Agenda Profile: Vadim Belobrovtsev
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement "On the Crisis of Democracy in Georgia" (449 AE)
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Political Position
The political position is clearly against the adoption of the Riigikogu statement concerning the crisis of Georgian democracy. This opposition is motivated by pragmatic foreign policy considerations, emphasizing that passing the statement will strain strategic relations between Estonia and Georgia. The speaker stresses that the countries are friends and partners, and doubts whether the friendship can continue in the same way after the statement is issued.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of bilateral relations (Estonia and Georgia) and international parliamentary practice. Particular emphasis is placed on analyzing the diplomatic consequences, and inquiries are made regarding similar statements issued by the parliaments of other European Union member states. The focus is on maintaining strategic partnership relations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is cautious and questioning, focusing on the potential negative consequences of the proposed action. Formal language is employed ("Esteemed Presenter") and rhetorical questions are posed to underscore the risk of escalating tension in diplomatic relations. The appeal is logical and pragmatic, rather than emotional.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker was active during the first reading of the Riigikogu draft declaration, posing two questions to the rapporteur concerning the consequences of adopting the draft. The pattern of activity shows participation in discussions on foreign policy topics.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is directed against the initiators of the bill, whose understanding of the potential negative diplomatic consequences is being called into question. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on preventing relations from becoming strained. The speaker asks whether the initiators realize that relations with Georgia will become tense.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate with colleagues who share similar positions, explicitly referencing the previous speaker and confirming the similarity of their views. This suggests a readiness to form a united front against the proposed bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly international, centering on the bilateral relations between Estonia and Georgia as strategic partners. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on the context of the activities of the parliaments of the European Union member states and the importance of international precedent.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus centers on opposing the adoption of the Riigikogu statement titled "On the Crisis of Democracy in Georgia" (Draft 449 AE). The speaker is acting as an opponent, utilizing questions during the first reading to highlight the danger that passing this draft poses to relations between Estonia and Georgia.
2 Speeches Analyzed