By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats
Total Sessions: 150
Fully Profiled: 150
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Economic views are clearly geared toward tax relief, demanding a reduction in the VAT on foodstuffs with the aim of improving people's livelihood. There is also interest in a fiscal policy restructuring of the entire tax system to achieve overall relief.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
It supports consumer protection and market regulation aimed at reducing the high costs of services (such as mobile communications and banking), which are currently driven by limited competition and excessive profit margins. It opposes tax hikes and criticizes the government's fiscal policy, which is increasing the deficit and the national debt burden to cover administrative expenses. It advocates for lowering the VAT on foodstuffs to improve affordability for citizens.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaker strongly supports raising the salaries of rescuers and police officers to lift them out of wage poverty, arguing that the promised 10% increase in the wage fund is insufficient. He/She also criticizes the regulation that exempts lighter scooters from mandatory insurance, suggesting this was done to benefit companies like Bolt, and demands that all light personal mobility devices be insured.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is strongly opposed to the redistribution of income (socialism), preferring fiscal discipline and transparency. Concern is expressed regarding the large deficit (4.5%) and possible additional tax increases in 2027.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is strongly opposed to the car tax, arguing that it will stall the industry and reduce overall tax revenue (VAT, income tax). Support is given to tax relief (specifically lowering the VAT on foodstuffs) and introducing new taxes for the financial sector (a bank tax) in order to balance the budget without hitting people's wallets. The preference is for protecting people's livelihoods and the business environment.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The majority faction is critical of the increase in consumption taxes and other changes to the tax system; it seeks to reduce consumption taxes on foodstuffs and emphasizes the need to support the fulfillment of basic needs. Critical of the coalition’s economic policy, the faction argues that the current tax burden structure is inequitable and increases inequality; it highlights the impact of inflation and the rising cost of living, and stresses the necessity of stimulating the economy through lower prices for essential commodities.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The primary emphasis is placed on budget and funding transparency and the realistic assessment of expenditures; it criticizes the projected maintenance costs and finds that funds should, if necessary, be directed toward main routes, the road network, and regional connectivity. It is skeptical regarding the economic viability of major projects and stresses that the actual requirement is controlled costs and a realistic budget.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
Supports policies aimed at improving living standards and the demographic situation (e.g., subsidizing housing for young families); there is no precise discussion regarding the tax or general fiscal regime; emphasizes the need for targeted implementation of social spending.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The issue stands as a major concern for the local economy and infrastructure: specifically, high ferry ticket prices and their impact on the Saaremaa/Muhu economy, corporate profitability, and the funding of regional development. The text stresses the need for transparency and a review of economic considerations (such as procurement costs, the new ferry project, and air transport services), citing examples related to the labor market and resource utilization (i.e., labor shortages). It also references state budgetary support and the regional effects of investments.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Seeks to guide the economy and the housing market toward better functioning through reforms: pro-active measures that will make loans cheaper and more accessible, and which introduce the proposals of the Bank of Estonia and the Financial Supervision Authority. While it emphasizes the issues of loan costs and real estate prices, it does not present detailed fiscal plans—instead, the focus is on the rapid implementation of reforms. It highlights the significant role of market functioning and trust.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The economic representation emphasizes the protection of entrepreneurship and the importance of competition; this is coupled with a critical attitude toward the expansion of green policies and the financial and regulatory burden placed on companies. One group of speakers seeks to ensure equitable treatment and effective market operation, while others highlight the necessity of prioritizing service quality and the interests of employers. The general stance is pro-business, characterized by a cautious approach toward regulators.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
A critical assessment, ranging from moderate to skeptical. It raises concerns regarding the pursuit of cost avoidance and efficiency, specifically mentioning a €35,000 fee for a private development service and the utilization of "taxpayer money." It is critical of the impact of tax increases on the economic environment and stresses the necessity of thorough analysis before decisions are made. It demonstrates a preference for an evidence-based approach and aims to avoid cost-driven and unnecessary allocation of private funds.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Concerning economic policy, it emphasizes the importance of evaluation criteria and impact analyses before implementing tax hikes or other financial decisions. It strongly opposes significant increases to car tax, income tax, and VAT without appropriate analysis, highlighting the negative effects these changes would have on people's ability to cope financially. It calls for forecasts and short-term and long-term scenarios, developed through analysis involving the private sector, in order to prevent instability and adverse economic effects.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
In the context of the economy, the focus is placed on fiscal transparency and the impact of taxes on the population. It is stressed that an unreasonable uniformity of tax rates could be detrimental to national productivity and the revenue equilibrium of local governments. Furthermore, concern is raised that turnover and taxation practices should not negatively affect incomes or regional economic specificities.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
Focus on reducing consumer loan costs by simplifying refinancing; highlights the importance of regulatory proposals and the need for government progress.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Economically critical yet reform-oriented: the party opposes tax hikes and the constant flux of the entire tax system. It seeks to reduce the social tax (from 33% to 20%) to incentivize youth employment, while ensuring health insurance coverage is maintained. Furthermore, it stresses the importance of improving business competitiveness and easing loan and property costs for young families. The platform emphasizes the need for an efficient and less complex tax system, and critically examines the impact of current tax policy on the people of Estonia.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
From an economic perspective, the raising of taxes and the overall tax system are being criticized, as they impact food prices and consumers. A desire has been expressed for analyses regarding the impact of these taxes on the economy and people's livelihoods, and the need for transparency is being emphasized. The tax spree is allegedly focusing on the harmful effects it has on consumers and the economy.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The focus is on economic themes, including the rapid growth of unemployment, the decline in employment rates, and wage disparities. There is criticism regarding tax policy (the car tax was mentioned previously) and an emphasis on the need for sustainable regional investments. It presents approaches designed to improve youth employment, including the idea for a draft bill on tax incentives for young workers, and support for increasing regional equality.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Economic policy tends to prioritize consumer interests and increased competition (for example, reforms concerning mortgage refinancing, fostering competition among banks, reducing consumer costs—specifically, lowering the VAT on foodstuffs—as well as debating labor and employment mechanisms). Concurrently, criticism is leveled at taxes and the state budget, emphasizing the necessity for transparency in both funding and expenditures. Furthermore, there is criticism regarding the rising costs of food and energy, coupled with a demand for impact monitoring.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The economic viewpoints center on the question of the stability of tax policy: there is opposition to permanent tax regulation, and it is argued that the burden on vulnerable individuals is increasing. Emphasis is placed on solving basic livelihood problems (a critique of the "solidarity" ethics often characteristic of political speeches). Furthermore, the necessity of regulating the quick loan market and the importance of consumer protection have been highlighted; all of this points to criticism of the coalition policy implemented by the Reform Party and Eesti 200.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The critical stance towards state green subsidies and the government's role in energy policy is based on economic indicators; emphasis is placed on price volatility within Nord Pool and the need to move away from subsidies. A market-based approach is desired, along with the involvement of companies in attracting investments and the better direction of state money to draw in Estonian businesses and capital.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Economic considerations are highlighted: questions are raised concerning the lifetime cost of creating and maintaining the data warehouse, and the origin of the sources; there is no support for cuts or praise for economic benefits, but rather an emphasis on potential costs and the uncertainty of budgetary support. While no clear pro- or anti-economic platform is articulated, the criticism focuses on cost accounting and budget subsidies.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The relevant economic perspective is critical: the draft legislation will lead to price increases and tax burdens, highlighting a reduction in consumer purchasing power and a rise in consumer prices. It also references TOT and unbalanced financial analysis, concluding that the cumulative burden of taxes and waste management costs will negatively impact the economy.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Criticism regarding the absence of economic impact data and assessments; emphasizes the necessity of demonstrating direct profit and revenue flowing into the state budget. The cost-effectiveness of the narratives is questioned (specifically, balancing tourism revenue against detention costs), and it is stressed that the impact on the state budget must be clearly quantified. Highlights the requirement for economic figures and impact analysis before proceeding with major decisions.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The economic approach is conservative, focusing on cost control and resisting tax hikes. This involves opposing tax increases, emphasizing the reduction of bureaucracy, and cutting budgetary spending. They advocate for lowering the VAT on food (a point specifically highlighted by the party/speaker), abolishing kindergarten fees, and criticizing the overall tax structure and the redistribution of subsidies. In energy policy, a critical view is presented regarding the green transition and the ENMAK bill, highlighting market volatility and the imbalance of investments.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A critical assessment of economic policy focuses on the tax burden, inflation, and the cost of living. The opposition emphasizes that while the tax curve is decreasing, its impact does not fully offset the combined effects of inflation and consumption taxes. They prioritize structural reforms, support measures in family and social policy, and economic stability. The rise in prices and the burden placed on the poor are highlighted as the government's responsibility, coupled with a call to strengthen economic competitiveness by ensuring transparency and the rule of law.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Tax policy must be sustainable, and consumption-based taxation should be reformed; the tax policy currently under discussion is increasing inflation and burdening the poor and middle-income individuals. It is argued that economic growth appeared to materialize thanks to the car tax, but the actual impact on the real economy is negative. The speaker prefers an energy-inspired approach but criticizes the lack of sustainability in the green energy direction and wishes to focus on oil shale and consider a nuclear power plant, which requires thorough analysis. Recommendations include investments in high technology and higher education, as well as the restructuring of the economy through retraining. The balance between fiscal discipline and growth is at the heart of the priorities.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Crucial from an economic standpoint is infrastructure that facilitates economic activity and the establishment of commercial flight routes, alongside increasing real jobs and tax revenue through the aviation sector. At the same time, emphasis is placed on the sustainability of funding and the transparency of costs; road investments are shown at a sub-risk level, and increasing teacher salaries is difficult to achieve; the necessity of balancing economic growth and costs is emphasized.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The prevailing view in the economic sphere is that raising taxes harms consumption and the economy and is a controversial means of covering the budget deficit. They advocate for a sustainable policy that protects the middle class and consumers, and for covering the budget through means other than tax increases; it is recommended to utilize European structural funds and direct additional resources towards security. Support is given to maintaining a minimal or reasonable tax burden and preserving the middle class's standard of living to facilitate investment.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The linguistic focus is on tax changes and budget balance. It supports structural reform of the tax system, emphasizing a fairer tax burden and the taxation of capital, assets, and high dividend income, rather than consumption taxes. He/She stresses that consumption taxes (which constitute a large portion of tax revenue) can disproportionately burden the poor. Therefore, reforms are necessary to ensure a progressive and sustainable tax system and the state’s financial stability even beyond 2026.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Economic viewpoints are segmented: the continued rigidity of tax policy and the growing tax burden (income tax at 24%, VAT at 24% starting July 1st) are under criticism. At the same time, the necessity of contributing within a framework of solidarity is highlighted, and the discussion includes mention of the possibility of reducing the 'tax hump' (the regressive income tax effect). Issues concerning the cost of living and people's financial well-being are paramount.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Criticism leveled at economic policy: the susceptibility to tax hikes and regulatory burdens; a demand for fairer support and investments that boost productivity and competitiveness. There is opposition to sharp increases in VAT, income tax, and excise duties; the necessity of protecting the competitiveness of farmers and businesses, and ensuring mutual support in stimulating the economy, is emphasized. A negative stance regarding the state's economic management; there is a desire to enhance income retention mechanisms for farmers during crises.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Emphasizing economic competitiveness and energy security: Curbing the current form of the CO2 market and the green transition to prevent a burden on economic activity.—Criticism regarding the unbalanced costs of the green transition and CO2 trading, and the resulting burden on consumers; a desire to review the impact on gross revenue and labor costs, and the need for modernization.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Prefers careful and determined financial management; does not support general cuts, but wishes to prioritize defense expenditures, digital and innovation investments, and energy saving (renovation of apartment buildings). It reports the economic impact of changing the tax system (the speaker notes that abolishing the tax hump will result in a cost of approximately half a billion to the state budget) and emphasizes the need to find additional resources and reduce bureaucracy.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The economic narrative focuses on prioritizing state expenditures away from the green transition (e.g., 14–18 billion in green investments versus the modernization of the oil shale sector). State support mechanisms are criticized (such as the subsidies given to Enefit Green), and emphasis is placed on protecting domestic resources, jobs, and the economy of Ida-Virumaa. Furthermore, the impact of energy prices on both production and consumers is highlighted, along with the need to reallocate priorities toward social and security matters.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The core criticism of economic policy revolves around tax increases and rising service prices damaging people's purchasing power. Recommendations include lowering the VAT on food and introducing special exemptions for the car tax targeting influential groups. The state budget and its financing mechanisms are also under fire, as they are deemed to shift the financial burden onto citizens. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of efficient and transparent funding for nursing homes and home care services.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Highlights the dilemma surrounding economic viability and potential costs; points out that wind energy might be unprofitable, according to claims made by Swedish analysts, and stresses the need for realistic economic assessments before a widespread transition.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economically, the criticism is primarily focused on emphasizing the burden on the taxpayer, the increasingly costly measures of the green transition, and potential financial losses. The text highlights the example of Sweden's seven-year loss experience with wind farms and argues that support mechanisms could increase both costs and the taxpayer's burden.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Supports market-based competition and the reduction of regulatory barriers, as these raise costs and undermine competitiveness. It is further emphasized that constraints affecting pricing and production costs are detrimental to the economy and businesses.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Within the economic framework, the representative is advocating for food security and inflation relief: he emphasizes the necessity of lowering the VAT on basic foodstuffs (to 9%), arguing that this will drive food prices down. He plans to utilize various tax adjustment instruments while simultaneously highlighting that consumption taxes constitute a significant portion of state budget revenue. He stresses the importance of taxing banks (a bank tax) and wants to maintain the current progressive tax structure (the "tax hump"), citing the high share of consumption taxes. Examples from all countries illustrate differences in competition and tax systems, but he views his proposed option as fairer in terms of the overall tax burden.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The text is critical of many large investments (approximately 14 billion euros) and the prevailing notion of how these investments will affect end-consumer prices (with forecasts of 174 vs 155 euros/MWh). It indicates that the sheer size of the investments may not guarantee significant price relief, emphasizing the need for clarity and control over growth in this sector. It shares the view that a moderate impact on growth and consumer prices may not be satisfactory if the investments fail to surpass expectations.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
It prioritizes cheap and stable energy for consumers and is critical of the high cost of the green transition; it emphasizes that large investments in green energy result in economic damage and non-competitive pricing for consumers. It supports alternative investments in oil shale and uses the ENMAK 2030 forecasts as the foundation for pricing (150 EUR/MWh). It notes that an "anomaly" has arisen in the market due to the events of the green transition and stresses the need for regional cooperation.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The economic discussion is closely tied to electricity prices and consumer interests. There is criticism regarding the subsidization of the energy system (specifically offshore wind farms), coupled with warnings about the increasing burden on taxpayers. The impact of tax policy and the income tax-free minimum is being debated within the context of corporate and consumer protection. The main focus is on balancing economic revitalization with stability.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Economic policy views: increasing productivity and competitiveness, and reducing the burden on consumers are central priorities. It criticizes the excessive profits of banks and calls for measures (such as a bank tax) to lower interest rates and regulate loan agreements and mortgages. In energy policy, it supports the use of oil shale as a cheaper alternative to green energy, emphasizing energy security and the price of electricity for consumers.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
An attitude focused on economic interests: this stance undermines the effectiveness of strong state regulation and favors market- and performance-based principles; it emphasizes that companies generate profit and that investments depend on quality services and skills. It seeks adjustments to the tax base or specific tax incentives (e.g., lowering the VAT on foodstuffs) and the cancellation or reduction of the car tax, stressing the impact of inflation and consumer purchasing power. Such a focus demonstrates a strong commitment to the interests of businesses and consumers, coupled with a critical attitude toward new taxing regulations.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economically, emphasis is placed on protecting taxpayer resources and ensuring cost efficiency. Criticism is directed at the high costs associated with using Chinese technology, as well as decision-making processes that allow for the procurement of equipment that is either more expensive or less secure. A commercial and viable approach is preferred, provided that security is maintained.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The preference is for reducing or optimizing taxes (such as lowering the VAT on foodstuffs). The text criticizes previous tax changes that increased the tax burden and diminished purchasing power. It highlights the "Euro-social calculation," which demonstrates the taxation of purchasing power and population welfare. Furthermore, it criticizes car-centric tax preferences ("the car tax") and stresses the need for stable, coordinated financial management of the economy.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It stresses the economic impact and the prospects for freight transport in the context of border closures; it does not present a clear economic program, but points out that the issues concern businesses and trade.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Not enough data
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The systematization of economic crises and oppositional rhetoric directed against tax cuts and price increases; criticism of the current government's taxation policy (car tax, increases in VAT and income tax, excises) and expression of concern regarding the demographic and social impact. It offers, as an alternative, potential state revenue derived from major levies (a bank tax and the taxation of large international platforms), but fails to present specific implementation policies. The text emphasizes economic decline and rising poverty as primary examples of the resulting damage.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
Emphasis is placed on economic damages and their impact (e.g., the damage sustained by Estlink 2, issues concerning the transparency of baseline data for energy plans, and the mention of a large sum (26 billion)); the focus must necessarily be on transparency and economic consequences, rather than growth-oriented fiscalism; the overall position leans toward infrastructure protection and damage mitigation.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The discussion revolves around the rising cost of the consumer food basket and the question of whether lowering VAT on food items is effective. Also under debate is the impact of taxing banks, alongside criticism directed at the profits made by shopping centers and retailers. It underscores the necessity of finding mechanisms to cap prices and influence essential businesses, but stops short of presenting any specific economic or tax policy proposal.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
From an economic standpoint, the emphasis is on evaluating the impact of tax and fiscal policy: the fight against the bank tax and the explicit desire to maintain or increase people's purchasing power (9% VAT on essential goods). It describes the differences in the Lithuanian model and stresses that the Estonian system differs from Lithuania's (classic income tax versus advance income tax plus dividends). It criticizes the government's tax regime as an economic deterrent and emphasizes the need for measures that promote economic growth, including the idea of lowering taxes on foodstuffs.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
In economic policy, the focus is on economic rationality and protecting consumer prices. It is critical of widespread investment in green energy and the associated pricing mechanisms, stressing the necessity of testing utility against cost and reducing the burden on the consumer. Skepticism is expressed regarding expenditures made on large fuel and wind farms, and it is emphasized that economic models should be market-based, not reliant on an ideological framework. It calls for transparency in budgeting and investments, as well as policies aligned with the interests of business and entrepreneurship.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
From an economic standpoint, the consumer emphasizes the priority of electricity prices and is critical of ENMAK's price forecasts and investments that could increase future costs. They advocate for targets aimed at a lower price per kilowatt-hour (recommending 5–8 cents) and stress that major investors will be attracted if the price is competitive, rather than through extensive, state-funded subsidies. They express skepticism regarding the usefulness of large investments if those investments do not provide a competitive advantage for the consumer.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The economic platform focuses on transparency regarding corruption and resource management; it emphasizes the discussion of losses and savings (400,000 euros, 1,350,000 euros, for 6,700 nursing home residents), but it does not present a specific program for overall tax policy or economic growth. It highlights the need for recovering funds and implementing anti-corruption measures.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The text emphasizes the importance of competitiveness and key economic indicators, while warning of the potential consequences of green policies on competition. It also notes the impact of US protectionism and the broader context of China's technological advancement. It argues that the advancement of the green transition must consider global economic relations, necessitating the adaptation of European economic policy in response to these changes.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
In economic policy, he is pro-market and anti-taxation. He opposes increasing consumption taxes, advocates for placing a greater burden on the banking sector (by accounting for the return on bank capital and profits), and using those funds to finance the state budget for security purposes. He values international comparisons and regional accounting, stressing that tax revenues must not impede economic growth; his focus is on data-driven, carefully considered decisions.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
It supports the bank tax as an additional revenue base, emphasizing banks' significant profits (2023–2024) as the impetus for taxation. It opposes the trend toward high motor vehicle taxes and registration fees, proposing a benefit for families with children (a zero rate for the car tax). The critical concepts of "tax hell" and the description "festival of tax hikes" point to the search for funding and regional balance, along with the need to explain the impact on the population. This is also linked to ensuring the reliability of the energy sector, which is part of stabilizing the economic environment.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Focuses on ensuring taxes remain within the Estonian economy and mitigating the risks associated with taxing temporary agency labor. It highlights the necessity of amending other legislation to resolve economic issues and guarantee fiscal stability.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The transparency of public spending and price control in public procurements are emphasized. An expenditure of 800,000 euros is mentioned, and a market assessment is requested. The desire is for informed and transparent decisions, as well as the investigation of market prices.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Stimulating consumption and stabilizing the tax burden are crucial for the economy. The negative effect of the car tax and high consumption taxes on purchasing power is recognized, and it is recommended that consideration be given to lowering the VAT on foodstuffs and generally balancing the taxation system. It is emphasized that taxes should foster the business environment and economic growth.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
It focuses on the proper use of public funds and transparency; it includes criticism of the state's financial decisions concerning Nordica and the associated risks to taxpayer money. It does not present broad economic policy proposals but emphasizes the importance of financial accountability.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economically skeptical and cautious; emphasizes that budget deficits and a lack of transparency could lead to tax hikes, deteriorating both the tax environment and the overall economic climate. The prevailing sentiment indicates concern over the integrity of the economic environment and the burden placed upon the populace.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The economic situation is viewed as a critical context when discussing hospital and labor compensation. Support is given to an investment that generates revenue for the economy and requires the state to increase accountability and tax enforcement. Numerical examples are presented (49.3 million in additional costs; 2%–3% of GDP representing the value of direct costs; 800–1.2 billion euros in indirect costs), and it is emphasized that the resulting added value and GDP growth will compensate for the investment.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The economic policy approach focuses on budget transparency and expenditure control; specific recommendations regarding taxes or investments are absent, but it is stressed that funds must be clearly planned and controllable. There is a critical stance on including 100 million in the budget if it is not clearly justified. This demonstrates a strong commitment to ensuring fiscal discipline and credibility.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economically, the main criticism revolves around tax hikes and service prices, which diminish consumer purchasing power. Criticism is also directed at energy prices and the costs associated with support measures, and there is an emphasis on the need to balance the costs of green policy with the interests of the state budget and the wider economy. [The policy/statement] supports the continued use of oil shale for the sake of economic stability and energy security.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The rising cost of payments and expenses is a significant issue; specific economic policy steps were not outlined, but the necessity of listening to the public's concerns and discussing financial matters was emphasized.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Supports economic austerity and cuts to government spending; emphasizes the impact of tax increases on society and the necessity of financial responsibility. It seeks transparency regarding expense reimbursements and, where necessary, tying salary to work attendance, citing the Belgian model as the desired solution. The statement stresses fiscal discipline and social justice.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The central focus is on controlling and saving financial expenditure. It is emphasized that transparency leads to savings, and that the Riigikogu (Parliament) and ministers should be required to provide expense documentation. Specific sums have been mentioned (1,500 euros per month for representation costs, 250,000 euros per year), alongside the necessity of allocating or redirecting resources (such as funding for school psychologists) according to established priorities.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
This economically critical draft bill highlights the burden placed on families, the reduction of household income, and the negative impact stemming from increased excise duties. The text emphasizes that tax revenue is substantial, but the implementation of these measures disproportionately affects the pockets of individuals rather than businesses; it favors Left-wing and fiscally prudent solutions.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
In economic policy, the focus is on criticizing tax increases and enhancing transparency; regarding the draft bill, the necessity of accountability and securing financial responsibility is stressed. The bank tax is mentioned as a specific policy choice affecting taxation, investment, and competitive advantage; it is emphasized that consumption taxes make up a large portion of the Estonian budget, and budget cuts require a transparent and well-considered approach.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The economic viewpoint centers on arguments against raising taxes and in favor of eliminating or reducing the tax bracket distortion (tax hump). It stresses that tax modifications could undermine people's purchasing power and economic growth, and underscores the need for transparency in financial decision-making and the safeguarding of entrepreneurial interests. These assertions rely on the projections of well-known analysts and the observation that eliminating the tax hump might not fully resolve the fiscal state, depending on the specific context.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
It is said that tax hikes are detrimental, arguing that fiscal policy erodes purchasing power and could lead to increased poverty. Expert opinions are cited which contradict the government’s forecasts. He emphasizes the necessity of strengthening the financial capacity of local governments and the importance of regional development, but the criticism carries a strong oppositional tone and remains skeptical about the growth forecasts.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The core of economic policy revolves around solidarity and tax guarantees, as well as the necessity of introducing new taxation (a bank tax) and reforming VAT (on food)—measures the coalition has been either unable or unwilling to implement. The bills tie wage payments and expense allowances directly to work contribution, while also improving the transparency of taxes and expense reimbursements. Preference is given to mechanisms that stimulate the economy and reduce both inflation and the cost of living.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
It emphasizes economic impact and cost savings: establishing a correlation between wages and expense compensations at the level of specific work activities, alongside increased transparency, which mitigates hidden costs; the objective is greater efficiency and improved control over resource utilization.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Regarding the economy, the speaker is critical: the increase in consumption taxes and excise duties particularly burdens low and middle-income individuals, which could reduce consumption and hinder economic stimulation. He emphasizes the need for alternatives (e.g., bank tax, platform taxes) and argues that the bill increases the state's tax revenue, but simultaneously harms consumption and the standard of living. He highlights a static vision where consumers are overloaded with taxes instead of fundamentally solving the budget deficits.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Issues of the economy and income were highlighted: specifically, the challenge of high employment and the importance of ensuring adequate livelihood. It is argued that a bank tax would have bolstered the state budget, and broader economic topics related to government formation are discussed. The speaker is critical of the government’s current economic policy and seeks to utilize economic policy tools to strengthen both the budget and national security.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
A central point of criticism in economic policy concerns tax increases and hasty decisions, which risk driving up prices and the overall cost of living. While the necessity of state intervention to support the economy has been stressed, this should preferably be done through transparent and thoroughly analyzed measures. On the topics of the green transition and energy, a critical stance is prevalent: emphasis is placed on utilizing oil shale as an energy source for the sake of energy security, alongside the need for exceptions (derogations) from the European Union to prevent undue burden on consumers.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Economically, the central criticism targets the coalition's tax policy and the new tax hikes, which increase the economic burden on people. It is stressed that healthcare costs and other tax increases put severe pressure on the populace. Simultaneously, emphasis has been placed on the need for economic growth and improving people's quality of life, rather than creating funding gaps that strain financing. Specific attention has been drawn to the necessity of a purposeful and balanced budget, and to avoiding excessive tax increases.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The stance is economically critical and leans heavily toward social protection. It focuses attention on the accelerated implementation of planned tax hikes, the lack of transparency in state budget planning, and the negative impact on the economic environment. Simultaneously, it stresses the necessity of protecting pensioners, supporting single residents, and ensuring the accessibility of vital services (such as dental care). It criticizes proposals to increase state budgetary spending without broad consultation and highlights the resulting damage to consumer and business confidence.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data. Economic or financial topics are missing; the text focuses on issues of legislation and oversight.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Critical of current economic policy, it is emphasized that tax policy must avoid significant increases in consumption taxes and service prices, which would unduly burden individuals and businesses. It is pointed out that funding relies on both European funds and loans, yet the necessity of a balanced budget and long-term development is stressed. The opposition's vision promises not to increase pressure on consumer spending and focuses instead on stimulating the economy through prudent investments.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
It focuses on criticizing the so-called "tax peace" and opposing tax increases; it highlights the negative impact on efficiency, the standard of living, and real estate market prices; it stresses that taxes are rising, which affects consumption and the housing sector; and it calls for suspending the notary fee and evaluating the economic repercussions at the national level.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
To alleviate the price level of food, [the speaker/party] supports lowering the Value Added Tax (VAT); criticizes the tax administration system and the transparency of budget planning; emphasizes the need for a balanced financing strategy to promote local producers and tourism, and points to possible options for limiting costs and seeking new revenue sources (quotes from discussions regarding total budget amounts and funding).
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Supports filling the state treasury, but is concerned about the impact of the car tax structure on low-income families and the weight given to the car's purchase price in the tax calculation. The need to balance achieving environmental goals and economic justice has been highlighted, emphasizing the greater impact of the tax on different population groups.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
Lowering the VAT on food as a tool for reducing inequality; criticism of the government's economic management and its indecipherable budget. It addresses energy security and the affordability of electricity prices, and points out that green policy and investments must be balanced so that energy costs do not put consumers at risk.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The core of economic development involves accelerating the utilization of funds and ensuring their effective implementation; it is stressed that cohesion policy instruments must serve as the engine for economic growth. This approach supports the active deployment of investments as a means of stimulating the economy, while also emphasizing the need to eliminate wasteful spending and increase performance-based implementation.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
A critical interpretation of the economic and tax plan opposes tax hikes and new taxes, emphasizing that these measures disproportionately affect rural residents and drive up prices (citing examples of an 8% price increase and the overall tax impact). It favors investments in regional development and maintaining essential services, demonstrating resilience against recession and an uncertain economic climate.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The criticism centers on economic policy: the budget is incomprehensible and lacks transparency; there are calls for clarity and readability. Tax hikes (specialist doctor fees, VAT, income tax, and excises) are cited as examples that have already taken effect, but whose necessity and impact require precise explanations. There is a shared conviction that the budget must be understandable to the public and should not support hidden or hard-to-track expenditure movements.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
He opposes tax hikes and wants taxes not to rise by 2028; he points out issues regarding the increase in service fees charged by state-owned companies and the overall tax structure. He acknowledges the need to understand regional wage disparities and improve access to services.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The economic perspective focuses on criticizing the large share of consumption taxes (which make up 41% of the state budget) and the objective of implementing a bank tax, which would lessen the burden on individuals and increase social solidarity. He emphasizes the necessity of regulation and the impact of Euribor on loan repayments, stressing that banks should show solidarity during economic conditions and that the distribution of burdens ought to be fairer. At the same time, he points out that domestic consumption and the business environment could suffer if taxes are raised, and therefore advocates for balanced tax financing.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
In terms of tax policy, there is skepticism regarding the increase of consumption taxes, with the emphasis being placed on the fact that such taxes can reduce overall consumption and disproportionately affect lower-income groups. The recommendations include utilizing alternative revenue sources (such as a bank tax or the taxation of digital platforms), as well as stressing the importance of investments, support for entrepreneurs, and strengthening the economic environment. The preference is for funding mechanisms that do not directly burden workers and consumers, highlighting the option of employing other tax allowances and cost reduction mechanisms.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
In economic policy, there is criticism regarding the increase of the consumption tax and a preference for a bank tax as a financing mechanism for the defense and security sectors. Emphasis is placed on the tax burden's effect on consumption and lower-income residents, alongside the need to manage the budget more transparently and in a more balanced way. It is argued that the rise in VAT and changes to income tax will increase the state budget, but the actual impact on the economy and people's livelihoods is viewed critically.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
Criticism regarding the expansion of taxation and the coalition’s plans that impact people's livelihoods; opposition to the bank tax and the partially progressive income tax. The recommendations focus on saving budgetary resources, reducing deficits, and setting certain limits on tax policy, emphasizing the need for financially realistic solutions.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The economic viewpoint is that tax policy should generate revenue, but the way this burden is structured primarily affects people's pockets. They argue that the revenue should be directed toward roads and infrastructure, not merely used to restrict targeted consumption. Critics argue that the increased revenue is not accompanied by transparent or targeted distribution, and they emphasize the need to manage resources more effectively.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Critical regarding the economy and skeptical of financial and funding policies; emphasizes that rushing will lead to negative impacts on the state budget and demands an impact analysis. It opposes tax increases or service price hikes and stands against plans that increase people's costs (e.g., consultation fees and inpatient daily fees). Recommendations lean toward achieving state budget balance and transparent discussion, and support family and demographic policy measures, but not in the form proposed by the draft bill.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Emphasis is placed on ensuring the competitiveness and economic sustainability of food producers, as well as the necessity of a national vision for the sake of economic stability. Concern is expressed regarding the tax increase in 2025–2026, and the state's crucial role in guaranteeing sustainable investments and the long-term viability of food production is highlighted; the inequality of subsidy distribution at the European level is also addressed.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The economic position is critical regarding capital allocation and reinvestment: concerns are raised over the excessive retention of profits and a decline in the volume of investment. Transparency in the use of capital is supported, along with a call for review, but no specific recommendations regarding macro-subsidies or fiscal policy are offered.
2024-09-26
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
His economic views are fiscally cautious and pro-redistributive: he supports a progressive income tax and a bank tax, and opposes any sharp rise in consumption taxes. He emphasizes that raising taxes primarily impacts those in poverty and low-income earners, which signals a deepening of social inequality. He also discusses the potential increase in social tax and the temporary status of the security tax, expressing concern over the permanence of tax changes and their effect on economic growth. Furthermore, he points out budget deficiencies that could place a burden on both individuals and the business environment.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The priorities for the economy are affordable electricity, developing domestic production, and mitigating global supply chain disruptions. He/She refuses to allow continued growth in dependency on China and stresses that the effectiveness of the green transition must be economically sensible and serve the interests of national employment and consumers. He/She recommends sensible subsidies in food and tax policy (such as lowering VAT on food) and increasing social expenditures to cushion the impact of inflation.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
A positive and growth-oriented view of the defense industry; it emphasizes the necessity of expanding operations based on forecasts of economic indicators (turnover, markets, volumes).
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
In the economic context, emphasis is placed on the recession, the need to capture new markets, and the importance of economic diplomacy. Practices that fail to support the development of exports or economic ties are criticized, and the reduction of embassy staff in China is cited as an example of resource scarcity. He/She emphasizes the need for a visible and effective economic policy within foreign affairs.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Support is given to family policy and the continuation of child benefits. Emphasis is placed on the importance of stable economic policy and promoting family formation through the measures outlined in the draft legislation. Precise financial data or specific numerical details are lacking, but the overall position leans toward a supportive direction via state spending aimed at bolstering families.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Focusing on economic factors, he emphasizes the price of electricity for consumers, the utilization of state and residents' funds, and the increasing burden of grid fees. He is skeptical of grants and state subsidies, arguing that the offshore wind project requires massive investments that will ultimately be paid for by the end consumer. He recommends an alternative: developing onshore wind and solar parks, which are more economically viable.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Economic growth and inflation are central concerns; he is critical of tax increases and prioritizes the stability of the economic environment and the protection of purchasing power. He emphasizes that the tax burden must not be excessive, and warned that impulsive tax hikes could trigger an economic recession. He highlights the need to maintain social solidarity and not eliminate the tax curve/hump, which, in his estimation, would be a mistake.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Criticizes fiscal policy and tax increases, representing a desire to prevent the general tax burden from being shifted onto people's pockets. It opposes the bank tax, arguing that the need to raise revenue should not fall on the shoulders of the average person (it offers alternatives that would not strain specific sectors). It is stated that economic policy should focus on the livelihood and security of the populace, rather than easily expanding taxation.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The focus of economic interests is to maximize economic activity and investments, reduce the regulatory burden, and avoid a situation where insurance and risks become intolerable. The financial impact (potential savings or loss) is assessed, and emphasis is placed on the unforeseen impact on entrepreneurship, employment, and tax and budgetary operations. Preference is given to structural solutions and those that are reasonable for businesses within the regulatory framework.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
Supports cooperation with the private sector (bus services) and discussion regarding financial aid for people at the border; emphasizes the need to coordinate and find financial solutions to improve the situation. Due to the lack of specific descriptions of tax or economic policy, it remains general.
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
It supports the objective of economic stimulation through the idea of a four-day work week, demonstrating a positive stance regarding the impact of working hours on the economy.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
In the context of the economy and the budget, there is opposition to expanding the tax base; the increased tax burden and a drop in turnover have been noted, and the ratification of the car tax would be detrimental to economic growth and entrepreneurship. The recommendation is to replace these taxes through new instruments, and several alternative measures are being proposed that would not increase the overall tax burden.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The aim is to avoid increasing the tax burden on ordinary citizens. There is criticism regarding the current tax practice, and a preference is expressed for directing funding through the taxation of goods and companies (a digital tax) as an alternative. At the same time, it is noted that the draft bill is not suitable for their faction, and the speaker emphasizes that, when examining the current tax reality, money is being taken from people, not corporations.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
The text is critical of the supplementary budget and expresses concern regarding the loss of tax revenue following the recent cuts. It stresses the importance of investments, highlighting defense investments and infrastructure (Rail Baltic, nuclear power plant) as central themes of economic policy. While it does not present specific tax or expenditure policy proposals, it underscores the necessity of transparency and control in public finance.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
He emphasizes that adopting the bill will bring additional costs to taxpayers and consumers, and its cost-effectiveness must be assessed. He wants a solution that will cost taxpayers and consumers less in the future. He stresses that socio-economic analyses and an energy balance must be available.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The direct written elaboration of economic policy is not covered; participants in the discussion refer to utilizing development cooperation instruments and potentially freeing up resources for Georgian civil society, but there is no clear overview regarding taxes, expenditures, or overall economic policy. The prevailing sentiment may be critical concerning the financing and procedures involved, but no concrete fiscal policy is presented.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The economic policy approach focuses on evaluating the impact of fees and taxes and preventing price increases. Attention is directed toward specific examples (e.g., increases in express passport fees, state duties, and fines) as perceived negative impacts on family budgets. Recommendations lean toward lower or more transparent fees, and the protection of stakeholders, especially families, is emphasized.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Information is lacking regarding economic, tax, or state budget matters. No economic positions or reconstruction plan was presented.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The economic outlook emphasizes a better distribution of consumption taxes and the overall tax burden, and at least a broader contribution to alleviating poverty. The draft legislation includes lowering the VAT on food, taxing banks and digital advertising, and directing funding toward youth extracurricular activities. There are also proposals concerning the tax package and tax reform, along with the need to find additional funds from various sources to reduce the pressure on the lowest earners.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The economically prudent view: the economic situation is poor and investments carry risk; onshore wind farms are cheaper to build than offshore ones, which affects the final price. He emphasizes that support must be economically justified, and complex subsidization plans can catch companies off guard, which is why a clear and consistent economic impact assessment is needed. He views economically sustainable growth and energy production efficiency as the starting point for the green transition.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Economic Focus: There is a desire to increase social benefits and support for household sustenance, and criticism is leveled against the taxation of pensions, which is linked to the government breaking its promises. The necessity of securing greater funding and utilizing European resources for the renovation of the housing stock is highlighted. The transparency of the funding plans and their alignment with the state budget are praised. However, critical views are voiced regarding guidelines that could increase the burden on the populace (e.g., income tax on pensions).
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Supports sanctions against Russia, viewing them as part of economic and political effectiveness, but stresses that asset confiscation must not occur without EU-level coordination and may lead to additional expenditures in the form of legal and administrative costs. It highlights that economic measures must be implemented in accordance with the law and in coordination with allies.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
He/She emphasizes that the increase in ETO (Emergency Stock Obligation/Operational Burden) and additional obligations might come at the expense of corporate investments, potentially affecting their competitiveness. He/She stresses the need for state aid and the possibility of the state assuming these obligations to ensure the readiness of reserves and post-crisis economic stability. This reflects the importance of crisis management and security of supply within the economic sector.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The argument, from an economic standpoint, favors implementing a temporary bank tax—justified by criticizing bank profits and the impact of Euribor—in order to support the economy. It seeks to avoid the widespread introduction of a car tax and broad tax reforms, emphasizing that a significant portion of the revenue should come from banks. This approach demonstrates a willingness to use fiscal policy as a stimulus for society, focusing on refunding money on loans and closing budgetary gaps via the banking sector.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
We don't have enough data for this period; economic policy issues are not the main topic of discussion.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
More concisely: It is stressed that additional taxes (such as those on sugary drinks and alcohol excises, etc.) increase consumption taxes and disproportionately burden low-income individuals. The preferred approach is policy that protects the economy and consumer affordability, coupled with investments in prevention and sports, which are seen as a cheaper and more effective strategy for public health. Finally, emphasis is placed on reviewing tax revenue forecasts and maintaining realistic expectations.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The economic perspective focuses on the fact that raising fines constitutes a financial burden on people, and the impact on behavior has not been proven. There is a lack of sufficient analysis, which is why there is a skeptical attitude toward the planned measure.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
In economic policy, it advocates for tax cuts and alternative loans (a bank tax) to cover the national debt; it resists energy-based taxation (excise duties on gas, electricity, and fuel are increasing), but wishes to avoid income tax reform and a general increase in taxes; it highlights the costs incurred by businesses and working people and criticizes seemingly unnecessary tax packages.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The economy and budget are referenced as a side issue compared to more pressing matters; the speaker emphasizes that debates should center on the economy, the budget, and people's livelihoods, yet offers no concrete economic policy measures. The text draws a distinction between priority issues and the context of funding, using this as a rationale for avoiding focus on the current draft legislation concerning e-elections.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The text focuses on the economic impacts of taxation, mentioning the magnitude of tax revenue and expenditures, and stressing that the tax can affect both businesses and the state treasury. It does not support tax policy as a standalone solution, but rather emphasizes the necessity of economic assessment and an evidence-based approach.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The core of the economic policy revolves around market-based pricing and enhancing competitiveness. This requires phasing out the universal service and replacing it with bonus or subsidization measures applicable during both favorable and challenging economic periods. The federal focus is placed on rapid decision-making and flexibility to prevent delays. The continuation of investments in sports development indicates support for investment and infrastructure procurement, though specific economic system reform is only addressed in general terms.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It stresses the transparency of underlying assumptions and the need to review economic forecasts. It is critical of overly optimistic scenarios and underscores the necessity of clarifying how expectations, such as the doubling of GDP growth, are formulated.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The chosen economic policy centers on protecting domestic production and ensuring food security; it advocates for state intervention among producers and intends to resist imports and foreign competition. As demonstrated by the 42% rise in food prices and the 40% import rate, there is an emphasized need to secure Estonia’s energy production and food reserves by 2030. Regarding the opposition to car or tax incentives—the policy does not support a car tax and seeks solutions for potential tax liabilities. The focus is distributed: achieving economic growth alongside social protection through managing consumer prices and guaranteeing food security.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
At the core of these economic attitudes is the fear of tax-induced inflation and strong criticism of recent tax changes. The text emphasizes the necessity of focusing on labor availability through training and retraining, favoring the utilization of the domestic workforce over increasing the reliance on labor brought in from abroad. It also highlights the negative impact on immigration levels and underscores that the government's tax hikes are insufficiently effective in curbing inflation.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
Economically pragmatic and centered on consumer price protection: it is recognized that the green transition will increase the price per kilowatt-hour, necessitating practical solutions to ensure a cheaper and secure supply. We support the acceleration of onshore capacity and immediate grid operations, alongside the development of international connections, often without excessive subsidies. Priority is given to maintaining competitiveness, controlling consumer prices, and ensuring the effective utilization of state investments.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The position on economic policy is critical and controversial: it condemns the expansion of consumption taxes, emphasizing that they raise price levels and disproportionately affect low- and middle-wage earners. It advocates for a bank tax as a fair contribution and stresses the need to avoid general tax burdens that deepen poverty. Regarding historical changes to the tax arrangement, it underlines the importance of balancing social expenditure and the overall tax structure.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Highlights potential financial gain (customers could save money); maintains a critical attitude toward the considerations of the government that adopted tax increases; focuses on the social economy and customer benefits as a priority.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Emphasizing the impact of energy costs and the economic inequality between Narva and other regions. It highlights the role of fluctuations in the price of CO2 quotas and calls for additional revenue to be directed toward mitigating heating costs in Narva, which demonstrates selective, regionally targeted implementation in economic policy.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The policy makes a clear distinction: opposing the car tax while supporting the bank tax. The goal is to find additional revenue streams to avoid placing a burden on ordinary citizens. The text indicates that tax changes have reduced the revenue base, making local municipalities dependent on the state budget. It emphasizes the necessity of increasing infrastructure funding and utilizes the balancing of national and local resources to improve fiscal dynamics.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
He is critical of proposed tax hikes, highlighting the underlying nature of inflation and the potential rise in consumer prices. He calls for a thorough impact analysis and transparency, and refuses to support any tax increase without clear numerical justification.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Economic issues focus on income tax changes: the planned rate of 22% might fall to 19.2%; the speaker shows interest in understanding the impact of the modified tax rates on people, and is critical of abolishing the tax hump.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Economically Prudent Approach: It is noted that green and alternative capacities are recognized as being cheaper and involving a lower administrative burden than nuclear energy. A cautious, yet comprehensive economic assessment regarding the future solution is presented.