By Plenary Sessions: Kalev Stoicescu
Total Sessions: 31
Fully Profiled: 31
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker indirectly criticizes the current rigid investment policy of the government or the responsible authorities (likely the Ministry of Economic Affairs or the Ministry of Defence). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the rejection of major investors and the excessive rigidity of the criteria.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is aimed at the policy of the government or the responsible ministry, which has prioritized military national defense at the expense of civil protection. The criticism is policy- and funding-based, focusing on the unequal distribution of resources.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Not enough data.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker does not directly criticize any opposing side or group. He mentions the amendment proposal submitted by the parliamentary group of the Social Democratic Party, but treats it neutrally as part of the legislative process.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at an unnamed political party, which is being criticized sharply and directly for claiming to give its best effort while failing to strengthen Estonia's national defense. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, expressing deep regret over the actions of the opposing side.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The main external adversary is Russia, which is described as an aggressor and a predator waging psychological warfare against Estonia. Internally, sharp criticism is directed at deficiencies found within the administrative domain of the Ministry of Defence concerning adherence to accounting rules, demanding the immediate rectification of these shortcomings and comprehensive explanations for taxpayers.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The criticism is aimed at the consequences of the previous 2017 amendment to the law, which resulted in unequal treatment for residents of islands with fewer than five inhabitants. No direct political opponent or group is mentioned or attacked; instead, the focus is on the necessity of improving the law.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no opposition. The speech focuses on supporting the draft bill and the consensus decisions of the National Defence Committee.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversaries are the Moscow Patriarchate and the Estonian Christian Orthodox Church subordinate to it, who are accused of being directly subservient to Putin's criminal regime and the FSB. The criticism is intensely political and security-focused, accusing the church leadership (Bishop Daniel) of disseminating Moscow propaganda and slandering the Estonian state at international forums (the UN, USA). The speaker entirely rejects the opposing side's assertions of apoliticality and claims that religious freedom is being restricted.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No domestic opponent or political grouping is criticized. The opposition is directed at an external threat—Russia's full-scale war of aggression, which demands the strengthening of national defense.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main criticism is directed at Russia, which is labeled an "aggressor," and whose actions in Ukraine are the direct cause for the withdrawal from the convention. International interest groups (ICBL, ICRC), which rely on humanitarian considerations, were heard, but despite their attempts at persuasion, the decision to ensure national security remained firm.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at Russia, which is referred to as a "serial aggressor state" and which is attempting to circumvent sanctions. Procedurally, the proponents of Draft Law 563 SE are criticized because the bill infringes upon the competence of the Government of the Republic and proposes indexation (an index of 1.3) that would cause an unreasonably large increase in costs.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation is directed squarely at those who spread exaggerations and absurd fabrications (e.g., an avalanche of stateless persons or 7 million migrants). Separately, criticism is leveled at one faction or party that opposes the USA and seeks to disenfranchise the citizens of a crucial ally. The criticism is intense, labeling the opposing side's claims as "total obfuscation" and "ludicrous."
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
There is a complete absence of criticism or opposition; the speaker is supportive and affirming, focusing on moving the discussion forward. There are no references to opponents or policies under criticism.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary confrontation targets the Russian regime, which is considered the perpetrator of hybrid warfare and the saboteur of critical infrastructure, as well as China, as an ally. Criticism is also directed at the Moscow Patriarchate, which is viewed as a political tool infiltrated by the FSB and thus unable to be apolitical.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is Russia, which is referred to as a "serial aggressor," and whose dictatorial regime is directly criticized. Domestically, warnings are issued regarding undemocratic political conditions and against isolationism, which would lead to a departure from liberal democracy.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The main criticism is aimed at the Georgian Dream government, who are accused of gross human rights violations and the brutal treatment of pro-European Georgians. The criticism is intense and politically charged, stressing that their actions are highly favorable to Russia.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The opposition stance is directed against Bill 540 OE, which was submitted by the Isamaa faction (Urmas Reinsalu). The criticism is primarily political and procedural: the proposal is premature, violates budgetary rules, and focuses too narrowly on a single capability. Furthermore, Isamaa is criticized for withdrawing a similar bill (589 OE) after joining the coalition.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is intense and directed at members of parliament who voted against the NATO collective defense contribution (Bill 485), a move considered literally shocking and dangerous. Colleague Mart Helme is being criticized for ridiculing international efforts. The opposition is viewed as an unwillingness to accept explanations, especially concerning the historical designations of the missions.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data (There is not enough data).
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The sharpest criticism is aimed at Russia and the historical Soviet regime, which are accused of genocide, criminal policies, and brutal methods. Specific domestic political opponents are not directly criticized; rather, it is mentioned that the decision regarding the security tax was preceded by a thorough debate.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The primary opposition is directed at the aggressor states, Russia and Belarus, due to their hybrid attacks, provocations, and influence operations, which are considered to be on a larger scale than ever before. Strong criticism is also aimed at the Russian Orthodox Church, which is subordinate to the Moscow Patriarchate, and is considered a branch of the Moscow authorities and a security threat in Estonia.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main adversary is Russia, which is characterized as an aggressive state that organizes hybrid attacks and targets civilians and infrastructure. There is also implicit criticism directed at those who question the credibility of NATO’s collective defense, deeming such doubts damaging and unwarranted.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker expresses strong opposition to the previous governments that made economic decisions in 2019 and 2022. The criticism is policy-based, accusing them of making "fundamentally wrong" and "ultra-populist" decisions which led the country into a poor economic state. The speaker also questions the sufficiency of the current governing coalition's actions in balancing the budget.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at those who express strong concern about the environmental and safety risks of nuclear energy (nuclear catastrophe). The criticism is indirect, presenting the opposing side's arguments in an extreme form to demonstrate their absurdity in the Nordic context.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
No direct political opposition is being voiced, but criticism is aimed at the slow pace of investment by the governments of major European powers into the defense industry. The speaker is questioning their readiness to act swiftly.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
Direct domestic confrontation is not described, but the criticism is aimed at the Russian state and its aggressive policies. It is stressed that Russia is not a "normal state" and must be held responsible for its crimes, given that it will not voluntarily pay a single cent.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main and sole opponent being criticized is the Russian Federation and its leader, Vladimir Putin, who is referred to as a dictator. The criticism is intense, morally and politically justified, focusing on the inhumanity of Russia's state governance and the absence of democracy. Compromise with the Russian regime is ruled out.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main adversary is Putin's Russia, which is characterized as a "barbaric" and "criminal regime," and whose actions are labeled as genocide. The criticism is intense and values-driven, accusing the adversary of the deportation of children, torture, and dehumanization, and demanding that war criminals be held accountable.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main adversary is Putin’s Russia, which is characterized as a state that employs crude and brutal force and has no interest in diplomacy. Russia must be deterred by NATO’s military capabilities and weakened economically. Criticism is also directed globally against states that abandon and attack democracy, and indirectly against those who believe Estonia lacks the necessary ambition to strive for membership in the Nordic Council.