By Plenary Sessions: Katrin Kuusemäe

Economic perspectives strongly support tax cuts for middle-income earners to improve their financial well-being. The speaker denies opponents' claims that putting money directly into people's hands would lead to increased inflation, thereby advocating for increased purchasing power.

The speaker relayed the government’s conservative economic position, which stresses the need to avoid any negative impact on employers. The government justified its opposition by citing concerns over a potential decline in production volume and the additional operational costs that would result from introducing extra public holidays. The government also emphasized that the number of holidays should be determined by the internal socio-economic balance.

Economic positions came to light regarding the 280 million euros in European Union subsidies, where he/she stressed that these agreements do not compel Estonia to give up using oil shale if the economic situation demands it. This demonstrates a pragmatic approach to financing and energy security.

Insufficient data

No data available.

Economic perspectives emphasize utilizing national defense investments as an engine for economic growth, supporting job creation and ensuring tax revenue remains within Estonia. It is crucial to involve foreign investors in developing the industry to guarantee future growth opportunities for the sector.

The economic perspectives indirectly address the clarity of regulation, particularly concerning construction prohibitions and the overall business environment, while stressing the necessity of bringing legislation into alignment with the constitution. No direct positions on taxation or budgetary discipline are put forward.

Insufficient data.