Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-03-19
Political Position
The commentator clearly takes a critical position toward the government, accusing it of indecisiveness and avoiding responsibility. They strongly support increasing national defense funding, specifically the indexing of compensation for reservists and the retention of experienced defense personnel in service. The text emphasizes the Riigikogu's role as a decision-maker, not a supplicant, and demands swift action on national security issues.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Exhibits a profound understanding of national defense issues, especially regarding the reservist compensation system and the personnel policy of the defense forces. Demonstrates knowledge of the work of the National Defense Committee and the technical aspects of the legislative process, specifically referencing the opportunities for submitting amendments between parliamentary readings. Uses concrete examples of government failures in various sectors.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It employs emotionally charged and confrontational rhetoric, combining it with concrete examples. The tone is critical and demanding, utilizing figurative language, such as describing the government as a "headless chicken." It appeals to both rational arguments and emotions, emphasizing urgency and accountability.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on limited data, it indicates active participation in national defense issues and in discussions held during the plenary session. It refers to earlier inquiries directed to the Minister of Social Affairs, which demonstrates consistent activity across various policy fields.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Expresses strong criticism of the current government, accusing it of implementing tax increases, demonstrating indecisiveness, and avoiding responsibility. Specific points of critique include the failure of Nordica, soaring electricity prices, and the sluggish pace of increasing subsistence benefits. The opposition is principled and encompasses both political and procedural dimensions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Demonstrates a readiness to cooperate with colleagues from the National Defence Committee, but expresses differing views regarding their approach. Calls on colleagues to support the draft legislation, but shows no willingness to compromise with the government. Emphasizes the role of the Riigikogu (Parliament) as the ultimate decision-maker.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
He criticizes the tax hikes and demands an increase in the subsistence benefit, pointing out that with the current 200-euro allowance, "you can't even afford to keep a cat." He expresses concern over the state's wasteful spending, citing the example of Nordica. He supports increasing national defense funding, viewing it as a necessary investment.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on the draft bill concerning the indexation of compensation for reservists and the reform of the pension system for active servicemen. It stresses the importance of the legislative process and the Riigikogu's role in making decisions, rather than simply awaiting government promises. Interest is shown in proposing amendments between the first and second readings.
3 Speeches Analyzed