Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker clearly adopts an oppositional stance towards Prime Minister Kristen Michal in the context of the motion of no confidence. They emphasize democratic legitimacy, pointing out that over 70% of the population supports the opposition, and call for the opposition to be more involved in decision-making processes. The position is moderately critical, yet constructive.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of public finance, specifically inquiring about the utilization of 2.6 billion euros and mentioning investments and various measures taken. They also display political analysis skills by referencing public opinion surveys and approval ratings.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetoric is polite and formal, utilizing traditional forms of address ("Thank you, Mr./Madam Speaker! Esteemed Prime Minister!"). The style is inquisitive and constructive, leaning more toward factual basis than emotional appeal. The speaker employs a diplomatic approach, acknowledging the Prime Minister's message before offering criticism.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on limited data: two speeches delivered during the debate on the motion of no confidence on the same day. This demonstrates active participation in parliamentary debates and consistent questioning of government policy.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is targeting Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the government, but is maintaining a constructive tone. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the inclusiveness of decision-making processes and the transparency of public finances. There are no personal attacks; rather, the opposition demands accountability and explanations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Expresses a clear desire for cooperation, calling for greater involvement of the opposition in decision-making processes. It emphasizes that this would benefit both the governing parties and the Estonian people, demonstrating a readiness for compromise and a constructive approach.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Demonstrates interest in the transparency of state finances, specifically inquiring about the utilization of 2.6 billion euros. Stresses the importance of investments but demands more detailed explanations regarding the allocation of state funds.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focusing on government accountability and transparency, while actively participating in the proceedings of the no-confidence motion. It emphasizes the importance of the democratic decision-making process and calls for a greater role for the opposition in lawmaking.
2 Speeches Analyzed