By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman
Total Sessions: 125
Fully Profiled: 125
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position focuses on the need to address issues cross-sectorally, emphasizing that fiscal policy must be integrated with regional and social policy. Cooperation with other sectors is considered paramount in order to find comprehensive solutions. The stance is moderately supportive of the broader political framework, rather than focusing solely on the narrow tax issue.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is a strong opposition figure who focuses intensely on social affairs, demography, and family support. His political stance is value-based, emphasizing the necessity of upholding the constitutional preamble concerning the preservation of the nation. He sharply criticizes the government’s fiscal measures, such as the car tax and cuts to family benefits, and demands that surplus funds be channeled toward children and families. He strongly opposes those who deem the issue of birth rate irrelevant, labeling them irresponsible.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's state budget proposal concerning the Health Insurance Fund, emphasizing the danger posed by a persistent large deficit and the lack of a responsible solution. The approach is policy- and results-based, focusing on fiscal responsibility and the fulfillment of the Fund's statutory duties. The speaker demands that Parliament refrain from irresponsibly approving a deficit budget without clear justification.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The most prominent issue is the changes in the organization of education, especially the advancement of basic school final exams. The speaker adopts a fiercely opposing stance, criticizing the reform for its negative impact on children's mental health and the quality of instruction. This position is aimed at improving the management of education and ensuring quality, not rushing things, and is strongly results- and values-driven.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political focus is currently on the economy's poor performance, particularly the decline in purchasing power and the inadequate level of domestic consumption. The viewpoint being presented is a strongly results-oriented critique, suggesting that current policies have failed, especially given that neighboring countries have been more successful in sustaining economic growth. The primary objective is to find a solution to halt the economic downturn and boost overall prosperity.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The political focus is heavily on regional policy and the problems associated with sparsely populated areas. The speaker is concerned about the depopulation of rural areas and the resulting public expenditures. He/she demands concrete plans for restoring financial instruments to local governments in order to support rural life and halt the population outflow.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The political focus centers on population policy and addressing the low birth rate, stressing the necessity of a stable family policy framework. We strongly support equalizing child benefits (100 euros for the first and second child) and increasing the benefit provided to single parents. This political framework is value-based, highlighting the state's duty of care, and sharply criticizes the government for its inaction and failure to keep its promises. The goal is to immediately send a positive political signal to families.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The political stance opposes the draft bill introduced by the Minister of the Interior concerning the monitoring of terrorist propaganda, arguing that it is "crude" and could lead to thought control. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of tackling radicalization at the legislative level while simultaneously protecting the interests of the Estonian state against subversive thought patterns. This position is strongly value-based, focusing on the defense of civil liberties.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political position focuses heavily on family policy and demographic issues, stressing the necessity of an evidence-based approach. The speaker sharply criticizes the government (the Reform Party) for political bias in defining what constitutes scientific evidence, citing the unfair re-evaluation of previous methods. The primary goal is to support families and children, particularly given the current difficult economic situation, and this approach is grounded in both results and values.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The political focus is centered on sharp criticism of the government's fiscal policy, arguing that it favors the wealthy and disadvantages low-wage earners, particularly in the context of the income tax exemption. There is also a strong stance in favor of increasing family benefits, demanding that the child allowance be raised from 80 euros to 100 euros, utilizing budget funds left over due to the low birth rate. These positions are strongly value-based, emphasizing social justice and the livelihood of families.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The most prominent issue is the fair compensation of national defense personnel. The politician stresses the necessity of raising the pay for young soldiers who serve on missions and risk their lives while earning only 1,200 euros a month. This stance is highly critical of the government's actions, given that pay raises disproportionately benefit the ministry's management, making this a results-based critique. Furthermore, he demands greater accountability from ministers and that they answer to the Riigikogu (Parliament).
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker is a staunch opponent of the government coalition's fiscal and social policies, focusing specifically on opposing new taxes (a car tax, an income tax increase) and cuts to family benefits. His/her views are intensely value-driven, emphasizing the protection of large families, pensioners, and residents of rural areas. State security is also a key issue, particularly regarding the voting rights of Russian citizens and uncontrolled immigration.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on the shaping of media policy and the transparency of state funding. The speaker strongly opposes a situation where state support becomes either the direct or indirect price for political loyalty to the ruling party. Specifically, concern has been highlighted regarding the potential additional funding for the Delfi Meedia group and its connection to journalistic bias against the political opponents of the Reform Party.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, criticizing the government's economic policy for imposing new taxes and obligations that drive up prices and costs. The speaker is concerned about the trustworthiness of the state security agencies, demanding transparency and the admission of mistakes, particularly concerning manipulation aimed at achieving political advantage. The platform is directed at criticizing both specific policy (waste reform) and the government's overall conduct (honesty in communication).
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus centers on justice issues, particularly prison management (including the import of prisoners and lease agreements) and competition law. The speaker adopts a sharply critical stance regarding the minister's evasion of responsibility and unethical conduct, stressing the necessity of upholding fundamental rule of law values and ensuring prosecutorial oversight. These positions are strongly outcome-oriented, criticizing the government's inaction and the political bias evident in the allocation of charges.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus centers on the timing of the legislative process for the end-of-life declaration bill and its potential consequences. The speaker stresses that comprehensive palliative care must be accessible and its action plan adopted before any steps are taken to regulate issues concerning the termination of life. This stance is value-based, emphasizing the ultimate value of life and demanding maximum caution to avoid the slippery slope toward euthanasia.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The political focus centers on the security of Estonia's Jewish community and the country's foreign policy stance regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The speaker expresses strong opposition to Estonia's votes at the UN, which they believe support the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority and pose a threat to local security. This position is strongly value-based, demanding that the state implement a clear strategy to protect the community amid rising hate speech and hate crimes.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The political focus is directed toward resolving family disputes and litigation concerning child visitation rights, emphasizing the necessity of protecting children as the most vulnerable party. This stance is reform-minded, proposing the inclusion of an independent expert in judicial decisions as a specific solution. Trust in the court system has been lost, which necessitates procedural reinforcement.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is fiercely oppositional, concentrating on a sharp critique of the government's economic policy and tax hikes (the so-called "tax festival"), which, in their estimation, will push a quarter of the population into poverty. The political focus is heavily directed toward social justice, halting regional marginalization, and improving the financial well-being of families. The stance is forcefully results-driven, accusing the government of destroying the competitiveness of the Estonian economy and demanding snap elections as the way out of the current situation.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The political position centers on the efficacy of government action and rectifying errors, particularly within the framework of boosting economic productivity and competitiveness. The speaker demands that the government and ministries conduct a rapid review and implement necessary changes, stressing that the state cannot afford to be a mere "spectator." This stance is strongly results-oriented and demands accountability from the government.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on resisting the government’s tax increases (excise duties) under the pretext of curbing inflation. They back popular legislative proposals (such as ending the practice of changing the clocks), stressing that the government ought to support these measures. The overall political framework is designed to emphasize the government’s failures and broken promises.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The political position is strongly critical of the ministry’s infrastructure strategy, which prioritizes mega-projects (Rail Baltic, Via Baltica) at the expense of rural road networks. This stance is results-oriented, highlighting the state's failure to guarantee local municipalities adequate funding necessary for them to meet their responsibilities. The speaker stresses that the condition of secondary roads is directly tied to the long-term viability of residents in rural areas.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker is taking a sharply critical stance against the government, focusing on the deficiencies in social security and the lack of accountability surrounding the Pihlakodu case. The political focus is both value-driven and results-oriented, demanding a clear chain of responsibility and preventative measures from the state to protect vulnerable members of society. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes the government’s demographic and education policies, particularly those affecting Ida-Viru County.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the minister’s plan to reorganize the schools on Hiiumaa under the framework of vocational education and regional policy, viewing this as a major blow to the local community. This stance aims to preserve educational institutions within the county and rests on strong political and legal foundations, raising questions about the decision's soundness and legality.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly oriented towards supporting the social sector and people with special needs, emphasizing the state's moral obligation. The most acute issue is the underfunding of special welfare services (a shortfall of 50 million euros) and the isolation of families. This position is value-based, stressing the inherent worth of every individual and the need to establish a sense of social security. The state has failed to prioritize this area, a failure which the speaker strongly criticizes.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
It focuses heavily on crises within the social sector, particularly the quality and accountability of nursing homes, as well as economic well-being. The political stance is sharply anti-government, accusing the coalition (the Reform Party) of engaging in a tax spree, breaking promises, and harming lower-income groups. The framework is strongly value-driven and results-oriented, demanding clear accountability from the state and the protection of vulnerable populations. It views the government's tax increases (exceeding one billion euros) as a direct threat to people's ability to cope financially and to the country's economic outlook.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus centers on clearly defining the chain of responsibility in social welfare (the Pihlakodu case) and evaluating the ethical and moral legitimacy of Supreme Court rulings. The presenter adopts a strongly value-driven position, demanding a reduction in the scope for interpretation within the legislation to prevent the evasion of responsibility. The main themes relate to ensuring societal security and justice.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is one of strong opposition to the ongoing social reform, which would establish a unified base rate, thereby leaving many target groups without necessary support. This stance is both value-based (citing a lack of justice) and results-oriented (given that the government's actual track record is one of worsening the situation), accusing the leading party of deception. The speaker, representing Isamaa, supports the proposal to terminate the proceedings of the draft bill.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker's political focus is centered on sharply criticizing the failure of the social welfare reform and the resulting poverty among pensioners, emphasizing that the government has failed to deliver on its promises regarding the availability of nursing home placements affordable with the average pension. Another key issue is the depopulation of rural areas and the deepening regional inequality, which the speaker attributes to the government's tax policy. The political stance is fiercely oppositional and performance-driven, demanding accountability and comprehensive, well-considered solutions from the administration.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The central theme is energy supply security and the lack of planning in the development of renewable energy, regarding which the speaker expresses strong opposition to the government's actions. Isamaa supports diversifying the energy portfolio and establishing new production capacities, but simultaneously demands the presence of dispatchable capacity. The political framework is aimed at ensuring the population's sense of security and opposing the idea that people should have to pay themselves into poverty for energy in the future. The position is that wind farms should be built on areas already impacted by economic activity, such as mining sites.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is conservatively cautious, emphasizing the necessity of eliminating any possibility of abuse and ensuring patient safety. The speaker holds the view that palliative care and hospice facilities must be fully established before the legalization of end-of-life declarations, citing the 2017 opinion of the Chancellor of Justice. This stance is strongly value-based, focusing on sending the right signal to society so that elderly individuals do not feel like a burden. The speaker represents the views of the Isamaa faction and identifies as a conservative.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position heavily focuses on prioritizing salary increases for coaches, demanding accountability from the minister regarding the fulfillment of a previous promise. This stance is results-oriented, highlighting the government’s inability to quickly finalize the coalition agreement and deliver on public commitments. The speaker also stresses the necessity of raising wages for other public sector professions, such as teachers, police officers, and rescue workers.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance regarding election methods is moderate and analytical, stressing that there is no preference between e-voting and paper ballots. The primary concern is the convenience and accessibility of the electoral system for various demographic groups. The speaker emphasizes that the e-voting system was designed primarily for the younger population and families with children, in contrast to the presenter's focus on the issues faced by older people.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The political focus is centered on combating poverty and regional marginalization, issues that are also being framed as matters of Estonian national security. The speaker is vehemently opposed to the government's proposed tax hikes (VAT, excise duties, car tax), arguing that they will worsen the cost of living and erode purchasing power, particularly for large families and individuals with disabilities. These positions are heavily results-oriented, highlighting the positive effects of social measures implemented by previous administrations while criticizing the current government's failure to meet its stated objectives.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political focus is currently directed at the consequences of the care reform, highlighting the abuse of the elderly and the excessive profits being made by nursing homes. The position taken is highly critical and outcome-oriented, demanding that oversight be launched into the funding model. The speaker stresses that despite rising prices, wages have failed to keep pace, resulting in the hiring of unqualified staff.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
A strong opposition stance against the Reform Party government, primarily focusing on energy security and the socio-economic crisis. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of prioritizing security of supply and affordable electricity prices over environmental objectives, especially given the current security crisis. The political framework is heavily results-driven, accusing the government of failing to ensure supply security for the public and businesses. The government is further accused of implementing tax hikes (VAT, car tax) that exacerbate poverty and inflation.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is directed at the unfair impact of the motor vehicle tax (car tax), particularly on large families and people with disabilities. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the method of the tax's implementation, criticizing the government's inability to account for necessary exemptions. The focus is outcome-oriented, emphasizing social injustice and the government's passivity in ignoring the concerns of its citizens.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is heavily directed towards social policy, particularly the issues of gender self-determination and quotas for governing bodies. The speaker is critical of these quotas, deeming them controversial, and highlights the practical problems associated with the topic of transgenderism, referencing international sports scandals. Their position is values-driven and cautious, concentrating on the potential negative social impact of these policies. They criticize the Ministry of Social Affairs' previous plans for addressing gender self-determination.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly value-based, emphasizing national security in the context of the eastern border and the importance of ensuring Estonian-language education, which he/she views as a security issue. The speaker opposes the stance that reduces local government politics solely to municipal policy. Furthermore, he/she expresses caution regarding the draft law concerning the foreign influence on religious associations, fearing its potential abuse.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The political position centers on strong opposition to increasing the quota for foreign and guest workers, particularly when integration is insufficient and requires additional funding. The most pressing issue is prioritizing the employment and education of Estonia's own youth (NEET youth) ahead of facilitating mass immigration. The argument is outcome-based, citing statistical data and the failure of integration efforts. The tone is critical, demanding that the government fundamentally shift its priorities.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The political stance is firmly focused on preserving and developing the domestic oil shale energy sector, viewing this as essential during a security crisis. The speaker opposes subsidizing renewable energy, arguing that, in their estimation, it leads to high electricity prices and national impoverishment. These positions are strongly policy- and results-driven, prioritizing supply security and economic viability.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is firmly aimed at the immediate closure of the Estonian-Russian border, deeming it a critical national security issue. The speaker criticizes the government for its sluggishness, bureaucracy, and self-satisfaction (being "on standby"), demanding round-the-clock service when the nation is under threat. They emphasize that economic revitalization and security are more important than bureaucratic protocols.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is supportive of the draft bill concerning the survivor’s benefit, but this is coupled with strong opposition to the government’s broader family and tax policies. The most critical issues are the welfare of children and families and halting the decline in the birth rate, which is framed as the defense of national values. The speaker supports this move as a step in the right direction but criticizes the government for taking three steps backward in family policy. The position is heavily value-based and focused on demographics.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is heavily centered on the natality crisis and population policy, underscoring the necessity of ensuring the sustainability of the Estonian nation and language. The speaker is vehemently opposed to the government's austerity and tax hike policies, particularly the reduction of benefits for large families and the car tax, which, in their estimation, has eroded the sense of security among families. The political framework is value-driven, directly linking the declining birth rate to the future and security of the state.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus centers on the sharp criticism of the deficiencies in the government’s tax and social policies. The speaker stands against onerous tax hikes and calls for fiscal adjustments that support the daily lives of families and the elderly. The criticism is heavily aimed at the effectiveness and integrity of the government’s performance, particularly concerning the issue of pension indexation.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is centered on criticizing offshore wind farm projects, highlighting procedural ambiguity and environmental impacts. The speaker demands clarification regarding the basis for the government's decisions (the Aurora analysis platform) and the actual continuation of the project (pouring concrete into the sea). This position is strongly critical of the transparency and feasibility of the government's actions, taking a results-based approach.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is heavily focused on the protection of rural residents and domestic animals from predators (wolves). The speaker highlights the contradiction in the government's priorities by contrasting proposed legislation designed to protect people from aggressive dogs with the current situation where livestock owners are struggling against predators. This position is value-driven, underscoring the necessity of guaranteeing public safety.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is firmly aimed against granting voting rights in local elections to citizens of aggressor states and persons with undetermined citizenship. This stance is justified by security considerations and the value-based necessity of protecting the Estonian nation, language, and culture. The speaker consistently condemns the coalition’s intention to enshrine the voting rights of persons with undetermined citizenship in the Constitution. The position is strongly value-driven and emphasizes the duty of loyalty to the Estonian state.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a strong, value-based position concerning the political decisions made by academic institutions, specifically criticizing the Estonian Academy of Arts (EKA) for ending its cooperation with Israeli universities. He stresses that state-funded bodies must take into account prevailing societal views and avoid actions that might offend the Jewish community. This stance is explicitly pro-Israel, condemning both the failure to denounce the Hamas attacks and the Foreign Minister's previous vote in favor of Palestine at the UN.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
The most prominent issue is national security and the threats posed by Russia, stressing the necessity of being prepared for various risk scenarios. The political stance is strongly value-based and takes a firm stand against the naive idea of granting voting rights to Russian citizens or holders of the so-called 'grey passport' (stateless residents). Support is also expressed for the State of Israel, and it is emphasized that Estonia must be protected above all else.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government's actions in energy and social policy. The primary issues are the impoverishment of citizens due to subsidized energy projects and tax increases, as well as the demographic crisis that the government is failing to resolve. Criticism is directed at both procedural aspects (decisions being made by three leaders) and substantive aspects (undermining the sense of security for families).
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oriented towards security and responsible foreign policy. The speaker heavily criticizes the Foreign Minister's claim that the vote for Palestine at the UN changed nothing, underscoring the negative impact this had on the local Jewish community's sense of security. Concern is also expressed regarding youth cyber defense and the lowering of the voting age to 16, which calls the statesmanship of the move into question. The political framework is value-based, emphasizing responsibility and community security.
2025-01-30
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly focused on restricting the voting rights of citizens of the aggressor state in Estonia, a measure with which the speaker expresses clear agreement. However, the speaker also voices concern regarding the social consequences of this policy, pointing to the potential alienation of Estonian patriots, which demonstrates a value-based approach to balancing security and integration.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly critical of the government’s actions regarding the availability of social services in rural areas for parents of children with disabilities. Opposition is also voiced against new regulations stemming from directives, which are viewed as excessive bureaucracy and over-regulation. The criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of policy implementation and the lack of consultation.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly critical of the government’s cuts to family policy, especially before the relevant analysis has been completed. The primary issues are the demographic crisis (low birth rates) and the reduction of benefits for children with disabilities. The political framework is value-based, prioritizing the interests of the nation-state and the security of families, and stands in opposition to left-liberal ideology.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance focuses on the necessity of tightening state control in the taxi industry to combat illegal labor and unfair competition. The speaker criticizes the government's position that responsibility lies solely with businesses, demanding more active state intervention in regulating the market. This position is strongly aimed at enhancing regulations and monitoring their enforcement.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on issues of gender identity and opposing the "marketing" of these topics among young people. The speaker questions the existence of political consensus both in Estonia and globally, emphasizing that there is insufficient political debate. The primary focus is directed at the potential harm that these topics could cause to schoolchildren whose nervous systems are still developing.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
One speaker expresses strong opposition to the car tax, emphasizing its negative impact on large families and residents of rural areas. He questions the government's actions and suggests the need for the government to fall. The second speaker fulfills a procedural role as the Vice-Chairman of the leading committee, supporting accession to the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, focusing on the procedural framework rather than the underlying policy.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political focus centers on the management of national defense and the criticism directed at the decisions made by the ruling party (the Reform Party). The speaker expresses strong indignation regarding the unexpected resignation of the head of the Defense League (Kaitseliit) and accuses the elite of cronyism. He positions himself as standing with the people, embracing "populism" as a condemnation of the elite. The overall stance is highly critical of the government's leadership style concerning national defense matters.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is highly critical of the government's actions, focusing specifically on a particular budget cut and its negative impact. The main emphasis is placed on the efficacy of the policy, particularly regarding the elimination of the €101,000 subsidy for extracurricular activities, which sends conflicting signals from the state concerning children's mental health. The speaker demands the restoration of the subsidy.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position centers on strong criticism regarding the behavioral culture and the level of debate within the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The speaker emphasizes the necessity of making politics understandable and clearly explaining it to the public, contrasting this with the government's arrogant demeanor. The position is value-based, stressing integrity and the need to listen to both the people and the opposition.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is critical of the government's energy policy commitments, particularly regarding the promised cost reduction of renewables and the accounting for grid investments. The speaker strongly stresses the necessity of negotiating derogations within the European Union for the oil shale chemical industry, demonstrating robust support for regional industry. The focus remains on the practical implementation of the policy and financial transparency.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The political position is strongly critical of the Foreign Minister’s previous policy toward Israel, which the speaker believes has led the country astray from its established course and distanced Estonia from its greatest allies (the USA, Israel). At the same time, the foreign policy position regarding the Georgia issue is supported, specifically to prevent falling into the Kremlin’s sphere of influence. The speaker demands a correction of foreign policy so that it is once again aligned with Estonian interests, and emphasizes the value-based framework of this policy (alliance relations, opposition to antisemitism).
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional to the government's actions, sharply criticizing the unanalyzed budget cuts and the broken promises regarding family policy. The speaker emphasizes the link between legislation and regional policy, prioritizing state credibility and security. The core framework is value-based, focusing on the crisis of trust and the abandonment of the spirit of the constitution.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position centers on strong opposition to the rampant growth of bureaucracy within the country and the increasing administrative burden. The speaker emphasizes the need to assess the practicality of transparently monitoring civil servants’ expense reimbursements and the potential additional costs involved, particularly in the context of the state’s current financial constraints, while keeping performance and cost control firmly in focus.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on the safety and protection of children from criminals, and maintaining the strictness of regulations concerning gender reassignment. The speaker vigorously opposes draft legislation that, in their view, increases risks (such as the employment of pedophiles) or moves significant control away from public scrutiny (transferring authority from the courts to administrative agencies). They emphasize the need to maintain existing strict prohibitions and prevent the easing of social regulations at the ministerial level.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The political position is strongly oriented towards amending the Constitution to restrict the voting rights of citizens from aggressor states in local government elections, citing security concerns. He/She supports the Isamaa party’s proposal to reserve the right to vote in the Constitution exclusively for Estonian citizens, while simultaneously acknowledging the rights of EU citizens under international law. The focus is dual: value-based (security) and policy-based (the content of the Constitution), underscoring the necessity of curbing overzealous politicians during the process of legislative change.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The political focus is heavily centered on demographics and the birth rate crisis, which is treated as a question of the state's sustainability ("in the Estonian language, with Estonian culture, and as a nation"). The speaker is in strong opposition to the policies of the governments led by Kaja Kallas, accusing them of neglecting population issues and reducing subsidies. Additionally, foreign policy decisions concerning the rules-based world order and the sense of security of the Jewish community are criticized. The political framework is value-based and concentrates on the effectiveness of the government's activities.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The political position is strongly focused on expanding the protection of children's rights through the UN Optional Protocol, stressing its necessity in resolving serious cases (such as sexual abuse). The speaker also strongly advocates for supporting demography and birth rates, highlighting previously successful measures. Furthermore, he sharply criticizes the current government's move to liberalize the granting of citizenship to perpetrators of serious crimes, viewing this as motivated by ideological goals and the acquisition of new voters.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is sharply critical of the government's efforts to downgrade sensitive socio-political decisions (such as the conditions for gender reassignment) from the level of law to the level of regulation, citing concerns over the loss of parliamentary oversight. He also highlights deficiencies in Estonian foreign policy concerning Israel and terrorism (Hezbollah), drawing on an illustrative example from Israel’s northern border. His views are strongly value-based and emphasize procedural control.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s foreign policy shift regarding the Israeli-Palestinian issue at the UN, considering it a betrayal of values and a security threat. Furthermore, there is a sharp demand for accountability regarding the losses incurred from Eesti Energia’s derivative transactions, highlighting the lack of responsibility taken by former finance ministers. The policy framework is strongly values-based and centers on the accountability of ministerial actions. The speaker criticizes the government for failing to pursue values-based politics.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on ensuring the safety of children and preventing pedophiles from working with them. The speaker is strongly opposed to Bill 427, which replaces a total ban with a mere restriction, arguing that this increases risks and creates security loopholes. This stance is value-based, emphasizing the necessity of an independent judiciary and public oversight when evaluating crimes committed against children. The ultimate goal is to halt the legislative process for this bill entirely, given that the risks have not been minimized.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government’s austerity measures and tax hikes, particularly those affecting the social sector. The most severe criticism targets the elimination of support for single pensioners residing in care homes and the increase in healthcare co-payments. It is stressed that these measures are cynical and specifically aimed at the most vulnerable populations. The language used is value-driven, highlighting the unethical nature of the government's actions and its failure to uphold promises (such as the tax-free average pension).
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
His political position is strongly focused on supporting worker welfare and paid leave, emphasizing the connection between time off and productivity. He is also a strong defender of homeowners' interests, opposing increases in land tax and viewing homeownership as a matter of dignity. His criticism of the government is intense; he accuses them of breaking their word and employing procedural steamroller tactics. His positions are strongly value-based, linking social welfare directly to economic gain.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s proposed legislation, particularly the car tax and the reform of the pharmaceutical reserves system. Criticism is primarily aimed at inefficiency, high costs, and market distortions, accusing the state of creeping nationalization and applying unequal standards regarding consumer protection. The stance is mainly policy- and results-based, demanding accountability and explanations from former ministers.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on restricting the right to vote in local elections for both third-country nationals and individuals with undetermined citizenship. The speaker emphasizes that this is a fundamental issue of values, one that Isamaa has consistently championed. He criticizes the government's compromise proposal, which would preserve the voting rights of those with undetermined citizenship, viewing it as being held hostage by the Social Democrats.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, criticizing the government's actions for deepening regional inequality and cutting support for vulnerable groups (pensioners in care homes). The speaker emphasizes that the government's actions (tax hikes, centralization of services) are diametrically opposed to the regional policy principles stated by the ministers themselves. The criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of the government's activities and the violation of value-based promises.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's inaction regarding security issues (specifically, voting rights for citizens of the aggressor state) and the restriction of economic freedoms (such as the nationalization of the pharmaceutical market). Criticism is directed at the government's priorities, which are dismissed as mere displacement activities and hastily pushed-through draft legislation. The need to protect economic freedom and the private sector is emphasized, alongside warnings against socialist measures. The critique maintains a dual focus: both values-based (protecting religious communities) and results-oriented (the budget and energy prices).
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is in strong opposition to the government's economic policy, sharply criticizing decisions made in haste and the lack of impact assessments, particularly concerning the profit tax. He/She challenges the government's narrative that opposing tax increases is anti-security or amounts to supporting Kremlin talking points. The political focus is directed toward criticizing the inefficiency of the government's actions and the consequences of the economic downturn.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is a prominent opposition figure (Isamaa faction) who sharply criticizes the government's fiscal and social policies, particularly the cascading tax increases and cuts made at the expense of vulnerable demographics (pensioners in care homes, mothers raising children at home). The political stance is value-driven, stressing the importance of public health and respecting the elderly, though necessary initiatives such as mental health reform are supported. The speaker characterizes the government's actions as a clear example of broken promises and outright neglect.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government’s process-driven and budget-based approach to social policy. The speaker emphasizes the interests of the nation-state and the small nation, and accuses the government of breaking promises made to families with children. The main issues are demography, family benefits, and the lack of transparency regarding state budget cuts.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly value-driven and well-considered, focusing on the protection and safety of children. The speaker firmly opposes the adoption of the bill if it leaves open the possibility that pedophiles could be employed in children's institutions. This position is aimed at correcting procedural errors and demands clarity before moving forward.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The political position is strongly opposed to Kaja Kallas’s government’s population policy, especially regarding the abolition of the institution of the Minister of Population. The most critical issue is the birth rate crisis, which is treated as a value-based and vital question concerning the survival of the state. The government’s actions are criticized for breaking promises and reducing the sense of security for families, and proactive engagement is demanded.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly oppositional, centering on sharp criticism of the government's tax increases and cuts (VAT, car tax, fuel excise duty, and reductions to hobby group funding). The main focus is on the policy's negative impact on young families and regional development, with the minister's regional policy goals being deemed utopian and merely rhetorical. Belief in the government's ability to achieve its regional policy objectives has vanished.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on foreign policy, particularly the Israeli-Palestinian issue. The speaker supports Israel's historical right to Jerusalem and sharply criticizes the foreign minister's conduct regarding the UN vote, viewing it as the pursuit of an independent agenda. These positions are both value-driven (the historical capital) and results-oriented (the criticism of the minister's actions).
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political platform is strongly focused on supporting demographic growth and family policy, stressing the special, constitutionally mandated protection of large families. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's austerity measures and the communication strategy of the Minister of Social Protection, which, in their view, undermines respect for motherhood and parenthood. The entire stance is value-driven, emphasizing the survival and growth of the nation as the bedrock of society.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's social policy, particularly concerning the removal of health insurance coverage for stay-at-home mothers. The speaker emphasizes that raising children benefits the state and generates future taxpayers, thereby prioritizing family values and demographic stability. The policy is criticized as reckless and shortsighted, with the government being accused of inciting class enmity.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker strongly emphasizes a value-based approach, highlighting the crucial importance of dignity in both lawmaking and human relationships. The political position is that, given the constraints of limited resources, human capital is the primary driver for achieving the collective success of the state and the nation. Politicians must be self-critical and improve their conduct.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker's main political stance centers on the demographic crisis (low birth rate, negative natural increase) and the preservation of the nation-state, which is framed as a constitutional obligation. He strongly opposes mass immigration and sharply criticizes the government's actions regarding population policy, specifically citing the abolition of the Minister of Population portfolio and the plans by Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo to terminate health insurance for stay-at-home mothers. The political framework is intensely value-based, focusing on upholding the Estonian language, people, and culture.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The speaker strongly emphasizes adherence to the practice of good law-making, criticizing the Ministry of Climate's failure to involve stakeholders in the preparation of the draft amendment to the Waste Act. The second important political position is supporting national defense and crisis preparedness, demanding the swift modification of the bureaucratic funding model (Naiskodukaitse). These stances are primarily procedural and focused on policy effectiveness, criticizing inefficiency and the lack of trust.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The political position is strongly value-driven, focusing on the removal of symbols of the Soviet occupation (especially the Maarjamäe memorial) and opposing any attempts to reinterpret them. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of removing 'red monuments' from the public sphere, equating Soviet symbolism with that of Nazi Germany. This stance is firmly aimed at protecting national historical memory and the sentiments of those who were repressed.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political stance is firmly against the car tax, viewing it as a direct consequence of the Reform Party's incompetent governance and a clear violation of election promises. The primary focus is on protecting vulnerable groups (people with disabilities, pensioners, and large families) and addressing the state's tax policy, which is generating widespread insecurity. Political stability has vanished, replaced by uncertainty driven by continuous tax hikes.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The political focus is heavily centered on restoring confidence among the Estonian people and businesses, confidence which has been undermined by the government's tax policy. The second key priority is tackling the demographic crisis and protecting the foundations of family policy, emphasizing that the Estonian state is being built for its children. The stance is fiercely confrontational, focusing on the government's incompetence and broken promises.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's motor vehicle tax bill, particularly concerning the target groups of disabled people and large families. The criticism centers on the government's failure to consider the proposals made by interest groups, which erodes citizens' faith in their country and their sense of security. This position is value-based and results-oriented, emphasizing the necessity of restoring the public's sense of justice.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The speaker expresses strong distrust towards the presented supplementary budget draft, casting doubt on the credibility of the government's financial management. The political position is performance-driven, emphasizing the opposing side’s previous contradictory promises regarding state finances and tax issues. Specifically, criticism is leveled at the impact of abolishing the tax bracket anomaly (maksuküür), which, according to the Ministry of Finance, primarily benefits the wealthier segments and creates a permanent budget hole.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s fiscal policy and supplementary budget, stressing that these measures fail to solve the problems facing society. The speaker focuses on exposing the alleged deception perpetrated by the government (the Reform Party) both before and after the elections, particularly concerning tax hikes and the abolition of the tax hump. The stance is value-based, defending low-income earners and families with children against the prioritization of the wealthy. Another critical issue is the 400 million euro cut to the national defense budget.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The political stance regarding the draft bill on nuclear energy is cautious and exploratory. Emphasis is placed on the need to clarify whether the bill's purpose is merely to establish a legal basis for becoming a nuclear state, or if that decision has already been made, and whether the initiative is driven by a genuine government need or by lobbying efforts. The focus remains on the procedural and contextual framework of policy development.
2024-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The political focus is on ensuring national defense capability, criticizing the government's budget cuts and the disregard shown for the advice of the Commander of the Defense Forces. They also stress the necessity of supporting the Women's Voluntary Defense Organization (Naiskodukaitse) and reducing bureaucracy in civil defense. In Ida-Viru County, the priority is maintaining Estonian-language education to halt Russification. The stance is strongly oppositional, accusing the government of adopting an "Excel spreadsheet approach" that ignores the real security situation.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on the defense of the democratic world order. The speaker firmly supports the adoption of the statement "On the Crisis of Democracy in Georgia," viewing it as a necessary step, much like previous calls to support Ukraine's territorial integrity. This stance is strong and emphasizes the need to speak plainly about important matters.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The political position is highly critical of the government's economic management and internal unity, particularly concerning the decline in Estonia's competitiveness. Strong opposition has been voiced against the idea of increasing the immigration quota, which is viewed as a threat to internal security and the taxpayer's purse. Criticism is aimed at the effectiveness and internal coordination of the government's activities.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The political discourse revolves around population sustainability and the birth rate crisis, stressing the necessity of supporting large families and providing them with a sense of security. The speaker is vehemently opposed to the government’s austerity measures concerning family benefits and tax hikes, particularly the car tax, which undermines families’ ability to make ends meet. This political stance is deeply value-driven, focusing on the future of the nation and the state while criticizing the government's short-sightedness.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly aimed at blocking pro-Kremlin influence within decision-making bodies, a stance presented as that of the Isamaa party. Criticism is leveled at the lack of security assessments underpinning the Interior Minister's attitudes, as well as his previous opposition to Estonian-language instruction and the confiscation of weapons. This position is value-based and forcefully contrasts with political vote-seeking.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The political focus is heavily centered on national security and immigration control. The speaker highlights concerns regarding the voting rights of third-country nationals and the prevention of pro-Kremlin influence operations. This stance is values-driven, emphasizing Estonia's exceptionally large share of unintegrated immigrant population (33%) and the necessity of addressing this issue.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker adopts a fiercely oppositional stance toward the ruling party Eesti 200, focusing on their incompetence and unethical conduct. Key points of emphasis include the government’s failure to honor agreements (regarding cuts and economic plans) and the misappropriation of intellectual property and trademarks. The critique targets both the party’s political performance and its underlying values, thereby calling the party’s overall credibility into question. The political framework employed is strongly results-oriented and ethical.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Politically, the speaker positions himself as a strong opponent of the sugar tax, criticizing it as merely a measure to fill the budget that fails to address actual health issues. He emphasizes the importance of good legislative practice and stakeholder inclusion, accusing the government of hypocrisy for ignoring the opinions of producers. Furthermore, a value-based position is crucial regarding the protection of religious freedom and the feelings of believers, supporting the plea made by the Council of Churches.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on sharp criticism of the government's inaction and its economic failures (nine consecutive quarters of recession). Key positions include strong resistance to centralized heritage protection bureaucracy and the proposed cuts to funding for extracurricular activities for families with many children. The overall approach is results-driven and values-based, stressing the defense of culture, family, and regional autonomy. The government is repeatedly branded as "lying" and "passive."
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the ideas of the extreme green transition, which call animal farming into question and promote urbanization. The speaker emphasizes the vital, value-based importance of promoting rural development and ensuring food security, prioritizing these goals over opposing policies. He/She warns that these extreme visions are genuinely on the table in the Riigikogu (Parliament) and require political opposition.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political platform is fiercely opposed to the government’s social policy, prioritizing the defense of subsidies for large families and the mitigation of the demographic crisis. This position is strongly value-driven, underscoring the constitutional duty to protect multi-child families and criticizing the minister’s actions as inflicting irreparable harm upon Estonia. The speaker demands that the benefits be reinstated and that a sense of security be established for families with children.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The political position focuses heavily on national security (suspending the voting rights of citizens from aggressor states) and demography (restoring support for families with many children). He criticizes the government for delays and ideological opposition on crucial issues, stressing that time is running out. His views are strongly value-based, emphasizing the need to protect both the state and the target groups afforded special protection under the constitution.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political platform is strongly value-based, centering on improving access to medication for cancer patients and supporting large families. The speaker sharply opposes the government’s tax hikes and budget cuts, arguing that they diminish people’s sense of security and generate uncertainty. Education has been highlighted as Isamaa’s number one priority.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The speaker's core political stance is population policy and supporting the birth rate, emphasizing the particularly crucial role of large families and the necessity of supporting them. He/She is vehemently opposed to the coalition's measures, such as cutting subsidies for large families and hobby group allowances, and the introduction of a car tax, viewing these as deterrents that drive families away. The political framework is strongly value-based, grounded in Article 28 of the Constitution, which mandates special care for large families.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly anti-government, focusing on the demographic crisis and the deterioration of families' economic security. The speaker emphasizes the constitutional obligation to ensure the survival of the nation, language, and culture, contrasting this with the government's tax increases and cuts to family benefits. The main topics are family benefits and the car tax, which are treated as hostility towards families. The stance is value-based, highlighting the special care for large families mandated by Article 28 of the Constitution.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The speaker's political position is strongly critical of the government's energy policy, emphasizing the priority of energy security and affordable electricity prices. He opposes state subsidies for offshore wind farms, viewing this as a violation of free-market principles and preferring instead to find a holistic solution. The political framework is geared towards revitalizing the economy through competitively priced energy and prioritizing national interests.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political focus is centered on opposing cuts to family benefits, especially those for large families, which is deemed an irresponsible act of societal polarization. The speaker supports the increase in family benefits implemented by the previous administration and casts doubt on the current government's narrative of fairness. The stance is strongly value-driven and politically confrontational.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is one of strong opposition to the government’s tax policy, particularly the proposed motor vehicle tax bill, which is deemed extremely unfair. The argument is framed around outcomes, highlighting the negative consequences of the taxes, such as growing regional inequality and accelerating urbanization. Furthermore, the speaker defends the economic competence of their allies against criticism from their opponents.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s proposed car tax bill, particularly regarding people with disabilities and large families. The criticism focuses on the rushed nature of the legislation and the resulting unfair treatment, underscoring the state’s constitutional duty to provide special care for these groups. This stance is value-driven, centered on social justice and the nation’s demographic future.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political focus centers on strong opposition to the motor vehicle tax, questioning both its necessity and the justifications put forward by the government. The speaker is demanding clarity on whether the tax revenue will be used to ensure the state's survival, win the war in Ukraine, or enhance national security. This position aims to criticize the lack of transparency and the perceived dishonest motives behind the government's actions and policies.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly focused on ensuring national defense and security, supporting both Ukraine's rapid NATO membership and the strengthening of Estonia's defense capabilities through a national defense loan. Domestically, there is an urgent demand for the revocation of voting rights for citizens of Russia and Belarus in local elections, considering the current situation unacceptable during wartime. The stances are value-based and emphasize the necessity of resisting interests that embody the values of a terrorist state.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly opposes the government's plan to utilize controlled immigration as a solution for the demographic and economic crisis. The political focus is outcome-oriented, highlighting the dissonance in statements made by government ministers and the absence of any cost analysis regarding the social sector. The proposal to solve the unemployment problem by importing cheap labor is subject to particularly strong criticism.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position focuses heavily on the urgent need to resolve the issue of revoking voting rights from non-citizens (Russian citizens). This is a policy-driven and value-based stance that emphasizes the importance of processing opposition bills and criticizes the government's inaction. The position is strong and demands immediate action.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker vehemently opposes the proposed car tax bill and criticizes the government’s steamroller tactics, specifically condemning the use of coalition parliamentary groups as a rubber stamp. The primary focus is on security, urgently demanding the revocation of voting rights for Russian and Belarusian citizens in local elections given the current state of war. Emphasis is also placed on the necessity of finding additional funding to resolve the ongoing teachers' strike. The overall framing is primarily policy- and performance-based, stressing the imperative need to restore parliamentary democracy.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is centered on supporting the industry of Ida-Viru County and the valorization of oil shale. The speaker sharply criticizes the failure of the Just Transition Fund framework, which he estimates has resulted in the loss of hundreds of jobs. He demands political direction from the government to secure specific derogations for Estonia in the field of oil shale chemistry, in order to elevate the region's industry to a new level.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on infrastructure functionality and improving the security of the electricity supply. The speaker criticizes the government's actions, deeming current investments insufficient and demanding adequate funding to strengthen the grid, citing the potential recurrence of past major power outages. This position is strongly results-oriented and centers on the efficiency of state operations in securing critical infrastructure.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker positions themselves as a critic of the government’s actions, focusing on security issues and the administration’s indecisiveness. There is strong support for revoking the suffrage of Russian and Belarusian citizens, which is framed as an urgent security matter. The criticism is primarily performance-based, faulting the government for its failure to prevent the teachers’ strike and for ignoring the recommendations of defense force experts.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political platform is heavily focused on cutting state expenditures and resisting the expansion of bureaucracy, particularly concerning the costs associated with the Ministry of Climate's green transition. Concrete savings proposals are put forward, including relocating the ministry to the 'super-ministry' complex and cancelling the construction of the 'Environment House.' This stance is outcome-based, stressing the implementation of solutions derived from prior government experience.