By Months: Tõnis Mölder
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
10.2025
5 Speeches
The political focus is directed towards budget execution and the sustainability of state revenues, particularly concerning felling rights fees and dividends from state-owned enterprises. The speaker questions whether the growth in RMK dividends stems from the sustainable management of forest assets or is drawn from previous reserves. The discussion of the topic is policy- and performance-based, centering on the transparency of state financial management.
06.2025
1 Speeches
The political focus centers on the processing of legislation and ensuring the protection of fundamental rights, particularly concerning whether natural and legal persons are treated equally in cases of legal violation. The speaker demonstrates a strong commitment to detailed policy development and procedural precision. Their position is aimed at guaranteeing legal equality within the context of the proposed bill amendments.
05.2025
5 Speeches
The political focus is centered on the compliance of draft legislation with the Estonian legal order and the reduction of the administrative burden on entrepreneurs, particularly concerning sustainability reports. The speaker supports the new government's bill, citing positive assessments from the Chancellor of Justice and major business organizations. These positions are strongly policy- and procedure-centric, emphasizing the legal correctness of the draft legislation.
01.2025
1 Speeches
The political stance focuses on clarifying the historical background of the Tallinn Hospital project and correcting factual inaccuracies. The position is primarily procedural and fact-based, emphasizing the necessity of ensuring the accuracy of the transcript regarding the project's inception date.
12.2024
1 Speeches
The politician supports the general principle of reducing bureaucracy, considering it inherently commendable. However, he questions the practical value of the specific draft bill concerning renewable energy development, criticizing it as mere window dressing. This stance is policy-driven, focusing on the law's actual impact on businesses versus the reduction of the administrative burden on officials.
11.2024
5 Speeches
The political focus is currently on restricting the voting rights of Russian and Belarusian citizens in local elections—a measure the speaker strongly supports and whose draft bill he himself initiated. Another significant issue is the concern that the goals of the Green Deal are losing focus both in Europe and globally. The speaker stresses the necessity of sincerity and broad consensus during the process of amending the constitution.
07.2024
2 Speeches
The most striking position is the strong support for the swift revocation of voting rights in local elections for citizens of the Russian Federation and holders of the gray passport—a measure the speaker has considered necessary since 2022. Furthermore, the speaker demands a clear direction on the draft competition law, which the previous coalition failed to resolve. The presentation of these positions is policy- and results-driven, underscoring the coalition's responsibility to make quick decisions.
06.2024
1 Speeches
The political stance currently focuses exclusively on the accuracy of the parliamentary voting procedure. The speaker adopts a moderate position, stressing the need to correct the voting result (specifically, the number of abstentions) for the sake of the official minutes. Procedural precision and correctness are paramount in formulating this position.
01.2024
10 Speeches
The political stance is heavily geared toward criticizing the government's actions and lack of transparency, particularly concerning the delays in key development plans (forestry, environment) and the regulation of the e-cigarette black market. The position stresses that national decisions (such as those regarding nuclear energy) must prioritize the interests of the state, not those of private enterprises. Furthermore, the communication strategies employed by state agencies (like the Competition Authority) are criticized for generating political bias.