By Plenary Sessions: Riina Sikkut
Total Sessions: 39
Fully Profiled: 39
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no direct mutual criticism, but the speaker notes that the restoration of proportions failed to gain broad-based support, which is why it was not included in the draft bill. The criticism is aimed more at the consequences of the previous legislative process (the change resulting from the administrative reform) than at specific political opponents.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition and Prime Minister Kristen Michal, who are accused of breaking promises regarding tax stability and the irresponsible stewardship of state finances. The criticism is intense and centers on political blunders (lowering taxes using borrowed money) and a general lack of accountability. The speaker is extremely critical of the government's policies.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary targets are the governing coalition, particularly the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister, who stand accused of avoiding responsibility and political short-sightedness. The criticism is intense, centered on political recklessness, the exacerbation of social injustice, and the desire to teach the opposition a lesson. There is no willingness to compromise, as evidenced by the proposal to reject the budget entirely.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary opposition is directed against the budget policy of the minister and the government, criticizing its unrealistic nature and the lack of a credible plan to cover the 2030 budget deficit. The criticism is both technical and political, focusing on the long-term impact of political decisions and the lack of societal consensus regarding tax increases.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is aimed at the minister's inaction or the shifting of responsibility onto local governments, who operate the schools. They are demanding concrete guidelines for state schools and proactive steps to alleviate inequality. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on the absence of solutions.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the prime minister, criticizing the impact of the Swedish prisoner agreement on security, healthcare, and the economy. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, demanding clarification regarding cost coverage, including healthcare expenses and language requirements. Furthermore, a motion of no confidence is being filed concerning the necessity of the position of Minister of Entrepreneurship.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the governing powers (the coalition/government), who are accused of lacking accountability and making decisions that contradict the recommendations of the Fiscal Council. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, focusing on the disregard for domestic budgetary rules and the addition of unfunded expenditures. Warnings are being issued regarding the long-term negative consequences of these short-sighted decisions.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The opposition is directed at the current form of the draft law and its inadequate privacy safeguards. Furthermore, criticism is leveled against the wrongful attribution of Kalle Grünthal’s positions (a procedural and personal correction), and concern is expressed regarding the privacy-infringing nature of the Estonia 200 concept of the "personal state."
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, who are being accused of demagoguery and drafting "the most irresponsible budget." The criticism is both political and economic, focusing on the unfair benefits the wealthy receive from abolishing the tax curve. Compromise on the government's current tax plan is ruled out, as it is ineffective and unjust.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Direct confrontation with specific political groupings is not articulated. Indirectly, criticism is leveled against the quality of work of the Riigikogu, the legislative body, which results in unjust or confusing laws. The criticism is procedural and aimed at the lack of clarity in the legislation.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the actions of the government (or the minister) regarding the alleged delay in planning the defense industry park and the unclear vision for the salary structure in the education sector. The opposition is based on policy and performance, demanding clarity and truth for the citizens.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
There are no direct opponents or specific groups being criticized; the focus is instead directed at shortcomings in market regulation, particularly within the non-bank credit market. The criticism targets systemic risks and consumer behavior patterns (specifically, prioritizing the monthly repayment amount over the total cost rate).
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
It opposes the government and the Minister of Defense, criticizing their approach to the requirement for building shelters and the government’s overall political instability. The criticism targets shifts in political stances (regarding the car tax and wages) and the procedure for handling draft legislation (specifically demanding a new official position). Furthermore, the validity of the decision reached consensually within the National Defense Committee is being called into question.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the actions of the minister and the government, which have allowed repeated major financial blunders. The objection is procedural and systemic, demanding clarification of responsibility and changes to the system to prevent tens of millions in erroneous advance payments in the future.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
A strong opposition stance regarding the government's immigration, regional, and economic policies, criticizing the minister for vague answers and a lack of numerical data. The criticism is directed at specific political decisions (avoiding the quota through exceptions, loosening salary criteria) and the Reform Party's previous positions on salary criteria. Personal criticism relates to Lauri Laats' perception of regional policy in Mustamäe.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main confrontation is aimed at the government and its ministers (Keldo, Ligi, the Prime Minister), criticizing their policies for increasing social inequality and failing to achieve the state’s strategic objectives. The criticism is sharp and policy-driven, focusing on the deficiencies in the government’s plans regarding security, productivity, and the fairness of the tax structure. No willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, compensatory measures are demanded.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Minister of Justice and the government, whose priorities are strange and illogical. Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (tax cuts for casinos) and at the Minister’s unethical behavior, who gave the impression that the speaker had supported the leasing of prisons. The speaker urgently demands the opportunity to refute the "lies" spread by the Minister.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the parties of the governing coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200) and specific ministers (Kaja Kallas, Lea Danilson-Järg, Margus Tsahkna, Liisa Pakosta). Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (tax hikes) and procedural unreliability (accusations of stalling the Competition Act, and Prime Minister Kristen Michal breaking promises regarding the tax moratorium). The opposition is intense, manifesting in proposals to halt the reading of draft bills.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Strong opposition is aimed at the government, and particularly the Eesti 200 party, who stand accused of obstructing restrictions on consumer credit advertising and politically overemphasizing competition law. The criticism is rooted in both policy and ethics, alleging that the government is protecting business interests rather than those of consumers. This opposition is intense and uncompromising.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The criticism targets the existing economic model and decision-making processes that have prioritized foreign capital and resulted in low value-added exports. The opposition is aimed at policies that fail to account for the needs of local businesses and are unable to translate the potential of education into economic success.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at colleagues who presented inadequate proposals or demonstrated a lack of nuance in assessing security threats. Helir-Valdor Seeder was criticized specifically; his statement was called "customarily very one-dimensional and insensitive to nuance" due to his disregard for the change in the threat assessment. Kalle Grünthal's proposal to use mines without withdrawing from the convention was also rejected.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The opposition is focused on the coalition's plan to introduce special car tax provisions for families with children, criticizing its complexity and the high cost of implementation within a short timeframe. Furthermore, the Centre Party is being criticized for breaking a previous promise regarding cooperation with EKRE, underscoring the lack of trust.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The main opponents are the minister, whose political framework (infrastructure is not politics) he/she strongly criticizes, and the prime minister, who does not support evidence-based solutions for improving road safety. The criticism is aimed at political indecisiveness and the deviation from established goals, while being policy-based in its essence.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The main criticism is directed at the government’s fiscal policy, accusing them of postponing unpopular decisions for political reasons (the 2027 elections). The previous Center Party-led Tallinn city government is also criticized for hindering the consolidation of hospitals. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, highlighting suboptimal management.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker is fiercely critical of the government's tax policy, which raises both VAT and income tax, denouncing it as an unjust burden on low-income earners. The speaker also criticizes those who oppose gender balance regulations, dismissing such objections (for example, those raised by Varro Vooglaid) as inappropriate, and defending the state-mandated rules as necessary and suitable.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
A strong opposition stance is aimed at the government and Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, criticizing their tax policy decisions and the misinterpretation of IMF recommendations. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of adopting unfair, growth-undermining measures and breaking its promise of tax peace.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker sharply criticizes the government's procedural irregularities, faulting them for initiating the designation of targeted protection zones without first amending the relevant legislation. He also criticizes the inconsistency of the government's tax policy and the frequent changes made over the last four years. The criticism is aimed at the fundamental principles underlying both policy and procedure.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No opposition is voiced; the address is directed at the minister and focuses on finding solutions to education issues. The criticism is aimed more at systemic shortcomings (poor exam results) rather than specific political opponents.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker criticizes those who systematically raise topics like transgenderism or "quotas for Black homosexuals," viewing these issues as a distraction from the discussion. He/She opposes those who consider women in leadership positions less competent, accusing them of holding prejudiced attitudes that impede the advancement of qualified women.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary confrontation is aimed squarely at the policies of the minister and the government, specifically criticizing the disregard shown toward the Competition Authority and the changes being made to regional policy plans. The criticism is focused on policy and accountability, escalating to the question of the minister's resignation should the transposition of the directive fail. Initially, a sharp contrast is also drawn with Varro Vooglaid, implying that the Social Democrats are the only ones truly defending democracy and the rule of law.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at those who spread misinformation and pseudo-scientific claims about wind energy, particularly concerning health risks. A person with a medical background who presented frightening claims about malformations is especially condemned, being accused of unethical behavior and disregarding science. The opponents' claims regarding the enormous scale of the planned projects are also considered unrealistic.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is primarily aimed at the inaction of previous governments and officials, citing the nearly two-year delay in implementing the Tobacco Directive and the protracted drafting process of ENMAK. The speaker counters Urmas Reinsalu’s criticism, defending the social democrats’ stance on the comprehensive energy strategy. He also criticizes the tobacco industry for deliberately cultivating new consumers.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at budget policy and financial management, which treats culture merely as a simple budget line item. The speaker challenges the mindset of "competition enthusiasts and progressive performance managers," demanding that they apply their performance-based criteria when compensating cultural workers.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at those who caused a nearly two-year obstruction during the bill's proceedings, which delayed the entry into force of a reasonable amendment. The opposition is procedural, focusing on hindering legislative work.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opposition is aimed at the government’s plans (amendments to the Employment Contracts Act) and the minister’s arguments, criticizing both the substance of the policy and professional competence. The resistance is intense, especially concerning the shifting of business risks onto employees and the undermining of worker protection. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, a struggle is being promised.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Direct political opponents are not criticized, but concern is expressed regarding additional barriers and increased bureaucracy that could prolong the process. The criticism is instead aimed at inefficient procedural additions and oversight stages that may not be substantively necessary. The compromise proposal is supported, even though it is not considered an ideal solution.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at those who view the directive as over-regulation or who question the availability of competent women, specifically citing the Minister of Finance’s personal skepticism and the questions raised by Siim Pohlak. The criticism is policy- and value-based, refuting prejudices regarding women's leadership skills and the unfair assumption of "stupid women."
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the proponents of the draft bill and those responsible for conducting the proceedings, who are accused of negligence regarding social cohesion and damaging the reputation of the Riigikogu. The speaker alleges that the true motivation behind the bill is the desire to reshape their own constituency, rather than engaging in substantive and well-considered lawmaking. The criticism is primarily procedural and based on underlying motives.