By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller
Total Sessions: 141
Fully Profiled: 141
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponent is the European Commission and the EU's central leadership, who are criticized for ideological conditionality and the stripping away of sovereignty. Domestic criticism is directed at the government, which is called "laymen" regarding agriculture and fails to take farmers into account. The criticism is policy- and value-based, and compromise is ruled out.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary adversaries are the minister and, indirectly, the Social Democrats ("Sotsid"), who are accused of stifling public opinion and serving the interests of lobbyists through amendments to the Planning Act. The criticism is intense and addresses both the transparency of fiscal policy and the violation of democratic procedures.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition is directed at the government’s budget policy and the methodology used for drafting the budget. The criticism is substantive and policy-based, focusing on the exclusion of depreciation from the budget, which points to a lack of fiscal transparency.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is aimed at the current ruling parties, who are accused of pursuing deliberate policies that lead to the decline of rural areas. The criticism is both political and procedural, focusing on the abolition of child benefits, tax hikes, and the increasing bureaucracy of PRIA (the Agricultural Registers and Information Board). The intensity of the criticism is high, with critics asserting that things are "rotten."
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is directed at the government's actions and notification procedures, as members of the Riigikogu were not informed of significant security incidents before the press release was published. The opposition is intense and focuses on the lack of transparency and the questioning of the effectiveness of the operations.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient information
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the current and previous governments (including the Social Democrats), who are being criticized for removing land tax restrictions and providing insufficient support to farmers. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of being ready to take money away from farmers. Officials and politicians who vote for laws without delving into the substance are also being criticized.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the government and a specific minister or official, who is accused of spreading misinformation and incompetence (e.g., the reprimand of the US Health Minister). Criticism is also aimed at the government's attempts to increase its power through the imposition of a state of crisis, which limits the role of the Riigikogu (Parliament). The EKRE faction proposes rejecting the bill at the first reading.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The opposition is directed against the government and leading officials, who are being criticized for making rushed decisions and avoiding responsibility. The criticism is particularly sharp regarding the handling of the Nursipalu case and the "labeling" of people—a critique that touches upon both political issues and personal justice. Criticism is also aimed at the government's failure to demonstrate the progress made in implementing the long-term plan.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the government's/ministry's actions, which led to the tightening of support conditions due to budget cuts. The opposition is policy-based, criticizing the decision-making process where the sector was presented with a fait accompli, and emphasizing that the cuts harm small-scale beekeepers and cooperation between producers.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary opponents are Kaja Kallas’s government and the responsible ministers, who are criticized for abandoning accountability and breaking their promises. The criticism targets both the political culture (the requirement of 51 votes for draft decisions) and specific policies (tax hikes, court budget cuts).
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main opposition is directed at the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of economic stagnation and ineffective tax policy. The criticism is policy- and ideology-based, accusing the government of taking money away from the people only to then present the increase in the tax-free minimum as a major victory. There is also opposition to the interior minister's position regarding foreign labor.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government who introduced the bill, criticizing their assertions that no new taxes would be introduced, along with the overall consequences of the policy. The criticism is intense, focusing on the policy's impracticality and the resulting increase in administrative burden. The speaker clearly supports the motion to reject the draft bill.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary confrontation is directed at the government and the minister facing a vote of no confidence, who is accused of applying double standards and protecting their allies. The criticism is intense and focuses on the ethical failure brought to light through specific individuals (Lehtme) and cases, thereby calling the government's legitimacy into question.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main adversaries are the Government of the Republic and the Riigikogu majority, who are accused of impoverishing the populace through tax hikes and of general neglect. The criticism is intense and political, extending to the accusation of implementing Putin's propaganda under the guise of a security tax. Former coalition partners (the Social Democrats) are criticized for their past support of tax increases and their current absence from the session.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main confrontation is between the government and the minister, who is sharply criticized for insufficient answers and for failing to accept proposals during negotiations. The criticism targets specific policies (tax hikes, the importation of cheap labor) and the government's failure to address the root causes. According to the speaker, the government needs to be "brought back down to earth," which suggests a complete unwillingness to compromise.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are the government and the coalition, who stand accused of neglecting the public's well-being and presenting vague draft legislation. The Social Democrats are specifically criticized regarding gender quotas and their past tenure in government. Furthermore, the Finance Minister is criticized for failing to deliver on promises concerning penalty units, a failure which points to problems with public trust.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The primary targets of criticism are the Prosecutor’s Office (for disregarding laws and minimizing the harm suffered by victims) and the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs/the Government (for offering inadequate solutions, focusing on installing cameras rather than ensuring accountability). The criticism is intense and aimed both at political inaction and the procedural deficiencies within the legal system. The former head of Slava Ukraini, Johanna-Maria Lehtme, is also being criticized for personal theft.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for the reform's hidden objectives and accelerated procedure. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the minister of reducing accountability for regional decisions. The speaker is certain that the reform's goal is the closure of courts in the regions.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The primary opposition is aimed at government ministers (specifically the Minister of Social Affairs and the Minister of Justice), who are being criticized for shirking responsibility and incompetent oversight. The criticism targets failures in policy implementation and procedural shortcomings, particularly concerning the activities of the Social Insurance Board.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the current coalition, who face sharp criticism for their ineffective tax policy, which has failed to enrich the nation. The criticism is based on both policy and performance, demanding political accountability for poor decisions. The opposition is intense, but there remains room for cooperation on the issue of tax reduction.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary conflict is directed at the minister and the government's financial strategy. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, focusing on the lack of clarity regarding the classification of the €2.6 billion investment, and the ignoring of climate issues in economic presentations.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponent is the ruling coalition, particularly the Eesti 200 minister, who faces criticism for an unclear political vision, factual errors, and a failure to grasp the realities of rural life. The criticism is intense and centers on government decisions detrimental to rural regions, such as the closure of services and tax increases. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; rather, there is a demand for the implementation of the political vision.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the bill’s insufficient clarity and contradictions, demanding that all matters be "unambiguously clear." The objection is procedural, focusing on who is consulted and when, and how the process is documented.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The primary confrontation is aimed squarely at the government, specifically the Prime Minister and Minister Karmen Joller, who are accused of destroying the country through their tax policies. The criticism is intense, directly linking social tragedies (such as the nursing home incidents) to institutions associated with the Reform Party. Opponents are being criticized for failures in both policy (taxes) and execution (security).
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Fierce opposition is aimed at the ruling coalition and the Reform Party, who are being criticized for tax hikes and ignoring the opposition’s sound initiatives. The criticism is intense, accusing those in power of presenting "anti-people" arguments and believing they are the only ones who know how to get things done. The coalition’s actions are being described as a slow-moving "steamroller" that simply rolls over all of the opposition's proposals.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Isamaa party, faulting them for contradictory behavior in supporting the energy sector development plan in 2017 and 2022. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, highlighting that the electricity market is not free of subsidies, as was originally promised. It is also emphasized that EKRE was the only party that did not support the 2022 amendment to the Energy Sector Organization Act.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The opposition is aimed squarely at the ministry's administrative operations, criticizing the creation of a new event organizer position as a potentially wasteful expenditure. Furthermore, there is indirect criticism of the justice system's previous sluggishness, demanding swift action from the new Prosecutor General.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the inaction of the government or the responsible ministry, which has allowed the cormorant population to spiral out of control. Specifically, current regulations are being criticized, as they appear to prohibit lethal deterrent hunting in the spring, even though this would be necessary to protect fish stocks. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the bill presented by the government, criticizing its content (surveillance capabilities, name restrictions). The criticism is substantive, focusing on the increase in state control and the restriction of individual liberties. Information regarding the possibility of a compromise is unavailable.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed at the Ministry of Finance and the presenter of the draft bill (the minister), who is accused of engaging in displacement activities and avoiding answers. The criticism is intense, expressing the wish that the same minister would not remain in office for the next 13 years. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and the procedure (the minister’s closed stance).
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is directed at the lack of clarity and contradictions within the draft legislation, particularly concerning the disparity between promises to reduce administrative burden and the actual costs incurred by businesses. The opposition is rooted in both policy and procedural concerns, calling into question the practical implications of implementing the law. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, centered on the demand for greater clarity.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker opposes the current system of renewable energy subsidies and the rhetoric proclaiming wind energy cheap, calling this cheapness illusory. The criticism targets the financial inefficiency of the policy and the burdening of consumers with infrastructure costs.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no direct opposition or criticism aimed at specific opponents. The criticism is instead directed at the lack of justification and evidence base for the policy, since examples are being demanded that would justify the joining.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at the government and the Eesti 200 party, who are being sharply criticized over the "Slava Ukraini" funding scandal and lack of transparency. The criticism is both politically substantive (concerning draft laws) and personal-political, demanding that the party look in the mirror and clarify the issue of funding.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the policies of the Government of the Republic and its ministers, particularly concerning the ideological promotion of education reforms and the green transition. Criticism is leveled at the government's inability to ensure birth rate growth and control the pro-Putin sentiment of Russian citizens in the Estonian media. Regarding the Minister of Education, skepticism is expressed about the positive impact of school consolidation.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is aimed at the official facing a no-confidence motion and the individuals responsible for the falsified data that served as the basis for the distribution of 2.6 billion euros. The criticism is intense and demands the publication of names, signaling a call for individualized accountability.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
The primary confrontation is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government, who are being criticized for failing to answer Mart Helme's questions and for their interpretation of the media coverage. Political criticism is intense, particularly concerning the financial feasibility of the green transition and the selection of energy sources.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed against the proposal by the coalition (or the initiators of the bill) to retain voting rights for stateless persons in the constitution. The criticism is policy-driven and principled, arguing that the amendment is neither expedient nor necessary for the Estonian state. The opposition is intense because the speaker views the change as a long-term threat to Estonia’s future direction.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is directed at the actions of the government/coalition, particularly concerning the reduction of funding for hobby education and the freezing of funding for youth camps. Concern is also expressed regarding the hindering of entrepreneurship, which could reduce private sector contributions to sports. The criticism is policy- and budget-based, expressing skepticism about the coalition's actual capacity to govern.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no adversarial stance, as the speaker is asking the Minister of Defense clarifying questions regarding existing legislation and border management. The criticism is aimed more at the lack or ambiguity of political solutions, rather than at individuals.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the proponent and the policy's supporters, who stand accused of misrepresenting data and prioritizing personal or ideological interests. The criticism is intense and includes allegations that the benefits are flowing into the pockets of specific companies and political parties, rather than reaching the Estonian people.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the leaders of three political parties who distributed 2.6 billion euros in subsidies for wind energy, along with the individual facing a motion of no confidence. The criticism is both political (the subsidies are deemed impractical) and ethical, accusing the opponents of using lies and hypocrisy to justify their stance on the issue of life expectancy in Ida-Virumaa.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the policy and regulatory framework of the government (the Interior Minister) which is considered insufficient for controlling agency labor. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on systemic loopholes and the risk of their exploitation, especially regarding the transportation of people.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Strong opposition to the government's policies, accusing the administration of prioritizing budget revenue (400 million) over the livelihood of the people. The government is also criticized for defending a rigid and unreasonable flat-rate tax system that deviates from international practice.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition targets the drafters of the bill (the ministry), who face criticism for submitting a flawed proposal—an omnibus bill structure that bundles several disparate issues into a single law. The criticism is both policy-driven and procedural, accusing the government of increasing bureaucracy and placing agricultural entrepreneurs at a disadvantage. The opposition is robust, demanding that the reading of the bill be suspended.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the coalition partners and the legislative committee, who are criticized for exacerbating opacity and failing to take an independent stance. The criticism is primarily procedural, as the committee simply adopted the government's position instead of making its own decision in its capacity as the employer of the Riigikogu.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The sharpest criticism is aimed at the minister's and the government's (especially Eesti 200's) austerity policy, which is viewed as a disregard for regional security. The government is being criticized for appealing to raw numbers and threatening layoffs in order to force judges to vacate the building in Jõhvi. The argument that the money saved by these cuts will be allocated to national defense is rejected, and the claim is dismissed as an illusion.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient information.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the bill presented by the government, criticizing the unfairness of its implementation and the resulting administrative burden. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, emphasizing that social conditionality places producers in an unequal position. The opposition culminates in a proposal made on behalf of the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party to reject the bill during its first reading.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary objection is aimed at the policy put forward by the presenter, specifically regarding the closure of courthouses and the failure to adhere to the principle of regionalism. The criticism is policy-driven, challenging the basis and procedure of the decision-making process, and inquiring about the specific minister's approval.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the government’s policy concerning the tightening of regulations and the suspension of proceedings under the Subsoil Law. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the drafters of the bill of ignoring socio-economic impacts and violating the legitimate expectations of businesses. The speaker represents the position of the political party (EKRE) that the amendment cannot be supported, demonstrating an uncompromising stance on this issue.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The primary criticism is aimed at Kaja Kallas’s government and four ministers who signed an agreement in 2022 for the continued development of the Aidu wind farm. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of weakening the country's defense capabilities and ignoring security threats. The opposition to the government’s actions is intense and uncompromising.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the government led by the Reform Party, which is accused of inefficient revenue collection and restricting entrepreneurship. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy (new taxes, consequences of the education reform) and procedural deficiencies (the absence of impact assessments). The speaker rejects the government’s assertion that opposing the tax equates to opposing national security, labeling this claim arbitrary.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is with the coalition and the Social Affairs Committee, who are being criticized for reintroducing the bill in the same form and ignoring substantive amendments. The criticism is both procedural (the use of a law firm, the committee’s inability to reach a decision) and fundamental (endangering the safety of children). Compromise is ruled out, as the speaker is calling for a vote against the draft legislation.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is directed at the minister and the government's administrative organization, particularly the transfer of the Land and Spatial Planning Authority under the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. This administrative change is viewed as non-transparent and illogical from a corruption standpoint, given that land resources ought to fall under the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture. The criticism is both procedural and political, emphasizing a lack of decisive action.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main targets of criticism are the Social Democrats (regarding their rhetoric and their demand for comparative analysis) and the coalition parties. The coalition is sharply criticized for its procedural rigidity, as they failed to consider the willingness of the initiators of the second bill to compromise and did not advance both bills equally. The criticism is aimed at procedural and political choices.
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the government's administrative reform, particularly regarding the establishment of the Land and Spatial Planning Agency and its placement under the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. The criticism is policy-based, alleging that the reform strips the regional minister of regional policy instruments and creates an impractical structure.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the government's policy and the budget drafting procedure, accusing the government of hypocrisy and failing to consider the Estonian people. It sharply criticizes the representatives of the Reform Party for their use of labeling and accusations, while simultaneously noting that the rapporteur managed to address the chamber respectfully. It criticizes the government's inability to take into account the opposition's substantive and concrete amendment proposals.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the coalition and the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, criticizing their lack of regional policy and the illogical nature of the reform. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of reducing the influence of the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture. The speaker also criticizes the rapporteur, who, in his estimation, doesn't need to know the content of the law but merely has to "parrot it."
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at the governing coalition, which faces criticism for lacking the political will necessary to support legislation beneficial to working people. The coalition stands accused of hypocrisy: they demand a massive impact assessment just to grant a single day off, yet they accept tax hikes without requiring one. The chance of reaching a compromise is viewed as a miracle, suggesting very low expectations for cooperation.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the coalition over the car tax issue, demanding economic justifications that would increase people's wealth and reduce regional inequality. Furthermore, the minister's record is being set straight regarding the years spent in the EKRE government, as they defend their political background against inaccuracies.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the government, directly criticizing the Minister of Justice’s actions regarding the closure of courthouses, viewing this as a distinctly negative issue. The achievements presented by the Prime Minister (such as Rail Baltic) are treated skeptically, with demands for their precise financial justification in order to verify the government's effectiveness.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at government ministers (the ministers of education, social affairs, justice, and regional affairs) for decisions within their portfolios that damage regional policy, such as the closure of schools and service centers. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, accusing the government of stifling regional development and shifting responsibilities onto local municipalities. The speaker urges the government to heed the opposition's proposals.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the rapporteur, who stand accused of escalating the security situation and submitting vague legislative proposals. The criticism is twofold: political (concerning ineffective solutions) and procedural (stemming from the confusion surrounding the amendments). The speaker represents a political party that explicitly rejects the ratification of the ILO convention, demonstrating an unwillingness to compromise.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The confrontation targets the economic policy justifications presented by the rapporteur, especially concerning the differential treatment of taxation for banks versus the general public. The criticism is strictly policy-based, focusing on the logical inconsistency in the timing of the taxation.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary confrontation is directed against the minister and the government, criticizing both their political positions (specifically, the interpretation of the tax increase) and the procedural delay in responding to the official inquiry. The criticism is sharp and questions the administration's mathematical and logistical competence.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the minister and the government, citing a lack of clarity in the definitions of the draft legislation and in the numerical presentation of the budget. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, demanding accountability and transparency regarding the use of state funds. The speaker criticizes the minister's tendency to evade substantive answers.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary targets of criticism are Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets and the police, who stand accused of targeted activities and incompetence in their harassment of Estonian citizens. The criticism is intense and suggests a deliberate misplacement of priorities, with compromise being ruled out entirely as calls for accountability intensify.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the government and the minister who prepared the draft bill, focusing on opposition rooted in policy and procedure. Specifically, the failure to take into account the proposals made by interest groups is being criticized, and clarification is being demanded regarding the ambiguity of administrative details. Furthermore, questions are being raised about the political narrative (a reference to Putin) employed by the government.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the government's policies and the activities of the ministries, criticizing both socially unjust tax measures and irrational administrative arrangements (the reorganization of posts). The criticism is strong, focusing on policy and procedural shortcomings, and demands specific explanations.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the inaction of the Minister of Infrastructure and the government, particularly concerning the neglect of development in Ida-Virumaa. It criticizes the shifts in political priorities that led to the cancellation of ready PPP projects initiated by the previous government (EKRE), and accuses the current administration of excluding crucial road sections (Jõhvi-Toila) from the road maintenance plan.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary adversaries are the ruling coalition, specifically the Social Democrats and Eesti 200. The criticism is both procedural (rushing the process, ignoring proposals) and political (tax hikes, misallocation of resources). The Social Democrats are accused of populism and overburdening businesses, while Eesti 200 faces accusations regarding foreign policy inconsistencies and a failure to understand partners (Hungary).
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
There is no criticism; the questions are aimed at obtaining clarifications and exploring alternative, simpler policy paths.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the lack of transparency surrounding the procedural decisions made by the Riigikogu, particularly concerning the actions of the committee chairman, who calls matters to a vote without providing any justification. The objection itself is procedural and centers on the absence of explanations, thereby calling into question the legitimacy of the decision-making process.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The criticism targets the unclear definitions and inadequate implementation plan found in the government’s draft legislation, particularly regarding the timeline for the nationwide risk analysis. There is opposition to adopting European terminology when those terms are less clear in Estonian. Furthermore, the potential negative impact of new digital solutions on the elderly is also being criticized.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The main opponent is the government, and specifically the Minister of the Interior, who is being criticized for failures within their administrative domain. The criticism is intense and centers on specific scandals (the Rescue Board’s boat rally, the Narva buoys) and the controversial handling of historical monuments. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; rather, they are demanding a change in the situation.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the minister and the government, accusing them of flawed procedure (specifically, the lack of a proper coordination table and rushing the process) and failing to involve businesses. The draft bill is frequently labeled "anti-business," and the failure to assess its socio-economic impact is also a point of criticism. The use of the justification that the measure is temporary—specifically to avoid subsequent evaluation and stakeholder involvement—is particularly condemned.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary target is the government, and specifically Minister Kristina Kallas, whose competence is being challenged due to her previous political decisions. The criticism is policy-driven, intensely focusing on the negative repercussions of centralizing education. There is no mention of compromise; the focus remains squarely on accountability.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The speaker is in strong opposition to the minister facing a no-confidence vote, criticizing both his lack of security clearance and his inaction regarding the relocation of Red Army infrastructure sites. Opposition is also expressed towards the political instability and ideological reversal (Centre Party members are turning into Social Democrats).
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The opposition is directed at the government's tax policy and the car tax law, which is being criticized for unconstitutionality and poor legislative drafting. The criticism is intense and politically charged, highlighting the shift in the tax's purpose (from environmental protection to plugging budget holes). A compromise is ruled out because the law cannot be fixed simply by introducing amendments.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The main confrontation is directed against the prime ministerial candidate and the governing coalition, criticizing both the political substance (tax increases) and the procedural justification. The criticism is intense, questioning the existence of a mandate for implementing such taxes and calling the tax label "security tax" baffling.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition and the rapporteur, who stand accused of ramming through legislation that violates the constitution. The criticism is both procedural (the failure to consult the Constitutional Committee) and substantive (the actual opposition to the law). This opposition is intense and principled, ruling out support for the legislation in any shape or form.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The main opponents are the government coalition and the committees responsible for drafting legislation, who are being criticized for the absence of substantive arguments and for disregarding procedural rules. Criticism was particularly sharp regarding the rapporteur of the Finance Committee due to his lack of preparation and for marginalizing the involvement of interest groups. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, demands are being made for the rejection of the draft legislation or the termination of the reading.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main adversary is the government and the Reform Party, who are blamed for the economic downturn and unfair taxation, specifically the car tax. The criticism is scathing, focusing on political failure and the lack of transparency when making crucial decisions (such as those concerning EU subsidies).
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is directed against the Reform Party and the government, who are accused of breaking pre-election promises and raising taxes. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the substance of the policy (the car tax being treated as a wealth tax) and the improper legislative procedure (lack of public consultation and the obstructive bundling of amendments).
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary confrontation is aimed at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government, who are criticized for a lack of transparency and insufficient communication in the performance of their official duties. Criticism is also directed at the procedure for replacing the government and the Prime Minister's personal attitude towards answering questions before the Riigikogu (Parliament).
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the ruling coalition parties: the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats. They are being intensely criticized for both political decisions (tax hikes, reduction of benefits) and procedural violations (the absence of WIK, the justification of urgency). The opposition is absolute; supporting the draft bill is ruled out, and the coalition stands accused of deceiving the electorate.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The primary target is the minister and the ministry he leads, who are being sharply criticized for ethical violations and specific failures. The criticism is aimed both at providing political cover within the European Union for platform companies and the disregard for anti-corruption legislation. The opposition's stance is intense, directly demanding the minister's resignation.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the Ministry of Finance for initiating the draft bill and for the flawed process, particularly due to the failure to involve key interest groups (the Central Union of Farmers, the Private Forest Union). The criticism is both procedural and substantive, accusing the government of shifting a money-extraction measure onto local municipalities. The criticism is intense and concludes with a proposal to reject the bill.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The confrontation is directed against the government and its ministers (the Prime Minister, the Minister of the Interior), criticizing their inaction and incompetence. The criticism addresses both procedural issues (the Prime Minister avoiding answering questions) and the poor handling of security (the border, the EE-alarm system).
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The confrontation is directed at the government's tax policy, specifically the changes regarding the taxation of pensions. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, citing a lack of answers and the disregard for Isamaa's proposals. Furthermore, there is sharp criticism aimed at the activities of banks, which are viewed as constantly taking money from the public.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the Ministry of Climate and the ruling coalition, particularly regarding the goals of climate policy and development strategy. The criticism is intense and politically motivated, accusing the government of encroaching upon private property rights and creating illusory activities (waste reform, preparation for phosphorite mining). The Minister's decision to redirect compensation for protected areas into CAP funding is especially criticized.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The main opponents are the government (the prime minister, the finance minister, and the minister) and specific officials, especially the Deputy Secretary General, who is criticized for spearheading the introduction of labor from third countries. The criticism targets both political decisions (cuts to local government funding, lack of economic stimulation) and ethical issues (conflict of interest stemming from the Bolt issue and the Deputy Secretary General’s background).
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the explanatory memorandum and the regulations put forth by the government, which create inequality for residents in rural areas and include requirements that are technically impractical. The opposition is focused on policy and procedure, concentrating on the illogical elements of the draft legislation and its practical consequences.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the respondent to the inquiry (likely a government representative), who is being criticized for providing an inadequate response and for their inability to address a large-scale security threat. The criticism specifically targets their inaction and the misplacement of priorities.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Education, who stands accused of avoiding responsibility and making failed political decisions. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the substance of the policy (school closures, funding shortfalls) and on the Minister's conduct (specifically, a lack of interest in the resignation of their Lithuanian counterpart). There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, the focus remains squarely on demanding accountability.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary target of criticism is the government, which is criticized for its governing culture (the "steamroller" approach) and for ignoring legislative procedures, specifically due to the lack of a formal intent to draft. The criticism is intense and highly political, culminating in the proposal by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party to reject the bill during its first reading. Previous governments (the Social Democrats/Sotsid) are also criticized for the effects of excise duty increases and the resulting border trade.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and ministers, particularly concerning the fast-tracking of draft legislation without due analysis. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, accusing the government of continuing its "steamroller" tactics and ignoring feedback provided in the coordination tables.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposing side is primarily criticized for failing to answer the questions raised in the inquiry (especially concerning social programs) and for misrepresenting the views of a colleague (Martin Helme). At the European level, the speaker is seeking disagreement and opposition (e.g., Poland, Hungary, Slovakia) to the introduction of green rules, indicating a desire to put the brakes on these regulations.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Strong criticism has been leveled against the government and the coalition, who are accused of ignoring the views of the 40% of people who distrust e-voting and of imposing an insecure system. Criticism is also aimed at the Constitutional Committee's subjective decision to bundle the proposed amendments together and at the pressuring of the Republic Electoral Committee to address the verification of insecure elections.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism targets the government's regional policy, specifically faulting the centralization achieved through the public libraries reform, which results in jobs moving from county centers to the capital. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the lack of regional sustainability and the deterioration of local services.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the justifications for the government's (or minister's) actions and funding, which are deemed insufficient or ineffective. Particularly sharp criticism is leveled against the Reform Party's historical stance on national defense, accusing them of campaigning to abolish conscription—an attack based on factual accuracy.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the government (which cannot secure additional funding) and the Ministry of Education and Research, which shows no interest in veterinary studies. The criticism is policy- and procedure-driven, accusing the government of "green hysteria" and managing the country based on an Excel spreadsheet, thereby ignoring the sector's needs. Separate opposition is directed at the stance of a ruling party member who considers living in the countryside detrimental to the environment.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the current government, which is accused of implementing economy-stifling taxes (such as fuel excise duty and road usage fees) under the guise of the "green transition." Critics oppose the government’s environmental policy, arguing that it actually increases the environmental footprint by forcing haulers to use multiple vehicles to transport the same volume of goods. The criticism is policy-driven and intense.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is directed against the minister and the proponents of the motor vehicle tax. The criticism is intense and encompasses both personal unethical conduct (driving with an expired technical inspection) and legislative and legal issues (procedural delays, inequality in the EU context). The opponent's behavior is directly labeled as illegal.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is clearly taking an opposition stance, criticizing the government over budget deficits and the prioritization of income tax reform. The criticism is policy- and financing-based, contrasting the government's new taxes (a motor vehicle tax) with the opposition's alternative (a bank tax).
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the government’s inaction or inefficiency, particularly concerning its failure to finalize policies and its lack of awareness regarding the professional backgrounds of people residing in the country. The critic also takes aim at the demands made by certain interest groups (such as Muslim/Jewish schools), dismissing them as pseudo-issues that divert attention away from providing aid to Ukraine. Furthermore, the lack of inter-ministerial consultation during the drafting of legislation is also criticized.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The criticism is aimed at the government and agencies (the Labour Inspectorate, PRIA) which impose bureaucratic requirements that make agriculture inefficient and ignore practical needs. A separate conflict has arisen with ornithologists, whose successful hunting ban has led to the failure of winter crops, despite the increase in the goose population.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is no criticism or opposition; questions are directed to the Minister to obtain information and clarification regarding the regulatory changes. Neither opponents nor policies are being attacked; instead, the focus is on understanding the details of the law's implementation.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed both at the Riigikogu Board for procedural deficiencies and at government ministers who wish to import labor from outside Estonia. The speaker criticizes the respondents for their vague answers and lack of awareness, while simultaneously rejecting the accusation that EKRE is not helping Ukraine. He expresses strong opposition to circumventing a referendum on the marriage issue.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The strong opposition is focused on the procedures for handling the draft legislation, criticizing the committee's process, which they claim is actively seeking reasons not to support the bill. Furthermore, the security of the e-voting system is being criticized, with suggestions that the system could be vulnerable to attacks by a malicious state (Russia). The criticism is primarily procedural and policy-driven.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The primary criticism is leveled against the government as a whole, accusing them of failing to secure strategic investments and centralizing regional policy. The criticism focuses on policy and procedure, citing the Olerex case as an example, where oversight and public procurement processes are contradictory.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The main opponent is the government coalition, which is sharply criticized for its family policy, tax hikes, and benefit cuts. The criticism is policy-based (the removal of benefits for large families, the motor vehicle tax, the sugar tax) and procedural (the government dictates the direction to the Riigikogu, rather than the reverse). The government’s actions are being labeled as undermining the state and anti-family.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary conflict is between the head of government and a specific minister, who is accused of hostility towards families. The criticism is intense, focusing on political failure (the declining birth rate) and the misuse of administrative procedures (the creation of a commission to delay matters).
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is in strong opposition, criticizing the Reform Party and the government for political stalling (specifically, restricting voting rights/suffrage) and for how the government sets its priorities (prioritizing the coalition agreement over the national interest). The coalition’s actions in local municipalities are also indirectly criticized regarding the timing of council sessions, which obstructs the work of opposition members.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the government's actions and administrative capacity, particularly concerning the education reform and the payment of supplementary wages to teachers in Ida-Virumaa. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, stressing that salary delays cannot constitute a long-term strategy and that checking documents twice a year is "incomprehensible."
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for taxing families into poverty and for ineffective tax solutions (like the car tax). The speaker explicitly rejects the claims that EKRE does not support national defense spending, stressing that conservatives have always advocated for 3% defense expenditure. The criticism is primarily policy- and value-based.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the Social Democrats, whose line of reasoning is dismissed as being simultaneously laughable and yet fear-mongering. There is also strong opposition to electoral alliances, which are characterized as an improper "hodgepodge" that obstructs communication between the central government and the local level. The criticism is both political-structural and personal/dismissive (referencing the insignificance of the opposing speaker's vote tally).
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the government's tax increases and policies, which have driven the agricultural sector into deficit and forced consumers to prioritize price when purchasing. The criticism is political and intense, suggesting that the government is essentially taking farmers' own money. Solutions are expected from the Minister of Regional Affairs (Social Democrats). This criticism is supported by economic data (for example, VAT revenue collection is lower than planned).
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The opposition is directed at the government (the Interior Minister acting as Prime Minister) regarding the lack of a concrete action plan on issues of mass immigration and the return of Ukrainians. The government's claims are criticized because, in the speaker's estimation, they are untrue concerning the wishes of the Ukrainian President. The criticism is policy- and results-based.
2024-02-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is insufficient data.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the "current coalition" and its tax policy, particularly the implementation of indirect taxes. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the negative impact of the tax increases on consumers and the business sector.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The opposition is directed at the assessment made by the Chancellery of the Riigikogu, which deemed the special labeling an interference in the business environment—a claim the speaker rejects, stressing instead the protection of consumer freedom of choice. The Reform Party was also criticized (with a humorous reference), and the chair of the session was asked whether the questions posed by a certain questioner regarding court cases were relevant to the draft bill.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
There is not enough data.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The confrontation is aimed directly at the policies of the government and the Prime Minister, criticizing their passivity and selective approach when it comes to taking a leadership role in Europe. The criticism is policy-driven, alleging that the government has embraced the 'green frenzy,' which will lead to the closure of production facilities in Narva and the oil shale industry.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the actions of the government and ministries, criticizing their failure to ensure the full employment of immigrants and their lack of flexibility when funding regional projects. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on rigid deadlines and inadequate financing that ultimately prevented the Jõhvi project from being implemented.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the majority, who routinely reject sound bills proposed by the opposition without examining their merits, justifying these rejections by citing future planned amendments. There is sharp criticism regarding tax hikes detrimental to farmers, as well as the structure of the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture, which signals the marginalization of the agricultural sector. The government’s activities are being dubbed the deliberate killing off of rural life.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The stance adopted is critically questioning of the government, especially concerning plans to ensure food security in times of war and crisis. The politician demands explanations and concrete steps from the government, pointing to potential inaction or insufficient planning. The criticism is aimed at the substance of the policy and the actions themselves.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary resistance targets the government’s policies, which impose coercive measures (such as mandatory reconstruction and the car tax) and prioritize major projects (like Rail Baltic) to the detriment of the regional road network. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the economic and social harm caused by these measures, particularly in rural areas. The critic also faults the ministries for failing to set an example by transitioning to more fuel-efficient vehicles.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is clearly adopting an opposition stance, criticizing the government's economic policy (while proposing alternative tax cuts) and challenging parliamentary procedures. They question the depth of knowledge held by coalition members and defend the right of those raising questions to debate the issue in the main hall. The criticism is directed at policy and procedures, not at individuals.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main criticism is directed at the government and ministries, criticizing their lack of transparency (the classification of information requests) and their uncertainty in ensuring national security (citing the University of Tartu and the Peipus border). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, demanding better management and proactive work.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at those who employ the "leaving the dead in peace" argument to obstruct the relocation of Soviet monuments, labeling this tactic as merely finding a justification to avoid taking further steps. Furthermore, the state's current policy, which has failed to remove monuments situated on private land, is also under fire.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The opposition's stance is directed against the government and the prime minister, sharply criticizing tax policy, foreign aid priorities, and the failure of integration. The criticism is both political (focusing on tax hikes) and procedural, hinting at inadequate investigations (the Lehtme case) and general dishonesty. The opposition is intense and highly accusatory.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The dispute is directed at procedural issues and the allocation of jurisdiction regarding the presented legislative amendment. The criticism is moderate and is expressed in the form of a question, raising suspicions that the Minister of the Interior may not be the appropriate minister to handle the matter, citing a potential sectoral mismatch.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the high taxation policy, evidenced by the desire to lower the VAT rate. There is opposition to the current tax policy, which results in a rate higher than the EU minimum. Specific opponents or political groups are not personally criticized.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The criticism is aimed at the government's handling of the Nordica sale process, questioning the transparency and timing of the procedure. The objection is policy- and procedure-based, not personal, and focuses on potential negative consequences.