By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Total Sessions: 163
Fully Profiled: 163
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The political stance centers on robust support for the reduction of the value-added tax (VAT), which was initiated through a citizens' initiative. The speaker intensely criticizes the government for implementing tax increases without proper analysis, labeling the situation a "tax chaos" or a "tax circus." The political framework is aimed at criticizing the government's activities and performance, and meeting public expectations.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Strong opposition to the government's actions, focusing on the healthcare crisis and the infringement of citizens' fundamental rights. The political position is primarily performance-driven, based on criticism of the government's actions and management, emphasizing the reckless squandering by the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa) and the growth of administrative costs. Speaking on behalf of the Centre Party, the speaker is clearly opposed to the legalization of license plate recognition cameras and the unequal treatment of people with disabilities in the context of the proposed car tax.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The political stance is strongly supportive of regulations, particularly regarding the safety of light mobility devices and small mopeds, given that the situation has become dangerous. The primary emphasis is on protecting children's health, placing this priority above the freedom of enterprise. This position is policy-based, highlighting the need to adopt the practices already implemented in neighboring countries.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political focus is currently aimed at evaluating the government's performance, particularly concerning economic policy and budget transparency. Concerns are being raised about the decline in consumer confidence and purchasing power, and demands have been made for clarification regarding how previous budgetary issues within the Ministry of the Interior's remit were resolved. The narrative is strongly performance-based, casting doubt on the minister's explanations and the overall management of ministerial portfolios.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political focus is centered on the strong opposition to the car tax, which is considered unconstitutional and socially unjust, as it would force disabled people to give up their cars. Criticism is aimed at the government’s tax policy (referred to as "tax chaos" and "tax circus") and its incompetence, with the Prime Minister being accused of spontaneously juggling taxes. The party (the Center Party) promises to completely abolish the car tax at both the national and local levels if they come to power.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The representative of the Centre Party faction holds a position of strong opposition regarding the draft bill, emphasizing the privacy of individuals and the protection of fundamental rights, as well as the necessity for comprehensive risk analyses and contingency plans. He called for the second reading to be suspended and stressed the importance of a broad-based debate and public transparency, suggesting an approach that is likely policy- and value-driven.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker's core position is that the 25 kg limit set by the e-scooter traffic insurance law unfairly targets a single market participant (Bolt) and is therefore unacceptable. He believes the decision was influenced by political donations and lobbying efforts, and that, if necessary, equal regulation must be ensured across all rental services; emphasizing consumer protection and market fairness. Furthermore, his stance focuses on anti-corruption oversight and the protection of public funds and public health, rather than prioritizing the interests of a single company.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker places citizen privacy and constitutional protection first, and expresses strong opposition to the super-database law. He/She emphasizes that the draft bill violates fundamental rights and could threaten the functioning of democracy, and calls on the coalition and the government to withdraw the bill and refrain from submitting new versions. The position is firmly rooted in values and rights, focusing on maintaining limits and oversight, and adopting an uncompromising tone.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
A critical and oversight-focused position. He/She emphasizes transparency and anti-corruption supervision within state institutions and remains skeptical regarding government decisions and the management of the office space acquisition. Specific questions are raised concerning the justification of expenditures and accountability, demonstrating a commitment to prioritizing the use of taxpayer money.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The main topic is increasing anti-corruption oversight and the transparency of the Riigikogu (Parliament). He is clearly in favor of greater openness and clarity regarding the mandate of the committees, especially concerning access to internal information. He emphasizes that parliamentary control must not be restricted on the basis of commercial confidentiality, and he seeks clarification on whether these restrictions are justified.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
A commitment to strengthening the autonomy of local governments and a position opposing the transfer of Toompea (central government) politics to the local level. This stance defends the funding of local governments and emphasizes that the central government's tax policy increases the burden on municipalities and harms the quality of life for residents. If necessary, we are prepared to utilize the assistance of the Supreme Court, and we call on local residents to elect resistance and responsible representation.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The primary priorities are anti-corruption oversight and ensuring transparency across the financial and corporate markets. The speaker highlighted the risks associated with the Enefit Green buyback case, specifically concerning the leakage of insider information and the potential for illicit gains. They strongly stressed the need for a thorough investigation and full public disclosure. Furthermore, they emphasized the ongoing active work being conducted within the Special Anti-Corruption Committee.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The oppositional stance involves a critical attitude toward the expenditures of the government and the Health Insurance Fund. It stresses the transparency of taxpayer money and the need for cost savings, simultaneously highlighting the necessity of a comprehensive labor policy and the utilization of impact assessments. While it does not present a clear vision for compromise policy, it is actively prepared to seek changes to decisions at the Riigikogu (Parliament) level.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The main focus is the criticism of the government's tax policy and the resulting concerns regarding budget and social policy. The speaker describes the tax policy as unstable and detrimental to people's financial standing, leveling strong criticism at both the consistency of the taxes and the logic behind the decisions. The stance is strongly oppositional, emphasizing the need for transparency, accountability, and the protection of vulnerable groups' interests. It also points to potential negative impacts on specific groups (families caught in the poverty trap, people with disabilities, the elderly, rural areas) and highlights risks associated with corruption.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker positions himself as a Member of Parliament who emphasizes the oversight of sectoral issues and fact-based debate. He highlights the problem of youth unemployment and the necessity of obtaining accurate data and understanding the root causes, referencing August data and the European context, which demonstrates an intensive yet moderately critical approach. Furthermore, he emphasizes transparency and accountability in governance, including the need for special scrutiny regarding RMK's long-term contracts, which can be interpreted as a focus on oversight and situational engagement.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main points focus on opposition oversight and criticism of the state’s functioning: strong criticism has been leveled against economic policy, including the adoption of the car tax and the sugar tax, and the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and European Union law is stressed. Transparency in the state budget and the targeted use of public funds are also emphasized, often shifting toward direct criticism of the government. Optimistic forecasts for economic development are tempered, and the priority is strengthening checks and accountability, as well as holding ministers responsible (e.g., through motions of no confidence). The overall tone is policy- and value-based, rather than merely personal at the personnel level, and the stance is strongly oppositional.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The coalition is prepared to cooperate on the opposition's draft bill, and the Centre Party stresses the importance of cooperation, driven by the desire to reduce bureaucracy, demonstrating an approach centered on reform and collaboration. However, there is strong opposition to a bill that would create a centralized "super-database" via the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, potentially jeopardizing constitutional principles and individual rights. Given this conflict, emphasis is placed on adhering to constitutional limits and the necessity of holding an emergency debate and seeking the required consensus. (This is not a significant signal towards radical zero- or single-issue initiatives; the focus remains on the functioning of democracy and fostering cooperation.)
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speakers emphasize the protection of privacy and fundamental rights and are critical of the draft law, which expands the collection of police camera footage and data without a thorough threat assessment and proper oversight. The critical parties demand a thorough debate and direct coordination with the Chancellor of Justice and independent oversight; they are prepared to reject the bill during its first reading. Concern is also noted regarding the balance between taxation and the state's sense of security, and it is emphasized that the legal order must be guaranteed within the framework of the constitution.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker expresses strong opposition to the creation of a centralized super-database, emphasizing that the state's core principle is not to consolidate data from all registers into a single, final view. This stance is distinctly policy-driven, centering on data protection, individual rights, and independent supervision. The speaker demands the termination of the draft legislation and a comprehensive debate. There is strong criticism regarding endangered privacy rights and potential profiling, alongside concerns about inherent risks and the lack of control.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Representing the Centre Party, he stresses the need to protect constitutional rights and uphold the views of the Chancellor of Justice. He is also strongly opposed to simplified administrative procedures and the expanding sanctioning powers of the Competition Authority. He emphasizes that tax and budget policy must be based on honest debate, and accuses the government and the Reform Party of deceiving the public with tax hikes. He positions himself as a defender of democracy and the rule of law, highlighting the necessity of keeping state governance within constitutional limits and preventing the development of a “punitive state.”
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
Supports increasing the state budget for the road network while highlighting the absence of a long-term plan. It criticizes the coalition agreement, stressing that isolated promises must be replaced by a comprehensive and sustainable funding structure. The stance is heavily focused on investment and results, concentrating on infrastructure's impact on the economy and public safety.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The main focus is the protection of constitutional rights and ensuring the legal clarity of the draft bill. The speaker emphasizes that the prohibition against self-incrimination in criminal proceedings derives from the Constitution, and the emphasis is placed on correctness and adherence to the position of the Chancellor of Justice. He asks whether this right extends to legal persons and whether the lack of such extension constitutes non-compliance with the Constitution, which indicates serious doubt regarding the draft legislation until clarity is achieved. Consequently, the position is moderate, focusing on the protection of rights and demanding legal clarity, rather than political confrontation.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary focus is on safeguarding civil rights and personal data protection within a democratic state governed by the rule of law, coupled with criticism directed at surveillance systems that were rushed into implementation and insufficiently regulated. [The subject] supports the decision to suspend the use of cameras until legal clarity is achieved, stressing the necessity of independent oversight and transparency. Family policy and the expansion of state aid to various local governments (specifically, free kindergartens) are also important, regarding which [the subject] is prepared for cooperation and a broader consensus. [The subject] is critical of the past conduct of the Social Democrats and the government, but is not destructive; rather, the approach is centered on finding solutions to problems.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Supports the draft amendment to the Traffic Act concerning the regulation of light personal transporters, small mopeds, and bicycles; emphasizes the importance of safety, public health, and maintaining the orderliness of the Tallinn urban environment, and sees the need for swift implementation and finding a consensual solution. It highlights the role of local governments in acquiring the right to impose restrictions and, keeping urban safety in mind, is prepared to contribute to making clarifications during the second reading. The focus demonstrates unified, practice-based, and relatively strong support, where both security and the organization of the cityscape are crucial.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The opposition's critical reception of the government's tax policy. It stresses that before the elections, promises were made not to raise taxes, yet hikes were later implemented, leaving payments reaching 24% in place. This deepens the general crisis of trust and exacerbates inequality. The focus is on restoring unity and public confidence, viewing the impact of the government's decisions within the context of security and trust as merely one element of a deeper underlying climate. The framing is primarily value-based and oriented toward performance oversight.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The main focus centers on the financing of Tallinn Airport and the demand for dividends. The representative is critical of the government's financing decisions, arguing that the termination of targeted funding and the required dividends are eroding the airport's profits and forcing fee increases. He emphasizes the need to revise the dividend policy and review the airport's financial structure to ensure the market can function properly.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The key themes are the effective implementation of the corporate liability provision and the establishment of precedent in judicial practice. The speaker is highly critical of the current practices of the prosecutor’s office and stresses that proceedings should only be initiated when the evidence is unambiguous. He/She expresses a desire to clarify the law and the need for greater specification, including considering the ministry’s proposals where necessary. The protection of victims and improving the responsiveness of victim support mechanisms are also important goals for him/her.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
For me, the conflict between the car tax and the Constitution is the central issue. I support the Center Party’s stance that the car tax increases the overall tax burden and is therefore unconstitutional; I demand either amendments or the complete repeal of the car tax. Although the Riigikogu supported this position, no actual change has been implemented, highlighting the need for further action. I am prepared to use all legal remedies available, including appealing to the Supreme Court, and I am awaiting a new or revised draft bill from the Ministry of Finance.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Oppositional and focused on maintaining strong engagement. The first section of the speech emphasizes taking responsibility for the finance minister's conduct and demands a substantive response; the criticism is aimed at the government and the Reform Party. The second speech is critical of the government's tax policy, highlighting the link between people's livelihood and national security; it is clearly opposed to making the tax hikes permanent.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main focus is reducing bureaucracy and improving competitiveness. He points out that the environmental requirements imposed under the European Union’s green policy disproportionately burden small farmers, and it is necessary to negotiate and take measures to mitigate their impact. This approach is policy-based and solution-oriented, with an emphasis on improving the functioning of the economic environment through dialogue.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker focuses on ensuring transparency and data accuracy concerning the private forest union's proposal and the logging of protected forest habitats. He/She is critical of the figures, emphasizing that the size of the available yield must be specified and realistic data presented. The stance is directed more towards justifying the data and demanding accountability, rather than making a specific statement either supporting or prohibiting logging.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The most characteristic feature is the support shown to the opposition regarding the funding of Rail Baltic and the general austerity policy. The speaker is critical of the government's plans, stressing that increasing costs at the expense of taxpayers while simultaneously needing to finance major investments is devastating. He/She emphasizes the need for risk analysis and cooperation assessments, and has somewhat more forcefully directed attention to the actual cost and benefit of the projects. The framing is more policy-making oriented (focusing on the efficiency and transparency of state expenditures) rather than being based on aid or teamwork.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
A critical stance toward current decision-makers and the risks of green politics. It highlights the dangers of corruption in the context of climate corruption and the need for transparency in voting procedures. The speaker references the Center Party's shift in position and stresses that their own crucial proposal may not receive support from other parties today, indicating a political struggle and, above all, a demand for accountability and transparency.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The opposition maintains a stance critical of the government, specifically targeting its tax policy, social guarantees, and oversight mechanisms. It demands accountability and transparency, and has called for the government's resignation due to unauthorized financial and communication directives. The opposition places the livelihood and security of the people at the core of its focus, stressing that the legislature must implement significant reforms and control.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main topics are the application of the provision concerning the liability of a legal entity in the context of the Pihlakodu case, and the strengthening of victim protection. The speaker has a strong, reform-oriented tone; he emphasizes that the legislator's goal was to create a precedent and the possibility of expanding case law, and that acceptance by the prosecution must not become an obstacle. He stresses the need for consensus and transparency, including the requirement to register lobby meetings.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The Centre Party representative has presented a strong opposition stance: the coalition’s policies are attacked, and the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats are vocally criticized. Tax policy (VAT, income tax, excise duties) is central, and reversing these changes or opposing their progression is presented as the plan to improve residents’ livelihoods. This text emphasizes the confrontation of hypocrisy and the necessity of taking responsibility; themes of corruption and state transparency are also highlighted.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The most crucial issues are guaranteeing the functionality of the special anti-corruption commission and revealing the accountability of political parties. The current position is highly critical of the coalition and the Social Democrats, emphasizing the necessity for transparent oversight. In Estonia, the prevailing approach is policy-based and performance-centric, giving significant importance to organizing public sessions and systematic monitoring. Within the context of relations with the Southern coalition, efforts are being made to highlight corruption and poor governance, and to honestly evaluate the government's performance.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the independence of officials from political influence and stresses that salary increases for civil servants should not be a means of securing political loyalty. He/She criticizes the minister's statement, which links the salary issue to the shortcomings of liberalism and democracy, and warns of the risk that such rhetoric could endanger the fundamental principles of democracy. The speaker emphasizes that officials must also be independent of the politics of the Reform Party, maintaining a position of neutrality and the defense of constitutional values. The overall direction is institutional integrity and the avoidance of political manipulation; non-partisan and, above all, value-based.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The thrust of the debate is centered on strong opposition and the advancement of an operational rule of law. The representative criticizes the Social Democrats' draft bill, which seeks to transform the Competition Authority into a punitive body and establish a separate administrative procedure, viewing this as a clear threat to the constitutional separation of powers. He/she advocates for the proper transposition of the European directive within misdemeanor proceedings, stressing that this approach is standard practice and fully compliant with the principles of the rule of law. Nevertheless, the representative is prepared to acknowledge the necessity of improving the draft bill and moving the process forward in the Riigikogu (Parliament), provided it does not infringe upon fundamental rights. The likely political image is one of centrism and value-based governance, though critical attention remains focused on the opposition and the administrative solutions proposed by the government.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Key themes include the procedure for amending the Churches and Congregations Act and general cooperation. The approach is measured and collaborative; emphasis is placed on the importance of consensus and procedural economy, as well as the willingness to support opposition proposals, provided they enhance transparency and efficiency.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
A strong focus on easing consumer prices and supporting local producers, exemplified by the proposal to lower the VAT rate for local producers to 9% and criticism directed at the government's plan to increase VAT. These positions are geared toward policy and social impacts, highlighting the vulnerability of pensioners and families and the necessity of price controls. This demonstrates a desire to influence specific changes in tax arrangements and competitiveness, rather than relying solely on rhetoric.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most crucial points concern the Tallinn city government's decision to limit the number of polling stations, which is viewed as a corresponding restriction of freedom. He/She expresses strong opposition to the decision, framing it as an encroachment upon the principles of free elections, and emphasizing the importance of voting without coercion or obstruction. This stance is policy-driven and value-oriented, aiming to preserve the freedom to choose voting methods, including the option of a paper ballot.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The central focus is the criticism of the Social Democrats' tax policy: opposition to the proposed car tax, the increase of VAT to 24%, and the increase of income tax to 24%, as well as opposition to tax recommendations that include taxing income starting from the first euro (with the exception of pensioners). The position emphasizes that the government has damaged people's livelihoods and proposes suggestions and open discussion regarding local mechanisms, such as lowering the VAT on foodstuffs. Final conclusion: oppositional, yet pragmatic—stressing the need for public welfare and tax transparency, and ready to consider certain ideas related to negotiations with the coalition.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speech emphasizes the accountability of the legal system and the protection of victims; it expresses strong criticism regarding the actions of the Prosecutor's Office and demands explanations and potential steps to initiate criminal proceedings against associated legal entities. The aforementioned lack of victim protection is cited as a problem that needs to be remedied. There is insufficient data to define broader partisan or ideological trends.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is strongly opposed to the government’s tax policy: he demands clarification on the temporary or permanent nature of the VAT and income tax, and stresses that the current tax model undermines residents' livelihoods and the nation's will to defend itself. He promises government reform and improved transparency, and describes the current coalition as an Excel spreadsheet dependent on people, which merely displays a target goal. In this plan, the positive direction involves abandoning or modifying the current budget allocation and focusing on social and security objectives through a responsible budget.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speech raises the constitutionality of the car tax as its central issue, stressing the absence of specific exemptions for disabled individuals and large families. The speaker characterizes the car tax as being in conflict with the constitution, seeing real dangers that could force people to give up essential vehicles. The position is strongly opposed to the car tax and underscores the necessity of implementing exemptions. Furthermore, it is noted that cases have already been filed in administrative court, and the legal and constitutional framework is highlighted as the foundation for the primary arguments.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The representative of the Centre Party, speaking at the parliamentary session on April 9, 2025, took a strong stance against the car tax, asserting a position that upholds constitutional and social justice. He/She emphasized that the car tax unfairly burdens large families, people with special needs, and residents of rural areas, suggesting the necessity of either withdrawing or amending the tax. Concurrently, he/she criticized the general tax policy (VAT, fuel excise duty) as excessively draining for families. The framing of the argument is policy- and value-based, and the representative pledged to utilize legal remedies and protection derived from international standards, including appealing to the Supreme Courts if necessary. Furthermore, he/she expressed readiness for broader cooperation with the opposition and for considering compensatory measures (for instance, in Tallinn).
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The core stance involves a critical assessment of the government's proposed repurchase of Enefit Green, coupled with a strong emphasis on the need for greater accountability and transparency. The speaker questions whether the initial decision to go public (IPO) and the state's partial privatization were adequately considered, suggesting that a different approach might have been warranted, particularly given the risks inherent in those past decisions. Furthermore, attention is drawn to the potential impact of tax increases and the necessity of parliamentary oversight. The speaker stresses the government's responsibility for its decisions. Crucially, the style is focused on resolving issues and demanding oversight, moving beyond mere political rhetoric.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main topics are the representation of women and their inclusion in company management bodies. He/She is critical of the regulatory directive and is seeking effective solutions, not merely those that offer superficial impact. He/She emphasizes the need for concrete measures at the national level.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The first address is oppositional and critical of tax policy: it is stressed that the EU directive could introduce a tax, and questions are raised as to why the coalition previously supported it. An explanation is demanded, along with the option to postpone or repeal the measure. The second address is fundamentally opposed to the car tax: emphasis is placed on protecting individuals with special needs and large families, as well as on the lack of constitutionality; it calls for the car tax to be repealed. Overall, the expressed positions reflect an oppositional stance; the transparency of tax policy and the consideration of social impacts are the main themes.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The speaker is highly critical of Eesti 200 politicians regarding the alleged risk of corruption and conflicts of interest surrounding the Greenful subsidies. They emphasize transparency and accountability, demanding clarification from the minister as to how and why Tarmo Tamm's son was included in the delegation, and how the Greenful representative was formally permitted to participate. This incident is viewed as a prime example of the pervasive and problematic practice of linking political influence with business interests, prompting a strong rhetorical response focused on control and oversight.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The Center Party stresses the car tax's inherent inequality and unconstitutionality. Furthermore, they highlight the need for special protection for disabled individuals and large families. They are vehemently opposed to the car tax and demand its immediate repeal, while simultaneously pledging to develop compensation or equalization mechanisms (for example, based on the Tallinn model) and to apply limited exemptions exclusively to all disabled persons. This stance is grounded in both policy and values, and involves the long-term deployment of legal arguments and the consideration of judicial measures.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The main political position emphasizes ensuring that ministers appear before special committees and increasing the transparency of the work carried out by those committees. He/She is strongly critical of the failure of government members to attend and demands answers. This position is policy- and results-driven, focusing on government accountability and the transparency of collaborative institutions.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Critical and cautious regarding the Social Democrats' plans and issues of power distribution; emphasizes the need to adhere to the existing legal order and ensure transparent oversight of state aid. Opposes major shifts in power that could increase the central control of the State Chancellery without adequate supervision. He/She stresses the balance between the economy and nature conservation and seeks to avoid radical changes that would jeopardize the legal process.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most crucial issues are anti-corruption oversight and the transparency of state funding within the framework of the Nordica case. The position is sharply critical of the decisions made by Minister Michal and the entire coalition, and emphasizes the need to strengthen accountability and supervision. It demands the active involvement of a special commission and the prosecutor's office, and sees direct liability for the members of the management board and the supervisory council, should the allegations prove justified. A clear direction for control and accountability, backed by strong enforcement, is taking shape, which is being contrasted with the criticism leveled against current practices.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Energy policy must be strategic and transparent, not simply a vehicle for ideological rushes. The opposition stresses the importance of energy security and a stable economic foundation, and objects to the rapid methods of implementing the green transition that increase the burden on taxpayers and consumers. Furthermore, they demand accountability and transparency in the anti-corruption context, including the minister's resignation and increased oversight by the Riigikogu (Parliament).
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
Critical of the continuing ownership policy, which is being carried out under strict control; the speaker emphasizes that the payment of dividends by state-owned enterprises reduces investment and raises consumer prices. He stresses the protection of affordable travel for consumers and market competition, and asks directly whether the ownership policy will be changed if such a practice continues. The style is policy-driven, featuring substantive criticism and advocating for consumer interests.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most crucial issues are constitutional reform and democracy, which the representative believes are being jeopardized for the sake of gaining quick political advantages. He/She stands with the strong opposition and stresses that any changes must be implemented transparently, constitutionally, and accompanied by impact assessments. The framing centers on core values (justice, the rule of law, security) and contrasts sharply with fast-tracked changes, which are viewed merely as a political instrument.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The most crucial topics are the amendment of laws and registration entries, as well as the intervention of religious organizations. He/She emphasizes that the current legislation allows for intervention when necessary and attempts to demonstrate that the government's intention to change the laws jeopardizes legal clarity and people's freedoms. The position is strongly opposed to the plans to amend the law, viewing them as dangerous to the rule of law, and maintains a consistent, admonishing rhetoric. It staunchly defends the existing legal framework, arguing that the problem is actually created by the narratives of the ministers and the commission, rather than the laws themselves.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The most crucial topics are offshore wind farms, the size of state aid, and the transparency of these matters within the decision-making process. The stance is critical regarding the coalition: it is emphasized that decisions must not be made in closed party meetings, and there is a need to involve the wider public and institutions; there is a strong desire for a democratic and transparent mechanism, rather than partisan haste.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
It emphasizes the opposition to the government and the Reform Party; is critical of the government's income tax policy concerning banks and shows a preference for balanced taxation, utilizing comparisons and irony as rhetorical devices. It stresses that the tax system should be fairer and more systematic for the general public, and criticizes the government's focus on various sectors. The critique is policy-driven, rather than relying on personal confrontation.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main political platform centers on opposing the current coalition's transport policy. They argue that free public transport in rural areas was eliminated because of the 2023 coalition. Furthermore, funding hasn't increased, no new routes are being added, and ridership isn't growing. This stance is strongly oppositional, focusing heavily on policy and results, and stresses the necessity of restoring or increasing funding and improving the public transport network.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker represents a strong opposition to the government and its economic policy, stressing that the public's opinion must therefore be given greater weight, while focusing heavily on the plight of ordinary families. He criticizes the coalition's priorities, noting that their concerns are directed more toward the wealthy than the general populace. He describes the use of fear tactics involving EKRE as evidence of a political strategy, asserting that the people will deliver the final verdict in the upcoming elections. His overall framework is populist, emphasizing the interests of the common people, coupled with a value-based critique of current economic policy.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
A strong oppositional stance regarding the government's economic policy; it emphasizes that the burdens of VAT, income tax, and car tax reduce household incomes. It highlights the link between people's welfare and the functioning of the state as a priority, and calls on the government to change its approach and present a clear economic recovery plan.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is strongly opposed to the Foreign Minister and criticizes the conduct of the party representative. The speaker suggests that party members are innocent, while simultaneously raising allegations of fraud and claiming that seats in the Riigikogu were obtained through donations from Ukraine. He stresses that the minister's reply was inappropriate. The focus of the position is on ethics and protocol during parliamentary discussions, rather than specific policy fields.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
An opposition representative, confirmedly critical of the government's economic policy. He fights against increases in personal taxes and promotes taxing banks' excess profits as an alternative source of funding, emphasizing that current measures primarily harm low-income individuals. He argues that temporary tax hikes are unreliable and promises that if the Center Party (Keskerakond) comes to power, the car tax and other tax increases will be abolished; his position is strongly policy-driven and resistant to new ideas in the competitive sector.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary focus is on amendments to the Hunting Act and the expansion of regulations concerning game hunting. The stance is measuredly supportive and requires broad discussion and engagement, rather than strict opposition. Strong opposition is not being voiced; the emphasis is on advancing the process and introducing potential changes during the second reading. This approach is policy-driven and centers on the necessity of expanding the regulatory scope of the specific draft bill.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main political direction is the raising of accountability for state aid decisions and governance. It partially confirms a negative stance regarding the emergency financing of Nordica and the lack of supervision over KredEx disbursements, emphasizing the need for transparency and compliance with legal acts. A strong, critical position is aimed at demanding accountability in line with the constitutional framework and protecting the autonomy and legality of the State Secretary.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
An opposition figure and sector representative who champions budget transparency and due legal process. They advocate for balanced democratic oversight and stress that decisions concerning finance and budgetary matters must not be delegated to the executive branch. While ready for cooperation, they maintain strong opposition to the coalition's current approach. Their core priority is improving the structure and transparency of the budget and amending the legislation itself, rather than relying solely on temporary fixes.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main characteristic is the strong support for the Tallinn Hospital project, which is viewed as a key driver for advancing the nation's healthcare and economy. The position is firmly supportive (strong), emphasizing the necessity of state co-financing and a shared contribution with Tallinn. Criticism regarding the Reform Party's activities in 2022 is being addressed, and efforts are underway to seek broad-based, coalition-driven cooperation (particularly with the support of the Social Democrats). The established narrative is policy- and performance-based, focusing on the project's wider benefits for both healthcare and the economy.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Kuiheidu is highly critical of the government's anti-corruption efforts and transparency issues, stressing the need to restore credibility and address conflicts of interest. He takes a strong oppositional stance, accusing the government of withholding information and making hasty, untrustworthy decisions. His framing is centered more on values and the defense of legal certainty than on pragmatic collaboration.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Regarding the state-owned company Eesti Energia, he stresses that the owner's expectations must be balanced against the interests of the populace and ensure a reasonable electricity price, rather than focusing solely on dividends, security of supply, or investments. He is critical of the fact that the owner's expectations are not reflected in written form and questions why this objective has not been documented to date. He condemns the cuts made in the judicial and other sectors without a thorough impact analysis, and emphasizes the necessity of evaluating the impact on the entire system.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
An oppositional and critical stance on the coalition's budget management; demands for faster and stronger measures to improve budget transparency and adherence to promises. Supports bills that increase transparency and criticizes the coalition's late procedures and the non-mandatory nature of explanatory notes.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Supports the presented bill; emphasizes the need for financial order and cost control. Expresses concern over the growth of ministers' salaries due to indexing, which indicates a critical attitude towards the burden on the state budget. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of substantive input in discussions about tax increases, preferring substantive debate over simply endorsing proposals with button presses.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the preservation of the apolitical nature and legality of civil service and strongly opposes the coalition’s plans to change the educational requirements for the state secretary and the coalition's general approach to the budget bill. They focus on protecting the independence of institutions and criticize the possibility of top positions being politicized to meet the coalition’s needs. Furthermore, they are highly critical of the coalition’s tax policy, arguing that raising income tax and VAT will damage the economy and the population, and increase poverty. The overall tone is that of a defender of the rule of law and the stability of institutions, for which stricter scrutiny of decisions is necessary.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The opposition spokesperson, who is strongly critical of the government's tax policy. They emphasize that security taxes and other tax increases disproportionately burden those with lower incomes and pensioners, and they draw attention to bank benefits as an injustice. They stress social solidarity and believe that banks should contribute more, rather than continuing consumption and income tax increases which harm the population.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main theme is restoring the Riigikogu's trust and improving its image; the speaker expresses a strong desire to close trust gaps and increase the credibility, but doesn’t outline specific measures regarding the draft. They defend the idea of the draft as a potential tool for strengthening trust, but remains cautious and doesn’t assert a concrete solution.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary position is oppositional and fiscally focused: the decision not to raise alcohol excise tax for 2025 alone is highlighted, along with general criticism of increasing taxes, given that revenue collection has been optimistically low in previous months. It emphasizes that tax policy must be based on realistic forecasts and that increasing taxes can reduce total revenue and damage purchasing power. The framing is politically driven and focuses on sustainability and financial stability, not an ideological manifesto of tax certainty. It draws attention to the fact that past tax increases may not yield the desired revenue, which means the discussion about excise taxes needs to be approached with a different consideration.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker focuses on the problems of state-owned enterprise participation policy and the state property law, emphasizing the need to improve the misalignment of owner expectations and strategies. They are strongly critical of the current coalition's plan, which could lead to politicians being brought back onto boards. They highlight the issues of dispersed responsibility and a lack of transparency, and demand clarity on how decisions consider the interests of consumers and taxpayers. They want analysis, openness, and accountability in the management of state assets.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main focus is on tax policy and the transparency of decisions: the speaker is critical of tax increases and emphasizes that business people were lacking in the decision-making process. They stress the need for evidence-based and thoroughly considered measures, and the involvement of experts. This position is policy- and results-oriented and focuses on systemic criticism regarding the necessity of well-thought-out decisions.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The most important topics are the financial well-being of pensioners and the protection of social services, which, according to the author, coalition policies seriously threaten (through tax arrangements, rising prices, and the abandonment of support). This is presented as a direct, strong resistance and a rejection of deviations (an emotional, values-based presentation). It is clear that the position is primarily oppositional and policy-driven, with a strong focus on protecting the vulnerable rather than seeking compromise with the coalition.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
Important topics are the rise in crime and the impact of the socio-economic situation, as well as tax policy; the position is strongly oppositional and accuses the government and the Reform Party of their economic policy. It is claimed that their policies have worsened people's ability to cope and that the strength of the country essentially depends on the living conditions of its citizens. A performative demand is presented that the state should focus more on the well-being of people than previous priorities.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The main position is criticism of the existing consultation practices and emphasizes the importance of early engagement with stakeholder groups and adherence to good legislative drafting principles. He notes that for 23 draft laws, less than five working days were left for consultation and submission of opinions, which is deserving of criticism. He is critical of the idea that a development plan shouldn’t even be drawn up; he calls for discussions with stakeholders and seeks a better restructuring. The overall position is reform-critical and aims to increase transparency and engagement.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The Centre Party faction represents a strong opposition to the coalition's budgetary policy, emphasizing transparency, performance-based budgeting, and a clear connection of state money to performance indicators. They have been sharply critical of tax increases and the car tax, arguing that these exacerbate inequality and worsen the ability of families to cope. Parliamentary oversight and the parliament's influence in budget preparation are considered essential, and the possibility for ministers to change spending plans at any time is seen as a safeguard against parliamentary censorship. At the same time, they are presenting their own bills to amend the State Budget Act in order to restore better explanation and transparency standards for expenditures and revenues.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main profile focuses on the interplay of two key areas: supporting the price regulation bill and enhancing the transparency and oversight of the Rail Baltic project. The representative stresses the importance of the bill and intends to compare the measures proposed by Latvia in order to find a superior solution. Simultaneously, there is an emphasis on the necessity of risk management, clear funding sources, and budgetary transparency within the context of Rail Baltic. The position is moderately critical regarding the financing of large infrastructure projects and seeks reasonable compromises, but it does not completely reject the bill; rather, it underscores the need for responsible funding.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
A member of the Center Party has adopted a strongly oppositional tone regarding the budget process, highlighting the lack of transparency, the loss of control by ministries, and stressing the necessity of amending the State Budget Act. He/She is clearly in favor of budget reform, emphasizing the inclusion of a cost-based/understandable approach and clear performance indicators in the explanatory memorandums.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The core argument is that transparency is lacking in the management of RMK and the Ministry of Climate, and secret contracts have created a potential for damage to the state. He/She is a strong critic, condemning decisions made within a narrow circle and the absence of proper control. He/She recommends an independent audit and stricter supervision to ensure the careful handling of state assets. The position is heavily focused on control and accountability.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a supervisory role, emphasizing that domestic legislation requires remedial action. They are critical of the quality of the government's current impact assessments but offer this criticism constructively, requesting a plan for addressing these issues. The focus is on foundational structures and high-quality legislative work, rather than public confrontation.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
He/She is critical of cannabis legalization and emphasizes highlighting the dangers, relying on international data and prioritizing the protection of youth. He/She also touches upon the potential link between the growth of organized crime and the legalization of drugs. Increasing motorsport safety is also important, but he/she recognizes the undesirable implications and risks associated with external requirements imposed for this purpose. Therefore, his/her overall position favors maintaining regulation and information-based deliberation, coupled with sharp criticism regarding cannabis legalization.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The presenter focuses on the protection of religious freedom and voices opposition to new legislative amendments that would restrict the activities of religious associations by regulating their membership or personnel composition. He stresses that the Criminal Code is already in place to prevent illegal activities, and the question is rather whether—and which—additional specific restrictions need to be clarified, not the broad limitation of religious associations. This stance is value-based and critical of state interference in religious organizations; central to the argument are individual liberty and fundamental rights, and ensuring their viability alongside state priorities.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The most crucial topics are the transparency of the state budget and the role of the Riigikogu in handling the budget process. He is critical of the coalition's plans, which could potentially diminish parliamentary oversight and allow a minister to unilaterally make changes to the budget. In formulating his positions, he emphasizes adherence to the constitutional process and the relevance of Riigikogu decisions, guiding the debate by lawful and strong institutional principles. This is a strong oppositional stance, grounded in values and focused on legality.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
A representative from the Reform Party emphasizes criticism of the tax policy, pointing out that new taxes will restrict the purchasing power of ordinary people and limit future investments. Their stance is firmly opposed to the government's tax policy. They refer to a critical argument regarding the draft legislation and fear that the negative effects might become noticeable within the current context. The political framework here is policy-driven, focusing specifically on the effect of taxes on the economy and consumers.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition's viewpoint centers on the bill that strips benefits from pensioners living alone, and they are highly critical of the tax and budget decisions. They stress that money should be channeled toward the care reform, and that local government funding must be proportional and immune from legal challenge. The desire to dilute accountability and transparency signals political, not merely personal, pressure on the cabinet.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition representative from the Centre Party, whose central priority is the transparency of the state budget and parliamentary oversight. He is strongly opposed to the current draft bill, stressing the crucial role of the Riigikogu and the visibility of every single line item for both expenditure and revenue. He proposes an alternative solution that would establish greater transparency for amounts up to the 500,000 euro threshold. Furthermore, he emphasizes the necessity of cooperating with the coalition to ensure the constitutional legitimacy of the budget development process.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
He/She is strongly opposed to the current government's tax policy, emphasizing that sharply raising taxes will damage the economy and disrupt family finances and lifestyles. He/She praises a controversial comparison—one where the taxes are likened to Putin's taxes—arguing that this comparison is justified by the state's poor communication. The text embodies firm political and economic criticism and raises questions regarding the accountability of the Ministry of Finance leadership. There is no initial presentation of a clear alternative solution; the focus remains primarily on identifying tax policy as the problem itself.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition position places central emphasis on tax amendments and the reduction of child benefits; the speaker accuses the government of causing the rise in household costs and price levels, and stresses the need to keep the accountability of state governance under control. The style is directed toward criticizing policy effectiveness and deficiencies in leadership capacity; implied alternative solutions were not directly offered.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The most crucial issues are the opposition to increasing healthcare costs—specifically, fees for specialist visits, hospital bed days, and medicine prices—and the criticism regarding the proposed changes to the educational requirements for the Secretary of State. He/She is clearly against these amendments and views the steps promoting them as problematic, particularly in the context of the livelihood of vulnerable populations and national security. Furthermore, he/she stresses the necessity of maintaining the consistency and constitutionality of legislation, emphasizing that the Secretary of State's role must prioritize the general public order over personal interests. Representing the opposition, he/she intends to reject the draft bill during the first reading.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Critical of the state's aviation policy and the management of Nordica; emphasizes accountability to taxpayers and the necessity for clear strategy and control. The statements indicate strong doubts regarding the sustainability of the national airline and the prevailing perception that the state should perhaps consider reprioritizing the role of state aviation institutions. The anticipated political direction suggests a preliminary state-level review and potential downsizing or reorganization, but concrete alternatives remain at the level of questions that have been raised.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The presenter concentrates on state budget transparency and anti-corruption measures, stressing the need to monitor the financing of large-scale projects such as Rail Baltica and Via Baltica. They are critical of the insufficient clarity surrounding the utilization of tax revenue and excise duties, arguing that this income should be channeled into road infrastructure. The presenter raises specific questions and calls on the relevant officials to clarify how these funds are actually being spent. This position is defined by an approach focused on improving the quality of policy and governance, rather than being tied to a strong political party grouping.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
I represent the Centre Party and stress the necessity of reducing the value-added tax (VAT) applied to agricultural products. There is strong support for this tax cut, as the grain industry has recently faced a difficult situation due to cold winters and excessively rainy summers. The Centre Party has already presented this proposal and urges the government and its coalition partners to take it under consideration.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Key issues include the defense against cuts to extracurricular education funding and ensuring the consistency of the constitution with European Union norms. The position is critical of the government's austerity plan and emphasizes the vital role of support designated for children and families, as well as the development of creativity. A topical issue is the regularity of criticism leveled by government members in the Riigikogu (Parliament), the necessity for greater cooperation among ministers, and increased oversight.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker, in a supportive tone, emphasized that the draft bill is highly important, aiming to improve the legal aspects of restrictions under the Arms Act. They wish to include citizens of OECD countries to maintain and expand cooperation with those nations. The proposal shows no noticeable opposition or major ideological change; the focus is purely on the legal supplement.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
As a representative of the Centre Party, they emphasize the need for young people’s well-being, family security, and alleviating the demographic crisis. They are critical of the government’s tax policy and cuts, which they consider unfair and a violation of solidarity in their economic views, and they stress that weaker families should not suffer under the burden of tax changes and cuts. They oppose the bank tax and value a greater sharing of the burden by the state in caring for families. The framing is policy- and value-based, focusing on social security and demographic recovery.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The core political stance is maintaining the indexation of pensions and opposing any decoupling of indexation. He/She stresses that pensions must not be burdened and that indexation protects against the rising cost of living. Furthermore, he/she is critical of the government's proposed taxes, such as the idea of a security tax and the increase in specialist doctor visit fees, preferring instead to consider targeted funding mechanisms (like a bank windfall profit tax) over broad-based levies. His/Her position is strongly policy-driven and centered on social protection and ensuring financial fairness.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
A strong, principled emphasis is placed on defending the constitution and respecting the parliamentary process. The position is highly critical of government decisions (especially the car tax) and the handling of the budget, stressing the necessity of representing the public voice and ensuring parliamentary oversight. The stance is values-based and results-driven—forceful in its sector-specific approach and oriented toward changes, provided those changes guarantee adherence to the constitution and a socially equitable distribution of burdens. Noticing a perceived constitutional drift, the individual calls upon the Riigikogu to renew its respect for the constitution and fulfill its role as the guardian of the separation of powers.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Critical and emphasizing the protection of rights: expresses concern over the trajectory towards a surveillance society and a police state, and stresses the need for transparency and decision-making based on clear grounds, especially regarding the potential prohibition of public assemblies.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
As a representative of the Centre Party, there is strong opposition to the car tax bill. He/she emphasizes the need for tax differentiations and exemptions, especially for people with disabilities. Furthermore, he/she stresses the consistent adherence to constitutionality and European Union law, warning that the general imposition of a car tax may be in conflict with the constitution. This represents a highly influential, antagonistic, and combative position where opportunities for compromise are limited.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
This statement represents the opposition's stance on the supplementary budget and the coalition's economic policy. It emphasizes that the proposed cuts to social welfare, special care, and child-related services are insufficiently justified, noting the absence of a clear strategic economic vision. The opposition demands measures that stimulate economic growth and proposes alternative funding solutions (such as a windfall tax on banks' excess profits and reducing bureaucracy), while criticizing the government's reliance on short-term fixes. The core emphasis must be on the strategic steering of economic policy, rather than temporary cuts.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The Centre Party representative is in strong opposition to the government’s tax policy, emphasizing that laws must improve people’s lives, not increase their burdens. He fights against the raising of fines, state duties, and the car tax, and stresses the necessity of constitutionality and inclusive lawmaking. He focuses on protecting the interests of vulnerable groups (e.g., people with disabilities, families, low-income citizens) and symbolizes reform as the need to significantly better plan and analyze proposals before any vote.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The Riigikogu has decided to freeze development cooperation with Georgian state institutions and redirect the freed resources to support Georgian civil society. This has been presented as a necessary political step. The speaker has supported the principle of this measure but questions what the specific implementation will look like, indicating a need for clarification regarding the precise mechanisms.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The most crucial issue is budget cuts and their resulting economic impact. The speech takes a strongly oppositional stance, arguing that cuts to operating grants are short-sighted and detrimental in the long term, projecting a revenue loss of 20–30 million euros. He/She blames the government and the Centre Party and stresses the need for them to take responsibility for these decisions. He/She emphasizes the necessity of a long-term, economy-stabilizing approach.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
As a representative of the Centre Party faction, a bill has been introduced accompanied by strong criticism directed at the opposition: the faction does not support the increase in car tax, state levies, and fines, and stresses the need for broader consideration of exceptions and exemptions. They argue that the proposed amendments are cohesive and cannot be voted on separately, which, in their view, symbolizes an impractical procedure. The constitutional and European Union legal basis is the central argument: the bill is, in their assessment, unconstitutional and contrary to EU law. Furthermore, the focus is on the power to highlight the distress of groups with special needs (people with disabilities, large families, families with children requiring special educational support), emphasizing that tax changes must not burden this segment of the population.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The primary concern revolves around the state's economic policy and the question of Minister Tiit Riisalo's professional competence. Speakers are strongly opposed to Riisalo's leadership and are demanding his resignation or removal so a new minister can be appointed; this political maneuvering emphasizes accountability and transparency, and criticism is aimed both at the economic policy and suspicions regarding conflicts of interest.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
His core political stance involves criticizing both the proposed increase in land tax and the expansion of the revenue base for local authorities. He stresses the importance of preserving the tax exemption for residential land and finds the state's current approach to municipalities unconvincing, aiming to reject the draft legislation during its first reading. His arguments are grounded in values and critical of the process itself, highlighting the potential impact on residents' lives and municipal autonomy.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The speaker represents the strong opposition to the coalition. He criticizes the supplementary budget and the tax changes, arguing that they are merely coalition tactics ahead of the elections and are not economically necessary. He describes these actions as a calculated, misleading effort designed to give the impression of deceiving voters, which is solely aimed at retaining support before the election.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The speaker is oppositional and highly critical of the government’s tax policy. They are strongly against taxing pensioners and criticize the draft bill, which would increase their financial burden. They stress that imposing additional taxes on banks must not occur, and the principle of legal certainty must be upheld for pensioners. They view the draft legislation as increasing inequality and worsening the situation for the poor, emphasizing the need for a balanced and fairer tax system.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The speech focuses on the necessity of increasing social benefits for people with disabilities and criticizes the long-term stagnation of support payments for old-age pensioners. He/She highlights the rising cost of living and demands that benefits be raised, while also discussing tax exemption for disabled individuals as a potential option; the overall orientation of this movement is tied to the improvement of social rights. The style is policy-driven and strongly oriented toward social rights, maintaining a critical stance toward the current government's direction.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The Center Party faction is strongly opposed to three specific pieces of legislation: the whistleblower act, the hate speech bill, and the provisions allowing the Competition Authority to impose large fines. The faction characterizes these as directives that have simply been copied, arguing that their implementation in the Estonian context will generate significant administrative burden without providing any added value. This stance reflects criticism of the coalition’s activities and emphasizes the necessity of adapting EU legislation specifically for Estonia, rather than merely duplicating it.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
A stance aligned with the opposition, highly critical of current economic policy. He/She emphasizes the seriousness of the economic crisis and demands concrete steps for economic recovery, arguing that current actions do not support economic growth and that budgetary problems have deepened. The framing is primarily political and results-based, focusing on the need for effective policy and an economically informed approach.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker focuses on the impact assessment of the draft legislation, particularly the increase in the workload of administrative courts and the emergence of new tasks. The position is policy-driven and analytical; the speaker raises questions about how the bills will actually function and whether the workload is under control. He/she does not express clear support for or opposition to a specific bill, but rather emphasizes the need for assessment and discussion.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The presenter concentrates on issues concerning the rule of law and administrative law, highlighting transparency and legal certainty. He has clearly articulated the position that revoking the voting rights of third-country nationals is unconstitutional, signaling a strong commitment to constitutionalism and prioritizing the protection of rights. The style is measured and argumentative, robustly emphasizing the defense of rights and strict adherence to the legal framework.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speakers' position is primarily oppositional regarding specific government bills: they criticize tax hikes and the increase of bureaucracy, emphasizing the importance of the principle of legal certainty and impact assessments. The Centre Party faction clearly stated that the bill is unacceptable to them and is requesting a separate vote on the bill's title and the opportunity to halt proceedings. There is also criticism directed at the "copy-paste" method used for transposing EU directives, along with a desire for the country to conduct a thorough analysis and a constitutional and social debate before the legislation enters into force.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The opposition is critical of the government's tax policy: specifically, the increase in fines and state fees is criticized as a mere tool for filling the budget, rather than a policy based on thorough impact analysis. It is stressed that fines should serve a disciplinary function, not push people into poverty; the question is being raised as to who exactly is targeted for these fines and why. Reference is made to the economic outlook (IMF forecasts), attempting to demonstrate that both the government's actions and the policy itself could harm vulnerable groups in society. While there is no clear alternative program, the demand for thorough analysis and responsible budget management is strongly emphasized.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
As a representative of the Centre Party, [he/she] is clearly opposed to e-voting and the restrictive procedural dealing associated with the related bills; emphasizes that democracy and the exercise of state power must adhere to constitutional principles, and restricting the opposition is detrimental. He/She calls for a vote against the aforementioned bill, emphasizing the role of the people as the ultimate sovereign power and the necessity of ensuring transparency and legal certainty in the electoral process. The style is centered on values and principles, and criticism is primarily aimed at the coalition and their procedural methods; demonstrating a primarily policy-based, democracy-protecting approach.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Accountability for education funding and management is under critical scrutiny; there is a desire for an efficient, results-oriented government and the actual fulfillment of promises. The current situation is viewed as critical, rather than merely concerning national policy direction, with the emphasis placed squarely on responsibility and outcomes. It underscores the necessity of finding solutions through dialogue with all parties involved and reviewing foundational statutes and legal amendments in collaboration with partners.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker voiced strong criticism regarding the direction of the government's tax and economic policies. He stressed that raising taxes during an economic crisis is detrimental and called for a holistic, economically sound solution, as well as ensuring compliance with EU requirements. He noted that healthcare funding requires clearly substantiated answers, and that the current rush to pass draft legislation is harming businesses and citizens alike. The overall position is critical, focusing on prioritizing the economy and legitimate regulatory compliance.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
An oppositional stance characterized by strong critical reframing. The representative stresses that the draft legislation aimed at increasing fines and state fees is driven solely by budgetary considerations and lacks adequate analysis; they are firmly opposed to these increases and call upon the faction to reject the bills. They emphasize the need to consider moral and social responsibility, arguing that the expansion of taxes and penalties should not be used to fund the budget, but rather must take into account issues of poverty and accessibility faced by the populace. A factional, value- and policy-driven approach in pursuit of prospective change.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary political position is opposition to the car tax bill, emphasizing its conflict with EU law and the Constitution. We support the withdrawal of the bill and the review of the tax changes, arguing that, as a coalition measure, they are excessively burdensome and inequitable. Furthermore, we stress the protection of voters and democracy, and the need for accountability in the use of public money.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition's position regarding the coalition's plan concerning mobile voting and the bundling of amendments. It emphasizes the protection of democracy, transparency, and trust, and criticizes the coalition's procedure as disproportionate and restrictive of democratic rights. It stresses that obstruction is a permissible tool in parliamentary work, and the coalition's move to try to limit the taking of recesses is unacceptable. The approach focuses on preserving values and procedural fairness, rather than merely on specific draft legislation.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
A key issue is the funding of youth physical activities and the criticism directed at the funding policies of the government and the Ministry of Culture. Strong opposition has been voiced against cutting funding for school and recreational sports, emphasizing the need for transparency and adequate financing. The situation is interpreted as a politically motivated injustice, standing in stark contrast to the stated goal of promoting youth health.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
He/She reviews the draft bill critically: the primary motive is revenue generation, not the improvement of traffic behavior. (The party) demands coordination with the ministry and an impact assessment to evaluate the reduction in misdemeanors and traffic violations. The position is characterized by moderate to strong opposition and is process-centric.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is vehemently opposed to the draft bill, emphasizing that its adoption would saddle the Competition Authority with a new punitive body and an administrative procedure fraught with constitutional dangers. He prioritizes supporting the economy and strengthening existing procedures during this time of business crisis, rather than creating parallel, wide-ranging penalty procedures. He describes the arguments drafted and presented as a political choice leading toward a “punishment state.” He consistently points out that the directive does not mandate the use of this new form and seeks to reject the bill outright/withdraw it during the first reading.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
As a representative of the Center Party faction, he is strongly in opposition. He emphasizes that the car tax bill and the broader tax policy may conflict with European Union law and the constitution, and demands that they must be withdrawn. He also stresses that the state must avoid budget risks, costs associated with court decisions, and burdening taxpayers; focusing on the values of fairness, the rule of law, and fiscal responsibility.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
As a representative of the Centre Party faction, strong opposition is expressed to the government’s plan concerning the regulation of the crypto market. He/She emphasizes that any changes must be accompanied by reasonable advance notice and impact analyses, and criticizes the short notification deadlines and excessive requirements that are not mandated by the regulation itself. He/She links this objective to protecting the stability of investments and entrepreneurship, and is prepared to withdraw the draft bill or significantly rephrase it. The ultimate goal is to maintain the competitiveness of Estonian crypto asset operations and avoid excessive bureaucracy.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The Center Party faction emphasizes the protection of the rights of large families and people with disabilities, and strongly opposes the car tax unless specific exemptions are included. Their position is clearly critical regarding the threat of rising poverty resulting from the cumulative effect of tax hikes, and they demand the establishment of exemptions or supplementary benefits. Furthermore, they stress the importance of legal certainty and the fulfillment of constitutional duties, viewing the government's actions as a failure to adhere to the coalition agreement and its promises, thereby causing budgetary problems.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker focuses on raising teachers' salaries and the government's inaction in addressing this issue; they are strongly critical of the coalition and the ministers, highlighting resource-wasting management and the failure to pay wages. The position appears to be policy- and performance-based, with the non-fulfillment of promises and the necessity of taking responsibility being the central themes.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The opposition holds a strong position regarding the government's tax policy, particularly against the sugar tax. It emphasizes that social policy must be funded by taxes and proposes alternative tax amendments (a bank tax, a digital tax, and a large corporate tax). Focusing on the financing of children's health and social programs, and utilizing critical assessment alongside testable alternatives, this approach may demonstrate a policy-driven methodology.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The representative of the Centre Party faction opposes the car tax and clearly asserts that it conflicts with European Union law and the constitution. He stresses that the last moment for withdrawing the bill is critical and firmly advocates for the draft legislation not to advance through the Riigikogu. The focus is on value-based and legal frameworks, rather than the traditional expansion of taxation.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The oppositional, value- and principle-based approach focuses on protecting the rights and legal certainty of large families. It criticizes the government's tax policy (especially the car tax and sugar tax), which it considers primarily a result of filling budget deficits and pre-election political maneuvering. It supports financing measures that would direct resources toward families and child support programs, and favors alternative tax policies (such as a tax on banks' excess profits or a digital tax) as a broader, better-targeted solution. This stance is allegedly aimed at protecting constitutional and legal certainty principles, while simultaneously criticizing the government for being fiscally repressive and acting purely for the sake of election results.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The acceptability of the car tax is the main issue. The speaker is strongly opposed to the draft bill, stressing that the car tax contradicts the constitution and European Union law and poses a threat to vulnerable groups. He emphasizes the need to withdraw the bill and present specific exemptions and alternative solutions that would guarantee social and legal certainty.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main topics highlighted are healthcare funding and children's health. He is critical of the government's tax policy, especially the plans led by the Reform Party, and stresses the need to change healthcare funding priorities. He emphasizes that taxes alone will not solve health challenges and prefers a systemic approach—a sustainable funding model, quality, and prevention. Therefore, his position is strongly policy- and value-based, stressing a fundamental shift in healthcare priorities.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Animal welfare and the establishment of a nationwide pet register are her/his primary focus areas. She/He is a strong proponent of a unified register, emphasizing that it will expedite the process of owners finding their animals, increase the efficiency of shelters, and reduce bureaucracy for local municipalities. Her/His approach is policy-driven and practical, focusing on cooperation between political parties and the avoidance of conflicts.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The speaker emphasizes the protection of the constitutional state and human dignity, and is strongly critical of the draft car tax law. He demands exceptions for people with disabilities, arguing that inadequate provisions could exacerbate their inequality and violate the principles of the social state. Simultaneously, he is critical of the government's intentions regarding the draft administrative penalties law, noting that it threatens the legal system and the business environment. His rhetoric is value-based, yet firmly rooted in the legislative process and emphasizes the need for legal clarity.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
A representative of the Centre Party is vehemently opposed to the proposed car tax and stresses the need for social safeguards for larger families. They are critical of the tax policy put forth by the government, suggesting that the support promised before the election could later be withdrawn. As an alternative, they propose an excess profit tax on banks. This stance is deeply rooted in values and policy, centering on the constitutional principle of the welfare state and the special consideration due to families with children.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The most crucial issues are the opposition to the car tax, its inherent unfairness, and its impact on poorer citizens and those living in rural areas. The arguments presented include: objection to the car tax itself and its potential conflict with European Union law. Emphasis is placed on the social harm caused to low-income families, pensioners, and rural residents. This has been promoted as a strong opposition movement, offering alternatives (such as an excess profit tax) and utilizing proposed amendments as a procedural opening. The focus is on a value-based and economically transparent turning point—namely, reforming the tax system.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Speaking as a representative of the opposition, [he/she] is unequivocally against the proposed car tax and demands that the bill be withdrawn or replaced by a tax on banks' excess profits. He/She stresses that triple taxation (VAT, excise duty, and the car tax) places a heavy burden particularly on rural areas, low-income individuals, and families, and deems it detrimental to the budget and the economy. He/She highlights the necessity for comprehensive impact assessments and ensuring legal certainty, describing the alternative as fairer and more functional. The rhetoric emphasizes the importance of order and ethical principles, while strongly positioning the alternative political solution—the taxation of banks' excess profits—as the preferred way forward.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
A critical stance fighting against the car tax. It argues that triple taxation (the VAT hike, excise duty, and the car tax) significantly burdens vehicle owners and calls for considering an alternative, such as a one-time additional bank levy. The position is strongly policy-driven and emphasizes the necessity of reviewing the tax structures, rather than supporting the current proposal.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker expresses strong opposition to the government's car tax plan. He highlights the impact of the three-part taxation—VAT, excise duties, and a separate car tax—and emphasizes that these measures increase the obligations of car owners. He insists that the money collected shouldn't just be about fee collection, but about investments, and that mobility in rural areas should be improving, not deteriorating. This is policy-driven criticism, focusing on the impacts of tax policy and infrastructure funding, and there is no significant deviation from earlier statements.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The main positions are increasing funding for higher education institutions and preserving Estonian-language higher education. The EKRE draft bill is viewed as too radical, and he considers the implementation of quotas for English-language curricula impractical. He emphasizes that the state should develop a financial model and guarantee at least 1.5% of GDP for higher education funding, and that these investments must yield returns for the economy and the labor market, ensuring students remain in Estonia to work. He also argues that the underfunding of higher education threatens democracy and security, and that linguistic development relies on funding for higher education institutions and maintaining instruction in Estonian.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The critical opposition regarding the PM’s road policy stresses that the road maintenance plan reduces investments and that the proposed car tax plan lacks clear justification, potentially signaling further investment cuts. Their stance evolves based on specific debates: the underlying goal is to either increase or maintain road funding and to mitigate the car tax's impact on the national economy. The opposition utilizes interpellations to compel clarification and scrutinize the planned directions; this approach demonstrates a strong, fundamentally ontological focus on control.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
An opposition figure and a sharp critic of tax policy; they emphasize that the abolition of the VAT exemption for accommodation establishments must be based on thorough impact analyses and consideration of regional effects, rather than merely plugging a narrow budget deficit. They support ensuring tax equity and regional stability, calling for a more comprehensive review of decisions and the implementation of necessary mitigation measures. They are strongly opposed to the current government's tax amendments and demand their reversal or a fundamental re-evaluation.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Criticism of the accelerated legislative process and the highlighting of the importance of constitutionality and impact analysis. The representative is value-based and central to the defense of the rule of law, emphasizing the need for thorough debate, an inclusive process, and clear justifications. He/She stresses that urgency must not be used as a justification for violating standard legislative practices, and calls upon the ministry and the Riigikogu to act responsibly.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary political stance, at minimum, involves criticizing the government’s education policy and stressing the state’s responsibility for guaranteeing teachers’ salary levels. They emphasize that the base funding for salaries must come from the state budget, not solely from local government budgets, and a strong counter-argument is made against “demagogic narratives”—the position is broad in scope and focused on independent oversight. There is a clear emphasis on the need to take real steps and assume responsibility, rather than merely searching for culprits; satisfaction with the alleged lack of funding is low.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It emphasizes the crucial role of the knowledge-based economy and the integrated development of education, higher education institutions, and science. Adopting a critical tone, it condemns the government’s plans to reallocate funding to address teachers’ salaries, stressing that this undermines the entire system. It demands specific goals, a broad, cross-party consensus, and an investment strategy for education and science based on solid evidence (1.5% of GDP for higher education, 3% for research and development, 2% sourced from the private sector). It views investments as the primary driver of economic growth and advocates for a comprehensive, long-term political agreement, rather than short-term cuts.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker focuses on amendments to the Income Tax Act and emphasizes the 30 different draft amendments to the Income Tax Act presented by his faction as being very good and necessary, although due to their similarity, only the income tax rate itself differs. He expresses the pragmatic goal of finding the optimal income tax rate and securing corresponding support from the coalition, stressing that this represents a policy-driven reform direction. At the same time, he notes that the coalition has voted these proposals down on previous occasions, which points to a challenge in finding consensus and the need for better coordination.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Education is the state's primary responsibility, and the teachers' salary fund must be covered by the state budget; this is the government's chief priority. The representative stresses the need for a unified, collaborative, and compromise-driven approach within the coalition in order to prevent a teachers' strike.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main focus is on monuments and the issues addressed by the draft bill, as well as the protection of the independence of judicial institutions. He/She notes that the coalition apparently did not wish to support the EKRE bill, and expresses a desire to see clear future plans. Furthermore, he/she emphasizes preserving the independence of the prosecutor’s office and fears risks of influence arising via the Ministry of Justice; the position is critical, but not directly regarding support for the bill that was initially confirmed. Not enough data to determine broader party support.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The presenter adopts a critical and notably incomplete stance regarding the coalition's plans. They stress the need to reassess the significance of the language reform in education, questioning whether a unified Estonian-language school implies a single system or separate school systems, and highlighting the necessity of clear definitions. The position is oriented more pragmatically and is values-driven, rather than being strictly politically fixed.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker highlights a legal loophole and a documentation issue concerning civil status procedures, identifying inter-ministerial cooperation and the development of regulatory improvements as the necessary solutions. They emphasize that addressing this gap is a priority, demanding practical fixes rather than ideological conflict. The position is pragmatic and policy-driven, prioritizing system enhancement over political decision-making.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Emphasis is placed on the issues concerning the ratification of the amendments to the ESM Treaty; the position is neutral and issue-oriented, reflecting neither a clear side nor opposition. The representative stresses the importance of the reform and seeks Italy's rationale and next steps.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker is in opposition and critical of the government’s economic policy, focusing on opposing tax increases and the need to review budget decisions. He/She emphasizes that the tax policy is being used merely to collect revenue and does not support economic revitalization, demanding instead investments and measures that promote economic growth. Furthermore, he/she argues that the redistribution policy inherent in regional politics does not make local governments wealthier and requires changes and clearer investment priorities.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The most prominent topics are the streamlining of the income tax base and the financing of local governments; emphasis is placed on the state’s role in funding education and acting as a bridge between local governments and the central government. He/She is critical of the current approach and is quite keen on securing additional resources, while stressing central funding and cooperation with local authorities, rather than focusing on accusations. He/She does not appear to be moving toward radical change, but instead seeks to emphasize the necessity of responsibility and partnership.