By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller
Total Sessions: 141
Fully Profiled: 141
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is fiercely opposed to the European Union budget proposal, which is viewed as a threat to the sovereignty and fiscal independence of member states. This stance is value-driven, highlighting the dangers of centralization and the linking of ideological conditions (such as the 'green frenzy' or LGBTX issues) to financial disbursements. The speaker pessimistically asserts that the budget is "one big bubble" and that the negotiations are leading nowhere.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is highly critical of the government's actions, particularly concerning fiscal transparency (specifically, depreciation accounting) and amendments to the Planning Act. The speaker vigorously opposes proposals that restrict the public's ability to participate in planning processes, accusing the opposition (the Social Democrats/Sots) of suppressing public opinion. The focus is policy- and accountability-based, demanding clarification regarding budget figures and the practical implications of the legal amendments.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political focus is on the critical analysis of the state budget and the financial position of the general government sector. The speaker questions the accuracy of the budget presentation, inquiring about the justification for excluding non-cash expenditures (such as depreciation) from the 2026 budget. The stance is strongly policy- and performance-based, centering on the demand for fiscal transparency.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly oppositional and results-oriented, arguing that the government's development strategy is "rotten" and focuses on consequences rather than underlying causes. Key points of emphasis include the lack of regional balance, the disregard for food security, and the harm inflicted upon rural life through tax hikes (car tax, income tax, and VAT) and the reduction of subsidies. The speaker accuses the ruling coalition of pursuing a deliberate policy that exacerbates regional marginalization.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political stance centers on criticizing the government's actions and transparency in the realm of national defense and security. The speaker casts doubt on the actual substance of cooperation with allies, dismissing it as mere rhetoric, and demands concrete results and metrics (e.g., the number of ships inspected). The criticism is strong and aimed directly at the government's performance and accountability.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient information.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The political platform is strongly opposed to tax increases, particularly concerning the land tax, which he/she believes damages agricultural producers and jeopardizes food security. He/She criticizes the government's inertia and past procedural errors in passing legislation, demanding a more substantive approach. He/She highlights EKRE's role in reducing land tax rates in local municipalities, thereby establishing a clear counter-position to the government's overall tax policy. The political focus is centered on supporting agriculture and addressing regional issues.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker expresses strong opposition to the government's legislative work, particularly concerning the crisis management bill, which aims to merge three existing laws. This position is strongly value-based, focusing on the fear of the government gaining "unlimited authority" to restrict people's movement and seize property during a crisis situation. Furthermore, criticism is directed at the government's inability to fulfill its promise to reduce bureaucracy, as well as its incompetence in international relations (citing the incidents involving the US and Lithuanian ministers).
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The political stance is highly critical of the government's actions, focusing specifically on poor planning and a lack of accountability. The speaker stresses the necessity of correcting previous decisions based on the National Audit Office's report and demands that those responsible (the Chancellor, the Minister, and the head of RKIK) be identified in connection with the "bare cupboard." This position is strongly focused on evaluating the efficacy of the government's performance.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The political stance is vehemently opposed to the tightening of beekeeping subsidy conditions, which excludes small-scale producers with fewer than 16 bee colonies. This approach is policy- and results-driven, emphasizing the negative impact of these cuts on the agricultural sector and producer cooperation. The speaker stresses the importance of making subsidies accessible to all beekeepers, regardless of the number of hives they maintain.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
This is a strong opposition politician who focuses on holding the government accountable and highlighting the failure to deliver on coalition agreement promises, particularly concerning regional policy. Stants is highly critical, demanding explanations from the Prime Minister and cabinet ministers regarding the impact of tax hikes and planned budget cuts. Their political stance targets both the government’s operational decisions (cuts, taxes) and the broader political culture (procedural rules).
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The political focus is on the country's economic competitiveness and the sharp criticism directed at the government's tax policy. The speaker opposes the government's idea that stagnation constitutes progress, emphasizing that Estonia has stalled among the Baltic states. The stance is strongly results-oriented, concentrating on the deterioration of Estonia's position in international rankings and the rising cost of living.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The political stance centers on strong opposition to amendments to the Waste Act, particularly the introduction of a new waste management cost fee, which is viewed as a hidden tax hike. The criticism is aimed at the state shifting its responsibilities onto local municipalities and worsening the financial situation of the populace. The speaker frames the government's actions as both ineffective and increasing bureaucracy.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly anti-government and results-oriented, focusing on the ethical and legal evaluation of the government's activities. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's inability to hold "their own people" accountable (e.g., the Lehtme, Pihlakodu cases) and accuses the government of arbitrary rule over the Estonian people. This stance is strongly oppositional and value-based, demanding accountability.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political platform strongly advocates for tax cuts, especially reducing income tax, so that working people have more money left in their pockets. This is framed as taking care of the Estonian people and ensuring the security of the state, sharply contrasting with the government's policy of raising taxes. The position is strongly value-driven and results-oriented, accusing the government of neglecting its own citizens.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political stance centers on strong criticism directed at the government concerning national security and labor policy. The speaker stresses the necessity of defending the eastern border and encouraging people to return to rural areas to enhance security. Furthermore, they are vehemently opposed to importing cheap foreign labor, viewing it as a threat to the future of the Estonian population and social services. The political framework is deeply value-driven and highly critical of the government's activities.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on energy security and pricing, demanding a derogation from the CO2 system due to the security situation and criticizing emissions trading. Furthermore, he/she defends private property against state nationalization and restrictions. His/Her views are predominantly policy- and value-based, questioning the government’s handling of the public’s economic well-being. He/She also criticizes the implementation of gender quotas, challenging the definition of the underrepresented gender.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The political position is strongly focused on demanding accountability from both legal entities (care homes) and private individuals (referencing the Slava Ukraini case). Emphasis is placed on the shortcomings of the legal system, and strict adherence to laws is demanded, particularly concerning the liability of legal entities. There is also indirect criticism of the coalition partner’s activities, implying that political connections are preventing Pihlakodu from being held accountable.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political position is firmly against the judicial administration reform, viewing it as a cunning ploy to shift responsibility and facilitate the closure of regional courthouses. The criticism targets the government’s hidden agenda and is primarily outcome-based, stressing the negative impact on regional services. The speaker is concerned that the minister will be able to politely recuse himself from decisions regarding the shutting down of courts.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The political stance focuses on criticizing the government's handling of the implementation of the care reform. The speaker accuses the ministers of passing the buck (the Minister of Social Affairs blaming the Minister of Justice, and vice versa) and questions the future sustainability of the reform. This position is strongly results-oriented and demands improved oversight.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on economic policy and lowering taxes, particularly reducing excise duties and VAT to bring down food prices. The speaker sharply criticizes the previous and current coalitions for their failed tax policies and demands accountability from politicians for their poor decisions. The stance is strongly results-oriented, emphasizing that you cannot tax your way to prosperity.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance centers on challenging the government's financial strategy and accountability. The speaker questions the minister's new designation ("Revenue Minister") and demands clarification on how the €2.6 billion wind farm investment is accounted for in the revenue and expenditure calculations. Furthermore, they criticize the omission of climate issues from the economic slides, demonstrating forceful, results-driven criticism.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's regional policy, emphasizing the link between the vitality of rural areas and the security and existence of the state. The criticism targets specific political decisions (tax increases, closure of services) that worsen the livelihood of rural residents. The stance is heavily value- and results-based, accusing the minister of presenting factual errors and lacking political vision.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most crucial issue is the abolition of CO2 quotas, which the speaker strongly endorses, viewing it as a highly sensible proposal. He/She stresses the necessity for Estonia to seek a derogation from the European Union, allowing it to trade without CO2 quotas. The political framework is clearly based on policy and regulation.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position centers on ensuring the clarity and unambiguous nature of the draft legislation, particularly regarding a sensitive subject like end-of-life declarations, which is referred to as a "difficult issue." Emphasis is placed on the necessity of avoiding contradictions within the law's provisions and guaranteeing the transparency of procedures. This stance is primarily procedural and focused on the quality of the legislation itself.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker adopts a highly confrontational stance toward the government, focusing on the creation of social inequality through tax policy and the state's inability to ensure the safety of vulnerable groups in care homes. The political focus centers on the failure of the government’s actions and the value-based protection of the weakest members of society. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes a statement made by a government minister, which, in their assessment, is divisive and tears the country apart by creating unnecessary distinctions.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on reducing the VAT on food items to 5%, which is viewed as the absolute minimum the coalition should undertake to support the public. This stance is strongly supportive, underscoring the necessity of easing price pressure on consumers and boosting the rural economy. The political framework is clearly aimed at providing economic relief and enhancing national security.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on the energy sector development plan and the preservation of oil shale, strongly opposing the phase-out of oil shale in electricity generation and industry. This position is policy- and results-based, emphasizing the need to ensure security of supply and the necessity of conducting prior impact analysis. The EKRE faction firmly supports the current proposal, which tasks the government with presenting the action plan to the Riigikogu, considering this a necessary step. The goal is to rectify previous, botched decisions.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The political focus is directed at the performance of the justice system and the expediency of administrative costs within ministries. The speaker is demanding accountability and the acceleration of proceedings related to high-profile cases (Slava Ukraini), emphasizing the need to restore public trust. The views expressed are strongly performance-based, calling into question the necessity of the ministry's new position (events organizer).
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is on protecting the environment and the economy from the negative impact of the explosive population growth of cormorants. The speaker adopts a strong, policy-driven position, urgently calling for the implementation of mitigation measures to curb the bird numbers and safeguard fish stocks. Specific emphasis is placed on the necessity of allowing spring lethal deterrent hunting to minimize damage to the fishing industry and coastal fishermen.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political platform is strongly opposed to the expansion of state control and surveillance, voicing concerns about the drift towards a "surveillance society" and a "police state." Furthermore, they reject bureaucratic restrictions on personal identity, such as regulations dictating the length of names on official documents. This approach is clearly value-driven, prioritizing civil liberties over state intervention.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly opposes the draft law on gender quotas, dismissing it as a mere displacement activity. The political focus must be outcome-based, stressing the necessity of improving the well-being of the Estonian people and establishing the conditions necessary for economic growth. He/She criticizes the Ministry of Finance, which appears to treat gender quotas as an indicator of economic growth.
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is clearly procedural, expressing readiness and consent to stand for election (likely for an internal position within the Riigikogu). The overall stance is positive and supportive of their own candidacy. Information regarding political or value-based viewpoints is unavailable.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus centers on the legal repercussions of implementing sanctions and the issue of administrative burden. The speaker is skeptical that the proposed legislative changes will actually reduce bureaucracy, given that they impose additional costs and new operational duties on businesses. Furthermore, the necessity of clarifying employee liability in cases of sanctions violation, particularly when mandatory reporting is required, is emphasized. This stance is policy- and performance-based, highlighting the contradictions between the government's stated goals and the bill's actual practical effect.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker supports the draft bill under discussion, deeming it reasonable. However, they simultaneously express strong criticism regarding the perceived cheapness of renewable energy, particularly wind power, stressing that consumers are ultimately required to cover the additional investments needed for building high-voltage transmission lines. The political focus is centered on the cost-effectiveness and fairness of energy policy, maintaining a strong policy- and results-driven approach.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is on the relationship between international law and domestic law, especially concerning the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention. The speaker is moderately skeptical, calling for concrete examples and cases that would prove that ratifying the protocol would solve a real problem in Estonia. This stance is aimed at assessing the justification and effectiveness of the policy ("what problem are we solving").
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing its criticism on both the necessity and the substance of proposed legislation. Specifically, there is opposition to the softening of the Aliens Act, which allegedly solves none of the existing problems, and criticism is leveled at the introduction of the undefined concept of "third person" in the Political Parties Financing Supervision Act. The framework of this position is primarily policy- and procedure-driven, calling into question the expediency of new regulations.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is sharply critical of the government’s ideological directions, particularly regarding the green transition propaganda, which is viewed as purely ideological. The speaker expresses deep concern over the drastic decline in the birth rate and demands concrete measures to support young families, citing Hungary as an example. Security issues are also prominent, specifically concerning the employment of Russian citizens in the Estonian media.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the poor performance and lack of accountability of the government official. The speaker emphasizes the unpredictability of the energy market and demands accountability for the distribution of 2.6 billion euros, which was allegedly based on falsified underlying data. The focus is on performance-based criticism and financial accountability.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
The political focus is heavily centered on energy security and national defense. The speaker forcefully opposes the government-promoted green transition and wind energy, deeming it unaffordable for Estonia and technically inefficient. In defense policy, there is a strong emphasis on the necessity of securing Estonia's independent defense capability and armament before transferring weapons to Ukraine.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is firmly opposed to a constitutional amendment that would grant voting rights to non-citizens in local elections. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of strengthening Estonian national consciousness and promoting Estonian-language local governance, viewing the extension of voting rights to non-citizens as a threat to the long-term trajectory of Estonia's future. This position is clearly value-driven, stressing the distinct right and privilege inherent in citizenship.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The political platform places a strong emphasis on national support for youth sports and physical activity, while also criticizing the lack of discipline within school physical education programs. The speaker is skeptical of the coalition’s capacity to finance this initiative, noting that "the money isn't there," and underscores the critical nature of upcoming budget negotiations. This stance is rooted in both policy and values, highlighting the importance of fostering discipline and promoting health.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The political focus is currently centered on the protection and visibility of the state border, especially following the removal of border buoys in the Narva River. This position is policy- and results-based, underscoring the need to ensure the clear marking and defense of the border. The speaker is seeking clarification on whether the border buoys are classified as nationally protected infrastructure, which signals moderate pressure on the government to find solutions.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly critical of claims regarding the cheapness of wind energy, labeling them as outright lies and calling for restraint. The main focus rests on energy security, environmental considerations, and ensuring the fair distribution of economic benefits among the Estonian people. This stance is highly confrontational and value-driven, with the party suspecting the opposition of simply lining the pockets of companies driven by specific ideological agendas.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political focus is currently directed at the 2.6 billion euro state subsidies earmarked for the development of wind energy, the expediency of which the speaker strongly calls into question. He directly refutes the government’s claim of cheap wind energy, labeling it "a complete fabrication," and demands explanations regarding the utilization of the funds distributed by party leaders. The political framework is intensely critical and results-oriented, concentrating specifically on financial inefficiency.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly focused on tightening immigration and labor regulations to prevent the abuse of fixed-term residence permits and the status of agency workers. The primary concern lies in regulatory gaps that allow temporary labor to enter sectors such as the taxi industry without language requirements. This approach is clearly policy-driven, concentrating on closing the system's "holes."
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The political position is strongly focused on lowering taxes, especially reducing the VAT on foodstuffs, which is treated as a pure security measure. The speaker frames their stance as value-based, stressing that the state must care for its citizens and their ability to cope. The previous reduction in fuel excise duty is also applauded as an effective measure that improved the consumer's situation.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to Draft Law 546, particularly concerning the social conditionality requirements being added to the criteria for direct payments. The position is policy-driven, highlighting the unequal treatment between businesses and individual aid applicants, as well as excessive bureaucracy. The stance culminates in a proposal to suspend the second reading of the draft law.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political stance is one of strong opposition to the opaque system governing the representation expenses and benefits of high-ranking state officials. The speaker emphasizes a value-based approach, demanding state transparency, legal certainty, and the fair utilization of taxpayer funds. He sharply criticizes the system where 20% of the salary is simply allocated as a supplement without adequate oversight.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly regional and security-oriented, opposing national budget cuts that weaken the state’s presence in border regions. The closure of the Jõhvi courthouse is the most fiercely resisted measure, viewed as nothing less than pure surrender and a threat to regional security. Furthermore, concerns are raised regarding the social consequences of abandoning oil shale energy and the resulting decline in employment in Ida-Virumaa.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is centered on the discussion and approval of specific fiscal measures, such as the payroll tax. The speaker employs short, direct affirmations ("Exactly!") and references facts concerning the implementation of the policy. The position is primarily policy-based, focusing on the factual confirmation of tax revenue collection.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly opposed to the proposed amendments to the law implementing the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy, particularly the introduction of social conditionality. The criticism centers on the increased administrative burden placed on applicants and the creation of an unequal situation among producers, given that sanctions are applied only to operators who undergo inspection. This position is clearly policy- and performance-driven, culminating in a proposal to reject the draft legislation.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is firmly opposed to centralization, particularly regarding the closure of regional courthouses. The speaker stresses the importance of the principle of regionality and maintaining public confidence, further linking the issue to national security policy significance. This position is primarily shaped by a value-based approach that prioritizes the symbolic significance of maintaining a local presence.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly protective of entrepreneurship and economic continuity, opposing regulations that restrict investments and undermine regulatory stability. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's draft legislation, particularly the amendments to the Subsoil Act, which halt proceedings and disregard socio-economic impacts. The position is value-based, emphasizing the protection of the legitimate expectation of entrepreneurs and highlighting constitutional conflicts. The Estonian Conservative People's Party does not support this amendment.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The political stance is strongly opposed to the construction of wind farms near border areas, especially if they compromise national defense capabilities and intelligence operations. The speaker sharply criticizes the 2022 decision by Kaja Kallas’s government to greenlight the Aidu wind farm, viewing it as increasing the security threat. The primary focus is on ensuring national defense and security, prioritizing them over development activities. This position is strongly value-driven and critical of the government's actions.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker represents a strong opposition stance, opposing the bills initiated by the Reform Party-led government, particularly the education reform and the new security tax. The political framework is primarily procedural and results-oriented, highlighting deficiencies in the legislative process (the absence of impact assessments) and the negative impact on entrepreneurship and regional development. The Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE) does not support the draft Education Act.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the draft bill presented by the Social Affairs Committee, which concerns amendments to the Child Protection Act and the Criminal Records Act. This stance is value-based, emphasizing the necessity of protecting Estonian children from pedophiles and preventing potential loopholes created by the proposed legislation. The speaker positions their party (EKRE) as the only one standing up for the interests of children.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance is sharply critical of the government's handling of state assets (the lands of Tartu Agro), highlighting the sluggishness and lack of transparency in the decision-making process. The focus is on administrative inefficiency and its negative effect on farming businesses. The speaker is demanding that the minister take quicker action and provide a clear schedule to prevent social tensions and financial damage to entrepreneurs.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political focus centers on amending the constitution, with the aim of restricting voting rights primarily to citizens of the Republic of Estonia—a measure supported as a common objective. Furthermore, the speaker stresses a firm procedural position, criticizing the coalition's failure to account for the willingness to compromise and advance parallel drafts of legislation to achieve the best possible outcome. The stances are strongly value-based (citizenship) and procedural (due process).
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
The political position is strongly opposed to the draft bill establishing the Land and Planning Agency, arguing that it represents the structurally inefficient creation of a "mammoth agency" under the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. The opposition is policy-driven, emphasizing that land-related functions should remain under the purview of the Ministry of Regional Affairs or the Ministry of Agriculture in order to preserve the effectiveness of regional policy. The speaker notes that EKRE supported the idea during Jüri Ratas's government, but the current implementation is conceptually different.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Strong opposition to the state budget, which has been dubbed the "tax hike budget," emphasizing its negative impact on working people and residents of rural areas in Estonia. The main objections relate to the increased tax burden (car tax, income tax, VAT) and the loss of the principle of regionality due to cuts. This position is strongly policy- and value-based, supporting the proposal to discontinue the reading of the budget.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the administrative reform planned by the government, particularly the transfer of the Land and Spatial Planning Agency to the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Industry. Criticism is also directed at the reduction of citizens’ right to consultation in the planning process, viewing this as a decline in substantive quality. The rationale is primarily policy-based, calling into question the logic and objectives of the reform and suggesting a desire to reduce the levers of regional policy.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position focuses on improving the welfare of working people, strongly supporting the provision of additional days off and the compensation of public holidays that fall on a weekend. This is a value-based approach that emphasizes the positive correlation between spending time with family and work efficiency. The speaker sharply criticizes the coalition's reluctance to support bills that would benefit Estonian working people.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political focus centers on the strong opposition to the car tax, with questions being raised about the justification for its continuation, particularly concerning the public's wealth and ability to cope financially. Furthermore, the speaker demands a critical reassessment of Estonia's foreign policy stances, especially in light of the UN Secretary-General's actions regarding the aggressor state. This reassessment of positions is deemed necessary because circumstances have changed.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The political position is critical and results-oriented, focusing on scrutinizing government activity. The speaker questions the accuracy of the financial data submitted regarding the Rail Baltic project contract award and criticizes the Minister of Justice's actions in closing courthouses. Furthermore, the importance of reducing bureaucracy is moderately emphasized.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on sharp criticism of the government’s regional policy, particularly concerning the closure of state and educational institutions in the regions. The speaker stresses that regional policy is directly tied to national security, and criticizes the government’s actions as short-sighted cost-cutting, confined strictly within the parameters of an Excel spreadsheet. He challenges the government’s "success story" regarding the Just Transition Fund, citing its inadequacy given the scale of job losses in the oil shale sector.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political stance is strongly oppositional, criticizing the government’s actions in both security matters (the border, the subordination of churches) and social policy. The most pressing issues are national security and the ratification of the International Labour Organization convention, which is considered redundant and unnecessary because it duplicates the Estonian constitution. The argumentation is strongly value-based, focusing on national interests and the preservation of the language.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political position centers on the fairness and timing of tax policy across economic cycles. The speaker questions the rationale for imposing taxes on the Estonian people and individuals during unfavorable economic conditions, while the taxation of banks is deemed unjustified. This stance is strongly policy- and value-driven, emphasizing the unequal distribution of the economic burden.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political stance is highly critical of the government's actions, focusing on the inconsistencies found in economic matters (VAT hike, recession) and social/logistical issues (the import/export of prisons). Sharp questions are being raised, challenging the logic and effectiveness of the policy. The focus is primarily on effectiveness and policy logic, rather than on a value-based framework.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political focus centers on state budget transparency and the precision of draft legislation, particularly regarding definitions within tax laws and how funding for major projects (like Rail Baltic) is reported. The speaker is critical of the minister's presentation and the lack of clarity in the budget documents, concentrating primarily on the effectiveness and specific details of the government's operations. The speaker demands clarification on exactly who is defined as a taxpayer under the tax law (i.e., companies, sole proprietors/FIEs, or cooperatives).
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker strongly opposes the government's internal security policy, criticizing the police's use of force against Estonian citizens during a historical memorial ceremony. His stance is value-driven, emphasizing the protection of civil rights and demanding accountability for the incompetence displayed by state institutions. Furthermore, he accuses the government of deliberately neglecting the protection of the eastern border in favor of addressing trivial matters.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political position focuses on the detailed scrutiny of draft legislation and clarity in its implementation. Concerns are highlighted regarding both administrative oversight (health promotion benefits) and the legislative procedure (the ignoring of proposals from interest groups). The stance is moderately critical, demanding accountability and transparency from the government in policy execution.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s proposed taxation measures and restructurings, particularly where they affect vulnerable target groups and rural areas. The focus is on criticizing procedural injustices and budgetary reallocations, demanding concrete justification. The standpoints are primarily policy- and results-based, emphasizing social justice and administrative efficiency.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Strong criticism regarding the government's priorities and execution of infrastructure projects, especially the neglect of road development in Ida-Virumaa (Tallinn-Narva). It demands high-speed internet access in remote regions and stresses that postponing infrastructure projects is a matter of saving lives and fostering business development. The criticism is primarily aimed at the government's poor performance and choice of priorities.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political stance is one of strong opposition, focusing on the government's incompetence and procedural errors (e.g., rushing legislation and ignoring proposals). Key issues include the underfunding of local municipalities, ensuring food security through primary producers, and fiscal responsibility (opposition to tax increases and the vague initiatives of the Just Transition Fund). The speaker defends the positions of their parliamentary group (EKRE) and accuses the government of populism.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The political focus is directed toward the technical details of economic and tax laws, especially concerning the pension system and VAT thresholds. The speaker emphasizes the need to reduce bureaucracy and simplify financial transactions, such as moving pension assets between pillars. The stance is policy-based, seeking clarity and efficiency in the draft legislation.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The political stance aims to clarify the norms governing international diplomacy and the location of embassies, while simultaneously supporting a specific draft bill. Domestically, the speaker criticizes the procedural lack of transparency in the Riigikogu (Parliament), questioning the justification for the voting requirements (51 votes). The positions taken are primarily policy- and procedure-based.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The political focus centers on ensuring clarity and practical feasibility in implementing legislation, particularly concerning crisis management and renewable energy. There is moderate skepticism regarding the wholesale adoption of European Union terminology (e.g., "formaalõpe" [formal education]), with a preference for clear Estonian concepts (such as "tasemeõpe" [level-based education]). The primary issues revolve around refining regulations and enhancing citizen engagement.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly opposed to the government, and particularly the Minister of the Interior, emphasizing the administration's inaction and incompetence. The speaker questions how long the people must endure such a government, focusing on issues of security (the Narva buoys) and historical memory (Lihula, Sinimäed, the Bronze Soldier). The opposition is intense and based on criticism of the government's performance.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The politician strongly opposes the government's environmental and energy policies, specifically the suspension of the processing of oil shale mining permits, deeming this anti-business and procedurally flawed. Key issues also include national defense (aid to Ukraine, the Defence League) and social policy (kindergarten fees). Criticism is aimed at the government's actions and failed procedures, demanding an assessment of the socio-economic impact.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker strongly opposes the government’s education policy, questioning Minister Kristina Kallas’s competence based on her previous decisions. The core issue is the centralization and reduction of educational opportunities, particularly in rural areas. The stance is highly confrontational and outcome-based, criticizing earlier decisions (the closure of rural schools and the scaling back of vocational education).
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The political position is strongly value-based, emphasizing the need to remove infrastructure objects that belonged to the Red Army and ensuring the swift completion of security vetting for ministers. The importance of the Tartu Peace Treaty and border issues are also stressed, demonstrating a strong national and historical focus. The speaker positions himself as ideologically pure, emphasizing that he was never a member of the Communist Party.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political stance is firmly against the car tax, which is deemed unconstitutional and an irredeemably bad piece of legislation. The focus is on the failure of the government's economic policy and the negative repercussions of tax hikes, demanding that the reading of the bill be immediately halted. This position is value-driven and has been forcefully articulated, stressing that this taxation is being implemented during a period of economic recession.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The political stance is strongly oppositional to the government's planned tax hikes, particularly regarding income tax and VAT. The speaker questions the labeling of these taxes as a "security tax" and sharply criticizes their impact on poorer people. The main topic highlighted is ensuring food security, which is considered a missing guarantee in the coalition agreement. The framing is primarily policy- and value-based (the protection of poorer people).
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The political position is strongly oppositional, centered on criticizing constitutional conformity and the integrity of legislative procedures. The speaker firmly rejects the specific bill (referring to the car tax) in any shape or form, deeming its justification unfounded. This is a value-based stance, underscoring the necessity of upholding constitutionality and criticizing the government’s arbitrary policy decisions.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The political stance is firmly opposed to increasing taxes and state levies, viewing this as an unjust financial burden on citizens and an attempt to shift state responsibilities. Criticism is leveled both at the policy substance itself (such as the rising cost of official documents and the impact of land tax on agriculture) and at the legislative procedures used. The speaker represents the position of the Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE), maintaining strong opposition to both draft laws.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker adopts a fiercely critical stance on the government's economic policy, highlighting the three-year economic decline and the administration's failed performance. Also central to the discussion is concern over the transparency and size of the state's financial contribution toward supporting Ukraine's EU accession talks. Their criticism is primarily aimed at the government's actions and overall effectiveness.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the car tax, which is being called a wealth tax, arguing that it worsens people's situation, especially in rural areas. It is emphasized that the current government has violated its pre-election promises regarding not raising taxes. In addition to criticizing the tax policy, attention is drawn to Estonia's unique e-voting system, which should either be modified or abolished in the interest of fair elections.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political focus is centered on the lack of government transparency and the accountability of the Prime Minister regarding his foreign visits, particularly concerning the secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg meeting. There is a strong demand to clarify whether the Prime Minister attended the meeting as a representative of the government or in a private capacity. Criticism is also being leveled at the inefficiency of the government's operations and communication (the procedural framework).
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy, specifically the abolition of the income tax exemption for pensioners receiving the average pension. The most salient issue is the deterioration of pensioners' well-being and the breaking of government promises, which is framed as increasing poverty among the populace. The stance is highly critical of the government's actions and is outcome-driven, accusing the coalition of worsening the welfare of the people.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the minister's specific failures and ethical issues. The need for accountability is stressed, citing the hiring of a lobbyist and the disregard for anti-corruption legislation in the case of the Deputy Secretary-General. Skepticism is also voiced regarding the opening of the labor quota, calling into question the government's optimistic report. The political framework is primarily results- and ethics-based, demanding the minister's resignation.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is firmly against Draft Bill 437 (the amendment to the Land Tax Act), stressing that the state is shifting the financial burden onto local governments and 520,000 landowners. This stance is based both on procedure (the absence of VTK) and core values, drawing attention to the negative effects on food security and private property. The address concludes with a motion to reject the bill at the first reading.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The political stance is heavily focused on national security and the effectiveness of crisis management. The speaker criticizes the government's handling of the buoy theft that took place on the Narva River and demands accountability for the failure of the EE-alarm system during the Uikala landfill fire. This position is sharply critical and results-oriented, calling on the government to take more decisive action and accept responsibility.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The political stance is strongly aimed at protecting the incomes of pensioners and opposing any changes to the taxation of old-age pensions. The speaker calls into question the objectives of the income tax reform and criticizes the government's failure to provide answers to specific questions. There is an alarming tone regarding how pensioners will manage their livelihoods under conditions of reduced income.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s Green Transition and Climate-Resilient Economy Act, viewing it as an obligation and a restriction rather than an opportunity. The speaker sharply criticizes the encroachment upon private property in forestry and the neglect of infrastructure (road construction) within the development strategy. The stance is highly critical and focuses on the practical and financial shortcomings of the policy.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's economic policy, focusing on rising unemployment (7.8%) and budget cuts affecting local municipalities. The criticism is data-driven, highlighting the contradictions between the statements made by the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance and the actual figures. Furthermore, the issue of a conflict of interest is being raised concerning the connections between the ministry and the company (Bolt).
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is on the details of implementing education and childcare policy, particularly concerning the accessibility and quality of services. The speaker moderately opposes sections of the draft legislation that create inequality for rural residents when it comes to securing kindergarten places. Strong skepticism is also voiced regarding the practical feasibility of new technical requirements (such as floor temperature), thereby calling the policy's viability into question.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is centered on internal security and public order, highlighting the protection of the elderly from widespread telephone scams. The speaker considers these scams a far greater security threat than the narrow subject of investigation for which a response was expected. This position is highly critical of the respondent's actions, given that this significant threat has completely fallen outside the scope of observation.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centered on criticizing the actions and accountability of the Minister of Education as part of a motion of no confidence. Key issues include the consequences of the school network reform (specifically opposing the closure of gymnasiums/secondary schools) and the state's inadequate financial support for local municipalities transitioning to Estonian-language instruction. The criticism targets the minister's overall performance and political management.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, criticizing the government’s “steamroller” policy and the cumulative impact of tax hikes (including the sugar-sweetened beverage tax, VAT, excises, and the car tax). The primary focus is on government incompetence and procedural violations, particularly the lack of a formal development intention or preparatory analysis for crucial legislative drafts. The speaker claims that the tax is purely designed to fill the state budget, not to improve public health, thus casting doubt on the government's stated objectives.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The political position is strongly oppositional, criticizing the speed of the government's legislative work and the procedural disregard, which is referred to as the "steamroller." It is emphasized that the change of minister has not brought a new approach. The main objections concern the lack of impact assessments and the haste—justified by the budget strategy—in raising fine rates and state fees.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position focuses on two main areas: the critical assessment of financial and green regulations at the European Union level, and social concern over the increasing number of abortions without medical indication. The speaker prefers economic revitalization over additional green rules and demands active state action in raising awareness of the value of new life. The standpoints are value-based, especially concerning social issues.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the expansion of e-voting and m-voting, stressing the system's lack of security and the widespread distrust among voters. The primary focus is on value-based criticism regarding the secrecy, transparency, and reliability of elections, asserting that the system is "controlled from within." The speaker argues that the distrust of 40% of voters should be setting off alarm bells, but the government is ignoring this danger.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The politician supports the government-initiated draft bill 377 SE, which addresses working while on sick leave and the transposition of the occupational safety directive, viewing it as the correct step forward. However, he sharply criticizes the government's regional policy, particularly the centralizing effect of the public library reform and the resulting job losses in county centers. His political framework is policy-driven, focusing on the specifics of legislation and ensuring regional sustainability.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The political position is aimed at criticizing the government's actions and funding, particularly in the infrastructure sector. There is a demand that the state redirect the extra revenue generated by the hike in VAT and excise taxes to local municipalities for road maintenance. Additionally, the need to clarify historical facts concerning national defense is stressed, specifically criticizing the Reform Party's earlier opposition to mandatory military service.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The central theme revolves around the chronic underfunding of veterinary education—a shortfall of 2 million euros—and the direct link this has to both Estonian food security and national security. The speaker strongly advocates for the viability of rural life and the agricultural sector, contrasting this stance with the government's alleged "green frenzy" and its reliance on management driven solely by Excel spreadsheets. This position is deeply value-based, stressing the importance of self-sufficiency levels and the strategic necessity of preserving rural regions. On a political note, there is sharp criticism directed at a ruling party member's assertion that living in the countryside is environmentally harmful.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is strongly focused on increasing the efficiency of road transport, supporting the allowance of longer and heavier truck combinations (road trains with greater gross vehicle weight) through amendments to the Traffic Act. Criticism is directed at the government’s current economic policies, especially the increases in fuel excise duty and road usage fees imposed under the pretext of the green transition, which are considered detrimental to the business environment. The political framework is clearly results- and policy-based, emphasizing cost-effectiveness and competitiveness.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The most prominent issue is the motor vehicle tax, which the speaker strongly opposes. This opposition focuses both on ethical concerns (the minister's unlawful conduct) and the legislative deadlock caused by the lack of European Union approval. The criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy and the personal example set by its proponent, thereby calling the government's trustworthiness into question. There is a strong emphasis on performance-based criticism, highlighting hypocritical behavior.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is highly critical of the government's budget priorities, particularly concerning the costly income tax reform, which is viewed merely as the fulfillment of an election promise. The speaker stresses the necessity of supporting large families and protecting the education network, especially opposing the closure of high schools in Ida-Viru County. The overall stance is primarily policy- and results-driven, demanding concrete actions.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is focused on the internal organization of the Riigikogu and the pursuit of office. The speaker affirms strong support for their candidacy for the Deputy Speaker position, which is a procedural and office-oriented framework.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on national defense, bolstering border security, and education policy, particularly in relation to Ukrainian war refugees. The speaker stresses the necessity of finalizing earlier initiatives, specifically the militarized border defense, and criticizes the current lack of data concerning specialists residing within the country. Regarding educational matters, he advocates for native language instruction, considering it crucial for supporting Ukrainian resistance. He also highlights the role played by his party (EKRE) in previous security decision-making.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political platform is strongly focused on supporting the agricultural sector and cutting red tape. The most pressing issues are the complexity of tracking working hours, which is a major headache for producers, and the ban on goose hunting, which is threatening winter crop yields. The speaker urgently calls for simplification in the process of applying for 2024 subsidies to ease the constant stress and anxiety faced by farmers.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political focus is directed toward the implementation of food safety and regulatory standards, particularly concerning the treatment of foodstuffs with ionizing radiation. Detailed questions are being raised regarding the clarification of existing market conditions and laboratory accreditation standards, which points to an implementation-focused approach to policy. The overall stance is primarily policy-driven and consumer protection-oriented.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker holds a strongly value-based and nationalistic political position, stressing the prioritization of Estonian citizens in both labor policy and the provision of foreign aid. He calls for public involvement in crucial social issues, specifically criticizing the failure to hold a referendum on the redefinition of marriage. This political stance is characterized by sharp criticism directed at the government's actions and procedural decisions.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly focused on political ethics and fiscal discipline, advocating for the elimination of expense allowances for members of parliament as a sign of solidarity with the Estonian people. Furthermore, strong concern is voiced regarding the cybersecurity of e-voting and the integrity of elections, citing potential malicious attacks by foreign states. These standpoints are both value-driven (solidarity) and policy-driven (technical analysis of draft legislation).
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The political position is strongly critical of the government's actions, focusing on strategic economic failures, such as the loss of Fibenol's 700 million euro investment to Latvia. Attention is drawn to concerns regarding deficiencies in regional policy, which affect job availability and access to culture. The criticism targets the government's comprehensive activities, including the Ministry of Climate and the Prime Minister.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The speaker strongly advocates for increasing the birth rate of the Estonian people and supporting small producers, favoring the lowering of VAT on foodstuffs and medicines. The political position is sharply anti-government, accusing the coalition of hostility towards families and undermining the state through tax increases and benefit cuts. The focus is value-based and results-oriented, stressing care for the Estonian nation.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is one of strong opposition, focusing specifically on the government's ineffective handling of demographic issues. Criticism is leveled both at specific policies (the reduction of family benefits and the rise in the tax burden) and against the government's overall poor performance, which has resulted in a low birth rate. The speaker criticizes the government for claiming they are acting correctly, despite the negative outcomes.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political position is clearly reformist and focused on security. The speaker strongly supports the bill initiated by EKRE concerning the prohibition on holding simultaneous offices as a Riigikogu member and a local council member, stressing the need for dedication to parliamentary work. Furthermore, there is a demand to revoke the voting rights of Russian and Belarusian citizens, linking this directly to Estonian national security. The government is also criticized for prioritizing the coalition agreement over the interests of the state.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political stance is strongly critical of the government's actions and the implementation of its strategy, particularly concerning the transition to Estonian-language education and the salary delays faced by teachers in Ida-Virumaa. The speaker calls into question the government's financial strategy, inquiring about plans to introduce new taxes to cover salary increases while simultaneously promoting austerity measures. Their focus is results-oriented, criticizing the inefficient and incomprehensible management.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy, particularly concerning the taxation of families and the implementation of the car tax. They emphasize the necessity of protecting families and rural areas and call for the introduction of alternative revenue streams, such as a bank tax. This political stance is strongly value-driven (the protection of families) and critical of the government's actions.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political stance is firmly focused on strengthening the ties between the state and local government—a goal the speaker identifies as the primary objective of the proposed legislation. It is stressed that this connection can only be effectively maintained through political parties, in strong contrast to electoral coalitions, which are dismissed as an ineffective "hodgepodge" or "jumble." The underlying framework of this position is distinctly political-structural and value-based, prioritizing the central role of established political parties.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The political focus is heavily centered on reducing the Value Added Tax (VAT) on foodstuffs to 5% to ease the burden on low-income families and ensure food security. This stance is forceful and highly critical of the current tax policy, which has driven up food prices and pushed the agricultural sector into losses. The presentation of the draft bill is primarily driven by policy and values, emphasizing the protection of both domestic producers and consumers.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker strongly emphasizes internal security and national defense, criticizing the government’s lack of a plan to cope with the threat of mass immigration (up to half a million people). The political priority is securing a pay raise for Rescue Board (Päästeamet) and PPA employees, recognizing them as frontline personnel during the state budget strategy negotiations. These positions are strongly value-based and aimed at improving the government's performance.
2024-02-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political focus is on cooperation between Estonia and Ukraine, especially in the digital sector and infrastructure development. The speaker clearly supports activities such as the construction of kindergartens and bomb shelters, but questions the goal and significance of the 800,000 euro cost for a specific digital project (the mRiik app). The stance is policy-driven, focusing on the financial clarity of international cooperation.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is strongly opposed to raising indirect taxes, specifically criticizing the coalition's planned increases to excise duties, VAT, and the proposed car tax. The speaker emphasizes that these tax hikes will directly impact the final consumer and the food industry focused on the Estonian domestic market. The stance is clearly outcome-based, focusing on the negative effect of these tax policies on the cost of living.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political position focuses on consumer protection and food safety, demanding the mandatory enactment of special labeling for insect-based foods to ensure consumers have a clear understanding of the product they are purchasing. The speaker stresses that current official recommendations are insufficient because non-compliance cannot be penalized, and therefore strongly supports the adoption of the proposed bill. The focus is both value-driven and policy-driven, emphasizing honesty toward the consumer.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The political position is strongly focused on supporting Ukraine, emphasizing the inclusion of a specific NGO (For Ukraine) on a list that will likely grant them tax benefits. The focus is value-driven, consciously supporting the channeling of donated aid directly to Ukrainian fighters. The speaker is an active policy maker who seeks to influence the legislative list.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political position is fiercely opposed to the current direction of the European Union's Green Transition, which is being labeled "green frenzy" and "green insanity." The speaker demands that Estonia take a leading role in Europe to halt this trajectory and instead focus on developing rural life and agriculture. The focus rests on the economic hardships stemming from compliance with the Green Deal requirements and the resulting increase in bureaucracy. This is a value-driven and results-oriented position, emphasizing the need to secure the livelihood of rural regions.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The political focus is on the effectiveness of the government's activities, particularly the integration of immigrants into the workforce and the sustainability of funding for regional sports projects. Pragmatic, policy-based questions are being raised, demanding clarification regarding the operations of the Unemployment Insurance Fund (Töötukassa) and the plans for the State Budget Strategy (RES). The stance is moderately critical, emphasizing the need for robust state intervention to support regional development.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is heavily directed toward ensuring food supply security and incorporating it as a vital service within the Emergency Situation Act. This is framed as a matter of reducing security risks and boosting public confidence. Strong opposition is also being expressed regarding the government's tax increases, which harm farmers and rural communities. Political action is primarily aimed at defending bills that were initiated by the opposition.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker strongly supports lowering taxes and excise duties, focusing specifically on reducing the excise duty rate on natural gas and increasing the compensation for personal vehicle use to 350 euros. This position is directly aimed at improving economic activity and reducing people's heating costs, thus operating within a results-based framework. The reduction in the excise duty is also justified by its compliance with European Union regulations and directives.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The most crucial issue is comprehensive security, which encompasses human, energy, and food security. The politician strongly supports accelerating the establishment of a defense industry park, considering it a timely and essential step. This stance is firmly focused on ensuring the nation's crisis preparedness and security.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The politician stands firmly against state-mandated compulsory reconstruction and the introduction of a car tax, emphasizing the right of citizens to manage their own property. He criticizes the government’s infrastructure funding priorities, arguing that road construction has been unfairly overshadowed by the Rail Baltic project and the renovation of apartment buildings. His positions are deeply value-based, centered on freedom and property rights, and are regionally sensitive.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political emphasis is on economic relief, repeatedly proposing reductions in the income tax rate (e.g., 19.7% and 19.1%) in response to the deteriorating economic situation and 40% inflation. The need to ensure transparency in administrative procedures (specifically, the grounds for opening packages) and to achieve state budgetary savings within the Tax and Customs Board is also highlighted. These positions are strongly policy- and results-driven, focusing on the direct financial impact on both citizens and businesses.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance focuses heavily on national security (border defense and countering foreign influence in the sciences) and the preservation of Estonian-language education, particularly in Ida-Viru County. The speaker criticizes the ministry’s lack of transparency (citing the Toila Gymnasium case) and demands concrete, proactive measures from the government to mitigate security risks. The core focus is on the efficacy of government action and adopting a value-based (pro-Estonian/patriotic) approach.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political stance is strongly rooted in values and aims for the complete removal of Soviet occupation symbols (the 'red monuments'). The speaker criticizes the state's current limited action, which has focused solely on monuments situated on state land, and urgently demands their removal from private properties as well. He deems the use of the sanctity of burial sites as a means to avoid removal to be an insufficient and even cynical justification.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centered on the preservation of the nation-state and the public's sense of security. The speaker stresses the necessity of directing defense expenditures within Estonia and criticizes the government's tax increases ("taxing people to death") as a factor eroding that sense of security. Also significant is the concern regarding the unified Estonian school system and the failure of integration, which indicates a critique based on both values and measurable results.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position centers on emphasizing the organization of parliamentary work and a competence-based approach, asserting that EKRE selects its representatives to committees strictly based on their expertise. The speaker calls into question the propriety of how the legal amendments are being processed, specifically asking whether the Social Affairs Committee and the Minister of the Interior are the appropriate bodies to handle this particular issue. This stance is procedurally critical and targets the correctness of the overall policy-making framework.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political focus is currently on reducing the VAT rate, a measure that is strongly supported with the aim of improving people's standard of living. This stance is based on both policy and tangible results, highlighting the need for economic relief. The speaker also indirectly criticizes the current tax policy, noting that it results in a rate higher than the minimum set by the European Union.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The political stance centers on the transparency and timing of the sale process for the state-owned airline Nordica. The speaker expresses concern that accepting non-binding offers prior to the final report could lead to non-transparent activities. The position is procedural and moderately critical, stressing the need to avoid a scenario where the company unexpectedly becomes profitable immediately following the sale.