By Agendas: Katrin Kuusemäe

The speaker supports reducing the tax burden for people earning the average wage to improve their financial situation, and strongly opposes high taxation of labor income. He/She emphasizes the need to leave money in the hands of the workers and casts doubt on opponents' arguments regarding the risk of inflation.

The economic perspectives are indirectly reflected in the communication of the Government’s stance, which stressed the necessity of evaluating the bill’s true impact and basing the determination of the number of holidays on maintaining internal socio-economic balance. This indicates a degree of caution, aimed at ensuring that adding an extra day off does not result in negative economic consequences.

The speaker conveys the government's conservative economic position, which emphasizes the need to avoid negative impacts on employers, a drop in production volume, and additional organizational costs associated with implementing extra public holidays. In the government's view, analyzing these impacts is the task of the bill's initiator, not the government.

The economic perspectives concern European Union subsidies and financing agreements (€280 million), emphasizing that these are linked to the submission of a development plan, not a binding oil shale phase-out date.

Insufficient data.

Economic views concern the transparency of how state funds are used and the prevention of corruption through the regulation of representation expenses. The speaker conveys the commission's opinion that the use of representation expenses is not transparent, and in some cases, there is a lack of knowledge regarding what the money is actually spent on.

Economic views emphasize utilizing the national defense budget as an engine for economic growth. A protectionist approach is supported within the defense industry to ensure that taxes and capital remain within the Estonian economy and to create new jobs.

The address indirectly touches upon the background of the work ability allowance payment system, which is related to social and economic policy. Specific positions regarding taxes, expenditures, or regulations are not expressed. Data is unavailable.

There is not enough data.

Insufficient information