Session Profile: Evelin Poolamets
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-01-16
Political Position
The political focus centers on amendments to the State Budget Act and the practical feasibility of implementing new budgetary principles (activity-based versus cost-based). The speaker expresses skepticism regarding the soundness of the current activity-based budget and emphasizes the critical nature of the timeline for enacting the draft legislation. His approach is policy-driven, concentrating on procedural efficiency and the oversight of government operations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates deep expertise in the field of state finance and budgetary procedures, utilizing specific terminology such as activity-based and cost-based budgeting. They are well-informed about the Ministry of Finance's plans to amend the State Budget Act, including the concept of the hybrid budget. This expertise is further reflected in their questions concerning the timeline for the bill's passage and implementation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is polite and formal, respectfully addressing the chairman of the session and the presenter, and expressing gratitude for the comprehensive report. The rhetoric is analytical and focused on questions, with the goal of determining the feasibility of the draft legislation and the government's alternative plans. The tone is measured and information-seeking, rather than confrontational.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The records show participation in the plenary session, during which two focused questions were posed regarding the draft legislation and related governmental activities. The questions specifically aim to clarify the handling process of the particular bill and the actions undertaken by the associated ministry.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and the Ministry of Finance, particularly regarding their opposition to the bill currently under discussion and their plan to introduce a hybrid budget. The speaker references the government's official stance (a letter confirming they do not support the draft legislation) and calls into question the efficiency of the current activity-based budgeting system. The critique is both policy-driven and procedural.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is inquisitive and information-seeking, addressing the presenter to obtain a thorough explanation regarding the Ministry of Finance's plans. The speaker acknowledges the presenter's work but focuses on identifying the government's resistance and alternative solutions. There is no evidence of broad-based cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives center on reforming the budget structure and fiscal responsibility. The speaker questions the capacity of the activity-based budget to find surpluses, pointing to the necessity for clearer and more efficient budgeting. The focus is on the systemic level of public finance management.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft bills amending the State Budget Act and the schedule for their procedural handling. The presenter is acting as a critical assessor of the bill, concentrating on the speed of its consideration and the government's conflicting initiatives.
2 Speeches Analyzed