Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Inquiry regarding coping policies (no 736)
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The author adopts a clearly left-wing social democratic position, strongly emphasizing the state's responsibility for citizens' welfare. They sharply criticize the Reform Party and Eesti 200 coalition for neglecting social policy and demand concrete steps to support those in need. Furthermore, they categorically oppose the withdrawal of the single pensioner's allowance, labeling the move unjust.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates in-depth knowledge of social policy, citing specific statistical data regarding the number of subsistence benefit recipients. Shows expertise concerning the pension system, cost of living indexation, and the mechanisms of social benefits. Uses precise figures (60 million euros for nursing homes) and technical terms such as the individual income tax rate.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Employs emotional and compassionate rhetoric, emphasizing the importance of human stories in political decision-making. Poses rhetorical questions ("How can the withdrawal of such support be justified?") and uses direct addresses to the Minister. The style is passionate and accusatory, yet maintains the framework of parliamentary decorum.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speeches will take place on the same day (May 12, 2025) within the context of the interpellation, demonstrating active participation in the discussion of social issues. This refers to the continuation of the previous agenda item, indicating consistent monitoring of the topics. It calls for further notification from the ministers in the future.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Sharply criticizes the coalition of the Reform Party and Eesti 200, accusing them of neglecting the social welfare sector. It expresses strong opposition to the previous coalition’s decision to withdraw the benefit for single pensioners. The opposition is principled and policy-focused, not personal.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
He politely addresses the Minister with questions and requests clarifications, demonstrating a constructive approach. He calls upon "dear colleagues" to stand united on behalf of the people, signaling a readiness to cooperate on social issues. The tone is assertive, but not hostile.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The text focuses on nationwide social problems, without mentioning specific regions or local characteristics. It references the role of local municipalities in the upkeep of care homes and the concerns of social workers, but the regional focus remains general.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Strongly supports state intervention in economic processes to ensure social justice. It demands the automatic linking of subsistence benefits to cost of living indexing and criticizes insufficient pension increases. It emphasizes the state's obligation to guarantee adequate funding for the social welfare sector.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Focuses intensely on issues of poverty and social inequality, particularly the plight of pensioners and low-income families. It emphasizes the state's moral obligation to care for vulnerable groups. It criticizes the reduction of social benefits as a moral injustice.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It calls for specific legislative changes: the restoration of the allowance for pensioners living alone, linking the subsistence benefit to the cost of living index, and the digitalization of the benefit application process. It focuses on improving and simplifying the social protection system, demanding an action plan from the government in the social sphere.
4 Speeches Analyzed