Agenda Profile: Irja Lutsar
First reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the European Parliament Election Act (lowering the voting and candidacy age) (414 SE)
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The political stance centers on lowering the voting and candidacy age for both European Parliament and Riigikogu elections, a measure the speaker strongly endorses (on behalf of Eesti 200). The framework for this position is both value-based and policy-driven, highlighting trust in young people and acknowledging their existing capacity for decision-making by the age of 16. The speaker views this legislative change as a tool for boosting the political activity and motivation of youth.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the legal and social definitions of adulthood, drawing comparisons between the onset of biological and social maturity. Specifically, emphasis is placed on the current legal duties and rights of 16-year-olds, such as marriage, parenthood, obtaining a driver's license, and full-time employment. The argument is supported by historical (Estonian Congress 1990) and international examples.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is persuasive and logical, relying on facts (a list of laws, international comparisons) and personal experience (speaking in schools). The overall tone is optimistic and trusting towards young people, calling on colleagues to trust the youth. The second speaker uses a short, direct, and accusatory rhetorical question directed at the opponent (Urmas Reinsalu), accusing him of populism.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively engages with youth, visiting schools to give talks, and notes that the young people involved in the Riigikogu were able to convince him/her with their arguments. Participation in sessions that run late into the evening hours is also noted.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed both at specific colleagues (Jaak Valge, Urmas Reinsalu) and at general skeptical arguments concerning youth suffrage. The speaker refutes claims regarding young people being more easily influenced and lacking life experience, pointing out that adults also cast their votes based on other criteria. Reinsalu is criticized directly through accusations of populism.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by repeatedly and supportively referencing the arguments made by the previous speaker, Hanah. The call for support is directed at all colleagues, asking them to trust young people and back the proposed bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the national level (Estonian laws, the Riigikogu) and the international level (European Parliament elections, comparisons with European countries and the United States of America). A specific local or regional focus is absent.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social theme is the political inclusion and trust of young people, emphasizing their social maturity and capacity to make responsible decisions. The speaker strongly supports expanding the civil rights of youth, citing the example that 16-year-olds already make significant life choices (e.g., selecting their educational path).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on supporting the Act Amending the European Parliament Election Act (Bill 414 SE), which aims to lower both the voting age and the age requirement for candidacy. The speaker is a strong proponent and initiator of this specific draft legislation (on behalf of Eesti 200).
2 Speeches Analyzed