By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas
Total Sessions: 81
Fully Profiled: 81
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The criticism is directed against the government's actions, particularly concerning its failure to reach a long-term agreement on teachers' salary increases for the coming years. The confrontation is policy- and procedure-based, directly questioning the Prime Minister about their satisfaction with the outcome of negotiations with the Association of Local Governments.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The confrontation is directed against the government and the minister, who are sharply criticized for breaking promises and constantly postponing the draft Language Act. The criticism is both procedural and political, expressing strong distrust in the coalition's competence. The speaker argues that the government does not consider the role of the Estonian language important enough.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the system and government institutions that permit requiring Russian language proficiency from employees, while simultaneously ignoring the lack of service in Estonian. There is also opposition to the passive attitude, where people "simply shrug their shoulders" when service is unavailable.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponent is the government coalition and the Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas, who is criticized for breaking promises, causing delays, and general inefficiency. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, specifically accusing the government of failing to take concrete steps and postponing important legislation (such as the Language Act). Attention is also drawn to the decision made by the majority of the Cultural Committee, which prevented the timely discussion of the bill aimed at averting the strike.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the prime minister, accusing them of shirking responsibility regarding the teachers' salary increase and failing to provide formal legal decisions to back the agreements. Criticism also extends to the mechanism used for distributing the differentiation fund, which incentivizes local governments to keep qualified teachers at a lower pay grade.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is directed at the government as a whole, and specifically Minister Liisa Pakosta, who is being criticized for a lack of trust, obfuscation, and strategically ill-conceived decisions. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the political mandate and procedural deficiencies (the hiding of reports). No willingness to compromise is being shown; instead, they are demanding the immediate resignation of the government.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at negative budgetary policy tendencies in science funding (the scattering of funds between ministries) and the pressure from real estate development targeting the Tallinn Song Festival Grounds. Organizational decisions that threaten the continuity of cultural tradition are also criticized (e.g., the loss of scholarships for choir conductors). The criticism is policy-driven and structural.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The primary criticism is aimed at the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, questioning the PM's party loyalty and the government's immigration policy. The criticism is moderately intense, featuring both personal barbs and policy-based opposition to increased immigration. The government's solutions regarding the labor shortage are considered insufficient or misguided.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at those who support joining the Ottawa Convention and complete disarmament, whom he accuses of the unrealistic attempt to be "more diligent on paper." The criticism is policy-driven and strategic, stressing that such actions would pose a significant threat to the civilian population. Specifically, it is noted that Isamaa was the only party that voted against the convention in 2004.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker is fiercely opposed to the ruling coalition, criticizing them both for failing to deliver on political promises and for procedural delays (specifically, the lack of a draft language law). The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of weakening the status of the Estonian language and abandoning the target salary for teachers. The speaker also notes that the coalition voted down the necessary amendments proposed by Isamaa.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed primarily at the system's deficiencies and the lack of coordination between local municipalities, which results in inefficient and haphazard decisions. It is emphasized that some investments have become futile, indicating dissatisfaction with the current planning structure.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The criticism is aimed at the government and the ministry for a lack of systematic approach, insufficient planning, and the failed implementation of reforms. Specific examples cited include the haphazard establishment of state high schools and the absence of proper consultations. A particularly strong point of criticism is the attitude, rooted in an inferiority complex, that permits the role of the Estonian language in higher education to diminish. The critique focuses on policy and procedure.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is primarily aimed at the minister and the government (Valitsus), accusing them of scaling back ambition, delaying amendments to the Language Act, and failing to deliver on promised salary increases for teachers. Separately, former Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev is criticized for the insufficient funding of activities outlined in the action plan. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
There is no direct oppositional stance; the criticism is limited to the previous speaker's swift departure from the podium, which prevented a question from being asked. The main objective is to obtain explanations and support for their proposals from government authorities (the Minister, the Ministry of Climate).
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Strong opposition to the policies of the government and the Ministry of Economic Affairs, especially regarding the plan to change the foreign labor quota. [The speaker/group] criticizes the government for ridiculing previous population policies but expresses satisfaction that the plan to amend the quota has been dropped, asserting that this happened under pressure from the opposition.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, whose plan to allow people from anywhere to participate in local elections has met with fierce opposition. The criticism is both political (a regional policy blunder) and procedural, accusing the government of merely faking productivity and deceiving local residents.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the government’s budget policy, particularly the idea of cutting the Ministry of Culture’s budget, which has been labeled as peculiar. Previous culture ministers or ministry officials are also criticized for failing to take the Book Year initiative seriously—a critique based on their inaction. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, not personal.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is sharply criticized on political and ideological grounds. The criticism centers on the Reform Party's deviation from market economy principles and its support for state subsidization. The speaker calls into question the opponent's fundamental value system.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism targets Russia's active influence operations and those local municipalities that are resisting the transition to Estonian-language education. The number of stateless persons who neither apply for Estonian citizenship nor learn the language is also criticized, as they are particularly susceptible to manipulation. This stance is policy- and value-based, centered on guaranteeing national security.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The main criticism is directed at the government, which is accused of having an overly lenient immigration policy and a desire to import cheap labor. The criticism is political and focuses on the inadequacy of the draft Language Act, as it does not include sufficient language requirements for service workers.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The primary adversaries are the proponents of increasing the quota, including the prime minister and employers who seek to drive down wage levels. The criticism is intense and focuses on political ideology and unfair economic motives that harm local workers.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the government and ministers, sharply criticizing the rushed process and insufficient preparation in carrying out crucial reforms. The criticism is primarily procedural and policy-based, accusing the government of prioritizing austerity over social priorities. Furthermore, those who deem issues of national culture unimportant are also being criticized.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the prime minister and the government’s policy regarding foreign labor, which is viewed as undercutting wage levels. Criticism is also aimed at cooperation with representatives of Eesti 200, who are mentioned as being enthusiastic about the introduction of foreign labor. The criticism is policy-based and intense, calling the government’s motives into question.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No direct confrontation is articulated, but criticism is aimed at an earlier funding change, which was an "unwelcome surprise" for other research and development institutions. The current focus is on clarifying the ministries' funding schemes, not on personal attacks.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are members of the Riigikogu (Parliament), who are warning about the potential negative consequences of revoking voting rights, such as residents becoming enraged and turning against the state. The criticism is intense and politically charged, with opponents accusing the other side of essentially justifying anti-state activities. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding that the will of the majority of the people be implemented.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The criticism is directed at the speed and priorities of the government's actions, particularly concerning the drawn-out delay in establishing the defense industry park, which is framed as both procedural and results-based criticism. Quotes emphasizing the need for urgency, previously made by former government members (Kaja Kallas, Hanno Pevkur), are also brought up to highlight the current sluggish pace. Furthermore, there is opposition to the view that allocated funds should be spent solely on technology, stressing instead the crucial importance of people.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is directed at the Ministry of Education for the rushed nature of the reform, insufficient principles of stakeholder engagement, and communication that generates uncertainty. At the political level, the Reform Party is criticized for its role in stalling the Education Agreement bill, citing the lack of sign-off from Finance Minister Ligi. The criticism targets the substance and procedures of the policy, not the individuals involved.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism targets the government's low level of credibility among the public, a problem presented as stemming directly from the government's own actions. This is performance-based criticism, demanding that the government take steps to restore trust, even though specific political opponents are not criticized by name.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The standoff is directed at the Minister of the Interior and the government's immigration policy. The criticism is policy-based, alleging that the official rhetoric conceals the true aim of bringing cheap labor and economic migrants into the country, who will also bring their families with them.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at cabinet ministers within the government’s inner circle who have publicly stated that allocating 5% of GDP to defense spending is not feasible. The resistance is occurring at the political level, casting doubt on the nation's capacity and ambition regarding security provision.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opponents are organizations and individuals who run negative campaigns against high birth rates and ridicule the creation of a family. Criticism is also directed at those who label speakers who value the family (e.g., "far-right extremists," "radicals," "proponents of birth machines"). The speaker accuses the opponents of disregarding the survival of the Estonian nation, directly linking this to threatening national security.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications for drawing up a tourism development plan that disregards culture, and more broadly, at the government for treating culture as secondary. The criticism is both procedural and political, highlighting that the Ministry of Culture’s proposals are requested far too late. The speaker finds the failure of other ministries to value culture to be "stunning."
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary confrontation is with the Ministry of Education and Research, which is being sharply criticized for rejecting the Isamaa amendment proposal and branding it as discriminatory. The criticism is intense, accusing the ministry of engaging in activities that "discriminate against Estonians" and of twisting the constitution. The speaker clearly declares that due to the ministry's position, they are unable to support the draft Basic Education Act.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The criticism is aimed at the coalition partners, particularly the Social Democrats (Socs), whose proposed changes to electoral procedures (pre-registration, loyalty checks) are being treated with irony and viewed as unreliable. Aggressively acting states (Russia, Belarus) are also sharply criticized for their interference and hostile behavior directed against the Estonian electoral process.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at officials of the Ministry of Education and Research (HTM), who are accused of concealing the true situation from the minister and unrealistically relying on internal reserves. The objection is both financial and procedural, as the law places vocational schools at legal risk regarding student admissions. The speaker also criticizes the deficiencies of the education agreement concerning the financing of vocational education.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The criticism is aimed at those who previously objected to bringing nationwide topics down to the local level. Skepticism is also expressed towards those who consider the sentiment of stateless persons towards the Estonian state to be too friendly, arguing that this masks a potential security threat. It is emphasized that individuals with undeclared Russian citizenship pose the same threat as citizens of a declared aggressor state.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The opposition is aimed at the current government’s activities and the prime minister’s promises. Critical attention is also drawn to the work of the previous administration (Kaja Kallas) and the necessity of amending its policies. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, focusing specifically on taxation and the achievement of climate goals.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Direct opposition is not being voiced, but criticism is aimed at the government's dominant role in initiating legislation. The speaker is advocating for greater independence and initiative for the Riigikogu without government guidance.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The main opponent is the governing coalition, which is being accused of breaking promises (teachers' salaries) and devaluing culture. Criticism is also directed at the Finance Committee, which disregarded good proposals without providing any justification. Intense language is being used, accusing the government of "running under the bar of our own culture."
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for breaking previous salary promises and for the lack of a formal procedural decision regarding the financing of the career model. The criticism is sharp, calling into question the credibility of the government’s promises and demanding more vigorous action from the Minister of Education during budget negotiations.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the questioners who ideologically took the abortion debate beyond the substance of the draft bill, and at those "accusers" who criticize the economic impact of the tax exemption for land under one's home. The criticism targets the inaccuracy and ideological bias of the opposing sides' arguments.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the government's policies, particularly regarding tax hikes and decisions to centralize regional policy. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, describing the government's actions as making life harder for people.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The criticism is aimed at the policies of the government and the Ministry of Education and Research, particularly concerning the reduction of funding for small schools and the shifting of goals. The speaker also criticizes a specific clause in the agreement between the education workers' union and the government, which could provide municipalities with an excuse to close schools. The resistance is based on policy and procedure, warning against creating false hopes regarding the preservation of the educational network.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main adversaries are the government and the coalition, who face criticism for lacking political integrity and failing to deliver on their promises. The criticism targets both policy (the car tax, the school network) and procedure (the stalling of bureaucratic processes). While the Regional Minister is described on a human level as "hapless," the political situation surrounding him is, in the speaker's estimation, "extremely tough."
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the government as a whole, accusing other ministries of working against regional balance. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on centralization, the pricing policies of state-owned enterprises, and the content of the education agreement, which pressures local municipalities to close schools. The efforts of the Regional Minister are acknowledged, but the lack of support from their colleagues is criticized.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main criticism is directed at the current government coalition, accusing them of failing to deliver on the promises outlined in the coalition agreement and lacking regional political will. The criticism is policy- and results-based, citing the widening gap between the ratio of teachers' salaries and the average wage as an example. The previous government (2022–2023) is also being criticized for the poor state of Estonian finances.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the government's actions concerning prison management and the inadequate honoring of historical memory. Specific criticism focuses on the failure to properly commemorate heroes, and the minister is directly questioned regarding the absence of threat assessments, implying an underestimation of security risks (e.g., "Putinists in a dormant state"). The criticism is rooted in policy and values.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Criticism is directed against the government and the committee handling budget decisions, faulting them for passivity and blindly trusting the government. The objection is politically and procedurally justified, focusing on the inadequate response to changed economic circumstances.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the logic presented by the minister regarding the equal treatment of services between those who are working and those who are raising children. The criticism is political and value-based, calling into question the future security of the state and the foundations of service provision.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opposition is directed at the government and the prime minister concerning the plan to raise the immigration quota and disregard the strengthening of Estonian language requirements. Strong criticism is also aimed at employers who wish to import low-wage labor, which suppresses local wages and takes jobs away from Estonians. The criticism is policy- and value-based.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the government and the minister who are promoting zero-based budgeting as a cost-saving measure. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government that the method they are championing does not result in genuine national savings, but merely generates unnecessary administrative workload.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are state-owned monopolistic enterprises (such as Elektrilevi), which are accused of prioritizing profit and efficiency over addressing consumer issues. The criticism is directed at their operating model, which involves bureaucratically exhausting citizens and suppressing demands through financial threats.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
While direct contemporary political opponents are not criticized, the speaker takes a strong stand against the Soviet occupation and the Red Terror. This opposing stance is directed towards valuing historical events and preserving their memory, thereby challenging the policy set by the Ministry of Defence.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Ministry of Education and Research, citing poor coordination, the failure of technical systems, and a delay in accepting responsibility. The criticism is both procedural and results-oriented, demanding that the ministry assume greater institutional responsibility to restore the state's credibility.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The main opponents are the Social Democrats and the Centre Party, who are accused of cynical politics and fostering a victim mentality. The criticism is intense and focuses on political motives (voter capture) and stances that threaten national security. The Social Democrats' desire to retain voting rights for citizens of the aggressor state in local elections is criticized particularly sharply.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main confrontation is with the government coalition and the Reform Party, who are accused of wrecking Estonia’s finances and strong-arming the implementation of the car tax. The criticism is sharp, focusing on political accountability and the social and procedural deficiencies of the law. The coalition’s accusations that the opposition is to blame for all the trouble were rejected.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The opposition's stance is strong, directed against the Reform Party and the prime ministerial candidate, criticizing their repetitive rhetoric about "fixing the country." The criticism targets both political decisions (the tax hump, Kulka funding) and procedure (the lack of priority given to education in the prime ministerial candidate's speech).
2024-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The speaker is in the opposition, criticizing the minister for an arrogant attitude toward members of parliament and questioning the government's capacity to successfully see major initiatives through to completion. The criticism is directed against the lack of policy implementation and oversight, particularly regarding the placement of children who lack language proficiency into Estonian-language environments.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The primary targets of criticism are the Georgian government, which stands accused of using repression and Russian methods against dissidents. There is also criticism directed at the internal hypocrisy within the European Union, which seems to reward forces that are either pro-Russia or fundamentally anti-EU. The criticism is sharp and principled, directly connecting the actions of these adversaries to Russian influence.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Strong opposition is aimed at the governing coalition (the Reform Party and the Social Democrats), which is being criticized for deliberately delaying the processing of amendments to the Language Act. The criticism is severe, accusing the coalition of serving the interests of the company Bolt and allowing "massive circumvention of the law." There is no willingness to compromise, as the situation demands immediate action, not the production of analyses.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the minister or a government representative, who stands accused of idealizing the attitudes of Russian citizens and providing an unrealistic assessment of the situation. The criticism itself is substantive and stems from a lack of confidence in the veracity of immigrants' responses during sociological polls.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary adversaries are the governing coalition (accused of failing to deliver on promises, lacking the ability to cooperate, and demonstrating fiscal irresponsibility), as well as the Tallinn city government and architects. Tallinn’s leadership faces sharp criticism for failing to understand the development needs of the national opera and for proposing irrational solutions. A compromise on the cultural project (the Estonia extension) is ruled out entirely, as the alternatives offered are deemed nonsensical.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at representatives of the Moscow Orthodox Church, particularly Patriarch Kirill, who are accused of failing to deliver a message of peace and ceasefire during the carnage taking place in Ukraine. The criticism is intense and morally driven, calling into question the Church's role during the conflict.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism primarily targets procedural violations by Riigikogu committees (specifically, delays in processing draft legislation) and the slow, ineffective performance of both the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Education. The Ministry of Finance is criticized because, despite working on the coefficients since 2018, they have produced no results. The Ministry of Education, meanwhile, is criticized for using excessive bureaucracy and the complexity of legislative changes as an excuse. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is with the government and its ministers, who are being criticized for raising the immigration quota and concealing existing exceptions. The criticism is aimed at political dishonesty and short-sightedness, which leads to security threats and facilitates the importation of cheap labor. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, the government is being demanded to thoroughly reconsider the matter.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main adversary is the minister/government, whose policy is being criticized for raising the immigration quota. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of concealing its true objective and favoring the importation of cheap labor instead of highly qualified specialists.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main targets of criticism are the current government and the Reform Party, who are accused of failing to deliver on the promises of the coalition agreement and leaving the Minister of Education isolated. The criticism is primarily policy-based and procedural, focusing on budget deficits and the use of one-off payments instead of permanent expenditures. It is claimed that the government’s actions have damaged trust and led to a breakdown in industrial peace.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the coalition, particularly concerning the budgetary uncertainty within the education sector. The Social Democrats and Jevgeni Ossinovski are directly criticized for failing to deliver on their promises and for their inconsistency, stressing the need to look for solutions in the future, not the past. The criticism targets the inefficiency of the government's actions and its failure to fulfill commitments.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Government of the Republic as a whole, citing the failure to fulfill promises, the lack of unified responsibility, and the slow pace of negotiations. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, demanding the collective responsibility of the government and that the issue be brought under the direct leadership of the head of government. The government's inaction is described as "disappointment" and "deception."
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Direct political opponents are not criticized, but concern is expressed regarding pointless duplication and the resulting financial burden on the state, specifically referencing the Ida-Virumaa film campus. The criticism is instead aimed at the potential side effects of the draft bill and the lack of future funding allocated for the seventh and eighth projects.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed squarely at the government's actions, particularly concerning the repeated failure to deliver on promises and the chosen funding mechanism. The opposition is primarily procedural, focusing on how the funds of the Cultural Endowment (Kultuurkapital) are being utilized and the creation of a new financial "side channel," the sustainability of which is highly questionable.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary criticism is aimed at the government partners (the Reform Party, Eesti 200) for their desire to increase the immigration quota and at the government for the insufficient enforcement of Estonian language proficiency requirements. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, highlighting the security threat posed by communities resistant to integration (Russians and Muslims). Opposition is also directed at granting voting rights to citizens of the aggressor state.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary conflict is with the government, which is being criticized for submitting the car tax bill—a move labeled a poor decision given the public's ability to cope financially. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the negative impact of the legislation and the administrative inefficiency it creates (the necessity of mapping data that should already be easily accessible).
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister, sharply criticizing proposals by ministers (such as Riisalo) to increase the immigration quota and their failure to adhere to population policy. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of organizing an uncontrolled influx and endangering state security. The speaker demands that the Prime Minister rein in the members of his cabinet.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism targets the government’s handling of research funding distribution and the slow pace of processing the draft law concerning the organization of R&D. This criticism is policy-driven, stressing that the current funding model (40:40:20) is detrimental to national research institutions and universities, as it channels funds into projects with potentially weaker quality control. Furthermore, the practice of financing service contracts at the expense of core research funding is also under fire.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government, which is being criticized over the threat of a teachers' strike and the unfair models used to fund the education system. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, demanding specific corrective actions from the government and accusing them of delaying the implementation of support measures.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponents are Martin Helme (EKRE), who is criticized for making false claims and being absent from a crucial vote, and the prime minister, who is accused of breaking promises made in the coalition agreement and failing to address strike prevention. Criticism directed at the government is intense and focuses on the political failure to secure funding necessary to fulfill their commitments.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main opponent is the current government, which is directly blamed for causing the teachers' strike and pushing society to the brink of stress. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the government's failure to adopt a "tangible solution" during wage negotiations. The government's actions are described as undermining the foundations of the state.
2024-01-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The primary opposition is aimed at the government coalition, which is being criticized for its inability to find 10 million euros for teachers' salary increases and to prevent the strike. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of failing to fulfill its promises and the Ministry of Education of adopting a rigid legalistic approach. Also criticized are "education gurus" who advocate for shrinking the school network in order to find money.