By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov
Total Sessions: 99
Fully Profiled: 99
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Strong opposition is directed at the Government of the Republic and its ministers, who are criticized for cynicism and inadequate policy (e.g., the Minister of Finance's alleged recommendation to "eat less"). The criticism is both political (the failure of the tax system) and ideological, opposing the individualistic worldview ("everyone is the master of their own destiny"). The government's actions are described as leading the country "into a deep hole."
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The confrontation is directed against the actions of the government or the commission, especially regarding the rejection of the measure and the lack of discussion of alternatives. He sharply criticizes the motor vehicle tax, citing its extremely negative public reception.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is clearly adopting an opposition stance, criticizing the government (the Ministry of Finance) for its failure to curb rising prices and ensure stable economic policy. The critique is directed at specific political decisions (tax increases) and their negative effect on the economy.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main criticism is directed at the government and the coalition, particularly regarding their tax policy (the car tax) and social policy (ignoring the poorest segments of society). The criticism is policy-driven and intense, accusing the government of losing the public's trust and exacerbating inequality. Rather than showing a willingness to compromise, critics are demanding the complete repeal of the government's policies (e.g., the car tax).
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
It does not present strong opposition, but rather constructive criticism. It demands "honest, transparent analysis" from the government regarding costs and technical capabilities. It expresses concern over bureaucracy and unrealistic obligations, but does not rule out cooperation. It criticizes the slowness of the process, not the substance.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The criticism is directed straight at the government and specifically the minister, calling into question their assertions regarding the success of the economic policy. The opposition is constructive—it poses specific questions and demands clarification, rather than simply launching attacks. It highlights the government's incompetence on economic issues, but maintains a focus on argumentative critique.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Sharp criticism of the government and its members, particularly the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice. It accuses the government of remaining silent on crucial issues and pursuing misguided priorities. It also criticizes the performance of the Prosecutor's Office and the legal system. No willingness to compromise is shown; on the contrary, it demands sweeping changes and accountability.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Sharply criticizes the ruling parties and their representatives, accusing them of disregarding the interests of the people and violating the constitution. Expresses strong opposition to the parliamentary majority’s decision to ignore the president’s concerns regarding the church law. The text employs a sarcastic tone, referring to the "miracle of the ruling party deputies" should they ever start working for the people.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
He/She systematically criticizes the government, particularly due to the slow preparation of analyses and the sluggish decision-making process. The government is also accused of placing local governments in a difficult situation through tax hikes. The criticism is primarily policy-focused, rather than personal, concentrating on specific systemic issues.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Criticizes the government’s approach to the healthcare waiting list problem, arguing that the minister’s stance regarding the insignificance of the queues is dismissive of the public. It also raises doubts about whether local municipalities receive adequate support during a crisis. Furthermore, it criticizes the opposition’s background as a potential obstacle to the adoption of draft legislation.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Levels criticism directly at the Prime Minister and the government, criticizing their tax policy and demanding concrete answers. It notes that the Prime Minister failed to answer their question regarding the reduction of the tax burden. The opposition remains constructive, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks, and offers alternatives (lowering the VAT on food).
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
It does not express direct hostility, but rather raises critical questions regarding the government's policy. It questions the rationale behind the immigration policy when there is simultaneously a large number of local unemployed people. The criticism is constructive and fact-based, not personal or ideological.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
It does not level direct criticism at specific individuals or parties, but rather focuses on solving systemic problems. It expresses frustration with the situation itself, rather than with the opponents.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
He sharply criticizes the government's slow pace of action and its bureaucratic approach. He is particularly critical of the Ministry of Social Affairs regarding the issue of the minimum subsistence level and, generally, the delays caused by various government agencies. He expresses dissatisfaction with the commissions' decisions to reject important draft legislation.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
He directs sharp criticism at the Minister of the Interior and the government as a whole regarding immigration policy. The criticism targets political decisions, not individuals, focusing instead on the policy's fundamental contradiction concerning the protection of local interests. He rules out the possibility of compromise, stating that 4,000 foreign workers are acceptable only as a temporary measure.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The Speaker sharply criticized the government's policy, accusing it of implementing tax hikes and providing inadequate technical solutions. He expressed deep skepticism regarding the ministers' claims, demanding concrete evidence to back up their assertions. The criticism remains primarily policy-focused, rather than personal, concentrating on the deficiencies in systems and decision-making.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The text launches sharp criticism against the government, accusing officials of "hypocrisy" and "bullying." It directly criticizes the government's tax policy and its attempts to restrict religious freedom. The speaker uses strong language, such as claiming the government is "steamrolling over [the opposition/the people]," and warns against opening "Pandora's box," signaling an uncompromising stance of opposition.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The criticism is directed squarely at the government, particularly regarding tax increases and green transition measures. The critique is policy-focused, not personal, concentrating instead on specific decisions and their economic consequences.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticizes the decisions of the Economic Affairs Committee and the government's policy regarding local municipalities. The opposition is focused more on policy than on personal attacks, concentrating on systemic issues in the relationship between the state and local governments.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
He/She sharply criticizes the current education system, labeling it an inefficient use of taxpayer money. He/She expresses opposition to the government's immigration policy, particularly the increase in quotas. The criticism is systemic and policy-focused, not personal.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
It criticizes the government directly, accusing them of underestimating the potential of Estonian workers. The opposition is politically focused, concentrating on the government’s failure to resolve employment issues. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, but clearly articulated.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
It adopts a clearly oppositional stance toward the government and its ministers, criticizing their fiscal and energy policies. Minister Ligi is criticized by name specifically regarding public transport funding issues. The attacks are primarily policy-focused, centering on the government's inconsistency and irresponsibility. It shows no willingness to compromise, instead demanding clear answers and changes.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is insufficient data to determine the opposition's stance.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
They adopt a critical stance regarding the government or the Ministry of Defence, demanding clarity and transparency concerning security operations. The criticism is not directed at individuals, but rather demands institutional accountability and further explanations.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Directs sharp criticism at the Reform Party government and the minister, accusing them of deceiving the public regarding the issue of tax hikes. They criticize both the policy itself (the tax hikes) and the behavior displayed (fudging the truth, outright lying). There are no signs of seeking a compromise; quite the opposite—they are leveling increasingly harsh accusations.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is no direct hostility expressed; rather, constructive criticism is offered regarding the Rail Baltic project, along with inquiries about alternative solutions. The critique is primarily practical, focusing on technical vulnerabilities instead of ideological disagreements.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The text criticizes the ENIC/NARIC decision to cease the recognition of diplomas, considering it both unjust and practically detrimental. It highlights a discrepancy between the Ministry of Education's demands and the actual capacity for providing available specialists.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Sharp criticism is aimed at the "radical politicians" and "militant politicians" who support the law on churches and congregations. The State Chancellery's symbolism advisor is also criticized in connection with the reform of religious holidays. Opponents are compared to the Soviet regime, using strong rhetoric such as "empty posturers."
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
No direct opposition stance is being expressed; the question is directed to the minister with the aim of finding a constructive solution. The criticism is aimed more at the situation itself than at specific individuals or political parties.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is criticizing the government in two key areas: education funding and energy policy. The opposition has taken a principled stand, accusing the government of lacking a mandate and adopting an ideological approach. The criticism is policy-focused, not personal, centering on the democratic legitimacy of the decisions and their socio-economic consequences.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
He/She sharply criticizes the coalition of the Reform Party and Eesti 200, accusing them of neglecting the social sector and of removing the lone pensioner's benefit (a measure implemented by the previous coalition). The opposition is principled and policy-centered, focusing on criticizing the government's priorities and decisions. It demands concrete answers and action plans.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Sharp criticism of the government and its members, accusing them of lying and implementing unfair tax policies. The Social Democratic Party was singled out for particular criticism regarding the unemployment insurance reform. [The speaker/group] warns against lying becoming a "political norm" and highlights the dangers this poses to democracy. Cooperation is not ruled out, but clear answers and transparency are demanded.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Directs sharp criticism at the parties of the previous government, specifically emphasizing the role of the Social Democratic Party in the recent tax hikes. It specifically criticizes the raising of general taxes, excise duties, and the VAT on food. The opposition remains policy-focused, not personal, concentrating solely on specific policy measures.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed directly at the government and the minister, demanding accountability for the worsening plight of pensioners. The critique is policy-focused, not personal, concentrating instead on the failure of the system.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Sharply criticizes the current government and ministers, specifically for their excessive focus on analysis and the lack of practical solutions. It accuses the government of failing in regional policy and allowing the deterioration of service accessibility in rural areas. At the same time, it offers constructive cooperation, calling on the government to accept the Center Party's assistance, a move that demonstrates pragmatic opposition.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The individual moderately criticizes the parliament's decision to forgo a vote on the reservists' compensation law and instead delegate the matter to "a narrow circle of people." They express concern regarding the lack of oversight authority among the relevant agencies, yet maintain a constructive tone, avoiding personal attacks.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker voiced moderate criticism regarding the minister's priorities, but framed it constructively. The opposition's focus is more policy-driven than personal, centering on the effectiveness of the government's performance in the area of citizen protection.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker does not express direct opposition to specific individuals, but rather criticizes the system and processes. The criticism is constructive, offering solutions (the creation of a commission) to mitigate the problems.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
He/She sharply criticizes the government and its policies, calling them ideologically motivated and completely disconnected from the needs of the people. The government is accused of failing to grasp the consequences of its actions ("does the government even know what it's doing?"). Reference is also made to the Finance Minister's allegedly indifferent attitude toward the economic hardships faced by the public.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
It directly criticizes the policy of the Minister of Education, especially the regional wage policy and language proficiency requirements. The opposition is primarily policy-focused, not personal, concentrating on the system's logical inconsistencies and the analysis of practical consequences.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Directly criticizes the Prime Minister and the government, citing low public support and demanding accountability for specific policy measures. The opposition is policy-driven rather than personal, focusing on the government's effectiveness and transparency. It also mentions other opposition parties (the Centre Party, Isamaa, EKRE) in a neutral tone.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
He sharply criticizes the bill's proponents, accusing them of political manipulation and attempting to eliminate their competitors. He asserts that the opposition is confusing the significance of local and national elections. He warns specifically against the creation of a "fifth column" and faults the opponents for their lack of statesmanship.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The government is criticized for its passivity in maintaining the monuments of the War of Independence. The criticism is primarily policy-based, focusing on the government's priorities and funding decisions. The tone is demanding, but not personally aggressive.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker refers to the "ideological orientation of the green transition," which may suggest a critical attitude toward extreme green policy approaches. However, this is not a direct attack, but rather a question of finding a balanced approach.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker does not express direct opposition, but instead asks clarifying questions regarding the presenter's proposal, focusing on identifying practical problems.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Expresses strong criticism of the current government, accusing it of implementing tax increases, demonstrating indecisiveness, and avoiding responsibility. Specific points of critique include the failure of Nordica, soaring electricity prices, and the sluggish pace of increasing subsistence benefits. The opposition is principled and encompasses both political and procedural dimensions.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
It clearly adopts an opposition stance toward the government, criticizing economic policy and the offshore wind farm project. The criticism is primarily policy-focused, concentrating on specific decisions and their impacts. It expresses direct dissatisfaction with the minister's responses, but maintains the boundaries of politeness.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Levels direct criticism at the Prime Minister and the government, accusing them of excessive deliberation and slow decision-making. The government's approach is criticized as fruitless bureaucracy ("you create committees, you debate, you hold consultations").
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Due to the scarcity of data, it is not possible to analyze the oppositional stance.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It does not express direct criticism, but rather supports the government's tax policy changes. The questions are aimed at obtaining clarification, not at launching attacks or expressing opposition.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The text indirectly criticizes Nordica's management and expresses skepticism about the handling of major state projects in general. The critique is constructive and systemic, rather than personal, focusing on management issues as a systemic question.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
It adopts a clear opposition stance regarding the energy policy of the minister and the government, criticizing their lack of trustworthiness and clarity. The criticism is primarily policy-based, focusing on specific promises and their fulfillment, rather than resorting to personal attacks.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Sharp criticism was leveled at the government and the bill’s proponents, accusing them of acting solely for the sake of power and attempting to divert attention away from ongoing scandals. It is claimed that the bill’s true objective is political gain, particularly in light of the upcoming Tallinn local elections. The criticism targets both the political substance and the underlying motives, with no mention made of any possibility for compromise.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker avoids expressing direct criticism or taking an oppositional stance. Instead, he focuses on maintaining a constructive dialogue with the minister concerning the funding of sports facilities.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker sharply criticizes the government's policies, accusing it of "verbal acrobatics" and dividing society. He compares the government's actions to the repressive policies of the Soviet Union regarding the restriction of religious freedom. The criticism targets both the political substance and the approach, emphasizing the danger the government's activities pose to national security.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
It criticizes the government's tax policy and its impact on the welfare of the population. It questions the government's decision-making process, specifically inquiring about the coordination between coalition partners. The opposition is constructive, focusing on policy measures rather than personal attacks.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
It directly criticizes the coalition, accusing it of opposing the bank tax and implementing an unfair tax system. The attacks are policy-focused, not personal, concentrating on specific policy choices. Opportunities for compromise are not mentioned; the position is categorical.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a clear opposition stance toward the government while maintaining a constructive tone. Criticism is not directed at individuals but demands concrete answers regarding political decisions and greater inclusion of the opposition, citing public support.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
It expresses veiled criticism regarding the decision-making process, which may be confined solely to the level of party leaders, but maintains a polite and constructive approach. It is not directly aggressive, but rather seeks clarification.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
It adopts a distinctly oppositional stance towards the government, criticizing both social policy and the ambiguity surrounding national defense funding. The criticism is primarily policy-focused, centering on specific measures and their deficiencies. It highlights the government's contradictions and unfairness in the process of policy-making.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data is available.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Levels sharp criticism at coalition MPs, specifically targeting the Reform Party and its partners (the Social Democrats, Estonia 200). Accuses them of acting against the interests of the people and engaging in deceit, employing personal attacks ("nice people who make not-nice decisions"). Demands that a motion of no confidence against the coalition be considered.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
It adopts a distinctly oppositional stance toward the government, leveling criticism at both healthcare and tax policies. The critique is mainly policy-centric, focusing on systemic issues and demanding specific solutions. It employs ironic phrasing, such as "with tax rallies," to characterize the government's policy.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
He/She indirectly criticizes the current government, pointing out that "good decisions get so politicized that nothing ever comes of them." Hope is expressed that the upcoming elections will give the public an opportunity to assess the current administration's actions. The opposition is moderate and constructive, avoiding personal attacks.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The Speaker is directing criticism squarely at the Infrastructure Minister and the government, demanding a thorough justification for the Tallinn-Vilnius rail link. The criticism is primarily policy-driven, focusing on the project's efficiency and the utilization of taxpayer funds. The opposition remains constructive, seeking clarification rather than resorting to personal attacks.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Does not express direct hostility, but instead raises critical questions regarding government policy. The criticism focuses mainly on political decisions and their impact, rather than personally attacking politicians. The questions are aimed at improving policy, not merely criticizing for the sake of it.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
It does not express outright hostility, but critically questions the adequacy and effectiveness of the government’s decisions. It is particularly critical of the cuts to the culture sector and the drawn-out decision-making process concerning the Estonia Theatre. It supports the Centre Party’s proposal for a public referendum, which indicates an oppositional stance.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Sharply criticizes the government's budget policy and the ministers' apparent incomprehension of the budget. Specific unjustified cuts (such as the police stations in Lasnamäe and Maardu) are highlighted as examples of the government's flawed decisions. The criticism is mainly policy-based, not personal.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
It expresses clear opposition to the government's economic policy, particularly the tax hikes and the sale of state assets. It directly criticizes the continuation of the "tax spree" and the adoption of the budget, vowing to vote against it. The opposition is principled and uncompromising.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is no direct opposition expressed; the speaker is rather posing a constructive question about potential problems during the system's implementation.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Expresses skepticism towards mining companies and their environmental protection promises. It indirectly criticizes the carrying out of studies, arguing that they are nothing more than a pretext for starting mining operations. The opposition is policy-driven rather than personal, focusing on environmental protection issues.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Sharply criticizes the governing coalition and its policies, accusing them of implementing taxes aimed at the poor and engaging in mere PR stunts. It claims that the coalition is using the pretext of security to justify unpopular taxes and may label the opposition as "enemies of the people." It supports the Centre Party's alternative tax proposals.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker directly criticizes the government and its ministers, including the Prime Minister, accusing them of contradictory rhetoric concerning social cohesion. The criticism is substantive, focusing on the disconnect between the government's public promises and its actual policy implementation.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Expresses clear and principled opposition to the government's tax policy, criticizing its inconsistency and anti-public nature. The opposition is policy-centric, not personal, focusing on specific policy measures and their consequences.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker sharply criticized the government and voiced support for the Centre Party, asserting that the true purpose of the proposed bill is to weaken that specific party. He accused his opponents of adopting urgent bills without proper analysis and engaging in political calculation, especially in connection with the power struggle currently underway in Tallinn.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The opposition adopts a clearly oppositional stance toward the government and the minister, criticizing their policies regarding tax hikes and benefit cuts. Specifically, they criticize the decisions to reduce support for large families and cut the allowance for single pensioners. The opposition is policy-focused and constructive.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
It directly criticizes the government’s policy, particularly the formality of engagement and the lack of results. The opposition is policy-centric, focusing on procedural shortcomings and the government’s failure to fulfill its promises in the areas of pensions and education.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
It sharply criticizes the governing coalition, accusing it of disregarding the interests of the people and dragging its feet on political decisions. It stresses that the VAT bill has been before the Riigikogu for the fourth time now, without any outcome. It criticizes specific ministers (referencing the minister who dubbed the measure a "robbery tax") as well as the government's strategic decisions concerning the railway sector.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Clear opposition is expressed regarding the infrastructure tax, but this is done constructively by offering alternatives. Criticism is directed at the substance of political decisions, not at individuals personally. On the issue of foreign missions, direct opposition is not voiced; instead, the government's positions are supported.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
A direct opposition stance is not evident. Instead, it expresses constructive concern regarding the practical implementation of the government's education policy, focusing on identifying problems and seeking solutions.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Avoids direct criticism of specific individuals or parties. The main criticism is directed against excessive bureaucracy and regulation at the EU level. It emphasizes the need to avoid "excessive interference in the sovereignty of member states" and "over-regulation," which could stifle innovation and development.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Criticism is leveled at the efficacy of the government’s anti-drug campaign, emphasizing that the current measures have failed to yield results. The tone is not overtly aggressive; rather, it calls for explanations and superior solutions. The focus of the critique is on the policy’s effectiveness, not the individuals themselves.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Raises critical questions to government ministers, particularly the Minister of Finance, concerning the fairness of tax policy. Criticizes the system where the state imposes obligations on local municipalities but fails to assume corresponding financial responsibility. Also questions the Minister of the Interior regarding ensuring the safety of women within the Riigikogu (Parliament).
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker criticizes the government's policy regarding the funding of pensioners' associations, but does so constructively, seeking explanations and solutions. The criticism is policy-focused, not personal, concentrating on specific decisions like the removal of fixed cost support. The attitude is more questioning than aggressive, seeking opportunities for dialogue.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
An outright opposition stance is not being demonstrated. The questions are aimed at clarifying the government's actions, not at launching attacks. The attitude is focused more on fulfilling a control and oversight function than on confrontation. Criticism is absent; instead, explanations and plans are being demanded.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is not expressing direct opposition, but rather offering constructive criticism regarding the current approach to regional policy. He/She challenges the concept of the "golden ring" and emphasizes that Harju County also faces many challenges that should not be ignored.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The text expresses clear criticism of the government's austerity policy, particularly concerning the decision to close the Consulate General. It questions the justification behind these decisions and asks directly why they were made. Crucially, the criticism remains focused on policy, avoiding any personal attacks.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
They sharply criticize the ruling coalition and its austerity policy. They accuse the leader of the coalition party of demanding overly rapid cuts. The opposition is both principled and emotional, focusing heavily on the social impact of the policy. There are no signs of a willingness to compromise.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Direct opposition is not evident—rather, it raises constructive questions and concerns about the functioning of the current system. Criticism is expressed through questions, not as direct accusations.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Direct criticism is not expressed; instead, questions are posed constructively regarding the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ efforts to influence NATO allies. The approach is more investigative than accusatory.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The text expresses criticism regarding the government's fiscal policy, citing the previously lost 800 million euros as an example of prior issues. Furthermore, it systematically criticizes the lack of transparency inherent in the budget process.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Criticizes the previous government for scaring the public and suggests taking concrete steps instead. Criticism is also directed at NATO countries that have failed to meet the 2% defense spending target. The text mentions that "even the Social Democrats get it," referring to the negative impact of revoking voting rights, which implies criticism aimed at the Social Democrats.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker does not express direct opposition, but gently criticizes the bureaucratic approach to language proficiency assessment. The criticism is constructive and aimed at improving the system, rather than being personal or sharp political attacks.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The speaker adopts a clear oppositional stance toward the governing coalition and, specifically, the minister. The criticism is primarily policy-based, focusing on the contradiction between the coalition’s austerity rhetoric and its actual behavior. The attacks are moderate but consistent, concentrating on highlighting systemic problems.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker voiced clear opposition to the government's car tax policy, criticizing both the increase in bureaucracy and the unreasonable nature of the redistribution. The fairness of redistributing funds among local municipalities was criticized particularly harshly, with the speaker pointing out that millions of euros had already been taken previously without the promised compensation.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
Criticizes the current government for failing to deliver on its promises, using the phrase "they talked a big game" and stressing that "naturally, nothing has been done so far." The criticism is primarily focused on performance and policy, not personal attacks.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The data is insufficient. The text of the oath does not contain criticism or references to the opposition.