By Plenary Sessions: Õnne Pillak
Total Sessions: 29
Fully Profiled: 29
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the EKREIKE government, accusing them of irresponsible fiscal policy, failing to build up reserves, and creating the largest deficit (5.2% in 2020). Current critics in the opposition are accused of bitterness and hypocrisy, given that they weren't concerned about the deficit during the "good times." Separately, EKREIKE is criticized for dismantling the second pension pillar.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Opponents are criticized for being overly emotional and misinterpreting facts, especially concerning how economic forecasts are covered in the media. The speaker condemns the "painting of a bleak picture" and calls for substantive discussions rather than those that play on emotions.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The confrontation is directed against the Centre Faction, confirming their lack of support for the construction of Rail Baltic. It criticizes the opposing side for seeking reasons why the project cannot be carried out and rejects their claims regarding the insignificance of the security dimension. The opposition is sharp both politically and substantively, but it is not personal.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Insufficient data
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
None. The discourse contains neither criticism nor conflicting viewpoints, but is aimed at constructive dialogue and gathering information.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The opposition is primarily aimed at the procedural motions of other factions (e.g., the Centre Party faction) and individual members (Urmas Reinsalu, Helle-Moonika Helme). The criticism remains consistently procedural, focusing on preventing changes to the agenda. The opposition is strong and uncompromising towards most of the proposed amendments.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no criticism of the opposition; on the contrary, their bill is welcomed as a "declaration of good will" and is supported. Criticism is absent because the opposition's initiative aligns with the government's goal of reducing bureaucracy and making decisions quickly.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The opposition is being sharply criticized for procedural duplication and putting on a political show, as their draft bill addresses a topic the government is already handling at the European level. The criticism is aimed squarely at their motives, accusing them of merely seeking a "check mark" for a social media post. Nevertheless, the speaker expressed a willingness to support reasonable proposals from the opposition that contribute to achieving common goals.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The pushback is directed at colleagues who, in their statements, minimize the issue of discrimination against women or digress from the bill under discussion by introducing a "but." The criticism targets the undervaluing of the topic's importance and the loss of focus.
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no opposition. On the contrary, the speaker emphasizes that the candidate has taken into account both opposition and coalition members in their work, indicating a desire to find broad-based support on institutional issues.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient information
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The stance toward the opposition (EKRE, Isamaa, the Centre Party, collectively branded as "EKREIKE") is extremely critical and hostile. They are accused of covering up corruption scandals and engaging in political theater, as well as being "against everything and everyone." The political grievances are aimed at their resistance to all forms of development and investment (wind turbines, a nuclear power plant, tram lines), which is dismissed as politically easy and convenient grumbling.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The objection is aimed at the narrative put forth by the previous questioner, which implied a reduction in benefits for single-living pensioners. The criticism is based on facts and focuses on debunking misinformation, rather than constituting a personal attack.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is focused on the potential effects of the government's budget policy, particularly concerning social benefits. The criticism is indirect and is expressed as a question seeking confirmation that child benefits will not be affected by the cuts. This opposition is policy-based, and its intensity is moderate, focusing on achieving clarity.
2024-09-26
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at alternative economic policy approaches, without naming specific opponents. The speaker takes a stand against those who believe the only correct solution is increasing the state's debt burden and widening the deficit, as well as those who advocate for a sudden, sharp increase in the tax burden. The opposition is policy-driven and moderate in intensity, emphasizing the balanced nature of the path chosen by the coalition.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
The stance towards the opposition is critical, noting that they do not support the tax and are attempting to exaggerate the scope of the bill. The speaker urges the opposition not to downplay the necessary changes implemented for people with disabilities. The possibility of reaching a compromise regarding the motor vehicle tax is considered impossible.
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The opposition's stance is fierce, accusing opponents (EKREIKE and the Centre Party) of spreading lies and half-truths and creating a distortion of reality. The criticism is directed at political hypocrisy, recalling their own previous failures (the Centre Party's unfulfilled promise) and the taxation of pensions. The speaker specifically refutes the facts presented by Andrei Korobeinik.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no direct opposition to political opponents, as the speaker is acting as the commission’s rapporteur. The speaker neutrally conveys the concerns of stakeholders (e.g., municipalities) regarding the shortage and burnout of child protection workers. Criticism is instead directed toward systemic problems, such as the sustainability of funding after the termination of EU funds.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the previous government led by the Centre Party, which is criticized for failing to raise benefits for adults with disabilities during the economic boom. The criticism is policy- and results-based, and it also refutes earlier claims regarding the initiator of the increase in benefits for disabled children. The confrontation is specific, but ultimately there is a call to avoid "heated confrontation" more broadly.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no political confrontation. Criticism is directed at specific proposals from interest groups (e.g., the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Chamber of Bailiffs), which were rejected based on political, legal, or resource-related considerations. For example, a proposal to shorten the period during which one can work while on sick leave was rejected, citing the need for increased medical resources.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the opposition (e.g., the Arvo and EKRE factions), who claim that absolutely no decisions have been made to benefit families with children. The critique is policy-driven, emphasizing specific government achievements (such as the reform of sick care benefits and funding for rare diseases). It also criticizes the opposition’s tendency to favor overly simplified solutions.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
No direct opposition or criticism of political opponents is voiced; the critique is limited to a neutral mention of a single dissenting vote concerning the commission's procedural decision. The speaker primarily relays questions and concerns raised in the commission (for example, employers' positions on why coverage shouldn't start from day one), which were subsequently addressed by the minister.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Data is lacking.