Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-05-20
Political Position
The speaker adopts a clearly oppositional stance regarding the tax hikes implemented by the Reform Party government, strongly criticizing the increase of both income tax and VAT to 24%. They emphasize that the tax burden is being unfairly placed on the shoulders of the working populace, while simultaneously demanding cuts in state spending and a more equitable distribution of the tax burden. The speaker accuses the government of outright lying, given that the security tax, which was initially promised to be temporary, is now being made permanent.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a good grasp of the tax system, mentioning specific tax rates (income tax and VAT at 24%) and the validity period of the security tax until 2028. Shows an understanding of fiscal policy and the principles governing the distribution of the tax burden. Uses accurate facts regarding government promises and how they have changed.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs confrontational and emotional rhetoric, accusing the government of "fibbing" and outright "lying." The language is direct and accusatory, utilizing evocative phrases like "a heavy blow," "the back door," and "a weak spine." Rhetorical questions are posed to emphasize the government's contradictions and perceived injustice.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on the limited data, it is not possible to draw conclusions about activity patterns.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Directs sharp criticism at the Reform Party government and the minister, accusing them of deceiving the public regarding the issue of tax hikes. They criticize both the policy itself (the tax hikes) and the behavior displayed (fudging the truth, outright lying). There are no signs of seeking a compromise; quite the opposite—they are leveling increasingly harsh accusations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Based on the limited data, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the style of cooperation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Based on the limited data, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the regional focus.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The statement expresses clear opposition to tax hikes, particularly the increase of income tax and VAT to 24%. It demands state expenditure cuts and a fairer distribution of the tax burden, criticizing the current policy as detrimental to the working population. Furthermore, it questions the use of defense spending as a justification for these tax increases, suspecting that the real goal is merely general budget patching.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Based on the limited data, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding social issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It focuses on issues of taxation and fiscal policy, particularly criticizing the government's policy of tax hikes. It demands clarification regarding the link between defense spending and the tax increases, and accuses the government of breaking its promises by making temporary taxes permanent.
2 Speeches Analyzed