Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a Proposal to the Government of the Republic" (630 OE)
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker takes a clear stance that Parliament should issue robust guidance to the government for the creation of an action plan aimed at combating fraud. They strongly support Parliament taking an active role in setting tasks with specific deadlines, while criticizing the sluggish response of the relevant agencies. The speaker stresses the need for swift solutions, citing the protracted procedure for raising the subsistence level as a negative example.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Shows a strong grasp of inter-agency cooperation, specifically citing the areas of responsibility for the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs and the Ministry of the Interior. Demonstrates practical experience in IT sector training and civic education, providing the specific example of the city of Maardu's experience in involving people with disabilities in training programs for the elderly.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The approach used is both emotional and personal, emphasizing how people are doubly penalized through state taxes and fraud. It incorporates real-life examples and uses direct appeals to the audience ("believe!", "this request is for all of you"). The style remains moderately critical yet constructive, providing concrete solutions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Refers to regular communication with ministers, specifically mentioning repeated questions directed to the Minister of the Interior and the Digital Minister. Demonstrates active engagement at the local level in Maardu, where practical solutions have been implemented to assist the elderly. Also actively participates in parliamentary debates concerning important issues.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The text criticizes the slow and bureaucratic approach taken by the agencies, particularly the Ministry of Social Affairs, regarding the issue of the subsistence level. Dissatisfaction is expressed with the ministers' "non-committal answers" and the commission's decision to reject the draft bill. The criticism is primarily procedural and focused on performance and results.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The text emphasizes the necessity of societal cooperation, urging engagement with the Harju County Council of Persons with Disabilities and the involvement of students. It supports inter-agency collaboration but insists on the leading role of Parliament. Furthermore, it demonstrates openness to finding practical solutions in partnership with various stakeholders.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Cites a specific example of a solution implemented in his/her hometown, Maardu, where a young man with disabilities was involved in conducting IT training for the elderly. Mentions the Harju County Council of People with Disabilities as a potential cooperation partner. This demonstrates a strong link to practical solutions at the local level.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Criticizes the state's tax burden on the populace, emphasizing the double strain caused by taxes and fraud. Supports raising the subsistence minimum from the current level of 200 euros, citing the inadequacy of current pensions. Calls for greater financial resources for police work in combating fraud.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It focuses on protecting the elderly from fraud, emphasizing civic responsibility and strong family ties. It supports the inclusion of people with disabilities in carrying out socially beneficial activities. It demonstrates concern for the welfare of vulnerable groups, including pensioners.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Strongly supports Parliament's initiative to provide the government with guidelines for drafting an action plan to combat fraud. It criticizes the Commission's decision to reject the draft bill, demanding the establishment of time-bound tasks. It emphasizes Parliament's role in making robust decisions on important societal issues.
3 Speeches Analyzed