Session Profile: Riina Solman
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
2024-06-19
Political Position
The speaker expresses strong distrust towards the presented supplementary budget draft, casting doubt on the credibility of the government's financial management. The political position is performance-driven, emphasizing the opposing side’s previous contradictory promises regarding state finances and tax issues. Specifically, criticism is leveled at the impact of abolishing the tax bracket anomaly (maksuküür), which, according to the Ministry of Finance, primarily benefits the wealthier segments and creates a permanent budget hole.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in state finance and tax policy, focusing specifically on the supplementary budget and the impact of eliminating the tax hump. To back up their arguments, they utilize data and assessments published by the Ministry of Finance, which lend technical authority to their claims. In particular, reference is made to Ministry of Finance tables that refute the assertions regarding the greatest benefit for low-wage earners.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly aggressive, critical, and accusatory, utilizing direct terms such as "you fumbled" and "lying." The speaker relies on logical appeal, using Ministry of Finance data to refute the opposing party's claims. The tone is formal, yet it includes strong personal attacks regarding trust and political integrity.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is highly active in parliamentary debates (Riigikogu), frequently referencing past information sessions and discussions. Furthermore, he closely monitors the opposition's public media appearances, citing specific answers given to Vikerraadio and Õhtuleht. This demonstrates continuous and detailed tracking of the opposing side's actions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary target is the Chairwoman of the Finance Committee (a former Minister of Finance), who faces criticism regarding both her political decisions and her personal integrity. The criticism centers on contradictory promises made about state finances prior to the election, as well as the distortion of the tax reform's actual impact. The intensity of the attack is high, directly accusing the opponent of "outright lying" and "deception."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on national topics, covering state finances, budget policy, and the nationwide impact of tax reform.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views are critical of the government's fiscal policy, opposing the supplementary budget and the abolition of the tax hump. It is emphasized that the tax reform primarily benefits the wealthy and creates a permanent budget deficit, which will necessitate future tax increases. Fiscal responsibility is supported, and the unreliability of the government's financial management is criticized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on opposing the supplementary budget bill and calling its credibility into question. The speaker positions themselves as a critical adversary to the government’s financial legislation, concentrating on the lasting negative impact that the abolition of the tax hump has had on the budget.
1 Speeches Analyzed