Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Draft law amending the Defence Service Act (563 SE) - first reading
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker clearly advocates for strengthening national defense, supporting the indexation of compensation for reservists and retaining experienced defense personnel in active service. There is strong criticism directed at the government's indecisiveness, particularly regarding tax hikes and social benefits. The speaker stresses that the Riigikogu's role is to make decisions, not merely to request them from the government.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a strong grasp of national defense issues, citing specific problems such as the fact that reservists' compensation has remained unchanged for eight years, and matters concerning military pensions. It also references details of social policy, such as the inadequacy of the 200-euro subsistence benefit.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Uses emotionally charged and critically sharp rhetoric, comparing the country's governance to a "headless chicken." Combines specific examples (the failure of Nordica, the rise in electricity prices) with general accusations directed at the government. The tone is urgent and demanding.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on limited data, it is not possible to draw conclusions about activity patterns.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Sharp criticism aimed at the government, accusing it of indecisiveness and shirking responsibility. The criticism specifically targets the Minister of Social Affairs and, more broadly, the government's failure to deliver on its promises. The opposition remains principled and uncompromising, demanding a more active role for the Riigikogu.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The text refers to collaboration with colleagues on the National Defence Committee, but criticizes their excessive trust in the government. It urges colleagues to support the draft bill, but overall does not emphasize a willingness to cooperate with the government.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Based on the limited data, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the regional focus.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
He/She criticizes tax increases and high electricity prices, citing Nordica's failed investments. He/She supports increasing national defense funding through compensation for reservists. Overall, he/she is critical of the government's economic policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The text mentions the inadequacy of the subsistence benefit, criticizing the meager 200-euro support. It emphasizes the importance of people in the context of national defense but does not address broader social issues.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It focuses on national defense legislation, particularly the indexation of compensation for reservists and issues concerning military pensions. It emphasizes the Parliament's role in decision-making and supports the submission of amendments between the first and second readings.
3 Speeches Analyzed