By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann
Total Sessions: 27
Fully Profiled: 27
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The rhetorical style is analytical, formal, and interrogative, focusing on logical and practical application problems. The speaker poses direct questions to the presenter concerning the technological direction and the limits of procedural capacity within the public sector, adopting a tone that is more concerned than optimistic regarding the slow progress observed so far.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The style is polite and respectful, addressing the minister formally and offering thanks for the presentation. The speaker employs a logical approach, presenting a specific policy question concerning the support of regional development. The tone is consultative and solution-seeking.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The style is formal, objective, and procedural, fitting the role of the committee rapporteur. The discourse is logical and evidence-based, neutrally conveying the discussion, questions, and responses received during the committee proceedings. Emotional or personal appeals are absent, with the focus remaining strictly on facts and procedural decisions.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker's style is formal and respectful, addressing both the session chair and the presenter with deference. The rhetoric is analytical and logical, focusing on posing questions regarding the practical application of statistics and potential avenues for fraud prevention. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed squarely on facts and the consequences of the policy.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, polite, and inquisitive, addressing the session chair and the presenter respectfully. The tone is analytical and logical, expressing appreciation for the work accomplished, but subsequently focusing on the objective assessment of the situation and inquiring about progress.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The style is formal and procedural, focusing on the neutral conveyance of the commission's work and procedural decisions. Following the official review, he/she permits the expression of a personal, logic-based opinion, emphasizing the significance of the legal framework and historical practices. The language is clear and factual, avoiding emotional appeals.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and fact-based, focusing on the detailed reporting of the Constitutional Committee's work to the plenary session. The address is logical and procedural, avoiding emotional appeals, and is aimed at both colleagues and the public.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the chair of the session and the presenter. The tone is inquisitive and solution-oriented, posing a direct question regarding practical measures ("What should actually be done?"). The style is primarily logical and policy-centric, rather than emotional.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and courteous, beginning with an acknowledgment of thanks to the presiding officer of the session and the minister. The tone is inquisitive and anticipatory, centered on logical policy analysis and demanding clarification regarding future plans, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and fact-based, fitting the role of the leading committee's rapporteur. The speaker focuses on procedural details, dates (April 22, May 6), and voting results, avoiding emotional or deeper substantive discussions. He emphasizes that exchanging substantive opinions would move the draft bill away from the main subject.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The style is formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on summarizing the content of the committee's discussion and its decisions. The speaker employs logical argumentation to explain the substance and rationale of the draft legislation, steering clear of emotional appeals. Emphasis is placed on the thoroughness of the debate and the fact that these same topics have been addressed extensively for a considerable time.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The rhetorical style is concerned and pressing, focusing on the necessity of protecting children's rights and the abuse of parental responsibilities. Emotional appeals are utilized, highlighting the failure to protect children and the systemic breakdown. The speaker employs figurative language, such as "using the right to decide as a weapon" and "virtual marketplace," to underscore the gravity of the issue.
2025-01-30
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
The speaker's style is highly formal and neutral, focusing exclusively on conveying procedures and the committee's decisions. Logical appeals are employed, referencing government positions and the results of the committee vote, entirely devoid of emotional expression. The presentation itself is comprehensive and detailed, capturing the nuances of the discussion.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, combining detailed reporting on commission work with strong moral and philosophical arguments. It uses a value-based appeal, emphasizing ethics, morality, and dignity, and quotes Dostoevsky to justify trust in those holding power. It labels the opposition's actions as populism, distinguishing between right-wing and left-wing populist rhetoric.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style is formal and procedural, focusing on facts and the communication of the commission's decisions. The speaker uses a critical tone to contrast the commission's constructive discussion with the non-substantive and tangential debate of the plenary session, specifically criticizing the use of "whataboutism." The appeal is primarily logical and centers on the correctness of the procedure.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The rhetorical style is formal and inquisitive, addressing the manager and the presenter. The focus is placed on logical clarification and obtaining specific examples in order to understand the relevance of the law’s application. The tone is cautious, attempting to avoid extreme interpretations ("I don't want to believe that").
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The speech is formal, neutral, and procedural, fulfilling the role of a rapporteur in summarizing the committee discussion. The style is logical and fact-based, relying on specific dates, voting results, and the precise referencing of colleagues' arguments (Jaak Valge, Hendrik Johannes Terras, Helir-Valdor Seeder). Emotional appeals are not used; instead, the focus is on the chronology of the proceedings.
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is highly formal, objective, and procedure-oriented, focusing on conveying the committee's discussions, arguments, and procedural decisions. The speaker utilizes logical and analytical appeals, avoiding emotional expressions, and emphasizes the presence of facts and protocols. The language is official and detailed, referencing specific dates and participating individuals.
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style is formal, analytical, and objective, focusing on summarizing the work of the Constitutional Committee and the legal discussion. The speaker employs logical arguments and references to expert viewpoints, describing the discussion as an "exciting legal debate." Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on procedural correctness and achieving consensus.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The style is polite, analytical, and question-oriented, addressing the presenter respectfully. The speaker relies on logical discussion, referencing the presentation slides and seeking clarification regarding bureaucratic obstacles. The tone is one that seeks positivity and ambition.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The language used is formal and respectful, addressing the presiding officer of the session and the minister with due deference. The style is analytical and focuses on posing clarifying questions, with the objective of determining the implementation procedures for the legislative amendment, remaining logical rather than emotional.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style is formal, neutral, and purely descriptive, typical of a committee rapporteur. The speaker focuses on facts and procedural details (dates of sessions, the consensus nature of decisions) and uses logical and official language.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The style is formal, explanatory, and procedural, focusing on logical arguments and legal terminology. The speaker emphasizes responsibility and seriousness when addressing security issues and uses metaphors (e.g., the hammer and nail comparison) to criticize a narrow solution. He answers questions directly, but often refers to committee discussions or other institutions (Kapo, special committee) when he lacks personal information.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style is highly formal, neutral, and descriptive, focusing on the precise reporting of the events, discussions, and voting results of the Constitutional Committee session. Logical appeals are employed, referencing specific dates, voting outcomes, and procedural decisions, entirely devoid of emotional or personal judgments.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker's style is formal, polite, and constructive, beginning by thanking the minister and wishing him/her strength to carry out the extensive reforms. The emphasis is placed on logical argumentation and policy optimization, as the speaker poses a question aimed at achieving a twofold benefit from the investments.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and procedural, focusing on the neutral communication of the commission's work and decisions. The speaker employs logical arguments (e.g., the sufficiency of the B1 language level and the issue of language proficiency among native-born citizens) and is precise when responding to questions. The tone is at times apologetic or self-critical, acknowledging the awkwardness or potential stumbling blocks in their delivery.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style is formal, courteous, and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and the dissection of systemic problems. A rhetorical device is employed where common assumptions are challenged (flipping the cause-and-effect relationship) to steer the discussion toward identifying root causes. The tone is solution-oriented and substantive, commending the presenter's previous work.