By Years: Õnne Pillak

The rhetorical style is formal and argumentative, relying on facts and figures, especially concerning economic and infrastructure topics. When criticizing the opposition, the tone is sharp and accusatory, employing terms such as "political theater," "political farce," and "mud-slinging." In social issues (such as discrimination against women), emotional and value-based language is also utilized, emphasizing the price of freedom and courage.

The style is formal and procedural, particularly evident in committee reports, which emphasize consensus-based decisions and the presentation of facts. In debates, the tone shifts to become more passionate and defensive, actively rebutting the opposition's assertions ("lies or half-truths"). It employs both logical arguments (such as the necessity of restoring order to public finances) and emotional appeals (security, the plea from pensioners to prevent war).