By Agendas: Katrin Kuusemäe

The speaker addresses the minister, seeking assurance regarding the soundness of the government's new tax policy while clearly contrasting it with the policies of previous administrations. There is no willingness to cooperate with the opposition, as their policies are described as harmful.

The speaker is procedurally cooperative, having taken on the role of rapporteur following the departure of the previous colleague. He/She refers to the committee chairman's proposal to include the draft bill in the comprehensive reorganization process of the public holidays system, demonstrating openness to broader systemic cooperation. He/She expresses hope that the Government is prepared to assist the parliamentary factions in conducting analyses.

The collaborative approach is evident in the work of the Constitutional Committee, where procedural decisions (such as placing the draft bill on the plenary agenda) were reached by consensus. Furthermore, the committee chairman's proposal to defer the bill in order to address the streamlining of the public holiday system comprehensively was also mentioned, which points to an openness toward systematic cooperation.

The style of cooperation is institutional and based on committee work, accurately relaying the commission's voting results and incorporating the viewpoints of ministry representatives (Ministry of Climate, Ministry of Finance) to clarify the facts.

He/She demonstrates cooperation with the committee majority, supporting consensus procedural decisions and voting alongside six members for the rejection of the draft proposal. His/Her role is to mediate the committee's common positions, and he/she works in cooperation with Committee Chairman Terras.

The collaborative style is professional and procedural; he emphasizes that the commission's decision regarding the inclusion of the draft bill on the agenda was reached by consensus. However, the voting result (5 for, 4 against) indicates a narrow disagreement within the commission regarding the rejection of the draft bill. He clearly distinguishes his role as a representative of the commission from his personal views.

The collaborative style is supportive and respectful, with the Minister being addressed by name. The speaker affirms the Minister's objectives concerning the increase of domestic production and seeks further information on their implementation, indicating a readiness for collaboration.

The style of cooperation is consensual and open, emphasizing that the Constitutional Committee supported the Chancellor of Justice's proposal unanimously. Collaboration also took place with representatives of the Chancellor of Justice and the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications in order to gain a comprehensive overview and detailed explanations.

The style of cooperation is consensual and supportive, as the Constitutional Committee reached a unanimous agreement on backing the Chancellor of Justice's proposal. Positive collaboration with the Ministry of Climate is emphasized; the Ministry confirmed its readiness to analyze the necessary amendments.

The speaker is taking part in the parliamentary proceedings, addressing a question to the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee during the debate on a matter of national importance. There is no information available regarding any inter-party compromise or coalitions.