Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Political Position
Sõnaja takes a clear stand against the amendments to the law on churches and congregations, strongly emphasizing the constitutional freedoms of religion and speech. It supports the President's decision not to promulgate the legislation and criticizes the parliament's attempt to forcefully push the law through. This position is value-based, centered on maintaining constitutional order and the balance between institutions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a strong grasp of constitutional processes, particularly the balance of power between the president and the parliament. He/She shows knowledge of the history of church-state relations in Estonia and the rights guaranteed by the constitution. He/She employs precise legal terminology and refers to specific institutions such as the Supreme Court and the Chancellor of Justice.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone of voice is urgently cautionary and emotionally charged, employing rhetorical questions and dramatic language ("slippery slope," "to force through"). The style is formal yet passionate, blending logical arguments derived from constitutional principles with emotional appeals. It utilizes direct address toward colleagues and and the public.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All three contributions took place on the same day (September 17, 2025) concerning the same topic, demonstrating active involvement in the discussion. The first two were brief questions, while the third was a detailed statement of position. This suggests a strategic approach—starting with clarifying questions and concluding with a comprehensive stance.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker sharply criticizes the parliamentary majority, accusing them of ignoring the president and undermining the constitutional order. The critique focuses primarily on procedure and principle, rather than being personal. He rules out any compromise on this specific piece of legislation, demanding that the law be scrapped entirely.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is insufficient data regarding the collaboration style. Although the speaker addresses colleagues with an appeal, there are no specific references to collaboration or compromise.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is insufficient data regarding the regional focus.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is insufficient data on economic views.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker is focusing on defending religious freedom, stressing its constitutional significance. They express concern that the proposed legislation could restrict the activities of religious organizations and the dissemination of religious messages. Their stance is distinctly liberal regarding religious freedom, advocating for the church's autonomy against state interference.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is clearly acting against the law and actively working to obstruct it. He/She focuses not only on the specific piece of legislation but also on broader legislative processes and the inter-institutional balance. He/She emphasizes the necessity of ensuring that laws comply with the constitution.
3 Speeches Analyzed