Session Profile: Anti Poolamets

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

2025-09-04

Political Position
The political position is strongly anti-government, criticizing the administration's inaction and the lack of substantive agendas, suggesting that the prime minister refuses to govern. Key priorities include restricting mass immigration, protecting national identity and indigenous populations, and prioritizing national defense over the development of wind energy. The political framework is value-based and critical of the government's actions, drawing parallels between contemporary politics and historical anti-democratic events.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of immigration and demographic statistics, utilizing specific comparative data concerning the Baltic states and providing precise figures regarding Ukrainian men of mobilization age. Furthermore, the speaker possesses technical awareness concerning the impact of wind farms on health (infrasound) and national defense (surveillance capabilities, radio interference), citing the views of experts and leaders of the Defense Forces. He/She also references specific educational materials and international conventions.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is predominantly critical and combative, employing strong accusations of misleading and disinforming the public (these are levelled against the Minister of the Interior). The speaker relies both on concrete data (regarding immigration and defense capability) and on emotional and value-based appeals (such as the protection of indigenous peoples and children's education). Historical parallels are also utilized to criticize the anti-democratic attitude of the socialists.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The representative is an active submitter of parliamentary inquiries (at least four inquiries directed at different ministers) and an initiator of draft legislation, focusing on demanding specific data and holding the government accountable. This pattern of activity demonstrates consistent criticism of the government’s operations and Riigikogu procedures, particularly concerning session agendas and scheduling.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is intense and is aimed at both the government and the Riigikogu (Parliament) board, criticizing both political inaction and undemocratic procedures (such as all-night sessions and committee work). The main opponents are Interior Minister Läänemets and Education Minister Kallas, who are accused of misleading the public and spreading extremist ideology. Socialists are also criticized for sacrificing historical democracy.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation style is focused on intra-factional activity, submitting interpellations and draft legislation on behalf of several Riigikogu members (e.g., 6, 9, or 10 members). There is no evidence of openness to compromise or cooperation with the ruling coalition or other opposition parties.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is primarily national (Estonian population, defense capability, education), but it includes strong international comparisons (immigration in Latvia, Finland) and references (the halting of Swedish wind parks, a Portuguese scientist). An important regional/international aspect is the protection of the rights of kindred peoples (the Mari, the Komi) and other indigenous peoples (Tibet), linking this to the status of Estonians as an indigenous people.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views are clearly aimed at lowering taxes, criticizing the socialist policies that have hindered this. Questions are also being raised regarding the financial cost to the Defence Forces of reducing the impact of heavy industry, citing the need for risk mitigation.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
In social policy, the speaker is strongly conservative, opposing mass immigration and emphasizing its speed and volume compared to neighboring countries. He is critical of the "extreme gender ideology" promoted in schools, accusing textbooks of misleading children with over 20 gender definitions. Additionally, he supports the protection of indigenous peoples' rights, considering Estonians an endangered indigenous people.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward scrutinizing the government's activities through interpellations, and toward two main draft bills: the suspension of wind farm planning (citing concerns over infrasound and national defense capability) and the ratification of the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention. Also important is the procedural focus, which demands the openness and transparency of the Riigikogu's work, and criticizes the use of night sittings.

11 Speeches Analyzed