Anti Poolamets

Anti Poolamets (EKRE) was an active opponent, criticizing the draft bill as "national masochism" and "neototalitarianism," arguing that it imposes intermittent power generation on communities and will result in environmental damage and the weakening of the economy. (Position: Right-wing)

The most active speaker was Member of Parliament Anti Poolamets (pid rYwMQ2pj_ac). He presented and developed arguments related to the inquiry, and offered a critical assessment of the proposed policy direction and technical solutions. His position has been described as other (a party-political opposition role), rather than classical left- or right-wing support.

The most active speaker was Anti Poolamets (a member of the Ekre faction), whose position on the right and his assessment had placed him in the focus of criticism, extended debate, and objections regarding speeches. His consistent participation, broad examples, and sharp comments reflect his role in the right-wing political direction.

The most active speaker was Anti Poolamets from the EKRE faction, who represents the right-wing line in the Riigikogu. He was the spokesperson for the agenda and, speaking about the topics discussed, highlighted criticism of the draft and pointed to concerns regarding the increase in bureaucracy and ideological control over the economy.

The most active speaker was Member of Parliament Anti Poolamets (pid rYwMQ2pj_ac). He posed several clarifying questions and participated in a heated debate concerning the relationship between the United States and Estonia, and the definition of democracy. His official political affiliation: right-wing politician (EKRE).

Anti Poolamets (EKRE, right-wing) was an active questioner, focusing on the lack of control over rented workers and the mass influx of foreign labor in the capital, who do not speak Estonian, criticizing the Ministry of the Interior's passivity in resolving the situation.

Anti Poolamets (member of the Riigikogu, EKRE) was the most active speaker in setting the agenda; his role was the initial introduction of the inquiry and leading the discussion. He belongs to a right-wing political organization, and his presentation emphasized fossil fuels and criticism of the previous debates in the education sector. Based on his activity, I can say that he represents a right-wing stance.

The most active speaker: Anti Poolamets (Isamaa faction). He spoke several times with his viewpoints and critical attention, representing a right-wing party perspective on the bill. His actions fell on the left-right political spectrum as belonging to the right (right-wing) wing—the Isamaa faction.

The most active speaker was Anti Poolamets (Isamaa faction, right-wing political orientation), who presented and developed the main discussion points and chaired several sections and supplementary proposals.

The most active speaker was Anti Poolamets (pid rYwMQ2pj_ac), a member of the Riigikogu from EKRE, a right-wing politician. He actively participated in discussions on the security of offshore wind farms and early warning systems, and posed clarifying questions about defense capabilities and communication strategies.