By Plenary Sessions: Hanah Lahe
Total Sessions: 25
Fully Profiled: 25
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The confrontation manifests on the procedural level, where the speaker criticizes the chair of the session, asking directly why they are unwilling to continue the work, citing the good recommendations of colleagues. Political opponents or their positions are not criticized substantively.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the argument presented by the speaker, which linked the imposition of the car tax with a low fertility rate. The criticism is substantive and well-argued, demanding clarification regarding the alleged connection, and is not personal.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no direct opposition or criticism directed at the other parties. The committee's discussion was described as successful, with all questions receiving good and comprehensive answers, indicating a smooth and conflict-free process.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The criticism is leveled against the initiators of the draft bill, who are accused of ignoring the environmental impact and inadequately preparing the proposal. The speaker disputes Mr. Epler’s claims, clarifying the Reform Party’s actual position within the committee. The criticism is primarily focused on policy and procedure, rather than being personal.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes colleagues from EKRE, Isamaa, and the Centre Party, accusing them of spreading lies, believing in conspiracy theories, and misleading the electorate. The critique is both political (opposition to the HKS and the green transition) and personal (accusing them of causing "existential angst"). Furthermore, the speaker criticizes the President of the United States for denying anthropogenic climate change.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Criticism is directed at the justice system and court decisions that appear to blame victims or mitigate sentences. The societal tendency to ridicule sexual offenses is also criticized.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is too little data.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the presenter, who focuses on the negative impact of wind turbines while completely ignoring the severe health aspects of oil shale mining. The criticism is politically intense and is based on questioning the selective focus of the policy and its resulting consequences. The speaker is indirectly criticizing the position that supports the continued use of oil shale energy.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opponent is Evelin Poolamets, who is criticized for deviating from the topic of the draft law and introducing irrelevant social issues (genders, hormones, e-elections). There is also strong opposition to the opponent’s position regarding the denial of the anthropogenic nature of climate change. The criticism is directed at both the procedure and the substantive viewpoints.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
No data available.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Strong and direct opposition is aimed at "non-believing politicians" who deny man-made climate change and ask questions "out of spite." The criticism is intense and partly personal, accusing them of ignoring science and undermining national climate policy. Colleague Anti Poolamets is also criticized for making fun of climate anxiety, which is considered "truly low."
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the bill's initiator (Kalle Grünthal), who is being criticized for failing to provide exhaustive answers to the questions raised. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, as the bill was rejected due to insufficient justification and a failure to demonstrate its necessity. The opposition was strong, which led to a consensus proposal to reject the bill.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
It stands in opposition to those parties in the Riigikogu who deny the reality of climate change or do not consider it a threat whatsoever. The criticism is aimed at political denialism, which prevents meaningful discussion and the finding of solutions.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
There is insufficient data.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
No criticism was offered. The speaker addresses questions raised by colleagues neutrally (e.g., stakeholder feedback or issues concerning the Agriculture and Food Board), focusing on the facts and the points that came up for discussion in the committee.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opponents are primarily representatives of more conservative parties, whose motives (bringing voters to the liberals) are considered cynical. The criticism is aimed at political arguments—such as the immaturity of young people, low participation, and a tendency to elect extremist forces—all of which the speaker systematically attempts to refute. The objections are treated as a backward attitude that fails to acknowledge the awareness of today's youth.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at EKRE representatives, who are criticized for denying climate change and offering contradictory explanations (cosmic radiation, volcanoes). This criticism is science-based and focuses on the inconsistencies in the opposition's rhetoric, rather than targeting individuals.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no opposition; the criticism is aimed instead at the restrictions of the previously effective law, which only allowed wastewater to be discharged into the receiving body, thereby preventing its reuse.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speech does not mention any opposing parties or criticism, since no amendments were received by the deadline and the committee's decisions were consensual. Insufficient data.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Direct opposition or criticism towards the minister is not expressed; instead, a question concerning their term of office is raised. The generalized criticism is aimed at countries that are unwilling to contribute to solutions for the climate crisis.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main confrontation is directed against the party of the spokesperson, who is accused of spreading personal misinformation about a colleague (specifically, the claim regarding the recommendation to eat insects). The criticism is intense and includes a direct reference to losing a previous lawsuit and the threat of a new court summons, making the attack both personal and legal.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the initiators of the bill, who rely on non-scientific sources and portals that discuss "the great reset of humanity." The opposition is intense and focuses on procedural shortcomings (the unapproved invitation of guests) and the lack of political justification, which would result in the closure of air traffic.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data