By Plenary Sessions: Maido Ruusmann
Total Sessions: 8
Fully Profiled: 8
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
No data available
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the presenter, who is being criticized for not being aware of the car tax relief measures for families with children agreed upon in the coalition agreement. The criticism is political and fact-based, focusing on inaccuracies in the presentation of the tax burden.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no expression of direct opposition or criticism aimed at specific opponents. Instead, the criticism is directed at the outcomes of the central government’s policies, which have resulted in the uneven distribution of investments and business activity.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Direct opposition or criticism towards political opponents is not expressed. The criticism is instead directed at the ineffectiveness of existing regional policy measures, noting that "conventional [measures] do not work."
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
There is no criticism; instead, questions are being posed regarding the recommendations given to the government and the analysis of regional policy, in order to ensure balanced economic development.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The main criticism is aimed at EKRE, whose motives for submitting 200 amendments are being questioned. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, raising the question of whether the goal was to obstruct the strengthening of local government autonomy. The speaker expresses "bewilderment" regarding the opposition's actions.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition targets the narrow scope of the government’s (or minister’s) actions or plans, criticizing the fact that the solutions are limited to a narrow educational approach. The criticism is policy-driven and framed as a question, intended to force the government to broaden its operational scope.