Session Profile: Andres Metsoja
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-10-14
Political Position
The political position strongly centers on the principles of public transport financing, advocating for the necessity of passenger contributions and completely opposing free transport funded entirely by the taxpayer. The speaker views the revenue sharing matrix for ticket sales as a matter of principle, demanding that the funds remain within the region where they were generated. This position is deeply rooted in policy and underscores the importance of regional financial equity.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in public transport financing and regional finance, utilizing specific terminology such as "ticket revenue," "taxpayer cost," and "matrix." He/She focuses on the system's inequitable distribution of revenue, where regions requiring co-payments subsidize areas offering free transport.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, addressing the minister directly with a sharp question. The tone is critical and principled, emphasizing the importance of the topic with the phrase "a very fundamental question."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed at the state's stance and policy, which permits the redistribution of ticket revenue among regions that already have completely free public transport. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on the unfair procedure of the current funding system.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly regional, emphasizing the need to ensure that the money collected through public transport co-payments genuinely remains in the region where it was generated. The speaker is defending the regions that contribute their own share to the public transport fund.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives favor the principle of user contribution in public transport financing, suggesting a preference for user-based financial discipline over general taxpayer expense. The speaker opposes the centralized redistribution of revenues, arguing that it disadvantages regions that rely on co-financing.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently aimed at a critical reassessment of the public transport financing matrix and the principles governing the distribution of ticket revenue. The objective is to ensure that funds collected through local contributions remain within the area where they were gathered.
1 Speeches Analyzed