By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Total Sessions: 125

Fully Profiled: 125

2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Direct opponents are not criticized, but the narrow approach to the tax issue presented by the rapporteur is challenged. The criticism is directed at the scope of the policy and the fact that the issues are treated solely as a tax matter, rather than as a comprehensive solution.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary confrontation is aimed at the policies of the governing coalition, sharply criticizing cuts to family benefits, the implementation of the car tax, and the seizure of 25,000 people's accounts. The criticism is both political (the budget deficit in the Health Insurance Fund, wasteful spending by the Ministry of Climate) and value-based (the suspicion of fraud leveled against pregnant women). He/She also criticizes the media outlet Ekspress for unfairly attacking the policy area that supports mothers with many children.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is directed towards the Minister of Finance and the government’s budget policy, alongside the priorities of the Health Insurance Fund’s leadership. The critique is strictly policy-based, focusing on fiscal irresponsibility and the inefficient spending of public money. The speaker questions how Parliament can responsibly approve a deficit budget.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponent is the Minister of Education, whose actions are sharply criticized regarding both policy (specifically, the organization of exams) and management style (the ignoring of feedback). The speaker accuses the minister of deeming feedback from educators and parents "unimportant" and failing to conduct the necessary analyses. The criticism is intense and centers on the minister's inability to listen and resolve issues.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the government or the responsible politicians who are in charge of economic policy, because their actions have led to a decline in purchasing power. The opposition is policy-based, stressing that "something is being done wrong" in Estonia compared to the more successful Baltic states.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
There is not enough data.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Strong opposition faces the Reform Party and Social Minister Karmen Joller, who stands accused of creating instability in family policy, engaging in perfidious conduct (breaking promises), and failing to act (inaction). The criticism targets the government's decision to postpone implementing these measures until the spring of 2026, even though there is already a budget surplus. It views the Reform Party as the main impediment to shaping a consensus-based population policy.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is directed at the actions of the Minister of the Interior and the security ministries, accusing them of rushing and putting forward a "raw" draft bill. The opposition is intense because, in the speaker's estimation, the bill threatens the emergence of ideological control.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is Minister Karmen Joller, and indirectly, the Reform Party. The criticism is intense and twofold: it concerns both personal conduct on social media (inciting and insulting people) and political inconsistency regarding the recognition of science-based methods. Opponents are accused of political hypocrisy and disregarding support for families in the 2026 budget.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, particularly the Minister of Finance, Kristen Michal, and Kristina Kallas. The criticism targets both policy issues (tax unfairness, lack of exemptions for the car tax) and personal conduct, specifically accusing Kallas of using profanity when describing the nation's financial state. The opposition is intense and uncompromising, demanding that the ministers be called to order.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The primary criticism is directed towards the Minister and the leadership of the Ministry of Defense concerning an unfair salary system that fails to motivate young soldiers. A strong oppositional stance is also evident in the procedural criticism, as the Minister did not answer the question posed, but instead stated what they wished, which points to a demand for accountability.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponents are the government led by the Reform Party and specific ministers, especially the Minister of Social Protection, Signe Riisalo, who is being called "the most child-hostile minister in Estonian history." The criticism is both political (tax hikes, cuts) and personal, accusing the opponents of unethical behavior (business interests related to nursing homes, violation of political culture) and lying. No willingness to compromise has been expressed.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the ruling political party (the Reform Party), who stand accused of potentially unethical media financing. Criticism has also been leveled at the Delfi Media group, which is suspected of intensifying journalistic pressure on the government's political opponents while anticipating state funding.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary targets are the Reform Party (over their tax policy and broken promises) and former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets (SDE). The criticism is intense, alleging that Läänemets and the security agencies spread inaccurate information and exploited the incident purely for political gain. The speaker implies this may have been a "political hit job" or a "setup" designed to prop up the ruling establishment.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the Minister of Justice and the Reform Party, who are accused of avoiding responsibility and protecting their coalition partners (Timpson, Laanet, Lauri). The criticism is intense and addresses both political bias and the violation of the principles of the rule of law, particularly concerning the lack of oversight of prosecutors. The speaker demands that the minister personally take responsibility for his actions, rather than shifting the blame onto his predecessors.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the bill's proponents regarding the poor legislative timing, as the declaration concerning end-of-life wishes reached the floor before the action plan for palliative care. Strong opposition is also voiced regarding the Supreme Court's decision in the Paul Tammert case, which established a precedent for assisted dying. The opposition is primarily procedural and value-based, not personal.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The main confrontation is aimed at the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the government, sharply criticizing both foreign policy decisions (specifically, anti-Israel votes) and the minister's conduct in the Riigikogu chamber. The criticism is intense and addresses both the substantive (policy) and procedural (inappropriate accusations, arrogance) levels. The speaker does not rule out a compromise but demands accountability and the creation of a strategy.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the manipulative behavior of feuding parents who use children as a tool against the other parent and engage in social media cancellation. The current court system is also indirectly criticized, as it fails to ensure justice without the assistance of an additional independent expert.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the government led by the Reform Party and the prime minister, accusing them of poor economic management and worsening the standard of living for the populace. The criticism is policy- and results-based, emphasizing the government's low support (80% of voters do not support it) and demanding snap elections. Additionally, the agreement concerning the transfer of Swedish prisoners is being criticized, highlighting reputational damage and security concerns.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The opposition is directed against the actions of the government or ministries, criticizing their past errors and demanding swift correction. The criticism is procedural and outcome-based, focusing on the state's conduct and work plans that require immediate modification.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the coalition and the Reform Party, who face fierce criticism over tax hikes and breaking previous promises. The criticism targets both policy issues (inflation, excise duties) and credibility, with the Prime Minister's statements being labeled an "information operation" or "a distortion of the truth."
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the strategic choices of the minister and the ministry, which leave rural roads neglected. The state is also generally criticized for being unwilling to provide local governments with the necessary funds to meet their mandated obligations. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on the unfair distribution of infrastructure and funding.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The opposition’s position is aimed directly at the government and ministers, who are criticized for their passivity, offering insufficient solutions, and sending contradictory messages (e.g., regarding gender-based care). The Justice Minister’s stance that "nothing can be done" is deemed unsatisfactory. The criticism targets both political inaction (lack of prevention) and previous decisions (the cutting of child benefits).
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the minister, whose actions (the merging/closure of schools) are being criticized as a major blow to Hiiumaa. The criticism is aimed at the political decision itself, its thoroughness and legal basis, not at the individuals involved.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the inaction of the state and the government, which has left the special care sector neglected and underfunded, and at the fact that this has not been a priority area for the state. Local municipalities are also criticized for their inability to provide sufficient services and support workers. Society more broadly is criticized for turning a blind eye and maintaining a superficial attitude toward the social sector.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the Reform Party-led government, Prime Ministers Kaja Kallas and Kristen Michal, and the Minister of Social Affairs. Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (the tax hike spree, the failure of the care home reform) and ethical conduct (breaking promises and deceiving the public). It criticizes the government's "silo mentality," where ministries fail to see the connections between tax increases and the social sector. The attacks are intense, and the possibility of compromise is not mentioned.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at systemic shortcomings in lawmaking (specifically, the lack of clarity regarding accountability) and the actions of institutions (the management of the care home, the Prosecutor's Office, and the Supreme Court), which fail to ensure justice for the victims. The opposition is aimed primarily at this unclear responsibility and the moral vacuum that allows those responsible individuals to remain unpunished.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is directed at the Social Democrats (SDE) and the leading party, criticizing their past actions in government (tax increases, ignoring the problems of disabled people). The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, accusing the government of superficial engagement and worsening the situation. Separately, the SDE's behavior in opposition is criticized, which leaves the impression that they are behind everything, despite earlier consensus in the commission.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the government coalition as a whole, who are accused of implementing unfair tax policies and enabling the enrichment of care home owners. Criticism is directed at political hypocrisy (the Social Democrats' regional policy rhetoric stands in stark contrast to their votes in favor of tax hikes) and the "high-handedness" of specific ministers (Jürgen Ligi). The attacks are intense and politically charged, pointing toward systemic failures.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Ministry of Climate and its former leaders (today’s Prime Minister and State Secretary Keit Kasemets), accusing them of lacking competence in energy matters and engaging in chaotic planning. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, emphasizing contradictions in state actions and unfair competition (renewable energy is exempt from the integrated permit procedure). The government’s actions are being described as "frenzied" and "scrambling."
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the premature handling of the draft bill and the inadequate regulation of its implementation, rather than the goal of ensuring a dignified end of life. Criticism is leveled against the "ruling party's opinion" regarding society's maturity and a State Chancellery employee's sharp retort concerning the topic of euthanasia. The criticism is substantive and focuses on ensuring safety and preventing the transmission of wrong signals within society.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism targets the ruling coalition, which stands accused of sluggishness and an inability to agree on core governing principles after two years in office. The critique is procedural, focusing on the government's operational inefficiency when it comes to delivering on its promises. The minister's pledge is being contrasted directly with the coalition's actual progress in negotiations.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposing side has focused its attention on the rapporteur, criticizing them for adopting a biased viewpoint and for concentrating too narrowly on older people. The criticism is primarily procedural, questioning the opposing side's groundwork and whether they have acquired current information from the Electoral Commission regarding the rectification of deficiencies.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The main opponent is the Reform Party government, which is being accused of taking money away from people via tax hikes and benefit cuts. The criticism is policy-based, particularly concerning the car tax, VAT, and the pension pillar reform, all of which are viewed as failing to help low-wage earners. The speaker also corrected the prime minister's statements regarding Isamaa's dismantling of the second pillar.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The criticism targets the government's failure to supervise the funding model of the care reform, which has allowed service providers to reap significant profits. Opposition is also directed at providers who have failed to raise wages, resulting in the hiring of unqualified personnel.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the Reform Party-led government, which stands accused of misleading the public (concerning the VAT increase) and incompetence (the alleged utopian nature of its energy policy). The criticism is intense and accusatory, especially concerning tax hikes and the disregard for energy security. The government is also accused of "steamrolling" the opposition and behaving disrespectfully toward other politicians.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strong political and procedural criticism has been directed at former government members, naming Kaja Kallas (as Prime Minister), the Minister of Finance, and the Minister of Social Protection. The criticism focuses on the disregard shown toward repeated appeals from large families and the procedural error committed by the Minister of Social Protection in failing to forward correspondence.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opposition is aimed at the Ministry of Social Affairs’ policy, specifically the sidelining of the issue of gender self-determination and the prioritization of quotas over actual wage gap reduction. The criticism is intense and includes personal accusations regarding the conduct of minority groups, drawing upon the speaker’s previous experience as a minister. The speaker also criticizes the former Minister of Social Protection for having raised the topic of gender self-determination.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the views of colleagues belonging to the Centre Party, who underestimate the role of local government politics. She/He also criticizes local municipalities that have hindered the transition to Estonian-language instruction. Additionally, she/he expresses concern about the potential negative impact of the bill, which could open the door to the harassment of religious individuals, citing the example of Päivi Räsänen, who suffered persecution at the hands of a prosecutor.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The main opponents are the advocates for increasing the quota for foreign and migrant labor (Erkki Keldo was mentioned) and the government, which has failed to ensure thorough integration or solve the problem of NEET youth. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the misplacement of priorities and the illogical nature of the policy itself.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
He opposes politicians who ignore Estonian energy specialists and prefer expensive renewable energy, which causes electricity prices to rise. Criticism is also directed at false narratives concerning the decreasing cost of renewable energy and the creation of climate anxiety among young people. He believes that politicians are not taking Konist's recommendations into account in the energy supply security plan.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main adversaries are the government and its advisors (e.g., Vootele Päi), who are criticized for slowness, bureaucracy, and prioritizing personal interests (vacations, weddings) over national defense. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, accusing the government of lulling the populace into a false sense of security and avoiding public debate. The adversaries are also accused of having an arrogant attitude that underestimates the uneducated masses.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is strong and aimed squarely at the government coalition’s policies, which are being blamed for worsening the well-being of children, especially those in large families. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on tax hikes (VAT, car tax) and cuts to family benefits, changes which were allegedly made "based on an Excel spreadsheet." The coalition is also accused of deepening insecurity and reducing people’s desire to have children.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government led by the Reform Party and the Minister of Social Protection, who are sharply criticized for cutting family benefits, pushing through the car tax, and ignoring demographic policy. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the ministers of demagoguery (pitting large families against small families) and ridiculing families with many children. It is noted that the government has ignored the appeals of demographers and the association of families with many children.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary targets are the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, who face sharp criticism over onerous tax hikes. The criticism is both political (concerning tax policy) and ethical in nature, accusing the government of dishonesty and demanding they tell the truth regarding pension indexation. The intensity of the attack is heightened by the use of a previous quote from Kaja Kallas.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed against the actions of the minister and the government concerning the establishment of offshore wind farms, criticizing both procedural ambiguity and the substance of the policy. The criticism is intense, demanding clarification regarding the basis for the uncertain calculations and the unexpected suspension of the project. No readiness for compromise is evident; the focus remains on demanding accountability.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the rapporteur and the ministry for their inaction or slowness in advancing the legislative process, which leaves rural residents without security. The criticism is policy- and procedure-focused, demanding an explanation as to why the threat posed by one type of predator is considered more important than another. The speaker expects to receive the same response that was given to Kert Kingo.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Centre Party and the Social Democrats, who face sharp criticism for political opportunism and for holding the Russian-speaking electorate hostage. The criticism is political and value-based, accusing them of destabilizing national security or contributing to such destabilization. The speaker categorically rejects the assertions that revoking voting rights offends people or increases destabilization.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at Mart Kalm, the former rector of EKA, for his political decision and his defense of it, which has fostered anti-Semitic sentiments within the university. Indirect criticism is also leveled at the Ministry of Education for procedural delays in responding to an information request, and at Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna for siding with Palestine in UN votes. The criticism is intense and values-driven.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
The main opponents are Priit Lomp and those opposition/coalition members who are accused of underestimating Russia's security threats. The criticism directed at Priit Lomp is both personal and procedural, accusing him of "shady dealings" for demanding money for the Kastre municipality kindergarten from the rescue teams' budget.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is aimed squarely at the prime minister and three coalition leaders, who are being criticized for their decision-making procedure (specifically, ignoring parliament and the cabinet). Furthermore, the leaders of the previous government (Kaja Kallas and the Minister of Social Protection) are also facing sharp criticism for damaging family security and confidence. The criticism is twofold—both procedural and substantive—and calls into question whether the government even has a program.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is between the Foreign Minister and colleague Sutrop, whose positions regarding the impact of the UN vote are considered frivolous and irresponsible. The criticism is directed at the political assessment and inaction in the field of cyber defense, demanding concrete measures.
2025-01-30
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
There is no direct opposition, as the speaker agrees with the core principle of the draft legislation concerning the restriction of voting rights for citizens of the aggressor state. The criticism is directed instead at the recommendations for excessive conciliation voiced in the public space (specifically, on the ERR broadcast) or the potential negative side effects of the policy that could alienate Estonian patriots.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the actions of the government and the minister, criticizing the inefficiency of the policy and procedural shortcomings. Specific criticism is leveled against the failure to inform partner organizations (e.g., the Equestrian Federation, Tori Horse Stud) when introducing regulations into the process.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The confrontation is directed at the policy of the Ministry of Social Affairs and the minister (Riisalo), criticizing the budget cuts and the inadequacy of the analysis. The criticism is ideological, pitting the interests of the nation-state against left-liberal equality policy and the principle of "all women quickly back to the labor market."
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the stance of the Minister of the Interior and the government, which places the responsibility for controlling illegal labor solely on the shoulders of businesses. The criticism is policy-driven and of moderate intensity, demanding state intervention and the tightening of controls.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the minister and the ministry, criticizing their actions in promoting the issue and introducing it into textbooks. The criticism targets the policy's direction and the procedure used (specifically, the lack of political consensus), accusing the government of "marketing" the topic to young people.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The government is facing strong opposition and is being criticized for imposing a severe tax burden (the car tax) specifically on large families. The political criticism is intense, suggesting that families will have to wait for the government to collapse before the situation can be resolved.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Strong opposition has been leveled against the Reform Party’s leadership decisions and the poor attendance of their politicians at a crucial debate. The criticism targets the elite’s cronyism and leadership style, which raises serious questions concerning national defense. The speaker demands that the Reform Party leadership clarify their expectations regarding the national defense bill.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the decisions made by the minister and the government, particularly concerning the cancellation of funding for extracurricular activities. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of sending irresponsible signals regarding the matter of children's mental health.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, accusing them of arrogance, know-it-allism, and justifying their actions by citing the opposition's incompetence. The criticism focuses on conduct and procedures, rather than specific policies, and stresses that such an attitude reveals the limitations of the speakers themselves.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is taking an oppositional stance toward the government (the Prime Minister and the Climate Minister), criticizing the feasibility of their energy policy promises and their strategic choices. The criticism is aimed at the substance of the policy and the specifics of its implementation, particularly concerning the location of the gas plant and the support provided to the oil shale chemistry industry.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary criticism targets the Foreign Minister's actions. He stands accused of undermining Estonian foreign policy and acting contrary to the interests of our biggest allies. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, directly linking the minister's policies with antisemitism at Estonian universities. The Prime Minister's responses to the earlier question were brief and caused awkwardness, suggesting a clear desire to avoid the subject.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is directed at the government and officials implementing austerity measures, who are accused of lacking analysis, breaking promises, and ignoring the regional policy impact. The criticism is intense and focuses on the loss of trust, legislative chaos, and the creation of security risks (the closure of the Jõhvi courthouse).
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the rampant bureaucracy and administrative burden within the country. Furthermore, the speaker questions the practicality of implementing more transparent monitoring of ministers' expense claims if doing so merely creates a new administrative burden. The objection is procedural and focused squarely on efficiency.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the coalition, which rejected Isamaa’s amendments, and the level of the Ministry of Social Affairs that has pressured for the relaxation of gender reassignment regulation. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural errors, such as moving the control mechanism away from public scrutiny and shifting authority from the independent judiciary to administrative agencies. He/She also criticizes the analysis commissioned by family doctor Eero Merilind from a law firm, which failed to address practical security vulnerabilities.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The main criticism is aimed at Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta and the drafters of the bill, who are forcing unconstitutional conditions (the creation of supplementary lists) into the explanatory memorandum. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, specifically asking who is still pushing this controversial provision and why.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Reform Party and the governments led by Kaja Kallas, who are accused of hostility towards demographic policy, cutting benefits, and breaking promises. The criticism is intense, targeting both specific political choices (the reduction of child benefits) and procedural issues (the closure of the special committee on the demographic crisis and the lack of transparency of the government commission). The speaker considers the government's stance on natality issues to be rigid and unserious.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
Fierce opposition is aimed at the Ministry of the Interior and the Interior Minister (SDE) regarding their policy on citizenship liberalization, accusing them of political corruption aimed at creating new Russian-speaking voters. The criticism is intense and ideological, linking these political choices to debates over voting rights and labeling it "ideologically corrupted thinking." It also indirectly criticizes the pessimistic stance of the Ministry of Social Affairs' analysts concerning demographics.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Social Affairs, which is accused of "fast-tracking" sensitive socio-political changes at the regulation level, thereby circumventing the control of the Riigikogu. He/She also criticizes the Foreign Minister's conduct in UN votes concerning Israel and terrorism. The criticism is both procedural, political, and value-based.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main targets of criticism are the government broadly, Prime Minister Kristen Michal, the Minister of Foreign Affairs (due to the change in course), and the Ministers of Finance (for avoiding responsibility regarding Eesti Energia). The criticism is intense both politically (changing values) and procedurally (Jürgen Ligi's constant interference). The speaker accuses the government of jeopardizing Estonia's security interests and the safety of the Jewish community.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the coalition and the majority of the Social Affairs Committee, who rejected Isamaa's four "very reasonable" amendments. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural rushing and the disregard for risks to children's safety. Specific presenters (Eero, Madis Timpson) are urged to engage in dialogue and answer questions, rather than evading them.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The main confrontation is with the ruling coalition and the leading party, who are accused of breaking promises (specifically, the tax-free average pension) and implementing cynical cuts. The criticism is intense and morally charged, focusing on unethical behavior carried out at the expense of vulnerable target groups (pensioners, mothers raising children), noting that the state treats mothers raising children as if they were homeless.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Strong opposition to the governing coalition, which is being accused of breaking its word regarding the implementation of the land tax. The coalition is also criticized for refusing to carry out impact assessments concerning the holiday bill, despite claiming they have the necessary mechanisms available. Strong rhetoric is being employed, referring to the government's actions as a "steamroller" that is attempting to re-educate homeowners.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party's finance ministers, who are criticized for evading responsibility and failing to answer questions. Political criticism is aimed at the government's draft legislation, which is deemed costly and market-distorting, with accusations that the previous system of reserves constituted illegality and substantive state theft.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is aimed at the governing coalition, especially the Social Democrats, who are accused of holding the prime minister hostage. The criticism is political and value-based, focusing on a compromise proposal that would preserve the voting rights of individuals with undetermined citizenship. Opponents are accused of lacking a sense of responsibility and prioritizing supporters of the aggressor state.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the government as a whole, and particularly at Regional Minister Piret Hartman and Social Protection Minister Signe Riisalo. The criticism is intense and policy-based, accusing the government of sharply increasing regional inequality and taking what little vulnerable people have left. The opponents are being labeled as magicians who are engaging in sleight of hand.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the Social Democrats (Minister of the Interior) and the Reform Party. The Social Democrats are accused of duplicity, engaging in displacement activity, and using political advisers as ministry representatives in the Constitutional Committee. The Reform Party is criticized for highlighting the wrong issues and for personal insults. [The speaker] sharply criticizes Tanel Kiik's rhetoric, calling it demagoguery and an attempt to frighten Isamaa (Fatherland).
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the government, particularly the Minister of Finance, who faces criticism regarding both policy (the tax cascade, lack of impact assessments) and procedural and personal aspects (name-calling, moralizing, and avoiding debate). The criticism is intense, and no willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding clear answers and a vision.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government and the Reform Party, who are being criticized both for their political decisions (cuts, tax increases, breaking promises) and for their personal attitudes (the verbal thrashing of women, treating the elderly as mere statistics). The opposition is intense, particularly regarding the reduction of the single pensioner's allowance, where the speaker, on behalf of the Isamaa faction, proposes to reject the draft bill.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the government and the ministers, especially the Minister of Social Protection, accusing them of procedural errors and breaking their promises. The criticism is intense, alleging that the government is making cuts at the expense of people's sense of security and pushing through unethical legislative amendments designed to benefit a single individual. The opposition is strong, and any compromise on the draft bill has been ruled out.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The opposition is aimed at the current handling of Draft Bill 427, criticizing both the rapporteur and the Social Affairs Committee for insufficient debate and procedural errors. The intensity of the opposition is high, as they are demanding the immediate suspension of the second reading to prevent the law from being adopted in a flawed form.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opponent is Kaja Kallas’s government and the Minister of Social Protection, who are facing intense criticism for political decisions (the abolition of the Minister of Population portfolio) and for breaking promises. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy (cuts to family benefits, tax hikes) and the procedures themselves (the inefficiency of the government commission and the lack of a clear strategy). The government’s actions are being labeled as perfidious, and the cuts are described as senseless and ugly.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the policies of the minister and the government, fiercely criticizing the tax increases and cuts that undermine regional policy objectives. The criticism is intense and substantive, demanding that the government halt further tax hikes and calling into question the minister's promise to "put a stop" to policies that run counter to regional development.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Minister of Foreign Affairs, who is accused of pursuing an independent line during the UN vote and disregarding the opinion of the Riigikogu Foreign Affairs Committee. Criticism is also directed at the Secretary General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other high-ranking officials who may have issued inappropriate instructions. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, who is sharply criticized for breaking promises, creating uncertainty, and implementing policies detached from reality (e.g., taking away health insurance). The Reform Party and the governing coalition are also criticized for not adhering to the constitution and violating liberal values (freedom of choice).
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main opponent is the Minister of Social Protection and the ruling coalition (the Reform Party), who are accused of creating hostility between families and pursuing negligent policies. The criticism targets both the policy itself (the removal of health insurance) and the communication strategy, accusing the minister of pitting different family types against one another. The intensity of the attacks is high, with the policy being labeled as embarrassing and unjust.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is no direct confrontation, but the speaker self-critically points to the possible unfair behavior of politicians and asks for examples of it. Furthermore, attention is drawn to the need to highlight the interactions between ministries and state officials.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The primary targets are Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo and Kaja Kallas’s third government. Criticism focuses both on political decisions (the reduction of family benefits, the plan to scrap health insurance coverage) and procedural failings (a failure to meet with target groups, the elimination of the Minister of Population portfolio). The attacks are intense, accusing the minister of sending mixed signals and engaging in a breach of trust.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and the ministries (the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of the Interior, and the Ministry of Climate), focusing primarily on procedural deficiencies and bureaucratic inefficiency. The speaker faults the minister for trusting their ministry colleagues and failing to properly review the stakeholder engagement process, which is essential when providing political input. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
Strong opposition is directed at Vladimir Svet, who is being criticized for failing to answer questions, arrogance, and ignoring the feelings of the Estonian people. Svet’s political style is being labeled as "pure Savisaar school." Criticism is also aimed at the Deputy Speaker of the Riigikogu and other members of parliament (Odinets, Kaljulaid) for violating procedural rules.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary opponent is the government led by the Reform Party, which faces criticism for breaking election promises and incompetent governance that has resulted in tax hikes. The criticism is intense and centers on specific political decisions (tax increases, the abolition of targeted benefits), demanding that the planned car tax be scrapped. The government's actions and rhetoric are being contrasted, particularly regarding subsidies and services.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
Intense opposition is aimed at the Reform Party and the government it leads. They are accused of draining resources through their tax policy and undermining the core principles of family policy. The criticism is severe, labeling their actions as sowing uncertainty, perverse, and anti-child. Opponents are criticized both for their policies (tax increases) and for failing to keep their promises.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main target of opposition is the coalition government and the Minister of Social Protection, who is being criticized for ignoring key interest groups (the Estonian Association of Large Families, the Chamber of Disabled People). The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural errors and the socially detrimental nature of the draft bill. Officials' claims that people with disabilities would abuse tax exemptions are being refuted.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The primary target is the Chairwoman of the Finance Committee (a former Minister of Finance), who faces criticism regarding both her political decisions and her personal integrity. The criticism centers on contradictory promises made about state finances prior to the election, as well as the distortion of the tax reform's actual impact. The intensity of the attack is high, directly accusing the opponent of "outright lying" and "deception."
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
The primary adversary is the Reform Party, which is accused of brazenly lying about the state of the nation's finances and impending tax hikes prior to the election. The criticism is intense, targeting both specific policies (the tax 'hump,' reduction of family benefits) and specific individuals (Annely Akkermann), who are accused of disseminating false information. The opposition is absolute, with the government's actions being likened to a wicked fairy tale character who causes harm to children.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
There is no direct confrontation, but criticism is aimed at the procedure and motives for initiating the draft bill, suspecting that it may be the result of lobbying, rather than a genuine government need. There is opposition to opacity and hidden influences in the legislative process.
2024-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The main opponent is the government and the Reform Party, who are being sharply criticized for cuts to the national defense budget and for economic policy decisions (the decline in GDP). The criticism is political and ethics-based, accusing the prime minister of lying and ignoring the military advice provided by the Commander of the Defence Forces. The government is being required to provide a one hundred percent guarantee that the national defense capability will not worsen.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The opponents are being criticized for attempting to frame a statement supporting democracy as interference or lecturing in the affairs of another country. The criticism is aimed at the opposing side's rhetorical framework, which, for the speaker acting as an envoy, raises questions, concerns, and causes embarrassment.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The main confrontation is directed at the government and the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, whose proposals (the immigration quota) and actions (the economic plan) are being criticized. The criticism is aimed both at the political solutions and the lack of internal cooperation within the government, referencing the Prime Minister's statements.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, who is accused of undermining the livelihood of families and disregarding population policy. The criticism operates on both a policy level (cuts, car tax) and a personal level (the Minister's perceived arrogance and unwillingness to tolerate criticism). The government's actions are being labeled as inadequate, short-sighted, and frankly, detrimental.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opponent is the Minister of the Interior, who is being sharply criticized for his past positions (opposition to Estonian-language instruction and the seizure of weapons) and for his current political motivation (chasing votes). The criticism is both policy-based and personal, accusing the minister of having unstable stances that are not rooted in security assessments.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the state's inability to integrate the immigrant population and the parliament's failure to reach a consensus necessary for passing the required legislation. Indirectly, the criticism is also leveled against those decision-making bodies that have been unable to prevent pro-Kremlin manifestations and influence operations, drawing a contrast between Estonia and Latvia.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the Eesti 200 party and its leading figures (Margus Tsahkna, Kristina Kallas, Tiit Riisalo, the Speaker of the Riigikogu), who are accused of systematic failure and unethical conduct. The criticism is intense, focusing both on political performance (failure to deliver on promises) and personal integrity (trademark theft, unauthorized copying). The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, a clear ethical message is demanded.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticized the minister for ignoring proposals from entrepreneurs and resorting to demagoguery, specifically by comparing food producers to tobacco manufacturers. He also attacked fellow member Juku-Kalle Raid for offering inappropriate judgments and displaying ignorance of cultural history, further accusing him of insulting the feelings of religious believers. The criticism targets the political substance, procedural matters, and personal conduct exhibited in the chamber.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the government, which stands accused of lying, passivity, and inaction, particularly concerning economic management and funding for Rally Estonia. The criticism is both political (tax reform, funding cuts) and procedural (delays in decision-making, bureaucracy). The attacks are intense, carrying a warning that cultural figures will be the next group to protest outside Toompea unless the government changes its course.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opposition targets "radical green transition advocates," who face criticism for pushing policies that make animal husbandry and rural living prohibitively expensive. This criticism is political and intense, given that the opponents' actions are perceived as a direct threat to the country's food security and its ability to survive (or its resilience). The speaker explicitly contrasts their viewpoint with those who are urging people to relocate to urban centers.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, who is criticized both for her political decisions (cutting benefits) and her ethical choices (inciting hostility, displaying undisguised contempt). The criticism is intense and accusatory, stressing that the minister has pitted different family types against each other and done so maliciously. The confrontation also extends to the government's actions, which have created chaos within families.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The main confrontation is directed at the governing coalition, especially the Social Democrats, who are accused of ideological opposition both to suspending voting rights and to supporting large families. The criticism is intense and accusatory, citing the failure to fulfill the coalition agreement. He criticizes the ministers for ignoring families with many children and for causing them inconvenience.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary confrontation is directed against the government and its ministers (especially Riina Sikkut), criticizing their tax decisions and spending cuts implemented during the crisis. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of eroding the public's sense of security and creating uncertainty, alongside claims that the ministers are acting in a cliquish or factional manner. The most acute criticism targets the withdrawal of funding for children's extracurricular activities and the removal of medical allowances for victims of repression.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The main opponent is the Reform Party and Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo, who is sharply criticized for cutting benefits for large families and prioritizing controlled migration over supporting the birth rate. The criticism is also aimed at the government's procedural errors, such as ignoring the association of large families during the car tax discussion, while an opposing NGO was invited to attend. No willingness to compromise is evident; instead, a change in government policy is being demanded.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and Reform Party ministers (Signe Riisalo, Mart Võrklaev), who are accused of breaking promises and showing hostility towards large families. The criticism is intense and ranges from political decisions (the car tax, budget cuts) to personal accusations (the spouse’s business interests in Russia, the ministers’ lack of empathy). The ministers are being called "the most child- and family-hostile" of all time.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the leading party (the Reform Party), accusing them of abandoning the principles of the market economy and allocating a 2 billion euro subsidy to an offshore wind energy developer. The criticism is intense and politically charged, pointing to the cancellation of Elektrilevi investments and the disregard for supply security, which has resulted in life in rural areas becoming impossible.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The confrontation is strong and aimed directly at a government minister, criticizing both the political decision (the reduction of family benefits) and the methods used to justify it. Critics are specifically targeting the creation of a narrative that pits large families against smaller families, labeling this move as irresponsible and divisive.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party coalition, which is criticized for "steamrolling" tax increases through Parliament and for the unfair motor vehicle tax. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political accusations and personal attacks (referencing the "tankist" [tank driver]), as well as accusations of lying. Jürgen Ligi has been named as a critic of the ally.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main targets are Minister of Social Protection Signe Riisalo and the Minister of Finance, who face fierce criticism both for unfair policies and for rushing the legislative process. The criticism is substantive and procedural, accusing them of disregarding constitutional obligations and disparaging families with many children.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev, who is personally criticized for impolite behavior and for hiding the draft legislation behind the cover of the teachers’ strike. The criticism extends to the government as a whole, faulting it for lacking a unified position regarding the goals of the tax policy and for ignoring 77,000 signatures.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main point of contention is directed at the coalition partner who blocked the revocation of voting rights for Russian and Belarusian citizens in local elections. The criticism is intense and highly political, accusing the opposing side of representing the interests of residents who uphold the values of a terrorist state. The speaker deems this opposition unacceptable given the current security situation.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government and its ministers, who are criticized for promoting immigration without analyzing the social costs. The criticism is policy-driven, calling into question the government’s solutions during periods of unemployment and its plan to import cheap labor. Specifically, the Prime Minister is being held accountable for the ministers' statements.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is clearly an opposition member, criticizing the Minister of Justice and the government for failing to address the opposition's legislative proposals. The criticism targets the government's procedural passivity and political reluctance to resolve a crucial security matter.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the government coalition, especially the prime minister and the Social Democrats, who are accused of refusing to address security issues. The criticism is both procedural (being used as a rubber stamp) and substantive, accusing certain parties (SDE, Center Party) of representing the interests of residents who hold the values of a terrorist state. The attacks are intense, and no compromise is offered on the security question.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the prime minister, whose policy regarding the implementation of the Just Transition Fund has been declared a failure. The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on the loss of hundreds of jobs and ineffective regulations that allegedly excluded the oil shale chemical industry from receiving funding.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the government's actions concerning the redirection of funds—originally intended for strengthening the electricity grid—to a gas power plant project. The opposition is rooted in policy and budgetary priorities, casting doubt on the government's capacity to guarantee security of supply.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary conflict is with the government and the prime minister, who face criticism over their policies (specifically, ignoring defense experts) and procedural missteps (such as shelving the election rights bill). There is also a noted internal storm of indignation within the Reform Party regarding the prime minister's messaging, which points to the government's inherent weakness. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of selectively safeguarding national security.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main criticism is aimed at the government’s financial policy and the Ministry of Climate’s plan to create new, expensive jobs at a time when the country should be cutting costs. Also under fire are the rules governing the repayment of European Union funds, which are deemed unfair and inflexible, thus hindering the development of new projects. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, focusing primarily on inefficiency.