By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets
Total Sessions: 136
Fully Profiled: 136
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
There is insufficient data.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary adversary is the institutions of the European Union, which are criticized for interfering with the taxation competence of member states and for actions contrary to the founding treaties. The criticism is intense and focuses on the procedural and legal basis, accusing the EU of usurping tax law.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for political incompetence, "institutional cover-up" (or "bureaucratic cronyism"), and a lack of transparency. The government is also accused of imposing a green transition that is both anti-environmental and totalitarian in nature, as well as deliberately weakening national defense capabilities (the scrapping of helicopters and ships). No compromise is being offered; instead, a complete change in the direction of policy is demanded.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at the inefficiency of institutional management (the lapse of internal control at the Ministry of Defence) and policies that have restricted the hunting of game animals. The speaker suggests that these hunting restrictions stem from "green transition arguments" or other unreasonable causes, which have inflicted enormous damage on farmers.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the minister under questioning, members of the Reform Party, the prime minister, and everyone who supported threatening the conference or remained silent. The criticism is intense and personal (focusing on lying and scandalous behavior) and centers on the restriction of free speech and the damaging of Estonia-US relations. Compromise is ruled out; an unconditional apology is demanded.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The confrontation is intense and is aimed at both the government and the Riigikogu (Parliament) board, criticizing both political inaction and undemocratic procedures (such as all-night sessions and committee work). The main opponents are Interior Minister Läänemets and Education Minister Kallas, who are accused of misleading the public and spreading extremist ideology. Socialists are also criticized for sacrificing historical democracy.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the banking elite and rule-of-law institutions that have failed to punish those responsible for high-level corruption. The speaker also criticizes the regulatory focus, which harasses small players (the bullying of the small) instead of large money launderers. The criticism is based on the inefficiency of policy and procedure.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is directed towards the previous government's inaction regarding the maintenance of shelters and the potential deficiencies of the draft bill concerning rural areas and existing infrastructure. There is no direct political confrontation or personal criticism; instead, the critique focuses on policy and preceding inaction.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary figures in opposition are the minister and the individual facing a vote of no confidence, who stands accused of avoiding responsibility and incompetence. The criticism is intense, centering on both the mismanagement of the legal system (stalled investigations) and the signing of a contract deemed harmful and risky to the state. There is no sign of willingness to compromise; instead, the demand is for full accountability.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government and officials, who are accused of betraying and selling out communities (the Lääneranna example), as well as the elites and bureaucrats of the European Union. The criticism is policy- and value-based, accusing the opponents of importing socialism and a command economy. No willingness to compromise is evident; they demand the discontinuation of the reading of the bills and the refusal of regulations, even under the threat of fines.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main targets are the Prime Minister (for being too lenient with officials) and the Minister of Defense (for sacrificing security for the sake of green ideology). The criticism focuses both on political incompetence and procedural deficiencies (specifically, the lack of a legal basis for data collection). The speaker accuses the government of misleading the public and avoiding responsibility, while ruling out any compromise that would jeopardize security.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the parliamentary majority, who are accused of squandering Estonian sovereignty and kowtowing to Brussels. The criticism is intense, accusing opponents of repeating Soviet-era mistakes (mass immigration, the all-union system). The ERJK is also criticized for its lack of systematic activity and for dealing with trivial issues.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the government's infrastructure policy and the green transition. The political attack is particularly fierce against "the notorious Autorollo minister, Keit Pentus-Rosimannus," who is accused of halting Martin Helme's PPP plan. Criticism is also leveled at the minister's optimism regarding the state of Rail Baltic, relying on evidence from the Latvian investigative commission.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The main opponents are the ruling coalition and Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is being criticized both personally (for past mistakes) and politically. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of economic stagnation, undermining democracy (through illegal e-voting), and influencing the media for the purpose of "brainwashing." There is no apparent willingness to compromise; instead, the focus is placed on the "chaos" the government has created in national defense.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is intense and aimed squarely at the ruling coalition. Eesti 200 is facing particular criticism for having completely forfeited public trust, with calls for them to step down from the government. The criticism is grounded in both ethical concerns (e.g., election manipulation, corruption) and political issues (tax hikes, lack of a clear mandate). The government stands accused of hiding behind national security issues while simultaneously destroying the economy.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main criticism is aimed directly at the government (addressed as "you"), accusing them of economic failure and prioritizing cheap labor. The opposition is particularly fierce regarding the Green Transition regulations, which are viewed as totalitarian and responsible for shutting down businesses. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, highlighting the inconsistencies in the government's actions.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the government coalition and its members, particularly the party of Liina Kersna and Johanna-Maria Lehtme. The criticism is intense and ranges from political (lack of mandate) to ethical and personal (fraud, handling matters deceitfully, squandering 3 million euros). Compromise is ruled out, as the government's resignation is being demanded.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the forces promoting the ideology of quotas and the green transition (the government/EU), who are accused of socialist delusions and encroaching upon the business sector. The criticism is intense and ideological, asserting that the opponents' activities are dishonest and unjust. Furthermore, the undignified behavior of the former prime minister on a plane is being criticized, with the opponent being accused of covering it up.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism targets the management and policies within the energy sector, which have resulted in chronic underinvestment and the deterioration of the system. This criticism is grounded in both policy failures and measurable performance, highlighting the current system's inability to execute its mandate, and directly citing the statements made by the CEO of Eesti Energia as supporting evidence.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the government (especially the Minister of Education and Research), Brussels, and LGBT organizations/gender propagandists. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the government of hijacking tax law and introducing "toxic trans ideology." There is no willingness to compromise, with demands that the government address the real concerns of the voters.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main targets of the criticism are the Ministry of Justice, the Prosecutor's Office (naming prosecutor Arik Lepp), and the ruling party (referencing Kaja Kallas's first government and the actions of the minister/former party chairman). The criticism is intense and focuses on ethical responsibility, failed investigations, and unprofessionalism. He/She also sharply criticizes the lack of accountability as a systemic problem.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker sharply criticizes the proponents of intermittent power, accusing them of ignoring the laws of nature and suffering from ideological blindness (a comparison is drawn to Lysenko). The criticism is primarily political and fact-based, focusing on grid instability and the economic inefficiency of wind farms. He calls on his opponents to "come out of hiding" and engage in debate, but remains uncompromising in his own positions.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Fierce opposition is aimed at the former governing coalitions, specifically targeting the EKREIKE era and the Ratas administration, as well as the US political model (the Trump administration). The criticism is intense and highly personalized, accusing them of dismantling democracy and degrading the quality of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). Opponents are directly branded as incompetent ("sheep").
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are "Brussels officials," who are accused of creating bureaucracy to justify their own existence, and the government, which implements EU mandates. The criticism is ideological, accusing the opponents of establishing ideological control over the economy. The opposition is intense and uncompromising, labeling the law the "snitching law" and linking it to historical repression.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main targets of the criticism are proponents of the green transition, the government (the Reform Party), and specific individuals presenting the proposals (Mario Kadastik). The criticism is intense and covers both political aspects (subsidies, lack of proper analyses) and ethical dimensions (fraud, the spread of false information, and the mocking of health issues). Attempts to strip local governments of their decision-making power are criticized especially harshly, with critics calling this the Reform Party’s way of practicing democracy.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponents are the coalition, the Minister of Culture, and "left-liberals," who stand accused of lying (regarding refugee status), betraying the national identity, and disseminating "crazy gender propaganda." The criticism is intense and values-driven, directly accusing the opposition of degrading women and destroying high culture. Compromise with the liberal cultural agenda is ruled out, as it has been branded the "age of madness."
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the procedures governing the organization of elections, which allow for the destruction of evidence, and indirectly at the Reform Party, in whose e-votes a "complete anomaly" was identified according to the diagram. The criticism is procedural and intense, calling into question the reliability of the system and the legitimacy of past election results.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main opponent is the governing coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is accused of harboring far-left ideas and merely feigning liberalism. The criticism is intense, spanning from policy issues (tax hikes, volatile electricity pricing) to personal accusations (the ruining of Marti Kuusik's reputation, Minister Tsahkna defending Lehtme). There is no willingness to compromise, as the government's actions are viewed as destructive to the state and diminishing national sovereignty.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponent is the government and its ministers (Sikkut and Keldo are referenced), who are being accused of restoring a planned economy and ignoring the concerns of the populace. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of arrogance, relying on shell companies, and a one-sided interpretation of democracy ("We're pushing you down the pipe"). The speaker also references the US withdrawal from the climate agreement to undermine the global legitimacy of the green transition.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is intensely and personally criticized due to historical financial corruption ("birth trauma," the $10 million case) and a lack of conscience. The criticism targets both the party's past and its current tax policy.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is being sharply criticized for his systemic and personal attack against US democracy. The criticism is intense, accusing Ligi of damaging allied relations and demanding that he either apologize or curb his rhetoric. Indirectly, the Prime Minister is also being criticized for failing to control his minister.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is directed against the governing coalition and a specific political party, who are being criticized for supporting and signing a convention that includes the concept of social gender. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing opponents of aggressive ideological promotion and incompetence. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, the demand is for the government to accept the consequences of the mistakes it has made.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the government and the minister, sharply criticizing their failures in cyber defense and the absence of serious repercussions. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing the government of attempting to impose censorship similar to that found in China.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary targets are high-ranking government officials, specifically Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and an unnamed minister whose resignation is being demanded. The criticism is intense, focusing on personal ethics, conflicts of interest, corruption, and the avoidance of responsibility (doing business with Russia, lack of accountability). Compromise is ruled out, as demands are being made for a full investigation and holding those responsible accountable.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The primary criticism is leveled against the government and its policies that favor foreign investors and speculative schemes. Specifically, the criticism targets the world's super-rich (e.g., Warren Buffett, Sumitomo) and foreign companies who demand massive subsidies and guarantees from the Estonian taxpayer. The attacks are intense and policy-driven, accusing opponents of driving the country into poverty.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the government coalition, the Ministry of Defense, and the specific politician Anti Allas. The criticism is intense, accusing them both of skimping on the individual soldier and coddling 10,000 Ukrainian draft dodgers. The attacks are based on both political and moral grounds, accusing the opponents of being detached from reality and supporting deserters.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, the honorary chairman of her party, and the government, all of whom are accused of ignoring laws and fostering negative attitudes. Strong criticism has also been leveled at the leadership of ERR regarding issues of Russian citizenship and security risks, calling into question both their suitability and the channel's funding.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Strong criticism has been leveled at state institutions (the Health Board) and other officials, who are accused of failing to investigate and improperly classifying adverse effects. The criticism is both procedural and ethical in nature, stemming from the suspicion of conflicts of interest among those recommending the vaccines. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, a comprehensive investigation is being demanded.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the government (specifically the Prime Minister and the Minister of Education) and ideological groups who are labeled as social democrats, liberals, and socialists. The criticism is intense, personal, and ideological, accusing the opponents of implementing Leninist projects, promoting pseudo-sciences, and destroying the Estonian economy. Compromise is ruled out, and the dismissal of the Minister of Education is demanded.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the minister and the government, who are sharply criticized for incompetence, secrecy, and unreliable data. The attacks are intense and focus on both procedural errors and ethical issues, including the risk of corruption. Criticism is also aimed at the unwillingness to present the data, even to the special anti-corruption commission.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary adversaries are the Government of the Republic and the Minister of Science. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of ideologically steering higher education and promoting pseudoscience (a reference to 150 genders/sexes). The opposition is rooted in both policy and ideology, and there is a complete unwillingness to compromise.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
The main opponent is the prime minister and the government, who are sharply criticized for contradictory policies (subsidies for large corporations versus a car tax for the poor) and failed education experiments. The criticism is policy- and results-driven, accusing the government of harming vulnerable groups.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main adversaries are those who support retaining voting rights for non-citizens, and those responsible for the money laundering issues that have arisen through the e-residency program. Criticism is aimed at the Chairman of the Constitutional Committee for being insufficiently informed when making such a momentous decision. Furthermore, former minister Jürgen Ligi is sharply criticized in connection with previous money laundering cases.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The primary confrontation is with the government, which is being criticized for pushing through the hate speech law and ignoring the concerns of the US ally. The criticism is intense and focuses on political decisions that threaten democratic values and allied relations. Mart Helme is criticized for using irrelevant arguments in discussions about the future of NATO.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the leaders of the green transition, who are dubbed "climate mythologists," "unscrupulous politicians," and "bought scientists." The criticism is intense, accusing them of opacity, corruption, and deliberately damaging the economy. The attacks are both policy-based and procedural, demanding the complete termination of the policy.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main adversary is the Prime Minister and the ruling Reform Party, who are being intensely criticized on both ethical grounds (lying, cover-ups, historical corruption) and political grounds (economic recession, radical green transition). Separately, the Prime Minister's colleague, Keit Kasemets, is singled out as the individual responsible for the government's actions. The criticism is sharp and uncompromising.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The opposition is directed at the government as a whole, and specifically at the Ministers of Justice (Maris Lauri, Liisa Pakosta) for spearheading the hate speech law. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of moving towards a less democratic order and damaging relations with allies.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the foreign minister, who are attacked both for political decisions (US policy, the closure of the consulate) and for issues of personal competence (secondary education, behavior in Georgia). The government's activities are labeled "anarcho-syndicalist" and "left-extremist," ruling out any cooperation whatsoever.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the minister and the Ministry of the Interior, accusing them of lacking control and failing to resolve ongoing issues. The backlash is intense and centers on the ineffective implementation of policy, particularly regarding foreign labor and language requirements, implying that the ministry is cutting costs by neglecting to solve the underlying problem.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the government, specifically Minister of Education Kristina Kallas, who is accused of spreading pseudoscience and acting as a propaganda minister. More broadly, the criticism targets those spreading "cultural Marxism," followers of Herbert Marcuse’s ideas, and the Soros Foundation. The criticism is intense and personal, demanding the Minister's immediate dismissal and the dismantling of the entire system.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The primary opponents are those seeking to cut ties with Georgia. They are accused of being overly critical regarding LGBT and minority issues, as well as hypocrisy (citing the US as an example). The authors of the Riigikogu statement are also facing criticism because their viewpoints contradict international (OSCE) reports. This criticism is intense and is aimed both at political consistency and the blatant disregard for facts.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the coalition, who are accused of slow action and wasting national defense funds on the green transition (offshore wind farms). A personal attack is directed at the former prime minister, who engaged in business dealings in Russia after 2014 ("Eldorado"). The criticism is intense and focuses on political errors and the incorrect setting of priorities.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are Maris Lauri and the Reform Party, who stand accused of sweeping problems under the rug and unsatisfactory financial management. The criticism is intense, ranging from political errors (budget inaccuracies) to personal accusations regarding a "contemptuous attitude" and constitutional violations (censorship).
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the minister and the government, who are being criticized for a courthouse closure plan that is regionally unacceptable. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of disregarding the security argument and the argument regarding state presence. The government's actions are being labeled as the weakening of Ida-Virumaa.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is no direct confrontation with specific political groups. The criticism is indirect and ironic, aimed instead at the disappearance of traditional expectations (white Christmas, snowmobiles) due to climate change.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is with the coalition and the Ministry of Climate, both of whom are accused of implementing unconstitutional legislation and "bad and politicized science." The criticism is intense, alleging that the government is weakening energy security and ruining Estonia's export industries, thereby serving the interests of the enemy.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The confrontation is directed at those who promote the hate speech law and use the labeling of speech as hate speech to suppress criticism. The criticism is intense and accusatory, ranging from criticizing political instruments (hate speech) to highlighting the personal work failures ("shoddy performance") of a high state official (the Prosecutor General). The opponent is directly accused of "hostility toward freedom of speech" and suppressing the free exchange of ideas.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the governing coalition and the liberals, who are accused of embracing far-left green policies and deliberately dismantling the economy. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, arguing that the government's actions are aimed at destroying competitiveness.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the government and its ministers, who are sharply criticized for breaking promises and undermining legal certainty regarding family benefits. Criticism is also aimed at the government's inaction (infra-sound studies have not been conducted) and its submission to international pressure concerning natural resources. The opposition is intense, accusing the government of failing to do its job and sacrificing national interests to serve the interests of Brussels or the oligarchs.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the executive branch and the government, particularly the Minister of Defence, who faces criticism for a lack of preparation and poor information quality. There is also strong criticism regarding the ethical issues of politicians and the appointment of corrupt individuals to high-ranking positions (EU posts). The criticism directed at opponents is multifaceted, covering political, procedural, and personal/ethical aspects (for instance, labeling the leader of an allied nation a fascist).
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main confrontation is directed at the government, specifically the Prime Minister and Defense Minister Pevkur, whose messages are considered contradictory and dismissive. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's inability to ensure the functioning of national defense early warning systems. Those in power are accused of ignoring a situation that endangers NATO's early warning capabilities.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the effectiveness of the government's tax policy, particularly regarding excise revenue collection. The positive effect of raising excise duties on the state budget is being called into question, suggesting that the resistance is rooted in the policy itself.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the coalition (who are criticized for ignoring the debate and being absent from the chamber), climate activists, and scientists, who are accused of spreading pseudoscience and incompetence. The criticism is intense, labeling the opponents' actions "irresponsible Lysenkoism" and "fueling climate panic." He/She also calls out the hypocritical air travel of politicians to climate conferences.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government coalition, especially the Social Democrats, who are accused of the principled defense of non-citizens' voting rights, and the Reform Party for dancing to the tune of the Social Democrats. The criticism is intense and concerns both political choices (tax law, budget) and procedural aspects (the rejection of cooperation in the Constitutional Committee). The speaker also criticizes the historical figure Re for destroying Estonian democracy in 1934.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The primary criticism is aimed at the prime minister and his governments, accusing them of fiscal dishonesty, budgetary opacity, and funding far-left ideologies. The attacks are intense and encompass both procedural criticism (answering the previous question) and the substantive accusation of funneling money to extremism.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Reform Party, particularly Kaja Kallas, Jürgen Ligi, and Valdo Randpere, who stand accused of weakening national defense and incompetence. The criticism is intense and addresses both political decisions (the desire to abolish conscription, the rejection of air defense) and personal behavior (accusations that Kallas engages in shouting). The speaker questions the opponents' motives, asking whether this was a matter of foolishness or something even more serious.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary confrontation is aimed at the executive branch (the minister) and the commission's representative, who are being criticized for failing to provide answers and for underestimating Parliament. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural shortcomings, as well as the government's desire to seize an unacceptable amount of power at the expense of Parliament by issuing a "blank check." Also criticized are the unsuccessful actions taken by NATO countries and the weakness displayed by the U.S. in Afghanistan.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main adversaries are the Reform Party and Estonia 200, which are referred to as "the liberal party" and "the arm-twisting party." The criticism is largely personal and ethical in nature, focusing on corruption, cover-ups, and the promotion of "utterly compromised" individuals to high office. The government is accused of constitutional nihilism and suppressing its rivals, ruling out any possibility of compromise.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is primarily aimed at the inaction or inefficiency of the government and state institutions (the Police, the Ministry of Regional Affairs, and the Ministry of Agriculture). The speaker sharply criticizes the police's inability to solve local drug problems and the government's plans to reduce the state's presence in Ida-Virumaa.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary adversaries are the Reform Party and the minister facing a no-confidence vote, who stands accused of crudeness, vulgarity, and employing an authoritarian tone. The criticism leveled is both ideological (the degradation of values, the imposition of gender ideology) and personal (facial expressions, the Moonika Helme incident). The speaker demands that the opponents, rather than seeking compromise, either stage a revolt or resign from the party, thereby ruling out any future cooperation.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the government minister and his party, who stand accused of ideological metamorphosis and incompetence. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political substance (left-wing ideology) and personal conduct (arrogance, failure to respond). The speaker is demanding a vote of no confidence in the minister.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main targets are the Minister of Justice, who is accused of selling out sovereignty and engaging in amateurish, enthusiasm-driven management, as well as the government as a whole, whose vision is considered unconstitutional. Jürgen Ligi has been specifically criticized for his arrogant behavior and for insulting female colleagues, which creates a negative atmosphere in the chamber. The criticism is intense and covers both political errors and personal unethical conduct.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Direct criticism targets the legacy of the Soviet Union and communist crimes, which resulted in genocide and the repression of 132,000 Estonian citizens. Indirectly, there is criticism regarding the slow progress in implementing promised projects (such as the Patarei prison research center), highlighting the need to adhere to deadlines. Opposition is aimed at any justification of occupation or annexation.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The challenge is aimed at the policy implementers (the proponent), criticizing both the content of the proposed increase in the consultation fee and the complex bureaucratic procedure required for applying for social benefits. The criticism is strictly policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition, which stands accused of including an anti-child provision in the draft legislation and thereby disgracing itself. The criticism is intense and morally charged, calling into question the willingness of other political parties to even address the issue, while exclusively highlighting the role played by the EKRE member. Opponents are being pressured to rectify the situation immediately.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the government's move to cancel family benefits, which had previously garnered cross-party support. Furthermore, Siim Kallas is being sharply criticized for his personal attitude, which is seen as mocking large families and is considered offensive to public sensibilities. The criticism is intense and addresses both political decisions and underlying values.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the coalition led by the Reform Party, who are accused of irresponsible policies and reducing Estonians to a minority in the capital. The criticism is intense and accusatory, focusing both on political decisions and the Prime Minister’s personal lack of experience. The government is also accused of misusing Ukrainian refugees and hindering their return.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The primary target is the government and the minister, who are facing intense criticism for their political choices (energy prices, the green transition) and for the poor management of infrastructure projects. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, accusing the government of failing in domestic affairs and pursuing unreliable regional policy.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponent is Foreign Minister Tsahkna, who is personally criticized for his "pig-headedness" and lack of historical awareness. Criticism is also directed at the decision-making procedure (the "axe method," referring to a heavy-handed approach) and the political substance (misplaced priorities, the destruction of symbols). The Minister pushed the decision through despite opposition from coalition partners and the Foreign Affairs Committee.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the current energy policy and the leaders driving the green transition, who are being criticized both for the policy’s consequences (unstable energy supply) and for their dishonesty (wasting resources under the guise of environmental protection). The criticism is strong and focuses specifically on political choices and their negative impact.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The main opponent is the Minister of the Interior and, more broadly, the government (including the Social Democrats), who are accused of chaos, arbitrary rule, and violating the constitution. The criticism is intense and personal, demanding the minister's swift resignation due to his lack of historical education and the desecration of the freedom struggle. The resistance of "no-officials" to government directives is also being opposed.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Direct opponents are not criticized, but indirect criticism is leveled regarding the state's insufficient action in supporting and developing the drone sector. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, not personal.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The chief opponent is the government, specifically the Prime Minister, who is accused of coordinating and sanctioning the removal of the Lihula monument. The criticism is both procedural (secret planning) and value-based (the mischaracterization of the Estonian freedom struggle). The speaker accuses the government of confusing monuments dedicated to perpetrators of genocide with the commemoration of Estonian freedom fighters.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary targets are the prime minister and the government, who are being criticized for financial irresponsibility and for implementing "externally sourced ideas." The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of destroying the rural economy and exports, and demonstrating a malicious attitude toward children's education. There is no willingness to compromise; the policies are considered utterly irrational.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The main opponent is the untrustworthy minister, who is being intensely criticized for his ideological stances and dishonesty. The criticism targets his personal credibility and the content of his previous statements (Putin's propaganda). Furthermore, the minister has been accused of arrogant behavior. Trust in the minister is clearly out of the question.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is accused of long-term deception, hypocrisy, and steamroller politics. The criticism is intense and ranges from policy issues to the handling of personal incidents (ministerial scandals), specifically referencing the Eastern transport scandal and the subsequent replacement of ministers. The Social Democrats have also been challenged regarding the issue of support for large families.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The main confrontation is aimed squarely at the prime ministerial candidate and the Reform Party. The criticism is intense and multi-faceted, covering both ethical violations (the funding scandal) and political unreliability regarding national defense issues. The attacks target personal trust and political consistency.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The dispute is directed at the government's tax policy, specifically focusing on how it impacts large families and whether the policy is balanced. The criticism is policy-driven, highlighting the complete disregard for their proposal and the imbalance in the tax design, which is pushing people into severe economic hardship.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
Insufficient data
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is extremely intense and personal, aimed directly at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas. She is being accused of immediately starting to lie the moment she approached the microphone and of spreading rumors concerning EKRE and Ukraine. The criticism is severe, but the speaker stresses that their side maintained its composure during the Prime Minister's Eastern transport scandal.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The primary opponents are the sitting government and specific ministers who are being accused of acting as spokespeople for Bolt lobbyists, deepening the economic recession, and showing obstinacy in making foreign policy decisions (a reference to Foreign Minister Tsahkna). The criticism is intense and accusatory, focusing on both political failure and ethical concerns. A compromise regarding the closure of consulates has been ruled out.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The primary opponent is Kaja Kallas’s government and the Reform Party, which are blamed for causing Europe’s deepest recession and a dramatic drop in exports. Criticism is also aimed at the ideological mythology of the green transition, which is leading to the destruction of the economy. There is also sharp criticism directed at the regime's analysts and academics who follow the government line and are keeping quiet about the rise in energy prices.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The main criticism is aimed at policies that encourage the import of cheap labor, and at the large technology companies that promote this model. The criticism is based on both policy and outcomes, blaming them for the decline in productivity. The opposition is intense and uncompromising.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism targets the Rakvere city government, which the speaker claims was formed illegally through vote buying, and also the police, who are accused of being completely ineffective in tackling drug problems. The criticism is both procedural and performance-based, highlighting the complete erosion of trust in the local authorities.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the decision-makers who have dismissed alternatives (especially the Linnahall site), criticizing the process as a shallow discussion. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, calling into question the thoroughness of the project's planning.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponent is the incumbent minister, whose activities are criticized both politically (the destruction of the language environment, the teacher shortage) and personally (unscientific views, the alleged bullying of the secretary-general). The criticism is extremely intense and culminates in a direct demand for resignation. No willingness to compromise is evident.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the executive branch, who are being heavily criticized for procedural errors and failing to carry out impact assessments. The criticism is procedural and calls for a concrete action plan (slowing the pace and conducting the analysis). The intensity of the attack is moderately strong, with the sentiment being expressed that, "We simply cannot proceed this way."
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism targets the institution responsible for presenting the forecasts, citing its unreliability and projections that fail to account for the green transition, which is inherently policy- and performance-based. Furthermore, a pointed question has been put to the Prime Minister, demanding clarification regarding his rhetoric and use of hyperbole concerning social issues.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the proponents of the green transition, who are accused of destroying industry through CO2 pricing and subsidies. The speaker sharply criticizes the Social Democrats for radical socialist experiments and the Reform Party for their support plummeting like a stone. The criticism is ideological and political, warning liberals against moving onto the social democrats' turf.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Strong opposition is aimed at the governing coalition, particularly the Reform Party (Mr. Kivimägi), accusing them of hypocritical conduct and restricting political freedoms. Criticism is also leveled at the Constitutional Committee, which rejected proposals aimed at improving electoral procedures in social welfare institutions. He accuses his opponents of establishing restrictions that could eventually be used against them.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The primary confrontation is directed at an official whose past business activities and involvement in companies related to public procurements raise doubts. The criticism is intense, focusing both on personal ethics (the relinquishing of the stake due to a "serious problem") and procedural errors in the procurement process (unlawful qualification requirements).
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party and the governing coalition, who are being criticized both for disregarding procedural rules and for pursuing policies that are devastating to national defense. The criticism is extremely intense, accusing the opposing party of being a danger to national defense due to their idea of abolishing conscription. Opponents are also accused of ignoring the truth and losing their temper.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, Minister Riisalo, Andres Sutt, and the government coalition as a whole. The criticism is intense and focuses on political failures (economic recession, data breach) and ethical issues (ties to Russian money). The speaker demands the immediate resignation of the ministers and the entire coalition, ruling out compromise should the current inaction persist.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition's stance is intense and uncompromising, directed against the government and its representatives. The criticism is both political (concerning the withdrawal of child benefits and the lack of indexation) and personal and procedural (including accusations of lying and violating the Vienna Convention). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding a change of government.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The backlash is intense and aimed at the entire coalition, particularly the Prime Minister and the Social Democrats, who stand accused of anti-nation-state actions and connections to Russian funding. The criticism is overwhelmingly ideological and personal, charging the opponents with spitting in the face of the Estonian people and doing a grave disservice to the Ukrainian fight. The speaker perceives a pattern, not mere chance, in the opponents' activities, which precludes any possibility of compromise.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the governing coalition and the prime minister, who face fierce criticism regarding their policies, ideology, and alleged corruption (specifically Russian money laundering and donations). The criticism is intense and accusatory, charging the government with misleading the Estonian people and implementing Marxist policies, and further questioning their loyalty (labeling them a Russian patriot, an Arab patriot).
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main adversaries are rapporteurs and politicians who support centralized urban planning and e-voting, and who are accused of employing Soviet-era methods. The criticism is ideological and intense, referring to their activities as having a "communist impression." Furthermore, law enforcement agencies are sharply criticized for their "sluggish and lazy attitude" when investigating vote-buying crimes.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The main opponents are the government parties (Eesti 200, Social Democrats) and the big businessman Oleg Ossinovski. The criticism is intense and directed both at morality (the acceptance of donations) and inaction (the lack of an investigation). The speaker accuses the government parties of being in the oligarch's pocket and of having connections that prevent the enforcement of sanctions.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the Prosecutor's Office and its leadership (Prosecutor General Parmas, former Prosecutor General Lavly Perling), who are accused of systemic politicization and the implementation of double standards. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural injustice, political ruination, and the squandering of state resources. The opposition is absolute, accusing the Prosecutor's Office of serving political objectives.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party, targeting both their historical role in attempts to abolish mandatory military service and their current defense planning. The criticism is intense, accusing opponents of forfeiting the training of men equivalent to an entire division and thereby weakening national defense. The attacks are primarily policy-driven and focused on evaluating outcomes.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The opposition’s stance is extremely strong and targeted directly at the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, who stand accused of lying, susceptibility to blackmail, and concealing Russian business dealings. The criticism is both personal and ethical, ranging from accusations that coalition partners were financed by Oleg Ossinovski to the demand that the Prime Minister take a polygraph test. Compromise is ruled out entirely, as they are demanding the immediate resignation of the Prime Minister.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary targets are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, the Reform Party, and the ruling coalition. The criticism is intense and primarily ethical, accusing them of continuing the "blood business" and circumventing sanctions. Also under attack is Oleg Ossinovski, the major businessman who funds the governing parties, who is labeled as corrupt and a sanctions-evading "elephant in the room."
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is directed at the current leaders of energy policy, who are accused of promoting unrealistic and unstable solutions (solar and wind energy). The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing that their plans will lead to a decline in the standard of living and the collapse of industry. He praises former Finance Minister Martin Helme for securing a 1000 MW reserve, contrasting this achievement with the current situation.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Social Democrats (mentioning Ossinovski) and Eesti 200, who are accused of destroying the nation-state and constructing an international dystopia. The criticism is intense and ideological, charging the opposition with the degradation of women and the artificial importation of terrorism risk. Compromise is ruled out, as this constitutes an existential cultural conflict.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the parties of the governing coalition (the Social Democrats and the Reform Party), who are criticized both for changes to the tax system and for education policy. The criticism is intense and policy-based, accusing the government of eradicating the language and culture of Ukrainians.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Reform Party and the Minister of Finance, who face criticism over controversial policies (freedom versus nudging) and an economically hazardous tax package. The critique is grounded in both policy and ideology, accusing the opponents of implementing measures that endanger private property and erode the public’s sense of security. The attacks are intense, often linking the opponents' actions directly to extremist ideologies.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at sprawling and responsibility-evading electoral alliances and associations that exploit legal loopholes to avoid accountability. A specific example cited is the electoral alliance Valimisliit Rakvere Heaks, which failed to disclose its funding sources. The criticism is procedural and centers on the lack of ethical responsibility.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are forces lacking political will and local governments that flout the law. Specifically, the leaders of the Narva City Council (Vladimir Belõi, Vladimir Žavoronkov) are criticized for legal nihilism and deliberately organizing sessions in Russian. The criticism is sharp and directed at the level of political power, which sets a bad example.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is directed at the Prime Minister's party (the Reform Party) and Eesti 200, criticizing their moral and ethical conduct concerning the acceptance of donations from an individual suspected of corruption. The criticism is intense and demands concrete cleanup operations, accusing the party of casting a shadow over the entire government. The critique targets both political ethics and the priorities of the security institutions.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main adversary is the Russian Empire and its current regime, which is accused of perpetrating genocide and war crimes. Criticism is also directed at those countries that interpret international law hypocritically, and a direct question is posed to China regarding the validity of international legal norms.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the Foreign Minister and the Social Democratic Party. They stand accused of unethical conduct and accepting donations from a major donor (Oleg Ossinovski) who is a sanctions violator. The criticism is intense, centering on political hypocrisy and a clear lack of accountability (specifically, the failure to even discuss returning the donation).
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is directed at the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of having inadequate priorities, cutting subsidies, and demoralizing the populace. University managements are criticized particularly sharply, accused of building "migration pumps" and betraying the ideal of the national university, drawing comparisons to Lumumba University. The criticism is intense and substantive, addressing both policy and fundamental values.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is directed at the prime minister and the government over their inaction, as well as criticizing the weakness of oversight bodies ("the net is still far too wide"). Coalition partners are being criticized particularly intensely, as they are financed by the tycoon Ossinovski, who is linked to Russian business schemes. They are demanding the prime minister personally intervene and declare a boycott against Ossinovski, which points to a personal and ethical attack.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the executive branch (the Prime Minister and Minister Riisalo), who stand accused of failing to manage immigration, allowing language problems to worsen, and failing to address the labor shortage. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, emphasizing the government's alleged inability to resolve even the most straightforward workforce issues.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at service providers who fail to ensure Estonian-language service, and indirectly targets the current fine systems, which are deemed ineffective. Specific political opponents or parties are not being criticized; instead, the focus is on systemic failure.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary opponents are pharmaceutical companies (Pfizer), who stand accused of fraud and criminal activity, and the European Union, for pushing dangerous regulations. Criticism is also aimed at Estonian politicians and the media, who promoted false claims about vaccines and actively suppressed information regarding side effects. Irja Lutsar is also directly criticized for her lack of professional expertise and her prior cooperation with Pfizer.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary conflict is with the governing coalition, specifically the Reform Party, which faces accusations of ideological betrayal and restricting civil liberties. Finance Minister Võrklaev is personally criticized for hypocrisy (he lives in the suburbs but advocates for curbing car dependency). The criticism is intense and targets both political issues (the car tax) and procedural aspects (deceiving the electorate).
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party and, personally, Jürgen Ligi, who is accused of attempting to dismantle the defense forces and pursuing the current policy that is impoverishing the populace. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political accusations (the green transition, the austerity program) and personal attacks (he slammed doors, he should be wearing a security guard's uniform). Instead of seeking compromise, the demand is for the opponents to rectify the damage and show contrition.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The most intense criticism is directed at the political bias of the Prosecutor's Office and the police, as well as the passivity and procedural inaction of the coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200). Among specific individuals, Valdo Randpere is criticized for his late participation and "rusty" performance. The criticism is leveled on political, procedural, and personal levels.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponents are the Prime Minister, the Minister of the Interior, and the coalition, who stand accused of violating the constitution and betraying Ukraine. Criticism is also directed at security agencies (Kapo, the Prosecutor's Office), which are suspected of political bias and attempting to seize power (the "deep state concept"). The intensity of the attacks is high, and no willingness to compromise is evident.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is primarily aimed at government officials, the Ministry of the Interior, and politicians, who are accused of arrogance, bullying, and spitefully enforcing laws in a gray area. Certain parties are also criticized for overemphasizing ideological issues (such as same-sex families) at the expense of social problems. The criticism is intense and value-based.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the Reform Party and its leading figures (Jürgen Ligi, Märt Rask, Kaja Kallas, Annely Akkermann), who are accused of unconstitutional activity, lying, and destroying the reputation of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The criticism is intense, ranging from political disagreements (ESM, tax policy) to personal and ethical accusations (the selection of judges, the shameful use of obstruction). No willingness to compromise is apparent.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The primary adversary is the government and the responsible minister, who is being sharply criticized for the inconsistency and manipulative nature of their policies. The criticism is policy-based (focusing on education and media), but it is delivered with high intensity, including direct accusations of hostility and hate speech. The speaker questions the government's motives regarding the financial incentives provided for closing schools in Ida-Virumaa.