Session Profile: Irja Lutsar
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-06-04
Political Position
The political focus is directed towards evaluating the practical consequences and international alignment of a specific political decision (likely a time zone change). The speaker is cautious and critical, demanding evidence regarding the support of Estonians and the negotiations held with European countries. The main concern is Estonia's regional isolation from its neighbors (Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Sweden) if the time standard differs by half a year.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the necessity of public opinion polls in Estonia and the complexity of international coordination. The expertise focuses on analyzing regional disparities (the time difference with neighboring countries) and their practical consequences. Furthermore, the need to ascertain the specific basis upon which the presenter's belief in European support rests is highlighted.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is polite, yet demanding and analytical, focusing on requesting specific knowledge and evidence. The tone is direct and logical, avoiding emotional appeals, and includes a brief, confident note regarding voice volume ("I can speak loudly"). The speaker asks the presenter to shed light on the topic, indicating a desire for a fact-based explanation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The activity was limited to participation in the plenary session, where a courteous introduction was given, followed by a detailed round of questioning directed at the presenter. The speaker also responded to a technical issue (audibility) and was prepared to immediately adjust the volume of their voice.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed against the preparation and underlying basis of the proposal put forward by the rapporteur, questioning both the failure to investigate Estonian support and the absence of international consultation. The criticism is substantive and procedural, demanding the presentation of evidence instead of mere belief. The intensity of the opposition is moderate, manifesting as questions and requests for clarification.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of collaboration is formal and courteous, expressing gratitude to both the presenter and the manager. The cooperation involves seeking knowledge and clarifications to assess the viability of the proposal, which indicates a readiness for further discussion once the evidence has been presented.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus is very strong, centering on Estonia's position within the context of the Nordic and Baltic countries. There is a particular emphasis on the need to synchronize the time standard with neighboring countries (Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Sweden) to prevent Estonia from becoming a "small island" isolated in a different time zone.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently directed toward the thorough scrutiny of the draft bill concerning the major political change (the time standard). The priority is ensuring that legislative decisions are grounded in research and international coordination, rather than mere belief. The speaker is serving as the critical reviewer of the proposed initiative.
3 Speeches Analyzed