16 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and procedural, focusing on the neutral presentation of the commission's decisions. The speaker maintains caution, repeatedly emphasizing their role as the commission's rapporteur and refusing to express personal opinions before the conclusion of the presentation. Logical argumentation is employed, referencing statutory provisions and the issue of proportionality, while refraining from emotional appeals.
12.2024
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and neutral, focusing on summarizing the commission's discussions and procedural decisions. The speaker employs logical appeals, presenting factual data and the positions of the Ministry of the Interior, while avoiding emotional language. The purpose of the speech is to provide a concise overview of the topic without repeating previously covered material.
03.2024
3 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and procedural, typical of the manner employed by a commission rapporteur. The tone is neutral and informative, focusing on summarizing the commission's discussions and decisions, and conveying the government's positions. Logical appeals are utilized, referencing previous proceedings and political risks.
02.2024
1 Speeches
The speaking style is highly formal and neutral, focusing exclusively on the delivery of facts and procedural decisions. The presenter employs a logical structure to provide a brief and rapid overview of the commission's deliberations, while avoiding emotional or personal appeals.