By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats
Total Sessions: 150
Fully Profiled: 150
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The rhetorical style is sharp and emotional when criticizing opponents, calling the minister's statement "appalling" and accusing it of having offended a large part of society. At the same time, the tone towards the presenter is polite and appreciative, posing questions directly and focusing on policy.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The tone is predominantly combative, critical, and accusatory, aimed especially at the government and former coalition partners (the Social Democrats). It employs strong emotional appeals (lying, shame, treating the public like fools) and presents detailed lists (ministerial failures, tax hikes). The style is rather colloquial and direct, intended to highlight the confusion stemming from the government's incompetence.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The tone is predominantly urgent, anxious, and critical, stressing that human lives are at stake and the situation is anarchic. It employs both emotional appeals (the threat to human lives, wage poverty) and logical arguments (the shifting of responsibility between agencies, legal loopholes). The style is formal, yet it also includes anecdotal examples of the daily traffic chaos in Mustamäe.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is formal, yet critical and demanding, centered on the minister's accountability and obtaining explanations. The speaker employs logical argumentation, citing the minister's own statements concerning the poor economic situation and the lack of budget transparency. Additionally, the rhetoric contains ideological confrontation, specifically labeling the redistribution of income as socialism.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is predominantly confrontational, emotional, and critical, especially towards the Minister of Finance, who is accused of disrespect, scolding, and failing to provide answers. Repeated and memorable narratives are employed (the shifting goal of the car tax, the "chicken-moose" tax), and there is a direct appeal to the public. The speaker emphasizes that the government's actions are "embarrassing and sad" and generate public distrust.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Eloquent, shocking, and emotionally charged, yet simultaneously grounded in a strong factual foundation. It employs swift and vivid comparisons (e.g., a circus), direct accusations, and emphatic exclamations. It approaches subjects both emotionally and logically, but often leans heavily toward confrontation by intensifying the arguments and utilizing florid, productive rhetoric.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The emphasis is combative and straightforward, utilizing questions and emotional pressure points (e.g., "pure hypocrisy"), interspersed with nostalgia and sarcasm aimed at the Greens. It blends emotion with factual data, though the speaker adheres to a recognized structure of critical discourse. It is highly direct, effectively provocative, and slightly humorous.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
A critical and constructive tone is maintained, utilizing questions and fact-based references; the format is formal, analytical, and solution-oriented, ensuring emotional emphasis does not dominate.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The voice pattern is emotional, critical, and straightforward; it uses questions, examples, and in some instances, irony to emphasize the crisis of trust and the need for direct answers. It often establishes a strong, commanding presence and a critical tone, but strives to remain focused on the facts and the core problem.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
A decidedly formal and analytical tone within the context of everyday policy discourse; utilizes factual references and institutionally credible sources, combining critical and collaborative registers. Employs metaphors (green vs. red), addresses colleagues, and gently encourages in-depth deliberation and concrete analysis of draft legislation.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The tone is confrontational and direct, utilizing emotional appeals and personal examples (e.g., children's school lunch and food waste). Interspersed throughout the text is a social yet critical assessment, along with funny or provocative keywords ("the green transition's green folly"), and direct gesticulation, which helps draw attention. The speaker employs both argumentation and preemptively accusatory rhetorical devices.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Saturated with intense, value-driven passion and combative, the tone is quite direct. It employs rhetorical questions and refutes counterarguments by citing source inconsistencies or inadequate analysis. The text is strongly skeptical, discrediting "good decisions" and instilling a need for control and accountability. It is heavily focused on arguments and facts, utilizing sarcasm and direct address, including phrases like "This number is 15.5%" and expressions "in quotation marks."
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Critical, yet constructive and grounded in facts; it utilizes specific examples (the car tax, the lack of clarity in the budget, the absence of impact analyses) and references institutional oversight mechanisms. The language is characterized by formality and the clear presentation of reasoning, which helps to advance arguments rationally. The text is primarily analytical and fact-based, rather than emotional.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The approach is formal, adhering to a fundamental, framework-preserving style, employing structured argumentation, specific questions, and references to official inquiries (or interpellations). While the text clearly outlines problems and provides recommendations, it lacks emotional drive; the rhetoric remains primarily concrete and fact-based.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The tone is formal and question-driven, relying on facts and concrete examples. It employs systematic inquiry and the necessity of evaluation to highlight problems and the requirement for future progress.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker's tone is dramatic and combative, often directed through pointed questions and intense inquiry; they utilize compelling data and strong phrasing, and pose rhetorical questions to facilitate understanding of the problem. The delivery is direct, emotional, and sometimes critical, yet simultaneously geared toward presenting motivated, concrete proposals and suggestions for improvement.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The tone is critical and challenging, direct, and focused on expressing strong emotions. Specific examples and catchy, rhetorical terms are used (such as "tax festival," "tax hell," and "mess") to ensure maximum impact.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The emphasis is placed on a direct and critical tone, supported by arguments based on established facts. It constantly employs direct addresses to the minister, questions, and examples, sometimes incorporating symbolic criticism (a "charade") and emotional references to the difficulties faced in local communities. It combines complex data with clear statements, all while maintaining a formal parliamentary style.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The style of expression is formal and structured, often conveying irritation and criticism, yet simultaneously employing fact-based arguments and direct questions. It features both emotional admonitions and rationalized explanations. In several pieces, the author uses humor or personal examples (such as the "munemed" reference) as an impetus, drawing attention to societal concerns. While the tone at the conclusion of some discussions remains serious and inviting, at other times it is aggressive and polemical.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The tone is formal, inquisitive, and cooperative. The speaker addresses the manager directly, clarifies the facts, and corrects the terminology corresponding to the concepts, which enhances credibility. Ultimately, he/she is cautious, but persistently oriented toward dialogue.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The tools employed include emotional and unambiguous language: direct questions, accusations, and a strongly critical tone aimed at the coalition. This is combined with a populist and dramatic style (showcasing “high-interest quick loans” and the “coping mechanisms of vulnerable people”). While some speeches are solidly fact-based, they often utilize strongly polemical and highly captivating rhetoric.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The discourse is critical yet constructive and focused on arguments. Questions, comparisons, and examples from neighboring countries are utilized to highlight areas of concern; the tone is formal and fact-based, punctuated by the occasional rhetorical question, such as, “Is this the only way?”
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker employs aggressive and emotionally charged rhetoric, relying heavily on questions and comparisons to highlight the threat to democracy. The text is dominated by criticism and alarm, although a fact-based approach is also utilized. The arguments are grounded in ethical and rule-of-law principles, rather than primarily seeking peaceful compromise.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The tone is combative, critical, and data-driven; it uses questions and illustrative examples (e.g., eggshells, consumer prices), and occasionally humorous jabs. The text is formally correct, but tonally forceful, and aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and transparency of the law.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
A critical and confrontational tone, employing strong value judgments and accusations (e.g., "the minister is lying," "the state is reduced to the status of a cheap service provider for clients"). It utilizes visual imagery ("prison tourism") and rhetoric focused on ethics and local security. While it balances emotional and logical argumentative approaches, it leans primarily toward accusatory rhetoric.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of delivery is highly impactful and controversial, combining an emotional initial impression with fact-based argumentation. It makes extensive use of rhetorical questions, direct addresses, and concrete examples, and the speech as a whole is often regarded as forceful and critical. Formally, it is skilled, swiftly directed, and interspersed with dramatic asides that emphasize the opposition and the solid foundation of the proposals.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Rhetoric is argumentative, passionate, and grounded in facts: it employs direct quotations, the structure of a debating question, and a powerful emotional message. The style encourages public discussion, yet it is simultaneously dense with numbers and references. The questions raised and the numerical evidence lend the speakers a forceful, persuasive tone of address.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Critical and fact-based, but not hostile; the tone is authoritative yet distinctly argumentative. It is slightly accusatory toward the government, employing direct claims and specific figures, which boosts its credibility. It utilizes structured, line-by-line frameworks—incorporating both questions and answers, as well as paragraphs—to guide the audience toward a logical conclusion.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The emphasis is on a concerned, questioning, and solution-oriented tone; it uses the interrogative form and references facts, which provides an analytical basis.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The speaker employs inquisitive, question-driven, and fact-based rhetoric. They address the minister directly, highlighting specific examples and posing pointed questions. The tone remains critical but avoids becoming personal, blending emotional appeal with nationally relevant data. Furthermore, the speaker frequently uses direct quotes referencing the minister's presentation and raises questions targeting any perceived inconsistencies.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker's style is combative and emotional, yet mixed with numerical evidence; they utilize several areas of address and hope to engage both the public and the faction. An image of a "smoke screen" (referring to the idea of the tax hump) is created, coupled with an emotional emphasis on generating poverty and inequality; the speaker employs interrogative sentences and moral arguments to increase pressure on the opposing side.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The tone is analytical, structured, and question-driven; it utilizes factual evidence from the IMF report and clearly poses questions regarding competence and the future plan. It highlights both positive and negative aspects but refrains from using agitated or emotional rhetoric. The textual argument is supported by numerical examples (33%, 40%) and references to the international context, which lends the discourse prominence, yet maintains a professional demeanor.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Rhetorically, this combines the standard formal debate with non-dynamic criticism. Questions, an irritating tone, and an emphasis on details and facts are employed; occasionally, this involves the evocation of accusations and scandals, but the discussion remains focused on the draft topic and is settled into repetition. The text exhibits both a softening and a sharp style, with emphasis placed on discipline and adherence to the thematic scope.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
In the speech, a sharp and incisive style dominates, characterized by emotional and concentrated criticism. Questions are employed, along with strongly worded assessments (e.g., crisis, survival, the state is not managing the economy), and the inclusion of factual data and examples. The emphasis is placed on defining the problem and demanding political accountability; the style is confrontational, but it also extends an invitation for an argumentative and parity-based discussion.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The style is critical and often provocative, employing historical and economic comparisons (for instance, a hotel that looks beautiful from the outside but is surrounded by chaos). The speaker uses questions, exclamations, and visual metaphors (e.g., "green is not green"). A large number of anecdotal examples and personal imagery (Tesla, diesel, child labor) contribute to the emotional impact.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
A constructive, question-focused, and data-driven style; it uses specific figures and sources (ERR) and raises questions rather than offering direct endorsements. The tone is critical, but non-hostile, combining fact-based discussion with attention-directing measures.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The emphasis is placed on the decisive and emotional, yet fact-based argument; it repeatedly employs calls for public involvement and broad debate, utilizing questions and emotionally charged references (e.g., public trust, the problems of Ida-Virumaa). It often combines appealing rhetorical elements—such as references to "the people say" and "the three wise men"—which heighten the sense of showmanship and confrontation.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
A markedly critical and emotional style; it often employs emotional preambles, questions, and personal observations, along with striking examples (e.g., references to the “surrender of the portfolio” and feedback from the Icelandic embassy). The text features clusters of paragraphs and a strong depiction of resistance, but occasionally also includes references to the desire for cooperation with foreign partners.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The tone is formal and analytical—it asks questions, introduces elements of criticism, and uses international examples to support the argument. The greeting and the speaker's respectful opening point toward the official rhetoric surrounding the specific issue at hand. The emphasis lies on presenting questions and arguments, rather than applying emotional pressure.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The tone is critical and persuasive: it employs emotional arguments supported by fact-based examples, using rhetorical questions and forceful exclamations to project a powerful image. The texts often contain a touch of drama, while simultaneously remaining concrete and analytical. The style is formal, yet sharp and direct, characteristic of the event.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speech is formal and fact-based, utilizing specific examples and pointed questions aimed at the government. Rather than emotion or sympathy, the preferred approach is an analytical and well-reasoned argument, delivered in a tone that stresses cooperation.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The focus is analytical and deliberative in nature, and it often uses examples and references (OSCE, media coverage) to increase its impact. The texts feature a mix of emotional resonance, fact-based argumentation, and the defense of democratic values; the style is formal, but also seeks to highlight important ethical principles (confidentiality, transparency).
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Rhetoric is voluntarily comprehensive, often combative, and overwhelmingly intimidating; it uses questions, tonal shifts delivered with a strong personal voice, and examples that support intellectual engagement. The text emphasizes internal structure: the presentation of facts and figures is blended with an emotional descriptive style; there is the recurring keyword "question of priorities," and critical references to opposing subjectivities.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
He/She structures their arguments based on analytical and robust data, utilizing questions and references to ENMAK numbers. The speech generates conclusions delivered with a critical but impersonal tone; factual and rhetorical assertions are blended, and a direct answer is missing for some questions. Different scenarios and examples are compared to highlight uncertainties and the necessity for clarity.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The tone is direct and somewhat abrupt, often utilizing questions to deliver criticism and compel responses. The text relies heavily on facts and figures, but the style remains formally critical, emphasizing problems and risks.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Obligatorily critical and polemical, often employing rhetorical questions, accusations, and an emotional tone; it uses strong claims and figures and draws attention to issues of trust and legitimacy; sometimes inviting and seeking cooperation, but primarily acting in contrast to the government.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is aggressive and sharp, relying heavily on fact- and example-based argumentation, and includes direct addresses to the presiding officer. The texts feature questions, critical remarks, and an emotional tone, coupled with concrete proposals for amendments; the discussion of social and economic issues is closely tied to political struggle.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The tone is emphatically argumentative and formal, with the discourse style primarily grounded in facts and examples. It utilizes questions and the search for answers (e.g., "Is it possible for us to...?") and stresses the practical implications for the economy. Emotionally moderate, yet firmly critical, and prepared to differentiate between ideas and their economic impact.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The tone is polite, inquiring, and data-driven; it uses questions and hypothetical scenarios to provoke discussion and scrutiny, rather than to demonstrate aggression. The text is formal, analytical, and systematic, and seeks to balance emotional narrative with facts, while offering constructive criticism.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The first speech is emotional, direct, and accusatory; it uses leading questions and emphasizes a large number of facts. The second speech is analytical and fact-based, highlighting references to protocols and criticizing the neglect of security issues. In both styles, the focus is on the questions raised and rhetorical attention-grabbing, but the tones differ: passionate versus calmly critical.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speech is combative and critical, employing rhetorical questions and a notably strong symbolic style (e.g., “tragicomic”). This is combined with emotional emphasis and a couple of personal touches (e.g., a compliment directed at female colleagues). The language is straightforward, sometimes ironically nuanced and informally polished.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A formal and direct tone; presented as a practical question concerning collaboration with colleagues, utilizing a specific example and economic criteria that strengthen the argumentation oruvit.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
It employs a combination of an incisive and conclusion-oriented tone: critical, emotionally charged, and repeatedly highlighting deficiencies. It utilizes rhetorical questions and metaphors (the clock) to demonstrate the inadequacy of the organization. The text is formal, but the tone is intensely emotional and critical.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
A tone that is emphatically honest and sharply reflective, carefully structured, and emotionally charged; it utilizes repetition and rhetorical devices ("badly/badly," "everything is bad") alongside moral narratives regarding the necessity of improving political culture. The speaker is eloquent and sounds like a critical observer, yet simultaneously continues to present concrete demands and proposals.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A tone expressing significant irritation and accusation, combative and decisive; utilizing powerful lists and an emotive style, emphasizing crises and the need for more radical measures; formal, but primarily argumentative and aimed at generating momentum.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
A formal and precise tone, complemented by the warming up of dialogues through the use of questions. It utilizes the emphasis of practical consequences and historical references, and relies on expert opinions; references to economic and safety contexts are also included as a continuation of the general discourse.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The emphasis is on a cautiously critical, but not overtly aggressive, tone. It employs questions and references to other politicians, conveying a sense of deliberation and control over the narrative and resources. It combines a formal style, fact-based references, and emotional appeals to concern, though it ultimately leans toward facts and rationalization.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetoric is combative and emotional, frequently challenging and critical. It employs provocative tactics, humorous asides (such as 'chicken eggs'), and sweeping generalizations. While the text includes fact-based assertions, they are often framed through the lens of veracity and moral conscience. Furthermore, it stresses the ambiguity and danger regarding the future operations of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament).
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The discourse and perspective are direct, challenging, and emotionally charged; they employ narrative-based and emblematic techniques (analogies concerning the example of the bottle, the TV by candlelight, etc.), multiple questions, and a critical tone. It balances emotion and logic but leans heavily toward a strong critical register, making compromise appear difficult.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The emphasis is notably combative and resolute, employing an emotional and multi-faceted argumentative approach. It includes cultural devices (the literary theme of Andrus Kivirähk) and context occurring within the contemporary media environment, combining factual and symbolic styles. The text maintains a decisive tone, which attempts to mobilize a cause, generate public confidence, and incite responses.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
At times, the style is highly turbulent and full of passionate outbursts. It uses concrete examples and figures, and addresses questions directly to ministers. The emphasis lies on an accusatory tone and an argument that is emotional yet simultaneously logical. The texts feature flashes of both descriptions and exclamations, alongside a small amount of narrative storytelling.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
An outspoken and combative tone, coupled with blunt questions and a critical perspective; uses emotional and provocative language, along with several rhetorical questions directed at the Foreign Minister. It blends personal commentary and examples from colleagues, combining numerical references and narrative allusions to maximize impact. Rapid textual or symbolic shifts, coupled with a critical mood setting, help create an intense debate.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
A critical, functional, and data-driven tone is employed; it poses specific questions and utilizes quantitative evidence to substantiate its views; it blends form (formal speeches) with direct criticism of the coalition, occasionally adding legislative irony aimed at the fourth and fifth estates/parties.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
An emphatically decisive and critical tone is used, yet it maintains an official and structured mode of address. It employs direct quotes, questions, and provocative observations (e.g., “How does this stand?”; “What is your position?”), which provides the companion and listener with immediate food for thought. In the written texts, it combines facts and colorful expressions, but strictly adheres to a formal and fact-focused style.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A formal and appropriately interrogative tone; poses specific questions and requests clarification. Utilizes references to data and legislation, not emotional rhetoric.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It employs irony and a questionnaire; the tone is critical, analytical, and invites debate, rather than being irritated. The examples provided (e.g., application ratings) reinforce the arguments, and the focus remains rational, not emotional.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Occasionally combative and sharp, it uses direct, challenging questions and a sarcastic tone (e.g., the MacLaren example). It aims for both emotional and rational emphasis, uses a blend of facts and examples, and stresses fairness and the assessment of economic impacts.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
A stern, confrontational, and blunt tone; used with the goal of verifying veracity, it frequently poses direct questions and strong accusations. It handles the input intensely and emotionally, yet remains grounded in fact-referenced materials.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The emphasis is critically forceful in its dismantling; it employs an emotional tone, quotes, and personal references, adding repetitions and humorous segments (e.g., "Kräpp või räpp"). The questions and provocations are directed toward criticizing the government's actions, all while maintaining a formal, rambling discourse.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The focus is on fact-based arguments blended with emotional appeals. Speakers adopt a critical yet sincere tone, coupled with affirmative and inviting phrases (“please vote,” “support this bill”). Short, memorable references to historical events and enumeration are employed to boost credibility and inject a degree of enthusiasm into the rhetoric, moving beyond mere routine formality. The texts also feature recurring stylistic emphasis and nationally unifying language.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Speaks in a tone combining directness and combativeness; employs rhetorical questions and frequent personal references. This creates a dynamic, provocative structure, while emphasizing factual scrutiny.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A controlled, critical, and emotionally balanced address. It utilizes specific examples (the high cost of notary fees, the snowball effect) and takes the form of questioning inquiries designed to highlight the answers. It presents powerful observations and employs slightly amusing metaphors, but ultimately sticks firmly to the facts and the core argument.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The tone is warm, inclusive, and vigorous, with a touch of humor; the speaker uses folk-inspired, down-to-earth language and consistently addresses the audience. The text contains short, striking phrases and frequent audience involvement (Applause), which creates a relaxed, festive Christmas atmosphere.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
A highly emotional and forceful speech, which levels powerful criticism at the government and its ministers. The text includes direct claims and moral arguments, incorporating some personal touches and references to social solidarity; the style is a somewhat rough mix of facts and ethical judgments, occasionally laced with irony.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The tone of the speeches is combative and direct, frequently using direct questions and accusatory or critical keywords. The text also incorporates personal examples and numerical details. Sarcasm and emotional language are employed (e.g., "this is complete ridicule," "why do you...") to strengthen the arguments.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The tone of the speech is decisive and focused on facts; it uses emphasis phrases such as “let me reiterate” and “as stated in the explanatory memorandum,” along with references to the bill’s legislative procedure, to increase persuasiveness. Although the current text is balanced, the combination of strong opposition and emotional expression persists.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The tone is substantive and argumentative, utilizing questions to engage the audience and providing examples (the Mustamäe meeting, national comparisons). It further emphasizes an ethical and emotional sense of justice and is critical of the existing system, but maintains a constructively peaceful tone. The language is formal, yet helpfully simplified to underscore the necessity of transparency.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is characterized by a critical yet gently constructive tone. They use direct questions and reference newspapers and expert opinions. Specific sources and quotes are embedded in the texts to strengthen the argumentation. The emphasis is on facts and procedural clarity, rather than mere emotion.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The tone is highly emotional and sharply critical, blending emotional appeals (concerning people who lack food) with fact-based references. The speaker frequently employs questions and comparisons, including drawing parallels to the 1990s, to underscore the problem and compel answers. The style is rich in justification, yet simultaneously, in order to stress security and accountability, the rhetoric is somewhat sparse in expression.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speech is primarily argumentative and fact-based, mixed with a critical tone regarding government decisions. Examples and statistics are utilized, sometimes followed by personal touches or humorous moments (e.g., laughter), but the overall language usage is formal and systematic. The emphasis is on clear proposals and the bigger picture, rather than rhetorical flourish.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
A pragmatic and fact-based tone, utilizing specific percentages and systemic approaches to competition/success. Arguments are presented clearly and persuasively, with an emphasis on cooperation and finding the best solution.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The tone of the speech is powerful and charged with conflict, combining emotional and logical arguments. Numbers, metaphors, and sharp observations (e.g., 1+1=2, brakes) are used to frame the debate and criticize the government. The text is sharp yet structured, utilizing questions and persuasive descriptions to emphasize its viewpoints.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Critical, yet formal and question-oriented; utilizes direct address and rhetorical questions (e.g., “I would really like to ask,” “That is the very question”). It combines emotional concern (security, livelihood/coping) with fact-based argumentation. The tone is forceful, but not irritated, maintaining an official linguistic register.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The discourse is primarily critical and challenging, often employing emotional and anthropomorphic examples, along with direct questions posed to the minister. The texts demonstrate a noticeable data- and fact-based approach, but simultaneously utilize a style clearly designed to engage a broad audience, and in some instances, the tone is sharply forceful. The rhetoric often relies on personal facts and observations and draws attention to procedural nuances.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The tone is decisive, emotional, and critical; a striking metaphor—the "total mess" (kobarkäkk)—is employed, alongside a strong moral appeal directed at the audience. The text features questions and exclamations that stimulate attention and underscore the urgency, but argumentation based on factual information and examples remains the dominant approach. The topics are addressed respectfully, but the viewpoints are strongly positioned and emotionally charged.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The style is specific, challenging, and emotionally sharp, frequently employing rhetorical questions and a strong personal tone. It opens with clarifications and accusations (the tax festival, the coalition, mandates), and utilizes examples and emotional references concerning the plight of pensioners and consumers. Critical phrases are often repeated, and the speaker addresses the audience directly (the Speaker of the Riigikogu, colleagues, the Prime Minister).
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The tone is formal and investigative; it begins with thanks and adherence to protocol, then poses specific and well-formulated questions to colleagues. It adopts an inclusive style, addressing colleagues by name, and promotes dialogue and cooperation. Emotionally moderate, the emphasis is placed on the exchange of ideas and the clarification of issues.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker addresses the audience directly, employing a somewhat critical and emotional tone; he frequently uses questions and concrete examples drawn from the experiences of neighboring countries to emphasize his viewpoints. The text features argumentation based on both examples and figures, and the systematic use of pauses and calls for a vote proves to be ritualistic.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker uses a direct, thought-provoking, and emotionally charged style of address; employing questions, comparisons, and statistics, and linking facts and assessments to strengthen the tone. A critical, yet formal, momentum of discussion develops.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker uses an active, critical, and emotional tone; employs questions, exclamations, and examples (e.g., the Spanish olive oil case), emphasizes practical solutions, and calls for bipartisan and non-governmental dialogue. The style is exploratory and powerfully argumentative, though occasionally it becomes rambling and marked by emphasized emotions.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speech is characterized by a critical and emotional tone, employing the speaker's own criticism and an interrogative style focused on questions. The tone is sharply decisive, occasionally irritated, yet simultaneously engaging, drawing in the listeners through rhetorical questions and forms of direct critique.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The tone is critically legalistic and decisively argumentative; it uses fact-based evidence and questions to expose the government's shortcomings. The speech is clearly structured, occasionally rhetorically sharp ("is the current government...?") and focuses on concrete policy recommendations (lowering VAT on food, energy policy). The texts note a forceful, yet not hypercritical tone, and examples such as power outages and regional inequality are used to heighten the emotional resonance.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
A data- and fact-based, formal, and question-centric style. It utilizes references to the National Audit Office (Riigikontroll) as authoritative sources and presents a direct question to the management, stressing the necessity of clarifying the situation. The tone is measured, critical yet non-hostile, and the discussion relies on facts and figures.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Critical, direct, and confrontational tone; uses concrete examples and poses frequent, persistent questions to the minister. There is often an emphasis on the need for honest answers, and arguments are woven together as a combination of emotional examples and factual data.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The rhetoric is primarily critical and question-driven, combined with fact-based referencing. It employs a clear and decisive tone, sometimes appealing and empathetically defending religious freedom, but simultaneously stresses the importance of public accountability and cooperation. The texts feature both direct questions and informal acknowledgments, which provide the speaker with a platform that is both forceful and nuanced.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The emphasis is decisive and critical, often raising questions and referencing data. A formal register is employed, along with references to the transcript; the tone is anxious and pressured, yet constructive.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The tone is critical, yet simultaneously collaborative: he uses moral arguments and appeals directed at colleagues, and in the rhetoric emphasizes an approach based on solidarity. A verbose, yet fact-driven rhetoric emerges, utilizing inquiries and drawing clear conclusions regarding the government's tax policy. Both emotional and rational discourse are highlighted, combining arguments with facts and ethical discussions.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
A serious, formal tone focused on core messages; utilizes both emotional examples (such as life in rural areas and the necessity of car ownership/transportation needs) and fact-based argumentation. Questions are frequently posed to the minister, emphasizing dialogue and cooperation, while striving to keep the discussion within a constructive and respectable format.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speeches are primarily aimed at disputes and carry a combative tone, with the opposition being both harshly critical and somewhat inviting compromise. The emphasis is heavily data- and number-driven: figures concerning the share of VAT, GDP, and budget revenue forecasts are cited, and alongside this, historical context and emotional stories are occasionally used to reinforce positions. The speeches adhere to the formal parliamentary address format, often referencing draft legislation and the budget, and utilizing questions and direct requests to steer the debate. The emphasis is both pragmatic and moral: some speeches highlight the economic impact and criticize those who oppose taxes, while others bring up the lives of ordinary people (support for pensioners, funding for care homes) and call on legislators to act appropriately.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
Conveyed with a strong and somewhat combative tone, it combines emotional rhetoric with facts and figures; it uses questions and examples (such as Russian speeches and identification problems) and makes direct appeals to ministers; while the format is official, the style is often cuttingly blunt.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Rhetorically critical and decisive, often under the control of emotion but primarily supported by logical argument. It employs questions, examples, and factual references to highlight contradictions and the impact on citizens. Formal in style, somewhat inflammatory in expression, yet disciplined in its reasoning.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
A targeted, contentious, and strongly critical tone; it utilizes direct judgments such as "blunder" and "omnibus bill," emphasizes the inconvenient and potentially harmful impact, and presents a strong tone of persuasion and admonishment; it combines the highlighting of facts and moral significance.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The discussion is formal, question-driven, and analytical; it utilizes specific examples and references to previous discussions to strengthen the evidentiary basis. The tone is critical, but not aggressive, and the emphasis remains on highlighting both problems and solutions.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
An analytical and fact-based tone; it uses specific figures to support its claims. It includes the rhetorical question, "Is the company too greedy?" which adds a critical and scrutinizing dimension. The official, slightly formal style of address and references to ministerial positions lend the speech political resonance.
2024-09-26
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speech is combative by nature and emotionally charged, often featuring sharp criticism and using vivid, personal expressions (e.g., “punishes people,” “you deceive voters”). It utilizes rhetorical techniques, draws comparisons between temporary taxation and historical contexts, and maintains a strong accusatory tone; yet, it is underpinned by numerical evidence and historical references. Additionally, the style is somewhat narrative, and the greeting extended to the respected Chairman may serve as a demonstrative opening gambit for the budget debate.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Speaks in a combative and emotional tone, often in the form of questions and strong assertions; uses dramatic gestures and examples, including a fist striking the podium, to maximize impact. The text also possesses a partially analytical, but primarily critical and combative style.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The discourse is critical and probing, utilizing direct questions and examples to highlight disagreements. The tone is formal, yet it expresses concern through emotional experience and discusses foreign policy. The text includes references to previous practice and rumors ("to paraphrase a member of your party") and helps reinforce the need for a clear message in order to continue the debate.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The tone is adaptive and polite, centered on posing a question and gathering information. Emphasis is placed on expressing gratitude and addressing the minister respectfully.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a critical yet measured tone, utilizing questions and specific examples. The texts adhere to a parliamentary format, frequently including a formal salutation and personal remarks, which are counterbalanced by analytical criticism. The focus is on clearly outlining the problems and seeking potential solutions to enhance the quality of foreign policy.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The discourse is formal, appreciative, and analytical; it utilizes questions and softens criticism, but simultaneously highlights the impact of policies and the necessity of action. The emotion is measured, and the focus remains on facts and fostering non-confrontational debate.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The tone is critical and ultimately argument-oriented. It employs rhetorical questions and emotional references (such as “running roughshod over public interest” and “the fairy tale that cheap electricity is coming”). The text’s structure is analytical, but it also includes sympathetic examples (fishermen, island communities) and draws attention to the procedural aspect (pauses, voting).
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
A combative style in the context of the local information hour, yet anchored by facts and references. It utilizes questions within sections, references to external sources, and straightforward viewpoints; occasionally incorporating levity (humor, laughter) and emotional shifts, but primarily maintaining an argumentative and structured level.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The tone is combative and highly diagnostic, often critical and direct. It uses strong emotional and provocative undertones (e.g., questions, personal references to ministers, cited statistics). The text includes motifs emphasizing social values, and sometimes irony and rhetorical descriptions of the chamber (e.g., "three minutes of extra time").
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The rhetoric is generally combative and impulsive: using strong language, repeatedly stating "I do not support/I do not agree," empathetically presenting a social assessment of the situation facing entrepreneurs, and directing questions to the chairman and the minister. While speaking, he/she combines emotional attention toward the business leadership with logical arguments, but the focus remains critical and confrontational.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The tone is calm, cooperative, and pragmatic; it uses direct address and questions to encourage interactive dialogue. The emotional emphasis is placed on empathy for people's circumstances and a focus on practical problem-solving. The language is polite and formal, yet straightforward.
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The communication is respectful and cooperative; it utilizes questions and alternative solutions (e.g., involving the minister, finding a substantive discussion). The tone is calm, not aggressive, focusing on procedure and solutions.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speech is tragicomic and highly emotional, yet simultaneously emphasizes a systematic approach to argumentation: it utilizes personal experiences and regional examples, reiterates observations ("I repeat"), references economic and legal facts, and attempts to urge the coalition to listen. The review also incorporates concern and hope, balancing both emotional and rational rhetorical techniques.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
A repetitive, direct address-focused, and emotionally charged tone: Specific examples and inclusive language are used when discussing a nationwide problem ("Dear Chairman of the Riigikogu," "Can you imagine?"). The speech is critical but not overly vulgar; it combines fact-based arguments with emotional appeals, emphasizing the magnitude of the burden and the decline in the quality of the living environment.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
The speech is formal, but delivered with an aggressive, critical tone, and includes sections of questions and accusations. It combines fact-based claims and emotional undertones; the emphasis is on the critical evaluation of procedure and government promises, and a call to act swiftly.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The emphasis is rational and fact-based; the tone is formal and clearly centered on the arguments; emotional displays are restricted.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
A heavy and official tone is present, coupled with a critical undertone. Strong preliminary arguments are utilized, alongside phrases expressing doubt and concern, and calls for broad discussion. The texts feature both emotional and rational argumentation, with an emphasis placed on collaborative capacity and flexibility.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The emphasis is placed on a formal, collaborative, and slightly persuasive demeanor. Discussions are often initiated with words of thanks directed at the chair, followed by an invitation for colleagues to reflect and debate. Repetitions and specific examples (such as the numbers of proposed amendments or requests for a recess) are utilized to steer the proceedings toward a vote. The style is predominantly argumentative and fact-based, yet it incorporates moral judgments and direct appeals aimed at colleagues.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speech is direct and hostile in tone, employing strong accusations and repeatedly using the word "lies." It utilizes rhetorical questions and directly addresses both the Speaker of the Riigikogu and the Minister. The style blends emotional critique with an emphasis on facts and diplomacy, aiming to mobilize opposition against the government.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style is combative and emotional, utilizing direct address and rhetorical questions. A moral argument is developed, focusing on human welfare and poverty reduction, and numerical data is provided to reinforce the message. The language is distinctly political, and the objective is to mobilize listeners to take action and influence the government.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The speech is formal, calm, and fact-based; it often employs questions to elicit responses and clarify viewpoints. Also included is a personal connection with Georgia, which adds a layer of humanity to the discourse and reinforces the tone of a diplomatic approach. Criticism may be voiced, but conflicts are not directly escalated; the emphasis remains on diplomacy and discussion.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The tone is calm and analytical, relying heavily on facts and figures. It employs thought-provoking references and uses pointed follow-up questions to effectively underscore deficiencies. The text itself is formal and highly considered, avoiding emotional language, and focuses attention on critical problems and viable solutions.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
A serious, formal, and question-oriented address; it combines the presentation of material and statistics structured as questions that compel the minister and the government to respond. It employs direct appeals and parliamentary inquiries, and sometimes an emotional tone to emphasize the situation of the people; it maintains procedural contacts within the Riigikogu and publishes criticism that is critical yet constructive.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The tone is formal, considered, and fact-based; it utilizes mitigating language and references to experts, emphasizes the pursuit of consensus, and seeks to justify the position based on the principles of constitutionality and the rule of law. Emotions are restrained, but the argumentation is thorough and systematic.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The tone is appropriate, measured, and focused on the issues; emotional interest is moderate and concentrates on a practical solution. It uses examples from specific companies and references ministerial figures, adding contextual weight. The text is structured, argumentative, and future-oriented.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The tone of the discourse is formal, yet critical and straightforward. Questions are utilized as the primary argumentative tool, and specific examples are emphasized to highlight deficiencies in the current practice. In complex passages, the approach remains balanced and non-committal, with the style leaning heavily toward focused discussion and favoring the pursuit of rationales.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
A critical and decisively argumentative tone, employing both emotional and fact-based argumentation. It uses concrete examples (bank profits, the example of bus companies) and poses questions to underscore the reasoning; the style is formal yet sharply critical.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The rhetoric is calm, measured, and focused on values; it employs rhetorical questions, moral allusions, and a classical reference (Publilius Syrus). The text is distilled and addresses fundamental ethical questions, rather than resorting to clamorous argumentativeness.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
A critical and argumentative tone is employed; it uses a combination of questions, facts, and examples, referencing specific indicators (the burden of tax changes, income disparity). It highlights practical shortcomings and unrealistic expectations, directing attention toward public finances and social impact.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
A combative and critical tone; uses rhetorical questions and the "carrot and stick" metaphor; emphasizes logical reasoning and the need for analysis.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The tone is critical, somewhat aggressive, and emotional; it utilizes rhetorical questions and strongly accusatory statements ("this is a big joke," "an internal coalition game"); it constructs a critical and provocative argument by combining the citation of facts and examples.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Speaks conversationally and persuasively, combining an emphasis on traditional values with technical references. They use examples and visual evidence (verification of paper ballots) and occasionally employ humor. The tone is critical, but they attempt to adhere to the established legal framework.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The tone is primarily critically constructive and focused on posing questions; it utilizes fact- and example-based argumentation and is delivered in a formal, parliamentary tone. It employs subtle allusions and analogies (such as the alcohol excise duty) and presents several inquiries designed to elicit a response and debate, rather than a directive.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
A somewhat data-centric and critical tone, supplemented by unambiguously vivid, specific examples and the use of numerical comparisons. It uses rhetorical questions and a decisive style, emphasizing quick solutions and flexibility. At the same time, the second address concluded with a friendly, questioning tone, highlighting the need for cooperation and the positive impact on sports development. Overall, it is a mix of solid form and emotional, meaningful argumentation.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
A formal and respectful tone; utilizes structured questions and references to economic concepts. The objective is the clarification of arguments through questioning, rather than emotional rhetoric.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The emphasis is urgent, problem-focused, and fact-based; it utilizes rhetorical questions and inclusive "we" language to maximize participation. The overall tone is primarily critical, but aims to be balanced and in outcomes XX; it employs concrete examples and places emotional stress on the food crisis and security issues.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The tone of the speech is primarily urgent, critical, and somewhat accusatory; it employs both an emotional and fact-based approach, addressing the audience directly and pointing to the "government" as responsible for the problems. The text embodies a strong moral and nationalistic atmosphere, and the rhetorical strategy merges data with emotional concerns.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The emphasis is placed on an analytical and fact-based tone, utilizing examples from external authorities (such as the head of the Belgian central bank) to bolster its arguments. The text includes questions directed at the audience, clarifying figures, and pragmatic elements; it adopts a calm yet determined and somewhat exhaustive approach, which seeks to integrate emotional and logical argumentation.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Critical, yet fact-based and inquisitive; it employs a parliamentary style, combining questions with arguments. It highlights specific figures and historical examples, attempting to demonstrate that government policy fails to meet the needs of the people. While it uses a strong emotional motivator to reference the cost of living and poverty, it maintains a relatively formal and argument-focused tone.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Formal, fact-based, and structured in the form of a modern parliamentary question; the tone is critical, but not emotional; it uses specific data and adopts a stylistically sensible, argument-supporting approach.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
A critical yet constructive tone; it combines emotional emphasis regarding social problems with the use of facts and data. It addresses the Prime Minister directly, presenting a question and a proposal while stressing viable solutions. The speech is formal, argumentative, and focused on presenting clear nuances.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
A formal and respectful tone; uses a direct, interrogative form, and focuses on facts and official addresses.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speech is critical and, at times, aggressive. It uses emotional examples (such as problems with ambulance and rescue access), and poses questions and direct challenges to the government. Alongside factual examples, the speaker employs rhetorical questions and counterarguments, and occasionally synthesizes transitions, moving the discussion from the purely argumentative level to a more narrative or conversational tone.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The tone is formal, measured, and interrogative; it utilizes precise figures and references to pose a question and verify facts, rather than emphasizing emotionality.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The tone is inquisitive and formal, often geared toward dialogue. The speaker uses questions to elicit clarification and arguments, refraining from aggressive rhetoric and focusing instead on fact-based discussion.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
A formal and cooperative tone; the argumentation is informative and focused on addressing specific questions. Both an inquisitive and an attention-directing style are employed, without adding emotional impetus; emphasis is placed on a fact-based approach and democratic debate.