Session Profile: Valdo Randpere
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
2025-03-12
Political Position
The political focus is on procedural correctness and the accuracy of political history. The speaker strongly criticizes committees for exceeding their mandate for the purpose of creating a political spectacle, and demands that the committees strictly adhere to the Rules of Procedure and internal working regulations. He/She actively combats the distortion of past events (Kaja Kallas’s resignation in 2022), emphasizing a fact-based approach. The stance is strong and aimed at correcting the political narrative.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and the competence of its committees, stressing the necessity of adhering to the law. His grasp of recent history is particularly robust; he cites precise dates (e.g., June 3, July 14, and July 18, 2022) and names the coalition partners involved in forming Kaja Kallas's second government. He leverages this knowledge to rebut the arguments made by his opponents.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is corrective and combative, utilizing historical parallels (Martin Helme's behavior) to refute the opponents' accusations. The speaker relies on logical and factual arguments, presenting specific dates and legal citations. The tone is at times dismissive, referring to the opponent's claims as "nonsense" and advising them to stop their "chattering."
5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is an active participant in plenary sessions, often making multiple interventions during a single debate to provide historical context and offer corrections. He demands the right of reply whenever he is referenced, demonstrating a pattern of immediately responding to opponents' arguments and interjecting into debates. His mode of operation is reactive and corrective.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Strong opposition is directed at the Helme family (Martin, Mart, Helle-Moonika Helme), who are being criticized both for political hypocrisy and for distorting historical facts. In Martin Helme's case, the emphasis is on procedural violations (failure to appear before commissions), while Mart Helme is criticized for factual errors concerning Kaja Kallas's resignation. The criticism is intense and includes personal remarks directed at their opponents.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on regulating the Rules of Procedure of the Riigikogu and the activities of its committees. The speaker demands that special committees, such as the special committee for state budget control, address only issues that fall strictly within their mandate. He/She supports strict adherence to the Internal Rules and Procedure Act to prevent political spectacle.
5 Speeches Analyzed