By Plenary Sessions: Alar Laneman

No data available.

The economic considerations relate solely to defense sector accounting, where it is emphasized that operational capability is more crucial than strict financial discipline during wartime. Broader economic perspectives are absent.

There is too little data.

There is not enough data.

There is not enough data.

Economic perspectives are limited to supporting defense spending, emphasizing that the costs of missions are modest (over 28,000 euros) and that the financing and procurement of defense capabilities is a priority. The position is defended that developing defense capabilities is a crucial investment in building the state's capacity.

Insufficient data.

Not enough data

No data available.

Supports large and targeted public spending in the field of national defense, positively citing "emergency cash injections" to compensate for previous shortfalls.

There isn't enough data.

Not enough data

No data available.

The economic perspectives center on fiscal responsibility and transparency in the state budget, criticizing the unreliable cost-based rationale used for calculating government levies. It is stressed that the government itself shapes the conditions of the economic environment (for instance, through taxation) and is consequently responsible for the stability of that environment.

Economic perspectives directly link deficits in democracy to negative fiscal consequences, arguing that less democracy translates to "more taxes and a lower standard of living." The speaker emphasizes that the state's objective is to guarantee a dignified and good life for its people, which necessitates a trustworthy process for the acquisition of power.

Insufficient data.

Economic perspectives emphasize that budget balancing and major green transition projects may be temporarily delayed if doing so provides resources for strengthening national defense. He advocates for reallocating resources from costly green projects to critical security sectors.

Economic considerations have been subordinated to security priorities, necessitating the postponement of major investments related to the green transition (approximately 1.5 billion euros annually). It is emphasized that the risks associated with the green transition do not pose an immediate threat, unlike Russia, and resources should be channeled toward strengthening national defense structures. Unrealized revenue from Eesti Energia and the timber sector is mentioned, which underscores the economic rationale.

No data available

Economic views are linked to fiscal discipline and the regulation of consumption taxes. The speaker actively participates in shaping national tax policy, proposing a specific VAT rate (19.4%), which suggests a precise, potentially revenue-based approach to taxation.

There is not enough data.