By Agendas: Eero Merilind

Our style of cooperation is direct and constructive, involving formally addressing the Minister to obtain information. This signals a readiness to engage with the executive branch on issues of policy implementation.

The cooperation style is consensus-based, underscoring shared responsibility and a common pact ("Estonia 2035" as this common pact). Concrete cooperation with local municipalities is highlighted through the permanent funding of mental health services and the provision of more flexible care instruments.

The collaborative style is open and respectful, addressing the minister directly to seek clarification. This indicates a desire to obtain clear and accurate information from the government.

The speaker works within the framework of the steering committee, where amendments were discussed and voted upon, with the voting results being presented (e.g., members who voted for or against the EKRE proposal). He/She emphasizes cooperation with the Ministry of Social Affairs and the Ministry of Justice and relies on external legal opinion. Although the discussion was lengthy, the committee stood firm on its position and rejected the proposals that failed to gain support.

The cooperation style is consensual and procedural, emphasizing that proposals within the commission (such as adding a draft bill to the agenda) were made by consensus, even though there was one dissenting vote during the ballot. The involvement of organizations (local governments and pensioners' associations) in the discussion is also mentioned.

Insufficient data.

No data available

The working style is highly consensus-driven and open to compromise, as all procedural decisions were reached by consensus. The Commission broadly engaged various stakeholders, such as Tehnopol, the Union of Pharmacists, and the Health Board, and fully considered the technical amendment.

The style of cooperation is consensual and collegial, emphasizing the commission's unanimity when making procedural decisions. The commission cooperated in questioning the minister and raising concerns. Procedural decisions were made by consensus (6 in favor, 0 against, 2 abstentions).

The collaborative style is consensual, as the Social Committee adopted all four amendments by full consensus. The speaker emphasizes that the discussions included the views of various stakeholders, with the aim of creating a supportive and effective child protection system.

The speaker adopts a collaborative style, expressing support for the bill and posing a clarifying question, which demonstrates a readiness to contribute constructively to the legislative process.

The cooperative style is consensual and open, stressing that all procedural decisions within the Social Affairs Committee were reached by consensus. Furthermore, positive reference is made to the explanations provided by Minister of Health Riina Sikkut, which support the objectives of the draft bill.

There is not enough data.

The speaker demonstrates a readiness for cooperation, acknowledging the Social Affairs Committee's interest and pertinent role in addressing this issue. Communication with the Chancellor of Justice remains open and is focused on clarifying specific potential solutions.

The style of collaboration is open and respectful, addressing the Prime Minister with words of thanks. The speaker demonstrates a willingness for constructive dialogue to ensure a proper understanding of the policy details.

The collaborative style is expressed through an appeal to members of the Riigikogu to support the bill, stressing the shared objective of improving public health. Specific cooperation partners or a willingness to compromise with other political parties are not mentioned.

The collaborative style is constructive and supportive; the speaker addressed the minister directly and commended his presentation. The speaker is seeking clarification on the implementation details of the draft legislation, signaling a readiness to assist in carrying out the policy.

The interaction style is polite and question-oriented, with the server being addressed formally ("Dear Server!"). Direct and detailed questions are posed, requiring the server to take a stance on regulatory issues (e.g., the prohibition of plastic bottles).

The collaborative style is polite and direct, communicating with the presenter (Irja Lutsar) in the form of a question. This demonstrates a desire to ensure that a shared and important position (the importance of vaccines) resonates throughout the hall.

The style of cooperation is respectful and constructive, involving addressing the Prime Minister directly and thanking him for the presentation, which signals a readiness for dialogue and the search for political solutions.

Insufficient data