By Months: Mihkel Lees

Total Months: 11

Fully Profiled: 11

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

1 Speeches

Direct opponents are not named, but the speaker indirectly criticizes the earlier setting of budget priorities, which allowed civil protection to be overshadowed by military national defense. The criticism is directed at shortcomings in policy and procedures, not individuals, and is of moderate intensity, presenting a question to the minister for an assessment.
Details View Details
09.2025

2 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the previous legal framework, which is considered fragmented, unclear, and peculiar because civil protection was not codified into law. Direct political opponents are neither mentioned nor criticized in the speech; instead, the focus is on rectifying the system's deficiencies.
Details View Details
06.2025

3 Speeches

The opposition is directed at Mr. Grünthal’s draft bill concerning the termination of daylight saving time in Estonia, as it conflicts with the desire to await a pan-European solution. The opposition is primarily political and procedural, stressing that the Riigikogu should not make a decision that "runs ahead of the train." As the Reform Party faction, he also expressed opposition to the recently submitted amendments regarding the agenda.
Details View Details
05.2025

1 Speeches

The speaker expresses support for the bill under consideration and addresses the Minister respectfully, meaning there is a complete absence of any opposition or criticism.
Details View Details
04.2025

2 Speeches

The primary confrontation is aimed at EKRE, who is accused of spreading baseless claims regarding wind farms. The criticism is intense and focuses on the harmful impact of the opposition's activities on people's mental health, which could lead to sleep disorders.
Details View Details
03.2025

2 Speeches

The direct political opponent is not criticized, but the speaker indirectly criticizes the current survivor's pension system due to its inadequacy, inequality, and failure to fully cover the costs of raising children. In a procedural address, he poses questions to the initiators of the investigation, calling into question the necessity of their work.
Details View Details
02.2025

1 Speeches

There is absolutely no opposition; the speaker, on the contrary, emphasizes that no objections or additional comments regarding the draft bill were submitted by the parliamentary groups, members of the Riigikogu, or interest groups. No criticism is being directed towards any party.
Details View Details
12.2024

5 Speeches

The opposition's position remains strong and consistent, particularly concerning the proposals put forward by Isamaa, which have been repeatedly rejected. The primary criticism targets the opposition's attempts to remove the security tax bill from the parliamentary agenda. The criticism is both substantive (policy-based) and procedural, accusing opponents of growing weary of security issues.
Details View Details
11.2024

1 Speeches

The opposition is being directly criticized for intimidation and misrepresenting the content of the pending bill, with claims that their statements are false. The criticism is intense and focuses on political dishonesty in the presentation of facts, especially concerning pensioner benefits.
Details View Details
10.2024

3 Speeches

The opposition is indirect and primarily aimed at potential critics who fear that people will be left vulnerable due to cuts in the social sector. Specific opposing parties or individuals are not being criticized; instead, the focus is on preemptively refuting objections by emphasizing the positive impact of the care reform.
Details View Details
06.2024

2 Speeches

Insufficient information
Details View Details
Back to Profiling