By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats
Total Sessions: 150
Fully Profiled: 150
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position centers on strong support for lowering the VAT on foodstuffs, viewing this, as the stance of the Center Party, as an essential step for improving economic well-being. This viewpoint is presented within a results-based framework, stressing the necessity of mitigating the overall cost of living and respecting the will of the people (the 100,000 individuals who signed the petition).
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
A robust opposition to the government, centered on the administration's incompetence, its lack of a popular mandate, and its dishonesty regarding tax increases. Political priorities are focused on improving the livelihood of residents, strongly advocating for a reduction in VAT on foodstuffs, and opposing the government's current fiscal policy. The political framework is firmly results-oriented and values-driven, while simultaneously accusing the government of having lost the public's trust.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaker’s political position centers on two critical issues: eliminating the anarchy caused by uncontrolled light traffic and resolving the issue of wage poverty among police and rescue workers. A strongly critical and results-oriented line is maintained regarding the inability of the relevant agencies to bring the situation under control. They demand swift and systemic intervention to ensure public safety and the proper recognition and compensation of state employees.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political focus is centered on fiscal discipline and budget transparency. The speaker explicitly opposes the socialist redistribution of local government revenue (the "Robin Hood" scheme) and is demanding explanations for the large public sector deficit (4.5%) and the poor state of the economy. The political framework is heavily performance-based and ideological, criticizing socialist measures.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary and strongest stance is opposition to the car tax and registration fee, highlighting its negative impact on the economy, the automotive market, and families with many children. The political framework is highly critical of the government's actions and is performance-driven, accusing the government of lacking proper analysis and ignoring public opinion. The speaker emphasizes that the country is sustained by its people, not by taxes, thereby prioritizing the financial well-being of the populace.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
An oppositional and critical stance regarding the current coalition's budget; emphasizing that the budget serves the wealthy and negatively impacts essential consumption taxes, rather than benefiting society at large. It stresses the need for more affordable foodstuffs and improved net disposable income, and identifies an urgent need for solutions to the demographic crisis. The style is policy-driven and highly resistant, while simultaneously underscoring the necessity of focusing on people's daily lives and arrangements. The contradiction between the fulfillment of the coalition's promises and the subsequent tax hikes demonstrates a clear desire for change: the position is deeply critical and advocates for fundamental change.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Strongly supports the continued funding and future of the Rail Baltica project, but emphasizes that this must proceed on the basis of a transparent business plan, economic viability, and environmental impact assessments. It is critical of the current budget and maintenance cost projections and calls for the involvement of a broader political spectrum, as well as Latvian and Lithuanian counterparts. At the same time, it underscores the necessity of moving forward with regional investments. It asserts that compromise and broad-based consensus are prerequisites, and alternative decisions will be made if necessary. The message is: we will continue, but cautiously and transparently.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The speaker expressed criticism regarding the government's measures, pointing out that they are ineffective and that public confidence is lacking. They stressed the necessity of improving the demographic situation and identifying mechanisms to boost the birth rate. The speaker called for the convening of a working group and collaboration with the Minister of Social Affairs and Health, grounding this effort in thorough analyses and practical proposals. The overall approach must be policy-driven and results-oriented.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary areas of focus are the timely disbursement of pensions and public confidence in social welfare. The stance is critical of the government, stressing the need for rapid corrective mechanisms, additional funding, and improved system transparency. It highlights the necessity of regional outreach and affirms that the solutions developed must ensure the sustainable and reliable operation of state institutions.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The approach supports improving housing accessibility and simplifying loan conditions, alongside the swift implementation of these measures. This is based on proposals from the Bank of Estonia and the Financial Supervision Authority, as well as the analysis provided by the Ministry of Social Affairs. It equally advocates for cooperation among various stakeholders and the successful adoption of broader measures backed by the coalition. Criticism is mainly aimed at the opposition, which either fails to fully grasp the issues or attacks specific proposals without adequate analysis. The stance is both pragmatic and policy-focused; the goal is to achieve demonstrable impact and concrete results.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
A multifaceted position – the period features speeches both strongly fighting against the bill and those emphasizing support for it. The first speech argues that the bill fails to support entrepreneurship and addresses the negative consequences of green policy; strong opposition. The second and fourth speeches present differing, yet at times constructive, viewpoints, emphasizing fair competition, security, and the quality of social services. Consequently, there is no unified party position during this period; instead, a diverse debate and a varied network of support and opposition emerge.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Oppositional and critical. The speaker highlights the issue of healthcare accessibility (15.5% of the population foregoes services) and the government's responsibility for this data and the resulting decisions, calling the minister to account and demanding verification of the statement. He/She poses questions and references concerning the thoroughness of the assessments in a strong, demanding tone, and is critical regarding the costs associated with finding the head of the Health Insurance Fund (35,000 euros) and the overall scope of social sector management. The framing is primarily focused on policy-making and results-orientation: he/she emphasizes accountability, transparency, and evidence-based action.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The core political stance is critical of rushed lawmaking, placing a strong emphasis on constitutionality, legal certainty, and transparency. He/She highlights issues in the adoption of laws, specifically the lack of impact analysis and clear comprehensibility, viewing these as fundamentally critical flaws. The position is strongly oppositional and procedural, demanding thorough scrutiny and accountability in the interest of the public. He/She stresses that legislation must be both value-driven and results-oriented, focusing attention on high-quality lawmaking that moves the country forward, rather than merely fast-tracking draft bills.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
A strong emphasis is placed on local taxation and the autonomy of local governments. Representatives are critical of the current amendments to the land tax and demand that local authorities be granted the right to differentiation and restored decision-making power; even if the demands concerning funding and the differentiation of tax rates splinter, the overarching goal remains the protection of the local economy and land productivity. This stance is rooted in formal inquiries and regional disparities; the position itself is politically specific and reform-oriented. Notably, the focus is on criticizing the state's current approach, and explicit legislative changes are sought.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
It emphasizes strengthening supervision of the financial sector and ensuring accountability. It is critical of RAB’s activities and calls for an assessment in light of the scandal. It supports easing the financial burden on consumers by simplifying refinancing, but views this primarily as a matter of governmental progress.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The opposition’s stance toward the coalition centers on issues of healthcare and social justice. It sharply criticizes the government’s economic policy, tax hikes, and the resulting impact on the populace. The opposition has clearly committed itself to mitigating youth unemployment and regional disparities, stressing that the ministers and the coalition have failed to take sufficient action thus far. They have highlighted their willingness to pursue acceptable, evidence-based solutions and seek cooperation with the coalition, while simultaneously maintaining the leverage of a strong opposition.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The speaker holds a strong opposition stance concerning the government's fiscal policy. He accuses the Minister and the Ministry of Finance of confusing the public through poor management and excessive taxation, and points out that the taxes raised during the debate are negatively impacting consumers. He stresses the necessity of conducting independent analyses and a critical review of this 'tax spree,' which would reveal the true impact of these taxes on the economy and the populace.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
As the main priority, it emphasizes regional policy and the preservation of local services (post offices, bank branches, ATMs), as well as state intervention necessary to sustain local life. It adopts a strongly critical tone toward the coalition and refers to decisions made by the previous government (such as the car tax and the termination of county-wide free public transport) as inadequate solutions, placing the issue of accountability front and center. The framing is centered on policy and results, not ideological conquest; it stresses that solving regional problems requires concrete steps and responsibility.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The position of the representative of the Centre Faction is strongly oppositional to the Estonian government: the core of the criticism focuses on the handling of the economy, energy policy, and the clearly inadequate support provided to regions and municipalities. This approach is primarily policy-driven and value-based, emphasizing democratic control, transparency, and a strong role for local areas. They also stress the necessity of public debate and cooperation, although their stance is often contradictory, and they are proactive regarding issues of conduct and political culture. Cooperative solution proposals, even controversial ones, are very rarely seen; the main focus remains the defense of public services and social guarantees, alongside criticism of the coalition's actions.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The subject under discussion is the third reading of Draft Bill 640 and its potential impact on the rule of law. The speaker stresses that undue haste could compromise the legal system and highlights the necessity of a reasonable schedule and comprehensive review; the quick succession of the second and third readings within a single week is, in their view, problematic. They emphasize that safeguarding the rule of law and ensuring procedural transparency are priorities, and they are prepared to involve the Finance Committee before the final vote. The text also references criticism suggesting that the accelerated procedure is linked to the approaching summer and the shift into holiday mode.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speakers' primary concern is their critical stance on the coalition's tax policy, deficiencies in quick loan regulation, and the need to strengthen consumer protection. Their positions are strongly oppositional concerning both tax arrangements and the issue of quick loans; they emphasize that the livelihood of vulnerable people must become the central priority, and they have repeatedly called for an urgent solution to limit the volume of quick loans and safeguard consumers. Regarding the issue of end-of-life declarations (living wills), the political debate indicates that long-term solutions are required for the cohesion of healthcare and social values, rather than draft legislation that merely delays action.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main viewpoint is that green policy is neither the sole nor an automatic tool for economic recovery; furthermore, its impact on the economy and the taxpayer is also subject to criticism. He/She emphasizes that state subsidization is wrong and constitutes a waste of taxpayer money, and raises the question of whether green policy is truly the best path to economic growth, or if, instead, direct engagement with businesses should be sought and investments should be attracted to Estonia.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The position on the draft bill reflects strong opposition to the coalition's plan to create an extensive data warehouse and surveillance network. He describes the proposal as a step directed against the rule of law, emphasizing the need for privacy and static control, and calls on coalition members to vote against the measure. The primary political tones are critical and opposition-focused, stressing a fundamental interest in defending democracy and the legal system.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Speakers representing the authorities express strong opposition to the current form of the waste management law. They stress the economic burden on the consumer (rising prices and fees) and raise constitutional questions; they recommend rejecting the bill or subjecting it to thorough reconsideration and analysis. A key focus is on political and legal risks, emphasizing that reforms must not undermine the balance of revenues and income.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
A strong opposition to the government and Minister Pakosta stresses that trust in institutions is low and must be restored. It opposes the government's plan and highlights issues related to an ethical and value-based framework, specifically rejecting the idea of "prison tourism." It demands transparency, impact assessments, and clarity regarding the principled nature of the confrontation.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
As a representative of the Centre Party faction, the main platform expresses the opposition's stance regarding the tax policy of the crisis society: tax increases boost people's purchasing power and livelihood, and he/she emphasizes the necessity of cost savings and reducing bureaucracy. He/She is strongly focused on family and social policy, desiring the targeting of expenditures for frosted/matte benefits and services, and avoids widespread extensive tax cuts only in words. He/She indicates that if the Centre Party returns to government, directions such as free kindergarten places in Tallinn and broader guarantees would be implemented, and speaks of programmatic and value-based priorities in addressing concerns.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition adopts a stance conscious of the rule of law and accountability. Their statements stress the guarantee of legality, the clear definition of responsibility, and the necessity of swift, legally expedient solutions. The core of the criticism targets the government's tax policy and inflation, which are perceived as deepening the economic environment that burdens the populace. Furthermore, the necessity of transparency in democracy and public administration is emphasized, coupled with a demand for debate and answers regarding the government's actions.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Critical and carrying a strong tone of political critique: it is emphasized that the government's current tax and energy policies are unsustainable and are hindering the economy and low-income individuals. He calls for a comprehensive review of tax policy and the consideration of tax exceptions concerning specific regions, aimed at boosting regional competitiveness. Regarding energy policy, he opposes the neoliberal approach to green fuels and believes it is necessary to seek alternative solutions (curbing the excessive expansion of green energy), and is prepared to put forward alternative guidelines (oil shale, the possibility of a nuclear power plant). It is acknowledged that economic growth does not equate to a genuine improvement in living standards and necessitates changes in energy policy and education.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main focus is on the safety and health of personal mobility device users and the security of pedestrians. The speaker presents statistics on injuries and emergency room visits and deepens the concern regarding the situation. He notes that the overwhelming majority of the coalition does not support the draft bill and calls for finding practical solutions outside of this bill, inquiring about the measures being discussed in the committee.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Developing the transport sector is their primary priority, focusing on aviation connectivity, the growth of local airports, and maintaining reasonable pricing for route subsidies. They emphasize that a more effective air traffic network and business routes targeting the enterprise sector stimulate the economy. Furthermore, they demand transparency and a stable financing model for Rail Baltic, ensuring that costs are fairly distributed. The overall approach is policy-centric and results-driven, requiring that economic benefits be clearly substantiated and costs managed transparently.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main emphasis is on the criticism of tax policy and the oppositional stance: the planned increases in VAT (to 24% starting July 1st) and income tax, as well as the idea of abolishing the tax hump, are being critically reviewed. The position is strongly value-based and focuses on achieving a fairer burden and protecting the livelihood of the middle class and low-wage earners; it has been stressed that these changes will harm the economy and consumption and increase inequality. However, there is no indication of engagement with the government regarding seeking a compromise—the focus remains primarily on highlighting criticism and opposition.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The core position focuses on a comprehensive audit and structural reforms of the tax system in Estonia. There is a strong readiness to follow IMF recommendations, emphasizing that economic growth cannot stem solely from tax increases, but rather from the necessity of achieving fairer and more sustainable tax revenue. It agrees with the need to incorporate the taxation of capital, assets, and high dividend incomes, and stresses the sustainable financing of defense expenditures and public services. This approach is guided by robust, policy-based, and forward-looking debate, rather than the immediate implementation of short-term tax concessions.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
These speeches reveal an oppositional trend: emphasis is placed on opening the economy and fostering international cooperation (especially with African countries, such as Botswana), while simultaneously criticizing the government's tax policy. Solidarity is supported, but it is stressed that this must be reflected fairly and reasonably, and they do not support an overabundance of promises. Amidst the complexities of these positions, the changing of promises has been criticized, and the impact of the cost of living on people has been highlighted.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Oppositional and ethical, focused on the vitality of rural areas and agriculture. It supports the continued financing of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and emphasizes the need to guarantee farmers a fair income, competitiveness, and the viability of rural regions. It is strongly critical of the government's tax policy and bureaucracy, stressing that the economy must be guided by a long-term plan and the defense of our interests in Brussels. The position is firmly politicized, and the goal is to influence the policy sector—not merely to react to stakeholders, but to establish a level playing field for farmers.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The most significant aspect is the criticism regarding the current form of CO2 trading and the green transition:— it is described as a redistribution market that harms the economy and competitiveness.— The need to review CO2 market mechanisms is emphasized, and the effectiveness of the green transition is doubted, citing Europe's faster action relative to global impacts.— National security and economic activity interests are brought forward, leading to a readiness to move towards reforms and potential referendums (e.g., on the topic of oil shale).— It is politically oriented, based on values and priorities, and seeks to balance environmental values with economic activity and security.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The primary focus is on budget transparency and conducting a thorough analysis. The stance is critical of the government’s plans, preferring to increase defense spending only when it is firmly justified. Simultaneously, there is concern regarding the guarantee of pension payments and energy stability. It advocates for a balanced approach, emphasizing that cuts should not be rushed from just one area; instead, the whole picture must be considered to find additional revenue streams. It recognizes the need for a broader vision that includes supporting digitalization and innovation, especially when budget cuts are implemented.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The core position is energy security and emphasizing national independence: promoting the retention of oil shale as a stable energy buffer, stressing the need for a popular mandate and the importance of a referendum on the oil shale issue. Criticism has been raised regarding the coalition's decisions directed toward the green transition and the need to propose amendments to ENMAK (Estonian National Development Plan for the Energy Sector) taking CO2 exposure into account; the strength is political, not merely technical, and strongly regional, preferring snap elections or a broad consultation regarding mandates. The faction emphasizes that the absence of a mandate and large-scale decisions necessitate the involvement of the public or a broad-based debate.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The opposition's stance towards the government emphasizes that the constitutional amendment restricting voting rights in local elections should not be maintained; they seek to restore broader suffrage and prioritize negotiations with allies. Furthermore, concerns have been raised regarding the implementation of the care reform and the impact of tax policy on the population's standard of living, highlighting the decline in purchasing power and the necessity of addressing funding issues. Ultimately, strong criticism is leveled against the transparency, cooperation, cost, and efficiency of the government's decisions.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Supports green energy objectives but remains critical of their feasibility, stressing the necessity for realistic solutions. It questions how the 2030 target will physically be met and brings up international examples (Sweden) that may point to economic risks. The framing is focused more on policy and demanding concrete results, rather than being an ideological pursuit.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The core position is a critical view of the government’s energy policy and the speed of the green transition. He/She stresses the need to ensure energy security and maintain affordable electricity, and is strongly opposed to the sale of the Kiisa power plant; emphasizing that a holistic perspective and realistic pricing are essential. He/She highlights the impact of the trust deficit on policy and wishes to examine the entire subject broadly, rather than using a single draft to address only certain aspects. He/She believes that the shaping of the green transition must take into account economic, social, and technical aspects, and should not be rushed.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The core issues revolve around the competitiveness of Estonian berry growers, specifically regarding regulatory barriers. The message is critical of the inaction shown by the current and previous governments and stresses the necessity of improving competitiveness by reducing these barriers. The stance is primarily policy-driven, focusing on practical solutions and actions targeted at the government.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary focus is the formation of a commission to investigate e-elections and the restoration of trust in democratic institutions. Support is given to parliamentary, cross-party cooperation and adherence to constitutional principles (secrecy, uniformity), and the necessity of auditing and improving the e-voting system is emphasized. Some third parties have expressed opposition to e-voting (calling for a temporary transition to more secure solutions or the complete termination of e-voting), but the main emphasis remains on establishing the commission and stressing the importance of the investigation for restoring public confidence.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main position is reducing the VAT on basic food supplies (9% for core food groups) as the primary means of alleviating the cost of living; this is a clear priority and a strongly positive direction for the representative. He emphasizes that the government is unable to guarantee people's incomes, and inflation and price hikes are deepening poverty, especially among young families. He is against abolishing the tax hump and wants to continue taxing banks; the position focuses on financial instruments and progressive taxation. His rhetoric is primarily policy-driven, and he usually demonstrates a strong national interest in protecting the price of the consumer food basket.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the importance of ENMAK and the pan-Baltic development plan, stressing the need for decisions to be made collaboratively and transparently. He/She is critical of the current processes in energy policy and highlights the necessity of clarity and taking concrete obligations, rather than just making promises. The speaker seeks support for the Isamaa faction's draft bill, which aims to bring greater transparency and clarity to energy policy.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker is critical of the current government's green transition policy concerning energy, highlighting the necessity of substantial investments and grid capacity, alongside the inherent volatility of green energy. He worries that the current trajectory is not economically viable and advocates for an alternative approach: investments in oil shale and, based on ENMAK 2030 forecasts, securing cheaper and more stable energy. He emphasizes protecting consumer prices and the competitiveness of the economy, conveying the message that achieving the green transition goals must be practical and economically considerate. The overall focus is a deliberate, practice-oriented approach centered on energy policy, with the long-term objective being the control of energy costs and economic sustainability.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is critical, focusing on energy and economic tax policy. It stresses the transparency and accountability of mandates and calls for policies that guarantee the legitimacy of coalition decisions and economic stability. It offers a rather harsh assessment of the government's direction regarding subsidies for offshore wind farms and the formation of energy consumption prices.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition's stance: strongly critical of the current coalition's economic policy, emphasizing the reduction of burdens on consumers and businesses and the restoration of trust in domestic politics. It advocates for a bank tax or similar measures aimed at limiting excess profits and stresses that the coalition has abandoned draft legislation over the past two years. In energy policy, it leans more towards the use of oil shale rather than expanded green energy models, and presents a vision where state market competition and consumer protection would be the primary priorities.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The question of adopting the gender quota bill is of major significance; the faction is highly critical and seeks to reject the bill, emphasizing that companies have already achieved balance and that additional legislation could negatively impact the economy. A previously mentioned positive stance on the bill suggests potential shifts in their position, but currently, the stance is clearly oppositional. The faction is focused on economic and operational sustainability without the imposition of a state-mandated quota.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speakers emphasize that national cybersecurity and data privacy are central concerns, and recognizing the risks associated with using Chinese technology is paramount. The current position is critical and preventative, focusing on constructive debate and the search for clear measures, including the possibility of restricting or modifying the use of Chinese technology if the threats are not subjected to broader control. This is an ongoing effort, centered on policy and security, striving for transparency and comprehensive discussion; while there is no definitive collapse, the need to clarify decisions is strongly emphasized.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is strongly critical of the government's proposed decision, arguing that it marginalizes a group of approximately 150,000 people and signals a lack of trust in them. He emphasizes the protection of the principles of the rule of law and questions how such a decision can align with long-term societal life and mutual trust. Additionally, he expresses dissatisfaction regarding the safeguarding of democratic rights and stresses the need to properly justify decisions that impact the populace. This stance is political and value-based, centered on credibility and the protection of legal rights.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker is a member of the Reform Party coalition and is highly critical of the Social Democrats’ policies. He emphasizes that the policies implemented over the last three years have been the opposite of what was promised, resulting in increased taxes and reduced purchasing power. He links his stance to the necessity of preventing regional inequality and ensuring greater transparency in tax policy, while also stressing the consistent operation of the coalition. Overall, his position is policy- and results-oriented, focused on defending the priorities of the Reform Party.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The presenter does not express clear political support for, or acceptance of, the proposal; instead, they focus on the economic impacts and risks associated with its implementation. The overall tone is neutral-critical, highlighting economic aspects and the questions raised regarding transparency, rather than taking an ideological dividing stance.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The most critical issues are the flaws in the draft bill and the lack of consultation with political parties; there is a strong current of opposition criticism. He/She stresses that the bill must be halted, a consensus must be reached with the political parties, and it can only be reintroduced to the chamber in a manner that guarantees due process. Furthermore, he/she demands snap elections and frames the assessment of the government's mandate around the necessity of protecting fundamental moral and democratic values. The framing is primarily focused on protecting the policy dimension and the constitutional order (policy- and value-driven, with strong criticism directed at the leadership).
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker adopts a critical perspective on the government’s major problems concerning political culture and the crisis of democracy, emphasizing that these issues stem from the work of the Riigikogu and the behavior of the coalition. He highlights the silencing of the opposition and the lack of ministerial accountability within committee work, arguing that the proposed bill is necessary to resolve these problems both in the current context and for future governance. The style demonstrates strong opposition; it is compelling and policy-driven, rather than being based on formalistic values. He is firmly in favor of the bill and stresses the need for systemic changes.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition's stance focuses on criticizing the economic and demographic crises. It accuses the government of implementing tax hikes and social cuts, arguing that these decisions have led to poverty and economic decline; it emphasizes the existence of a crisis of democracy, a leadership crisis, and a demographic crisis. It urges the necessity of snap elections and the prime minister's resignation, stressing that the solution lies in a policy-driven change that restores control over these crises.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The core vision centers on protecting maritime infrastructure and national sovereignty, making the draft bill highly relevant. Support is strong and prioritized, underscoring the necessity of protection from both an economic and security perspective. He points out that issues arising in the Gulf of Finland and those concerning neutral waters are causing economic harm, which makes the effectiveness of the regulatory mechanisms currently in use crucial. The overall approach is geared toward the policy and defense coordinator, rather than being anti-reform; it assesses relevant changes in infrastructure defense.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The statement emphasizes the need to avoid panic and favors a calm, prepared approach to foreign policy. It raises a critical question regarding the minister's public statements and inquires about his or her position within the cabinet. Furthermore, it advocates for adherence to energy policy and climate goals, citing international developments. The tone is critical concerning the behavior of coalition partners, noting that the role of the SDE within the coalition may appear to be that of the opposition.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The core position of the representative of the Centre Faction is oppositional to the government’s policies and staunchly against the bank tax. He stresses that policies based on religious or ideological grounds harm the economy and diminish people’s pocketbooks. This stance is heavily rooted in political and economic motives, centering on criticism of the current tax policy and the government’s overall incompetence. He proposes snap elections to renew the mandate as a necessary solution and views state governance as something that can potentially be improved by the current government losing its mandate. Pallina specifically emphasizes political accountability and economic impact analysis as the fundamental context for this debate.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
A strong opposition to the government's energy policy and its approach to the green economy. The speaker emphasizes the priority of economic viability and consumer prices, calling for pragmatic economic activity; sensible decisions for both citizens and businesses, and stressing the necessity of a new government (using the specific phrase: Estonia needs a new government, a change). Their position is strongly policy- and value-driven, focusing on increasing financial accountability and the transparency of the state's role.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker takes a strong opposition stance and accuses the current government of inefficient decision-making in the energy sector and of failing to heed expert advice. He emphasizes that the primary priority must be affordable electricity prices for consumers and fiscal sustainability, rather than massive infrastructure projects that could strain the economy. He expresses his readiness to vote in favor of a motion of no confidence against the Prime Minister and urges other members of the coalition to also consider the opposition's viewpoints. He frames this as a task requiring a clear shift in government accountability, one that must be demonstrably improved for the benefit of the people.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The primary focus is on the health of the coalition at large and the competence of the ministers; a positive direction involves restoring the government's credibility through making adjustments to the ministerial lineup and, where necessary, replacing ministers (the speaker stresses the option of a vote of no confidence). The stance is strongly critical of both the government and local leaders, emphasizing the necessity of accountability and transparency.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of strengthening Europe's influence and takes a critical stance toward current US foreign policy. They argue that Europe is deeply complacent and weak, requiring strong leadership. The speaker connects foreign policy direction with the green transition and economic competitiveness, stressing the need to respond to US protectionism and China's growing influence. This position is action-oriented and critical of the government's performance, calling for reforms and a proactive, rather than merely reactive, approach.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
He is critical of the government's tax policy, arguing that consumption taxes and raising income tax inhibit economic growth and reduce people's quality of life. He advocates for higher taxation on bank profits, suggesting the revenue be used to fund security and social needs, citing the profits made in 2023–2024 and the impact of Euribor. Furthermore, he stresses the importance of regional policy and identifies the revenue gap faced by local municipalities as a critical issue that requires resolution. However, despite long-standing criticism of the ruling coalition, he is not ready to move toward coordinated solutions until a thorough analysis has been completed.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The speaker aligns with the views of the Centre Party; he emphasizes practical solutions necessitated by the energy policy crisis and the shift in taxation, and thereby strong functional guarantee initiatives (such as allowing offline payments). He is a clear proponent of taxing banks (the bank tax) while simultaneously seeking to alleviate the burden on residents regarding car and registration fees, proposing a zero rate for the car tax for families with children; this reflects a critical and needs-based approach to the government's tax policy, with an emphasis on transparency and impact assessment. Proposals concerning energy, the economy, and infrastructure demonstrate his political priority and his readiness to act further on the proposed solutions.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main focus is the analysis of data from applications for the registration of short-term employment in Estonia and the clarification of language requirements (including the A4 level requirement). He/She asks questions and seeks 2024 data and explanations, emphasizing transparency and control. He/She emphasizes the need to ensure that taxes remain within the Estonian economy and notes that additional legislative steps are necessary to improve regulations concerning temporary agency labor.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The text emphasizes a critical approach toward the minister’s public statements and the general trend where politicians may utilize historical or cultural themes to successfully advance their policy objectives. The individual leans toward a position of control and transparency, underscoring the necessity of reviewing assessments and feedback. No specific program or ideological direction is articulated, but the position is strongly rooted in performance and accountability.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Opposition to the car tax and fairness for families are paramount; the faction promises to reverse the car tax and criticizes the coalition's tax policy as unjust and burdensome to the economy. There is a strong assessment that the wealthy pay less while families with lower incomes face a disproportionate tax burden; the need to protect large families and the interests of rural residents is emphasized.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The opposition's position centers on the transparency surrounding the government's loan to Nordica and the utilization of KredEx funds. They are highly critical, accusing the minister of outright lying or deliberate obfuscation, and demanding both clarification and concrete answers. There is no clearly articulated alternative policy proposal; the primary focus remains on ensuring accountability and safeguarding taxpayer funds.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is critical of the incumbent government's budget management and stresses the necessity of increasing state budget transparency. While supporting the overall objective of the draft legislation, he emphasizes that amendments must be made and the opposition's proposals incorporated; the speaker is ready to proceed to the second reading and subsequent debates. The general tone is focused on policy and performance, with the stated goal being to end the government's "agony."
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The presenters are strong proponents of building the Tallinn Hospital and view this project as a significant development for the country's healthcare structure and a cross-party goal forming the basis for cooperation. They criticize the political gamesmanship involved in the Reform Party and the coalition’s previous decisions, emphasizing the need to jointly take responsibility and move the project forward. Their position is politically forceful, focusing on cooperation between the state and local government (acting as a B-opposition) and securing financing through European Union funds. At the same time, they stress that the economic and social impact must be accentuated, and decisions must be future-oriented and measurable.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Transparency of the state budget is a key priority; [the speaker/party] is critical of the actions of the coalition ministers because the budget is incomprehensible. [They] support the Estonian Centre Party's initiative to improve this area. [The speaker] raises questions and emphasizes that work cannot continue with incompetent ministers.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Representing the Centre Party faction, an oppositional trend is visible regarding the government's policy, focusing on criticism of energy policy and issues stemming from the economy. They favor the use of oil shale and the development of dispatchable capacity to guarantee energy security. Furthermore, they express strong criticism toward the support provided to green energy and stress the necessity of balancing competing interests. Simultaneously, they underscore the need for a constructive response and a debate utilizing open, non-demagogic arguments.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Economic issues—new taxes and increased costs—have been highlighted, but specific solutions have not been presented; the position remains moderate and focuses on listening to the people and cooperating for the sake of national unity. The text indicates a desire to find solutions through public debate, rather than by distributing populist promises.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The core issues are the transparency of the representation expenses and salaries of government and Riigikogu members, and the cutting of expenditures. The stance is strongly critical of the establishment, emphasizing solidarity in the interests of society and consumers, and the need for greater financial discipline. Attention is focused on both reducing costs and enhancing the sense of fairness; the position is policy-centric and value-driven: solidarity and the honest use of public funds are the priorities.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main features include promoting transparency in representation expenses and state budget savings, alongside criticism of government decisions. The position carries a strong oppositional undertone, focusing on passing draft legislation and strengthening expenditure control. Furthermore, clear support is expressed for Georgia’s aspiration to join the European Union, emphasizing a diplomatic and mediating approach.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Against the car tax and the accompanying draft legislation; represents strong opposition and emphasizes that the bill significantly burdens families and businesses. It argues that the bill brings no benefit and is only justified if implementing fixes for existing problems and reducing costs fails; it describes the proposed tax hikes as having a negative impact on the economic situation of households.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The Center Party faction stresses the need to increase transparency regarding ministers' representation costs and demands stricter accountability. They are not immediately seeking a reduction in the total amount of these expenses, but rather require visibility and control over how they are utilized. A significant priority is articulated as the necessity of preventing vague expenditure and ensuring that funds are genuinely allocated for their designated purpose, rather than being spent covertly. Furthermore, this criticism extends to the general budget and tax policy, emphasizing the importance of solidarity and heeding the will of the people.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
As a representative of the Estonian Centre Party faction, his primary focus is directed toward budget and tax policy, and he maintains a clearly defined opposition stance. He views tax increases as detrimental to the financial well-being of the populace and the competitiveness of entrepreneurs, and advocates for the abolition of the "tax hump" or a significant restriction on their rise. His position strongly emphasizes economic and social welfare, supported by external analyses and fundamental budget evaluations.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The speaker is clearly in opposition and focuses on criticizing economic and regional policy. He takes a strong stand against the government’s fiscal policy, arguing that rising taxes and increased burdens on local municipalities are damaging residents' purchasing power. He underscores the growing regional income disparity and the issue of inadequate regional policy, which he feels is not being sufficiently addressed in the current debate. He stresses the need for better national policy and engagement, and demands concrete answers.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The most crucial topics are linking the salary and expense allowances of Riigikogu members to their work contribution/attendance activity, and ensuring greater transparency. The position is strongly focused on solidarity and emphasizes justice and responsibility through the fulfillment of work duties, but it is simultaneously critical of the government's current decisions (e.g., the Waste Management Act and Ericsson). The faction's stance is systematic and based on the preparation of specific bills, rather than being driven by underlying emotion; it stresses the need for a model that is flexible but governed by clear rules.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The Center Party faction stresses the need to increase transparency regarding the work and expenses of Riigikogu members, alongside implementing reforms aimed at cost savings. They consider the current draft bill incomplete and wish to include robust measures to link salaries and expense compensations directly to work performance, as well as increasing transparency in government representation costs. They are open to cooperation and promise to submit further amendments to achieve a comprehensive and impactful solution.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
As a representative of the Centre Party faction, this speaker takes a strong oppositional stance on tax policy: he does not support the current bill, which increases excise duties on alcohol, tobacco, and fuel, and stresses that the burden will fall primarily on low- and middle-income individuals. He proposes alternatives (such as financing through a bank tax or platform taxes) and criticizes the bill's ostensible financing method as merely increasing consumption taxes. This is a policy- and value-driven position, the core objective of which is to protect the population's livelihood and economic stability.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker is oppositional and critical of the government. They highlight the high unemployment rate and security concerns, asserting that the general standard of living is failing to improve and that compromises made at the expense of national security are unacceptable. The speaker recalls the initial objection to the constitutional amendment concerning suffrage and demands the reasons for the reversal, specifically referencing the coalition's involvement in this shift. The overall tone is policy-driven and performative, centering on the stability of state security and democracy.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main objective of the Riigikogu speakers is to demand transparency regarding the impact of tax changes on the state budget, stressing the need for prompt and substantive answers from the Minister of Finance. They are critical of the government’s economic policy, particularly the tax increases which, they argue, increase the burden on households and consumers. Furthermore, they emphasize energy security and the use of oil shale, and they call for adequate support for the economy and cooperation with the executive power; it is crucial to consider the impact of coalition agreements and maintain an open debate.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The applicable statements adopt a rather critical stance, emphasizing the protection of democracy and social rights. A strong objection has been raised against the draft bill, citing haste, the absence of an impact analysis, and the burden of widespread costs placed upon the populace (especially regarding health insurance, hospital bed-day fees, and prescription charges). Furthermore, there is an emphasis on the necessity of preserving democracy and equality, alongside opposition to restrictions on local voting rights. Regarding issues of family and demography, the focus is placed on the values of empathy and integration.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
Oppositional and socially focused. The primary priority is the protection of pensioners (including payments on the 5th of the month and support for single pensioners in care homes) and preventing ill-considered tax policies that could harm vulnerable groups. It criticizes hastily implemented tax hikes and the processing of draft legislation without broad consultation, stressing the coalition’s lack of a mandate and the need for wider inclusion. The stance is prominent and strongly critical regarding the coalition’s and government’s economic policy; it articulates a readiness to defend social guarantees and demand that the interests of pensioners be taken into account.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main topics are ending the abuse of regulations by law enforcement agencies and improving the oversight of those mechanisms. He/She presents the idea that the draft bill aims to put an end to this, and emphasizes the need to discuss why the abuse occurs and how to implement the regulation correctly. He/She does not express a clear, firm political side or objection, but their tone and questions suggest a leaning toward reform and supervision.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The Center Party faction is in direct opposition to the government's proposed Estonian budget direction, stressing the need for transparency and coordination between the legislative and executive branches. The faction highlights that the government's sweeping budgetary powers and the lack of a sufficient long-term strategy are problematic. It is seeking a consensual solution that equally involves both the coalition and the opposition. This position is strongly value-based and procedural, emphasizing transparency, fairness, and broad inclusion, rather than focusing solely on economic performance.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker is vehemently opposed to the current tax policy. He considers the increase in notary fees and the rise in VAT to be detrimental, emphasizing that these changes will impact people's daily lives and the real estate market. He stresses the necessity of halting the draft legislation and ensuring a thorough debate within the cabinet before proceeding.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The focus is placed on highlighting the draft bill to lower the value-added tax (VAT) on foodstuffs as a priority measure, coupled with criticism of the government's tax policy. It stresses that the current government's actions constitute a "dead end" and calls for consensus across the Riigikogu (Parliament) and an approach to the Rail Baltic issue that moves beyond the divide between the coalition and the opposition.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary concern revolves around the impact of the car tax and balancing its stated goals between the economy and the environment. Both the initiation and the implementation of the law are facing criticism, raising questions about whether the true objective remains environmental protection or is merely aimed at filling the state coffers. The tone is critical, emphasizing the necessity of considering the burden placed on vulnerable families and ensuring transparency throughout the decision-making process.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker is strongly oppositional towards the government. The core of the criticism centers on economic dominance, an opaque budget, and the deliberate misdirection away from key issues. He/She highlights regional inequality and argues that lowering the VAT on foodstuffs is a justified tool for mitigating this problem. Simultaneously, in energy policy, he/she stresses the necessity of a concrete plan and the sustainable use of state resources. At times, the speech is value-driven, focusing on improving people's livelihoods and reducing economic disparity, but the criticism remains direct and delivered with a forceful tone. The underlying position is policy-based, aiming for change through political debate.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the need for the maximum and most efficient utilization of European Union cohesion policy funds. They point to the findings of the National Audit Office as the reason why certain resources are left untapped. The speaker is highly critical of the current government's handling of this funding, emphasizing that the money must serve as an engine for economic growth and must be deployed transparently and swiftly. The stance is results-oriented and demanding in practice: there is a clear need to increase accountability and responsibility and to ensure promises are met. No specific party affiliation is indicated, but the criticism centers on the government’s management and the efficiency of fund usage.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The Centre Party faction is a strong advocate for regional policy and the preservation of services in rural areas, emphasizing that the state must continue the State Houses project and maintain services in rural regions. It is highly critical of the government’s regional and tax policies, alleging the non-fulfillment of promises and the disappearance of services. Its approach is policy-based and value-driven, focusing on direct accountability and an honest ministerial response.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary topics are the protection of religious freedom through amendments to the Churches and Congregations Act, and enhancing the transparency and clarity of the state budget. Efforts are underway to prevent a divide between different sectors, and the necessity of public debate and explanations concerning ministerial draft bills is being stressed. The anticipated approach combines political and value-based principles with the duty to ensure public oversight, coupled with a critical stance toward the practices of undue haste and cabinet secrecy. Support is focused on collaboration with others, and Lauri Läänemets is cited as a role model for improving discussion and introducing topics in the Riigikogu before rapid decisions are finalized.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
He is critical of the coalition government and emphasizes the decline in trust toward both the Riigikogu and the government. He views the coalition’s decisions, including tax increases, as the main reason for the decrease in public confidence. He stresses the need to increase accountability and transparency and restore trust, rather than merely focusing on political control. The framing is primarily centered on outcomes and accountability.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
As a representative of the Centre Party faction, he/she stresses the adoption of the bank tax and opposition to the increase of consumption taxes. He/She considers the bank tax more suitable on the level of natural solidarity and critically scrutinizes the government's tax system, which he/she deems harmful to low-income earners. He/She emphasizes the financial stability of the populace and simultaneously calls upon all Riigikogu members to vote in favor of the bill, thereby demonstrating a strong and concrete, yet non-radical, position in the field of taxation.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The representative focuses on the transparency of the care reform's funding and ensuring the capacity of local governments; emphasizing the need to receive answers from the minister and engage in constructive dialogue. He/She does not express absolute opposition to the reform, but highlights questions regarding the funding of additional obligations and the need for inherent oversight of the Riigikogu's work and public trust. He/She stresses that trust in the Riigikogu is vital and calls for solutions achieved through cooperation and clear communication.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main issues are the financing of national security and the advocacy of tax policy. Criticism is voiced regarding the coalition's tax policy, along with a preference for utilizing alternative solutions (such as a bank tax) instead of increasing the consumption tax. Also present is a strong, though not extreme, theme concerning remembrance and human rights—specifically, in the context of the 1944 deportation of the Crimean Tatars, emphasis has been placed on recognizing the historical tragedy and standing up for these communities. Secondly, emphasis is placed on reasonably limiting the burdens placed on the populace and maintaining fundamental responsibility in matters of taxation.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The most prominent topics are fraudulent calls and national security, as well as concerns regarding tax policy and the economy. He/She is in the opposition and criticizes the coalition's tax policy (the bank tax, progressive income tax), arguing that the government is unable to implement his/her ideology. He/She stresses accountability to the entire coalition and the necessity of maintaining ideological clarity—or otherwise leaving the government.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The Centre Party faction opposes the draft bill, stressing that the hike in petrol excise duty and the new car tax will primarily burden households, particularly those in rural areas. They are demanding the bill be rejected, arguing that the true objective is not to curb consumption but merely to boost state budget revenue. This strong opposition utilizes critical, fact-based rhetoric, which is characteristic of the party.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition's stance on the government's draft bill; it stresses that the bill is the result of undue haste and inadequate analysis, and demands a clear debate and a proper impact assessment. It represents a principled objection and seeks to prevent budget-damaging measures from being implemented without comprehensive review, framing the issue as a problematic blending of poorly formulated policy areas.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker is critical of the government's agricultural and economic policies, highlighting concerns about the diminishing role of the state and stressing the need for a clear vision and concrete solutions. He emphasizes that the interests of food producers and farmers must be considered, noting that within the context of the European Union, the unequal distribution of subsidies and the improvement of competitiveness are crucial issues. He is strongly pro-agriculture and underscores the necessity of state intervention and a strategic plan, particularly during this period of tax increases. The objective is to ensure the sustainability of agriculture and the competitiveness of domestic food production.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The central theme revolves around Telia’s financial conduct and its investment strategies. The speaker is critical of Telia’s profit margins and the current low level of investment, questioning whether the funds are actually being reinvested. This highlights the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability. While the political stance is critical, it does not propose specific state-level solutions; instead, the focus remains on overseeing public interest and monitoring how the company utilizes its capital.
2024-09-26
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Speaking from an opposition standpoint, the speaker is critical of the government’s budget, arguing that it endangers the middle class and those living in poverty. He emphasizes that the tax implications of the budget are due to its burdening of the middle class and asserts that the coalition is continuing the policies of the Reform Party, effectively punishing the populace. He calls for a progressive tax system (graduated income tax) and a bank tax, and opposes increases in consumption taxes. He stresses that mothers and families risk losing legal and social guarantees if the state continues on its current path. He sees a strong need for debates, alternative solutions, and ensuring proper party oversight.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
At the plenary sitting of the IV session of the XV Riigikogu, members of the Centre Party Group are taking an oppositional stance against the coalition: they emphasize the protection of the economy, regional inequality, and criticism regarding the accelerating pace of the green transition. They are strongly opposed to the rapid implementation of the green transition, arguing that the development of Estonian production and the benefit to the EU economy must be prioritized before introducing a radical green shift. They also stress the importance of ensuring affordable electricity and strengthening the business environment, as well as reducing dependence on China.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker is critical of the change in direction in foreign policy and emphasizes the need for a clear and unified prime ministerial position. He highlights that Estonia voted in favor of the UN resolution condemning the occupation of the Israeli-Palestinian territories, but this deviated from its previous stance, and he argues that, at the leadership level, this contradicts the US position. Many political forces and former foreign ministers are concerned, which makes clarifying the position especially necessary. The stance is critical and is aimed at ensuring the clarity and consistency of the government's foreign policy.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
He supports the strengthening of the defense industry and views its economic impact as significant. He stresses the necessity of seeing specific forecasts regarding increased turnover, new markets, and volume growth, and is open to analyses and data sharing.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The main themes are the continuity and clarity of foreign policy. The speaker is critical of the rhetoric used by Eesti 200 and the actions taken by Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna. They emphasize the necessity of maintaining and developing diplomatic relations while avoiding confusion. The stance is critical, the objective is clear, and the hope is directed toward achieving better management of foreign policy.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary political position is the promotion of family policy and demographic development. We support measures that encourage family formation and the retention of child benefits, viewing the demographic picture as a central political issue. Criticism is focused on the current government, which is deemed unstable and prone to reversing previous decisions; the emphasis is placed on the necessity of consistent and future-oriented measures.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
As a member of the Estonian parliament, he/she is a strong voice in the opposition regarding energy policy: he/she firmly opposes the draft legislation aimed at accelerating investments in offshore wind farms and other renewable energy projects, arguing that it undermines consumer interests and economic viability. He/she stresses that the priority must be affordable electricity and favors nationwide onshore wind and solar solutions over offshore installations. Furthermore, he/she highlights the need for a clear national policy concerning CO2 emissions from oil shale and the protection of existing jobs, viewing this as key to long-term economic stabilization. This stance reflects a balance between economic and regional/cultural considerations, focusing on maintaining stable consumer prices and employment levels.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
There is strong opposition and criticism regarding the government's tax policy: the tax hikes appear to be framed as quick and "easy" solutions, which could fuel inflation and reduce purchasing power. He/She emphasizes the need for evidence-based economic analysis and is convinced that the measures should promote solidarity and economic growth, rather than hindering it. He/She is critical of the proposed taxes and income tax rates, stressing that the anticipated balance must be achieved through an evidence-based approach, not via unilateral spending cuts.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Internal security and people's livelihood are the most crucial aspects; the speaker emphasizes that the strength of the state depends on its people and comes across as a guarantor of strong social security and safety. He/She is critical of the government's economic and tax policies and stresses that funding must be directed toward improving people's livelihoods and security. The outline presents a strong opposition and a value-based approach: 'Livelihood is Security.' The style is policy/performance-based and critical, yet it focuses on concrete problems and their solutions.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The parliamentary group is strongly opposed to the draft bill in question: they emphasize that the bill adds burdens to businesses and could lead to insurance problems and a reduction in the number of investments. It is highlighted that the consultation round did not include the association of circular economy enterprises, meaning the process is deficient and the outcome is unfavorable for the business sector. The stance is strongly policy-driven and centered on economic criticism; they propose rejecting the bill/submitting amendments and increasing stakeholder involvement.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The most crucial issues are the border situation and restricting travel to Russia; he/she clearly agrees with the stance that Russia should not be visited currently. He/She stresses the need for humanitarian aid at the border and cooperation with the city of Narva and local municipalities. The support is directed toward a strong, value-based, and practical starting point. He/She does not present detailed political plans but emphasizes improving the lives of the people and the importance of collaboration.
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The primary interests are promoting family values and flexible working hours; the goal is to provide families with better opportunities to spend time together and achieve work-life balance. It supports the concept of a four-day work week as a tool for both family life and stimulating the economy. It emphasizes that decisions must stem from thorough discussion, rather than merely relying on the submitted draft legislation. The position is policy-driven, focusing on social objectives, and demonstrates a willingness to engage the minister and relevant committees in a substantive review.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The car tax issue is primary; the position is strongly against the car tax, and the desire is not to adopt it or to replace it with other means. There is a firm emphasis that the current legislative process has gone awry, and the tax will neither improve people's welfare nor the budget. Furthermore, it primarily burdens rural areas, families, and businesses. The speaker highlights the problematic nature of both constitutionality and the proposed financing methods, and is prepared to submit amendments. If necessary, they stress that the tax burden must be avoided or alternatives must be found. The comment is made that the President's veto acknowledges the problem, and the coalition should consider a slightly different solution.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The core of the speech is the opposition to the land tax increase and a general critique of tax policy; the speaker emphasizes that the burden of the local living environment and regional funding falls directly onto the people, and that the cumulative, tax-increasing burdens imposed by the government harm the populace. A powerful pivot is aimed at the decision not to increase the burden on local municipalities and families, and there is a broader call to adopt alternative funding and taxation possibilities. The style is policy-driven and strongly value-based, focusing on the well-being of the people and the region.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
Representing the opposition, the party holds strong criticism toward the coalition. It argues that the supplementary budget and its processing are deficient, and public trust has eroded due to the failure to deliver on promises. It demands accountability and transparency, and calls for snap elections if the situation remains unchanged. Furthermore, it asserts that the government is failing to earn the mandated confidence it pledged, stressing the necessity of scrutinizing reforms and pursuing fundamental changes.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The stance is one of strong opposition to the nuclear energy bill. He/She stresses that moving forward requires having all the necessary knowledge and socio-economic analyses, which are currently absent; this will result in additional costs for the taxpayer. He/She deems the decision incorrect and demands comprehensive analyses before proceeding.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main topics are Georgia's democratic and pro-European future, and the preservation of Estonian–Georgian friendship. This position highlights Bing's critical attitude toward the rushed Riigikogu statement and underscores the necessity for a flexible, analysis-based, and consensus-driven foreign policy. A value-based emphasis on cooperation with allies and a procedure open to compromise places this viewpoint squarely in the center, avoiding extreme solutions.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The Centre Party faction advocates for the protection of citizens' interests regarding administrative fees and expedited services, emphasizing the need to reduce or modify charges that affect people’s lives and family expenses. They are critical of the Reform Party’s policies and committee decisions, and they stress procedural deliberation and time for discussion (a recess/adjournment) as a means of finding better solutions. This measured and policy-driven approach demonstrates a strong, yet non-radical, opposition stance directed against the policies of the ruling party.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speech focuses on defending Estonian-Georgian relations and criticizing the government's policy. The speaker is clearly opposed to the government and emphasizes support for Georgia's Western orientation, arguing that the government has created a rift by lying to the people. They demand that the government stop overstepping its mandates and resign voluntarily, delivering a strong assessment rooted in policy and values.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The representative of the Centre Party faction is staunchly opposed to the government’s tax policy. He stresses that the current coalition has increased the tax burden and exacerbated poverty, and he prioritizes improving the standard of living for the populace. He advocates for a proactive, people-first tax policy that emphasizes social justice (such as lowering the VAT on food) and increasing funding for youth extracurricular activities. His approach is policy- and value-driven, focusing on protecting the welfare and equality of the people.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
He emphasized Estonia's long-standing support for Georgia's path toward full membership in the European Union and NATO. He considers diplomacy paramount and stresses the importance of cooperation and continuous dialogue in foreign policy. He is critical of the Foreign Minister's actions regarding the protests in Georgia and demands answers, while simultaneously highlighting the friendly nature of Estonia-Georgia relations and the importance of maintaining the European trajectory.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The Centre Party sets out the general direction for the green transition: it must proceed based on balanced, economically sound decisions. The party does not currently support expediting offshore wind farm development, citing the lack of a clear electricity transmission plan and a unified regulatory framework. Simultaneously, they stress the importance of dialogue with businesses and the necessity of a clear energy policy direction.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
A critical analysis of social policy, marked by concern and critique, emphasizes that the social assistance system is fragmented. It focuses too heavily on excessive bureaucracy and lacks efficiency in promoting human well-being. The analysis calls for a systemic overhaul to prioritize individual needs and effectively reduce poverty and inequality. Strong emphasis is placed on the disparities in subsistence benefits, the taxation of pensions, and the sustainability of support for the disabled elderly. The document urges reconsideration, increased funding, and a comprehensive review of the coalition's current policies. It takes a strongly oppositional stance toward the coalition's social policy, stressing the necessity of addressing deficiencies identified by both the State Audit Office and the general population, particularly as they relate to human quality of life and dignity.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker stressed the need for rigorous sanctioning against Russia and the necessity of freezing state assets, but maintains that any confiscation must be carried out in coordination with allies and the European Union. He is clearly critical of the violation of the rule of law principles that led to the current situation and refuses to support any document that contradicts the constitution. The primary objective is cooperation with the European Union and our allies, ensuring decisions are made jointly, rather than pursuing a unilateral path.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The state must ensure the availability of food reserves and the provision of vital services. It is emphasized that food supply companies are included in the list of vital services, and the state must provide assistance when necessary to ensure these companies remain competitive. The core question is whether the state should assume additional obligations and investments to guarantee preparedness. This position strongly underscores the need for state intervention and preparedness in the context of vital services and crisis management.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The core political stance revolves around criticizing the new requirements for childcare services. The speaker is skeptical and strongly calls for both comprehensive justification and public debate. Furthermore, he suggests that the Minister of Education lacks a clear grasp of the situation and raises the question of why such stringent requirements are being implemented at this specific time. The regulatory approach to this sector is critical, resting on the fundamental need for decisions that are both measured and well-justified.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The opposition's stance against the government’s economic policy involves criticism regarding the failure to fulfill promises and the lack of necessary optimization. They stress that the government has abandoned its commitments and failed to introduce any strengthening initiatives, proposing a bank tax as a suitable solution for the budget deficit. The position is policy-driven and critical of the current administration’s actions, focusing specifically on taxing the banking sector as a means of economic support.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker demonstrates a moderate and measured position: he does not support rushed decisions and emphasizes the protection of religious freedom and social stability. He seeks discussion, a communication plan, and a balance between security and the rights of the religious community, and is prepared to move forward through dialogue and peaceful negotiation.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The stance opposing the proposed sugar tax bill highlights the already heavy overall burden of consumption taxes. It advocates for prevention and health policies (such as promoting sports culture and preventative work) instead of implementing an additional tax. Furthermore, it points out that the projected tax revenue (25 million) is unrealistic and that administrative costs will diminish the overall effect. This position reflects criticism of the government's fiscal policy, stressing the need for a balanced approach rather than introducing further levies.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The main viewpoint: [We/I] do not support improving driver behavior by increasing fines. It is critical that no prior analysis has been conducted and that the monetary impact has not been clearly proven. This raises the question of effectiveness: does raising fines actually change behavior?
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is strongly against the coalition's tax policy, primarily opposing the motor vehicle tax. They propose using a bank tax as a solution to fill the state budget. Furthermore, they stress the need to cancel or postpone the income tax reform to protect businesses and the working population. Their arguments are based on economic figures and alternative solutions, rather than simply generating ideological opposition.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main position is a critique of the draft legislation concerning the inclusion of e-voting and mobile voting; it stresses the use of paper ballots and internal oversight, and demands that the bill not be passed in its current form. The stance is strongly oppositional to the bill and highlights the necessity of stricter mechanisms to guarantee security and transparency. It also places minor emphasis on traditional electoral principles and the integrity of democratic processes.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The primary focus is improving youth health. We are critical of the sugar tax, emphasizing that taxation alone will not solve the problem; instead, a holistic approach must be employed (physical activity, nutrition, and raising awareness). In addition to previous proposals, we support reviewing a specific impact assessment and timeline, stressing the necessity of an evidence base. The style is policy- and results-driven, not emotional, and we maintain reservations regarding tax policy until the existing program has been fully analyzed.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The first speech is a forceful critique of energy policy, stressing the inflexibility of the universal service and the fact that consumers are trapped. He is strongly opposed to the current universal service model and highlights the need to terminate it and replace it with a market-based price, coupled with transitional subsidization when necessary, during both good times and bad times; the emphasis is placed on making swift political decisions. In the second speech, he shows support for the football hall project and seeks plan continuation from the government, but focuses more on the specific question rather than the main critique; he does not voice strong opposition to the football investments. Overall, his positions are aimed at fostering a flexible, competitive economy and promoting infrastructure development within government operations.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Transparency of economic scenarios and scrutiny of the methodology are a top priority. The speaker maintains a critical but non-hostile tone, emphasizing that the underlying assumptions and categories (very positive, conservative, moderate) must be clearly specified. He does not express a clear preference for specific economic policies, focusing instead on analysis and increasing public accountability.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The most noticeable position emphasizes the protection of the domestic food industry and the guaranteeing of food security; it is strongly critical of the current market-based regulation and stresses the need for the state to set goals in the food sector. It highlights Estonia's capacity to feed its own people and reduce imports, thereby advocating for state intervention on behalf of producers. The adoption of energy policy and the linking of the 2030 goals with food policy provide indications of a strong commitment to independent production. The objective is policy- and value-based, with an emphasis on state intervention in food production.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is oppositional and critical of the government. He blames tax increases and the rising cost of living for the deepening demographic crisis, and emphasizes the necessity of implementing measures that would both lower living costs and curb the outflow of young people. Crucially, he stressed the importance of engaging the domestic workforce through retraining and vocational education, rather than relying on an increase in foreign labor. Furthermore, he pointed out that the government has failed to present clear plans, and their responses lacked any concrete roadmap for action.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The speaker supports the green transition but emphasizes economic viability and the protection of consumer interests: the green objective is important, but electricity prices and competitiveness are priorities, grounded in collected data and practical experience. He wants to rapidly develop onshore capacity and improve distribution and grids while reducing bureaucracy to achieve stable and affordable energy. He is cautiously critical regarding nuclear energy and highlights the need for a thorough discussion, but does not rule out future alternatives such as hydrogen-powered gas turbines; his overall position is balanced and pragmatic. The overarching goal is to balance national competitiveness and the consumer interests of the population based on data, rather than pursuing an impulsive ideological line.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
An opposition representative whose central focus is criticizing tax policy and reducing the cost of living and poverty. He is strongly opposed to the current tax hikes and the accelerated expansion of consumption taxes, arguing that they increase inequality and disproportionately affect low- and middle-income individuals. He notes that previous income tax cuts combined with general tax reductions deepened poverty, and views a bank tax and other measures as potentially fairer contributions that should be considered. Finally, he emphasizes the need for an honest debate and cooperation to find solutions, rather than allowing political opposition to become entrenched.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the termination of the universal service and demands the swift implementation of that decision. They are critical of the coalition's delays and position themselves as an advocate for realizing financial benefits and ensuring timely action. This position is characterized by a forceful need to expedite matters rather than postpone them, and the overall tone is policy- and economics-driven (focusing on financial gain for citizens).
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The worsening socio-economic situation in the Narva region, rising heating costs, and issues within the energy sector are currently the main focus. He/She is critical of the government’s actions to date and stresses the necessity of state aid for Narva. As a solution, he/she proposes state assistance and directing the supplementary income generated from CO2 quotas to Narva, which demonstrates a policy-driven, solution-oriented stance.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Not enough data.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker is a critic of regional policy, arguing that regional policy is entirely lacking and that funding for local municipalities is insufficient. He stresses the necessity of increasing the funds allocated for road maintenance and warns that the current budget cuts will begin to deteriorate the condition of the roads within four years. Additionally, he is against the car tax but in favor of the bank tax, emphasizing that the tax burden on ordinary citizens must not be raised.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
On the economic policy front, the speech primarily focuses on criticizing tax hikes. The speaker highlights the potential impacts of the two-percentage-point increase in VAT, as well as the potential effects of the excise duties on fuel, gas, and electricity. They also stress the necessity of conducting an impact analysis and having a fact-based debate. The style is strongly oppositional and aimed squarely at criticizing the government's tax policy.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The representative demonstrates an oppositional stance on tax policy: they do not support the introduction of a progressive income tax and are critical of abolishing the tax bulge. They emphasize that the impact of tax changes must be clearly taken into account and demand a thorough explanation regarding the effect on individuals. Data for comparing this position with previous periods is unavailable.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The presenter avoids taking a definitive stance either for or against the nuclear power plant. Instead, they stress the necessity of a broad discussion and the importance of getting substantive answers from the working group's report. They emphasize that the final decision must be based on a comprehensive evaluation—weighing risks, economic factors, and social impacts—rather than being rushed. This approach is policy-driven and is effectively underscored by its focus on procedural considerations.