Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Request for information regarding the restoration and resilience plan and the use of oil shale (no. 668)
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker clearly adopts a defensive position regarding the Estonian oil shale industry, asking the Prime Minister whether the European Union's emissions reduction requirements are truly so strict that no alternatives exist. The speaker emphasizes the experience of other countries (the USA, Brazil, China, Israel) in utilizing oil shale and demonstrates moderate opposition to a rapid abandonment of oil shale.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a solid grasp of the international oil shale industry, naming specific countries (USA, Brazil, China, Israel) and posing technical questions regarding various processing technologies. Furthermore, they demonstrate an understanding of the European Union’s environmental policy and the requirements for reducing emissions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
They employ a series of questions directed at the Prime Minister, which constitutes a polite yet determined approach. The tone is constructive and fact-based, focusing on technological solutions and international benchmarking. Emotional rhetoric is avoided in favor of logical argumentation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on the limited data, we can only say that the speaker is actively participating in parliamentary discussions regarding the Recovery and Resilience Plan. No further data is available.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker avoids expressing direct opposition, instead critically questioning the European Union's environmental requirements and their inevitability. The approach is more skeptical than hostile, seeking alternatives to the rapid phasing out of oil shale.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker politely addresses the Prime Minister, using the official form of address, "Lugupeetud Peaminister" (Esteemed Prime Minister). This demonstrates respect for inter-institutional cooperation and the pursuit of constructive dialogue.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It clearly focuses on Estonia's national interests, comparing Estonian technologies with those of other countries. It emphasizes the opportunities for preserving the Estonian oil shale industry through international experience.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It demonstrates support for investments in developing oil shale processing technologies, signaling a commitment to economic growth and technological advancement. It inquires about potential alternatives that could preserve the industry's economic significance.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Based on limited data—the speech does not directly address social issues such as education, healthcare, or social policy.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on the Recovery and Resilience Plan and the regulation of oil shale usage, with specific questions being asked about policy formulation. It demonstrates an interest in finding legislative solutions that would allow for the sustainable development of the oil shale industry.
1 Speeches Analyzed