By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Total Sessions: 163
Fully Profiled: 163
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the government, particularly the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance, who are being criticized for failing to conduct proper analysis when implementing tax hikes. The criticism is intense and centers on the government’s incompetence and their illogical claims regarding the impact of lowering the Value Added Tax (VAT).
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the government as a whole, the Ministry of the Interior, Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller, and Eesti 200. Criticism is aimed both at the substance of the policy (surveillance, the car tax) and at the procedures involved (hiding statistics, lack of debate, and post-factum legalization). The attacks are intense, accusing the government of losing the public's trust and gaining entry to the Riigikogu through fraud.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The main opponents are the Reform Party and Eesti 200, who are being criticized for consistently voting down draft legislation. The criticism is both political and substantive, accusing them of prioritizing business freedom over the protection of public health, especially the health of children.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Finance and the government, centering on the ineffectiveness of economic policy and deficiencies in budget transparency. The critique is rooted in both policy and procedure, citing as an example the funds that went unspent during the closure of the Kopli fire station. Furthermore, the minister is criticized for their tendency to blame economic woes on survey methodology rather than acknowledging the genuine decline in purchasing power.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats, who are being accused of causing tax chaos, withdrawing family benefits, and demonstrating social callousness. The criticism is intense, focusing both on political incompetence and the poor attitude shown by the Minister of Social Affairs (Karmen Joller) towards organizations representing people with disabilities. Any compromise regarding the car tax is ruled out, with demands for its complete abolition.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The primary opposing viewpoint: against the draft bill. The criticism is based on the inadequately regulated scope concerning privacy, data protection, and control, coupled with the opaque nature of the debate. As the opposition, it defends the limits of state intervention and civil rights.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Highly critical of the coalition parties (Reform Party, Eesti 200, Social Democrats), and accusing a decision—which is viewed as serving their specific interests—of being supported by donations. It champions alternative, unified regulation and consumer protection principles; the criticism emphasizes the utilization of political influence and leverage.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The opposition to the bill, expressed at least in part, includes criticism over the prioritization of coalition interests and lobbying, accusations of corruption-like schemes, and the infringement of fundamental rights and democracy. It is stressed that the government is unwilling to compromise, that the bill cannot be justified through amendments, and that it should be withdrawn entirely. The intensity is high, the tone is aggressive, and generally, there is no consideration given to risks or potential compromise.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Clearly oppositional; critical of the decisions made by the government and state institutions, and demanding transparency and accountability. This involves not only political criticism, but also the concrete application of oversight and skills in an anti-corruption context.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Not enough data
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
Strong opposition to the tax policy of the government and its coalition partners (specifically concerning land tax, car tax, VAT, and income tax). The criticism primarily focuses on policies by which the central government burdens local municipalities and deals with the populace, and “Toompea politics” is treated as the main force that needs to be resisted.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
There is insufficient data; specific opponents or groups are not named in the first speech, and the criticism is general and context-based, rather than being a personal accusation leveled against controversial groups.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Characterized by a strong oppositional tone; the criticism is aimed squarely at the government, the management of the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa), and their expenditures. It defends taxpayer interests, employing sharp accusations and criticizing the hypocrisy surrounding the government's failure to provide impact assessments. Language suggesting compromise is limited, with the primary focus being accountability and improved transparency.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
A strong oppositional tone: it accuses the coalition of its tax policy and causing hardship for the wider public. Emphasis is placed on accountability and criticism concerning the special anti-corruption committee and the leaking of internal information; it does not merely relay attacks, but presents strong accusations and demands clarification. It advocates a complete rejection of compromise and stresses the importance of oversight and accountability.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Procedural criticism concerns previous actions (RMK secret contracts, long-term agreements) and demands a special audit to clarify who was behind these events and for what reasons. The criticism is primarily procedural and focused on demanding accountability, rather than being a personal attack, and is aimed at improving the transparency of the previous government's actions.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
A deepened opposition stance: critical of the government's economic policy and legislation; attempts at autonomy that conflict with EU and constitutional law, and the demand for effective oversight of local government expenditures. Direct motions of no confidence against ministers and emphasized links to corruption cases (e.g., Bolt) demonstrate a strong and active confrontation.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The most direct objection to the draft bill in question: criticism against the creation of the “super database” as being unconstitutional and infringing upon individual rights; intense, almost principled opposition, emphasizing the need for constitutional limitations and the protection of privacy. This essentially constitutes the main substantive counterpoint to this bill and stresses that the debate must not be one-sided.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are the Coalition and the Reform Party; accusations center on one-sided debate, pressure exerted in the name of security, and the justification of illegal activities. The intensity is high; there is constant discussion about the infringement of fundamental rights and the protection of personal data, and the possibilities for compromise are seen as limited.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The drafts outline strong opposition positions: the creation of a centralized database is not supported; critics highlight risks from both legal and surveillance perspectives, as well as the restriction of privacy rights. The Center Party faction has attempted to propose halting the reading of the bill. The tone is politically critical, demanding thorough discussion and the implementation of changes.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main emphasis is placed on criticizing the government's tax policy and leveling accusations of "lies to the people." It positions itself as an adversary to the direction taken by the Reform Party and the government, stressing the protection of fundamental rights and highlighting the stances of the Chancellor of Justice and the Supreme Court. It employs strong criticism regarding both the decisions themselves and their impact on families with "medium and small incomes," and speaks about the necessity of setting boundaries against the government's increasing control and its shift toward becoming a punitive state. The vocabulary chosen is highly confrontational, critical, and serves to maintain an atmosphere of sustained criticism.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
Criticism of the coalition, its budget plans, and the coalition agreement; it emphasizes that promises will not solve the road problems and suggests the necessity of a larger, financially secure long-term plan. The criticism is political, and the objective focuses on increasing funding authorization.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
There is insufficient data to evaluate opponents or their political groups during this specific visit; the representative only emphasizes the protection of rights and the clarity of the bill, not specific opposition criticisms.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Critical of the actions taken by the government and the respective ministers, particularly regarding the directive for the use or construction of the CCTV camera network; it views the rushing of the draft legislation and the hidden 'memo-state' as a danger to the democratic rule of law, and considers the intent of these proceedings to be unconcealed. It demands that the legality be brought to light and verified, and calls for greater transparency and independent oversight.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opponents appear to be focusing on the inconsistency shown by at least some political parties (such as the Social Democrats on the committee) regarding the draft legislation. Certain parties are being accused of hypocrisy or "two-faced behavior" (supporting the measure in Tallinn while taking opposing positions in the Riigikogu), and the restriction of entrepreneurial freedom is being treated as a potential source of opposition. The overall assessment is that the issue is highly controversial and requires further development and consensus.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
A clearly oppositional stance regarding the government's tax policy; critical concerning the fulfillment of promises and issues of trust; emphasizing the necessity of ensuring social cohesion and public confidence, while demanding answers and alternative courses of action. The attitude is strongly critical, but no specific policy proposals are offered.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The government's financial decisions are under criticism; critical has been their impact on aviation companies and the rise in fees, along with the necessity of reviewing the dividend policy. It does not reflect well as a whole, despite the compromises made.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The main emphasis is on the criticism of the prosecution and current case law, and it is noted that these must be further developed or reinterpreted; the criticism is categorized through procedural and interpretation-based issues. He/She stresses that signals directed to victims are insufficiently coordinated and highlights the necessity of demonstrating that corporate liability can be effectively interpreted and implemented. The established criticism is strong, and the opportunities for compensation or reconciliation remain limited.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The main focus is on the opposition to the car tax; the car tax's conflict with the constitution is highlighted, and additional criticism centers on the reasons for its implementation. This stance relies on the positions presented to the Chancellor of Justice and the Riigikogu (Parliament), emphasizing the necessity for amendments or outright repeal.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary focus is on the conflict between the government and the coalition; criticism is directed at the Minister of Finance, the coalition partners, and the Reform Party, with unnecessary appeals to moral authority. This is an intense and direct attack involving accusations of immorality, corruption, and money laundering; instead of compromise, the emphasis is placed on increasing contact and accountability.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The criticism centers on the environmental requirements of the European Union's green policy and the onerous impact they have on small businesses. Specific opponents are not named; the focus is instead placed on the necessity of change and dialogue.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the figures presented by the ministry and the explanatory memorandum of the draft bill; accurate and transparent data is being demanded. The tone is critical, but does not indicate outright rejection or confrontation, focusing instead on deliberative scrutiny.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The main theme of the political stance is the criticism of the government's Rail Baltic funding: it is critical and stresses that the cost is excessive and cooperation with Latvia is not assured. He emphasizes the necessity of risk analysis and funding transparency, pointing out that the financing and infrastructure situation is potentially detrimental if a solid financial model is lacking. The author of the second address adds that the parallel drawn with the Kremlin in the Prime Minister's speech was ineffective and inappropriate; there is also criticism regarding personal remarks.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
It emphasizes confrontation, criticizing the "current decision-makers" and mentioning that he suspects individuals even in other parties (including the social democrats); the tone is strongly critical and unreservedly skeptical. The condemnation is directed at the government's decisions and green policy, and it is stressed that the opposition and other parties may not support the proposal.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Clearly oppositional; criticism is directed at the government and its policies (taxes, detrimental impacts on livelihoods, lack of oversight). It emphasizes accountability and the need for change and responsibility; the tone is strongly critical, calling the government to account and suggesting a potential retreat or resignation.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The most critical parties involved are the Prosecutor's Office and the management of Pihlakodu; the accusations focus on negligent supervision, failure to initiate proceedings, and sending false signals to the victims; official criticism is sharp, emphasizing the need to ensure effective accountability and the protection of victims' rights.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary attacks are aimed at the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats; the coalition’s policies are judged to be detrimental, and criticism is frequent and intense; compromise is seen as limited in scope, manifesting primarily as protest and opposition to draft legislation.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The opponents are the Social Democrats (SDE) and the other partners in the coalition; criticism centers on their leadership and policies, along with the claim that their exercise of power has failed to improve the public’s standard of living. The clear position is to stand in opposition to the SDE and emphasize the perspectives of the Reform Party/Eesti 200.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism targets rhetoric resembling that of a minister and the focus on ideological loyalty. Emphasis is placed on the independence of civil servants from politics, and the practice of using salaried positions for political leadership is not supported. The critique is grounded in a political framework (focusing on procedural matters and the defense of democratic principles) and avoids direct personal attacks against specific political parties, although conservative parties are mentioned as a potential scenario. The intensity is moderate and principled, rather than personal.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponents are the social democrats, whose methods and manner of transposing the directive he depicts as a threat to the legal order and business freedom. He accuses them of advocating for the further expansion of punitive mechanisms and the initiation of administrative proceedings, often employing highly judgmental language. The tone is intense, yet there is no indication of a compromise being offered concerning these measures.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The approach to the opposition is pragmatic: [he/she is] willing to support the opposition's submission of reasonable amendments if this aids in achieving consensus; [he/she is] neither critical nor aggressive.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Critical of the government's economic policy, particularly concerning the managed tax changes (the VAT hike). It is noted that the Centre Party submitted a draft bill to reduce [the rate] to 9%, which the Reform Party did not support, citing the complex, intertwined debate between opposition positions. The second paragraph directs criticism at the premises of the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) and the lack of a necessary legal basis. The opposition is seen as complicating the oversight of enforcement and the growth of a surveillance society, while emphasizing the protection of fundamental rights.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Taking a strongly oppositional stance against the Tallinn city government's decision; it argues that the decision restricts the principles of free elections and deems it fundamentally problematic. It criticizes the decision's impact on democracy and the freedom of voters, employing strong language such as “infringement.”
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main rival is the Social Democrats and their tax policy, which is treated as detrimental to people's livelihoods and opposed to the democratic spirit. The criticism is noticeably strong and emotional (referring to an "anti-people government" and "hypocrisy"), but the direct possibility for compromise is signaled by an unwillingness to restrict rather than approve. It is emphasized that the criticism of previous decisions is visually manifest.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
A critical stance towards the Prosecutor's Office and the justice system, as well as the broader informant network (due to unacceptable public statements and the lack of protection for victims). The second speech features sharp criticism against lobbying and the associated idealistic posturing and political games (Uber, Bolt, the Reform Party, Eesti 200); delivered with a strong opposition tone. The intensity is high.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the coalition government and the prime minister, who stand accused of imposing excessive taxation and lacking transparency. Criticism is also directed at the finance minister's statement, the Reform Party, and Kristen Michal, who are described as parties riding the wave of populism. The statement is heavily colored by a tone of political confrontation, with minimal references to compromise; the criticism is strong and directly related to the government.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the car tax policy and the approach it represents; the criticism is policy-based and legal, emphasizing the lack of differentiation and the conflict with constitutionality. It highlights the controversial changes that have been introduced and the readiness to seek judicial assistance. No specifics regarding compromise are mentioned, indicating strong opposition to the car tax.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the government coalition (including the Reform Party) and the Social Democrats, who are accused of increasing taxes and imposing an unfair burden on families. The speaker emphasizes that the car tax perpetuates injustice and lowers the standard of living for key social groups; it is directly claimed that the coalition is guilty of implementing damaging tax policies. The attack is strong, but it is constrained by the desire to utilize legal means and seek cooperation with the coalition, rather than foreclosing compromises through personalizing the conflict.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The main focus is criticism of the current government’s decisions and the coalition’s intentions, particularly concerning the state repurchase of Enefit Green and the lack of transparency in tax policy. The stance is strongly critical and demanding, directed towards additional scrutiny and the conclusions under review by the special anti-corruption commission; promoting compromise is not highlighted.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Criticism of the regulatory solution and the overall direction, emphasizing the need for broader and more concrete measures. The tone is critical, though not personally adversarial.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strongly critical and accusatory towards the Social Democrats; emphasizing their lack of consistency and shifting principles. Intense, but primarily in the context of political confrontation.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Both speeches represent strong opposition: the first speech featured criticism of tax policy and the EU directive, along with a demand for clarification and possible postponement; the second speech focused on opposing the car tax, emphasizing legal issues and the protection of vulnerable groups. The intensity is high, the criticism is concentrated, and while seeking compromise is primarily viewed as necessary, broad cooperation with the coalition is not described.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
Opposition-style criticism directed at Eesti 200; accusations of corruption, conflicts of interest, and illegal procedures; emphasizing the necessity of transparency and oversight. The aggressive tone used in posing questions demonstrates strong opposition and a demand for accountability, showing no willingness to tolerate unjust practices.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opposition is aimed at the coalition and the Reform Party: there is deep criticism of the car tax, alongside accusations of unreasonable tax structures and procedural limitations. The intensive criticism concerns both the political decisions and the implementation of democratic procedures, highlighting violations of constitutionality and civil rights. Should the demands presented be disregarded, specific legal remedies are being planned.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The primary critical issue is the failure of government members to appear before special committees; the criticism is procedural, focusing on the lack of attendance and responses, rather than the expression of personal contempt. The process is intense and purposeful, and compromise is being emphasized over the continuing burden related to legal accountability.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The core opposition is directed at the Social Democrats and their plans; criticizing their approach regarding the birch forest issue and, more broadly, their systemic proposals. It fails to provide the necessary leverage for major changes, such as new punitive mechanisms for state institutions, and emphasizes that the rule of law must be followed, special audits must be conducted, and new, separate forms of procedure should not be created. It characterizes the confrontation as discursive and gives the impression that compromise is possible in some sense, but makes no bold commitments.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The attack is primarily aimed at Minister Michal, along with the management and supervisory boards of KredEx and Nordica. The criticism also extends to the coalition as a whole, which, in the speaker’s view, has obscured or diminished accountability. It is highlighted that crucial operations were conducted without transparent procurement processes or due procedure, and the speaker calls for investigation and holding those responsible to account. The intensity is high, and compromise is not on the table, as the explicit goal is thorough scrutiny and ensuring accountability.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Clearly oppositional; highly critical of the coalition’s energy policy, claiming that decisions are made behind closed doors and through rushed procedures. It demands a democratic debate in the Riigikogu and accountability, including the minister’s resignation.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
Heightened conflict with the official ownership policy and the regulations governing dividend payouts in state-owned enterprises; criticism primarily aimed at the unfair balance between policy (as economic activity) and consumer prices. Intensive, direct, and demanding: it seeks specific explanations and brings the arguments into the spotlight, but may not articulate a concrete or intuitive compromise.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A clearly oppositional stance regarding the constitutional amendments; critical of the coalition and the forces supporting it. The messages focus on defending democracy, the rule of law, and security, as well as exposing the conflict between the amendment procedure and fundamental principles; no compromise is evident, and the need for transparency is emphasized.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
All criticisms are aimed at the government's proposed legal amendments and the approach that facilitates registry entries. He/She stresses that this poses a danger to the rule of law and dismisses the alleged "false" narratives as untrue, prioritizing the application of existing law and the protection of rights, rather than the adoption of amendments. The opposition is directed at the politician/policy, not the individuals.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The opposition leveled criticism at the coalition's decision-making process and its rushed legislative efforts. They stress that the crisis has not been handled with sufficient transparency, and there is a need for a public debate and discussion involving the whole of society.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Strongly oppositional: criticizing the government and the Reform Party regarding the tax burden on banks and general economic policy. The style is intense and argumentative; the criticism centers on the unfair treatment of banks and the desire for an alternative, more transparent approach to government policy. The absence of any pursuit of compromise was not directly highlighted.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposing force is the current government/coalition, which is being accused of failing to provide funding, breaking promises, and obstructing the advancement of the current reform. The intensity is high because the criticism centers on the neglect of decision-making and financing, and the absence of effective outcomes.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A distinctly oppositional stance toward the government is maintained: the economic policy is criticized, concerns are raised regarding the well-being of ordinary families, and the government is accused of indifference toward the populace. Furthermore, Eesti 200 is attacked as members of the opposition, with allegations of fraud and misleading the electorate; the overall tone is sharply critical and antagonistic.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Intense criticism leveled at the government's tax policy; it criticizes both the current and previous administrations for the burdens resulting from their tax policies, emphasizing the necessity of change and the need to take responsibility.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
A strong oppositional stance taken against the specific foreign minister and their party; the criticism focuses on the minister’s conduct and the party’s background, emphasizing the conflict regarding established protocol and ethics.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Clearly antagonistic towards the government and the Reform Party coalition: the criticism centers on taxation, the impact of economic policy on ordinary citizens, and budget transparency. It highlights that the government has managed the economy "criminally" and proposes, as an alternative, the taxation of banks' excess profits; it stresses the need to protect vulnerable groups and promises changes to the tax system should there be a potential change in power.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No direct opposition has been stated; there is no clear criticism of the source of opposition; emphasis is placed on opportunities for dialogue and inclusion, rather than resistance.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The opposition maintains a critical stance toward the government’s actions, accusing it of a lack of transparency in its decisions and the reckless squandering of taxpayer money in the case of Nordica. It emphasizes the necessity of control and accountability, demands a series of inquiries, and insists that the situation cannot continue without thorough consideration and transparency.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Primarily critical of the coalition, stressing that the current budget violates the constitution and that the lack of transparency is detrimental to the public's economic and social welfare. Frequently cites examples of administrative failures by the Ministry of Finance and other government bodies, and urgently demands solutions. The tone is direct and forceful, but cooperation with political rivals is not ruled out in order to achieve objective changes.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are described as the Reform Party, which is accused of causing the suspension of European Union funding and the project's delay. The opposition's view is strongly critical, expressing deep criticism regarding political decisions made on a personal level. Statements have indicated that the opposition makes no distinction (between the parties/issues), and they wish to seek a mutual solution through coalition negotiations.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main argument of the opposition centers on criticizing government decisions and leveling accusations regarding issues related to corruption. He/She emphasizes the issue of public trust and the scourge of corruption, demonstrating that these matters are political and directly relate to bureaucratic transparency. Personal conflicts (conflicts of interest) can also be highlighted, and he/she demands answers and accountability.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the frameworks for state management and the schemes for implementing the company owner's expectations, as well as the periods of austerity. It stresses the need for a more thorough impact assessment and the prioritization of residents' interests. There are no explicit personal or party-based attacks, but rather a general critique of the measures currently in place.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition: critical of the coalition's policy and its budgetary practices; attacks are directed at the procedure, transparency, and the correctness of the figures; does not want an uncompromising situation, but better transparency.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Specific adversaries are not named; there is criticism regarding the current system's lack of transparency and emphasizes the need for changes. In terms of attitude, it takes the position that financial matters must be discussed and made visible, not kept secret.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
As a core enterprise, there is strong opposition to the coalition’s planned bill: the change to the state secretary’s education requirements, the content of the draft law on noise, and the plan for a security tax. It defends the rule of law and against the impartiality of institutions, using close criticism and emotional comparisons, arguing that such changes damage trust and promote political agendas. Powerful resistance is directed both at specific bills and at broader tax policy.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
A clearly oppositional stance regarding the government; the focus of criticism is tax policy and the actions of the Centre Party government. It points out that the coalition has not been sufficiently solidarity and the proposed solutions damage those with lower incomes. It does not show a willingness to make major compromises with the government, but emphasizes alternative tax proposals and equality.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
It criticizes the Riigikogu as an institution and its current lack of trust in the eyes of the people; the criticism is strong, directed at the institution as a whole, not at specific individuals or groups.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Opposes the government's tax policy, particularly its intentions to raise alcohol excise duties and broader taxes. The critical tone concerns primarily the projections regarding revenue and impact on purchasing power; criticizes the rationale behind the decisions and emphasizes the need to consider the realism of the projections. He insists that tax policy must keep the burden under control and should not increase the tax burden without clear evidence.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The position is directly oppositional to the government: criticism of the coalition’s and ministers’ actions; finds that economic and security issues are not receiving enough attention and demands clear answers and oversight.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
A critical stance regarding tax increases and a demand that decisions be more thoroughly considered and involve business people; focuses on political opposition, not personal attacks. Represents a strong, politically-driven resistance, without ruling out compromise in context.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government coalition (the Reform Party, Social Democrats and others) and their bills, which are seen as insulting to pensioners and increasing the cost of living. Tax cuts and social service reductions are being criticized, along with political modernization; the tone is strongly critical and confrontational, aiming to disrupt or reverse contentious decisions.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The opposition viewpoint: criticism of the government's economic policy and tax increases; emphasizes that these harm citizens' ability to cope and increase the crime rate. The intensity is high, as it is claimed that the policies are unreasonable and that the country’s priorities are wrong.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The criticism is directed at the previous lack of intention for inclusion and development; it highlights that inclusion and early discussion are necessary and presents an alternative, more inclusive approach to the government's actions.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
A clearly oppositional attitude towards the coalition’s budget policy and the expansion of ministerial powers; the criticism is both political and procedural. Personal attacks and accusations primarily target the attitude and approach of coalition ministers, while standing up for families and vulnerable groups is seen as a priority. Their position is not one of warm cooperation, but the need to declare and discuss responsibly and transparently is emphasized.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition’s stance is critical of the Center Party/Estonia’s political handling of Rail Baltic’s management and finances: unverified figures are being cited, the formation of a special commission is being demanded, and it is stressed that funding and expenditure issues must be resolved through independent oversight. Furthermore, criticism is leveled against the coalition’s draft legislation, and while greater consensus is deemed necessary, control over project risks and costs is stressed as being more important.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
A strong opposition stance toward the government and the coalition: the criticism centers on budget transparency, the erosion of oversight, and the superficial approach taken by ministries. The opposition is prepared to submit alternative bills and stresses the necessity of a professional, verifiable budget.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The attack is aimed at the management of RMK and the Ministry of Climate; the criticism is both procedural and systemic (the ultimate goal being transparency and control). It is intense, but it may not rule out a separate compromise; rather, it emphasizes accountability and the strengthening of control.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The main thrust of the political criticism focuses on the shortcomings of the government's legislative process, rather than personal confrontations. It criticizes the inadequacy of impact assessments and the lack of early stakeholder involvement; demanding a thorough review of the audit and corrective measures. The intensity is moderately critical, not personal or extreme.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
He/She is critical of cannabis legalization and expresses opposition, citing risks to young people, the environment, and organized crime. The issues and concerns he/she has raised demonstrate political resilience against such a policy; although it is not a direct anti-government protest, it constitutes an indirect defiance of the new regulation.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Critical of the state plan and unwilling to contribute to its adoption; emphasizes the need to clarify and improve the constitutional framework concerning religious associations, and remains skeptical regarding the expediency and effectiveness of new restrictions. A strong degree of steadfastness is evident, coupled with a desire for minimal compromise.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The primary point of contention revolves around the approach taken by the government and the Ministry of Finance regarding cuts to budgetary control. Criticism focuses on the minister's right to amend the budget without preliminary scrutiny by the Riigikogu (Parliament); there is an emphasis on the necessity of restoring and safeguarding parliamentary oversight. The coalition's plans face intense pushback, with greater transparency and constitutional procedure being proposed as alternatives.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government's tax policy and the role played by the Ministry of Finance; it is stressed that the new taxes damage the economy and reduce the purchasing power of the average consumer. Furthermore, the Ministry of Finance and the processes used to handle the draft bill are criticized (specifically, the lack of committee discussion), and the need for transparency is also highlighted.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary antagonists are the Ministry of Finance and the government's budget spending; the criticism centers on the impact of tax hikes and cuts to the social sector. The message stressed that the opposition must have a voice regarding the state budget, and that the minister's responses are inadequate, adding that the use of personal insults is unacceptable. The intensity is high, and the room for compromise is limited.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
A strong opposition stance; critical of the coalition and the Ministry of Finance; emphasizes that the budget must be transparent and controllable, and is prepared to disregard the coalition’s plans if they do not increase transparency; offers an alternative and demands changes.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
Highly critical of the current government's tax policy, focusing on tax hikes as the root cause of the problems. It slams the measures adopted by the minister and the government, stressing that these actions are damaging the economy and disrupting family finances and household arrangements. The intensity is high; no clear strategy for cooperation or compromise is offered in this passage.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The strong opposition to the government's economic policy: delivering a critical assessment of tax hikes and the reduction of child benefits; emphasizing the negative impact on families and overall economic welfare; and raising questions concerning the government leader's position and the direction of the administration.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Working together with the Centre Party faction, his primary position of opposition is directed against the government's plan to alter the educational requirements for the Secretary of State and modify the entire law solely for the benefit of one individual. He is attacking both the procedure surrounding the draft bill and the general process by which legislation reaches this chamber, leveling accusations of political susceptibility and the creation of a dangerous precedent. He employs powerful rhetorical maneuvers in his counter-offensive, stressing that changes of this nature would undermine the state's continuity and credibility.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Strongly critical of the actions taken by the government and the ministry concerning Nordica; emphasizes potential taxpayer detriment and negative parallels with Estonian Air. The unusual question format and the act of raising the issue (mätta tõstmine) suggest confrontation, and government policy is primarily addressed through questions of oversight and accountability. It does not represent a new compromise or cooperation supported by specific proposals.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The text is highly critical of the government’s budget and financing policies, highlighting the lack of transparency and the failure to account for the allocation of funds. It demands clarity, specifically that revenue be directed straight into road infrastructure. It lays out strong political criticism concerning budget organization and stresses the need for accountability and oversight, though it stops short of presenting a specific opposition solely as a standalone program.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
An opposing tone regarding the government's austerity policy and the process of adopting EU norms; emphasizes adherence to the constitution and greater parliamentary oversight. Trenchant criticism is directed both at the sustainability of the framework (or document) and political conduct (the routine nature of ministerial criticism and the lack of coordination). It demands answers and accountability for the government's actions.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Critical of the coalition: accuses the government of harassing young people and families and asks why priorities don't cover the health and well-being of children. It highlights that the coalition does not support its bills and symbolizes a broader political opposition to their preferences. The intensity is strong, and it emphasizes that the coalition is ignoring demographic challenges and family-oriented emergency policy.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Shows a strong opposition stance toward government policy, particularly regarding the security tax, the increase in specialist doctors' fees, and the reorganization of healthcare. It criticizes the conduct of the government and the Minister of Finance, as well as the fragmentation within the coalition, while simultaneously offering alternative solutions (such as utilizing a bank windfall tax as supplementary revenue). It defends the interests of the vulnerable and focuses on the necessity of financial justice and budgetary oversight.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Critical of decisions made by the coalition and government (especially regarding the car tax and procedural practices). The decisions are described as unconstitutional, and it is emphasized that the state must not restrict the Riigikogu's ability to represent diverse societal groups. The tone is one of strong conflict and opposition, but the focus remains on policy and procedures, rather than personal attacks.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
Critical of the draft legislation; a strongly oppositional character, primarily due to the risks associated with restricting rights and freedoms.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The Opposition urges the Coalition to look beyond unilateral solutions, criticizing the bill's handling and its conflicts with both statutory law and the Constitution. It is stressed that the coalition is relying on tax exemptions for winnings and is attempting to prohibit the use of funds designated for disabled people. The Opposition remains strongly critical and is not prepared for a general compromise regarding the car tax.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
Clearly oppositional: The criticism centers on supplementary budget cuts in the social sector and a fundamentally flawed approach to budget preparation. He/She accuses the government of lacking strategic planning and details how the cuts could affect vulnerable groups and economic growth. While acknowledging that some coalition members supported the budget, he/she strongly emphasizes their objections and calls for sweeping, broad-based change.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The main opposition strategy is criticism of the government's tax policy and the methods used to cover budget deficits. They emphasize that increasing fines, state fees, and land tax primarily burdens the less affluent and constitutes a violation of the principles of legal certainty and solidarity. The opposition also focuses on protecting the administration of justice and ensuring constitutionality, considering the capacity to make reasonable draft amendments essential.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is insufficient information to determine the opposition's position in this section (specific opponents or criticism directed at specific groups are not indicated).
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition maintains a strong and strategic stance: criticism is directed at the government's economic policy and austerity measures, particularly concerning the role of the Centre Party and the accountability of the Reform Party government. They vote against short-sighted decisions and demand precise forecasts and clear answers regarding revenue volumes. A key characteristic is the direct leveling of accusations and the challenging of official figures to demonstrate the responsibility of the politicians.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The core focus is critical of the policies of the government and the coalition: it opposes the raising of the car tax and state fees, and accuses the government of making unreasonable and unfounded decisions. Questions are often raised as to why amendments cannot be voted on separately, and it is emphasized that the coalition's priorities are uncoordinated and that the taxes impose too heavy a burden on the people. There is intense and widespread criticism, coupled with direct opposition to the content of the presented draft bill.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
A robust and continuous opposition targeting Riisalo and the Eesti 200 politicians. The criticism is sweeping, focusing on shortcomings in economic policy, and allegations regarding a lack of transparency and conflicts of interest. Opportunities for compromise are limited, and the objective is the replacement of the minister.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition has taken a position against the land tax increase, stressing that it would harm small municipalities and their residents. They aim to reject the bill during its first reading and are presenting criticism regarding the state's overall approach.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Clearly critical and in opposition. It criticizes the coalition and the government over the timing of their tax changes and supplementary budget, and accuses their actions of being tactics aimed at deceiving voters. The accusations presented are strongly linked to issues of political opposition and responsibility, without offering ready-made proposals for alternative solutions.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The core conflict: a contradictory approach to the draft legislation; acknowledging the rationale behind the criticism and the inequality; emphasizing the protection of pensioners' situation and justice.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Critical of the government's approach to supporting people with disabilities and in the context of the car tax; claims that the existing need for support has become outdated, and that the government's measures may not cover new costs. Presents strong political criticism, using arguments regarding skewed financial and social policies.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary resistance is aimed at the coalition's plans and their rationale: the draft bills have been copied from directives and are ill-suited to Estonian circumstances; it is stressed that these measures will harm businesses and local governments and fail to offer the desired protection to the public. The intensity is high, and compromise is currently not a priority.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
A clearly oppositional stance toward the government's economic policy; the criticism is rooted in the poor performance of the economy and the fiscal situation, demanding specific actions. Of significant importance is the adoption of the controversial proposal to abolish the tax hump, with the ensuing discussion emphasizing the need for a realistic impact assessment and better achievement of results.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The focus is on the objection to the Isamaa draft bill, noting its incompatibility with the Constitution. It is highlighted that voting procedures and participation may be inconsistent, and it is stressed that revoking the right to vote is not compatible with constitutional requirements. The intensity ranges from moderate to strong, depending on the context; there is no personal attack, but rather a principled criticism directed at the constitutionality of the legislative steps being taken.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The core opposition manifests itself through criticism of the coalition and government bills. The Centre Party faction is withholding support for the bill and is demanding a separate vote and an adjournment of proceedings. The criticisms focus on the substance of the draft legislation and the role of the committee (specifically, the bundling of amendments and the political nature of the committee's decision). Intense fighting and comprehensive resistance are the dominant tones.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
A strong opposition stance regarding the government's draft legislation: primarily opposing the increase of taxes and fines, and criticizing the hike in prices for state services. The tone is intense and critical, labeling the measures as cynical/amoral and emphasizing the necessity of impact analyses. It focuses on criticizing the government's accountability and political objectives.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opposing stance regarding the coalition and government procedures; accuses [them] of obstruction and violating constitutional principles; frequently calls for the protection of the opposition's rights and the equality of their mandate; remains reservedly critical concerning compromise.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Critical of the government and the minister’s policies: accuses them of avoiding responsibility and failing to fulfill their promises; stresses the necessity of faster, evidence-based solutions. Seeks to increase accountability and draw attention to the interests of schools and teachers.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The stance is fiercely oppositional to the government's tax policy, emphasizing the avoidance of burdens on businesses and citizens, and the crucial importance of adhering to EU requirements. Simultaneously, it condemns the use of the executive body to restrict the rights of the opposition and stresses the necessity of open dialogue and the benefits of cooperation.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
Elevated rhetoric and firm defiance against the coalition. The main criticism centers on the necessity of the draft laws and their impact on citizens, and it is stressed that the coalition is tragically attempting to meet budget targets through penalties and increased tax burdens. He is strongly opposed and asserts that the adoption of all the draft laws should be rejected.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is critical of the coalition, focusing on the controversial aspects of the car tax bill and demanding its withdrawal. The accusations center on political motivation and the limitation of democracy. They are prepared to take legal action if the bill is not withdrawn.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The position clearly stands in opposition to the coalition’s intent to define and restrict the rights of the opposition, as well as to bundle amendments. This initiative highlights the risks associated with mobile voting and the lack of safeguards for electoral secrecy. It employs strong rhetoric to underscore the defense of democracy, transparency, and the rights of the opposition, seeking to counteract the coalition’s measure. It greatly emphasizes the necessity of preserving the opposition's rights to interpellation and debate.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The text is critical of the policies set by the government and the Ministry of Culture. The criticism is strong, highlighting concrete issues like funding cuts and the threat of redistribution. It is intense, calling out a moral and practical imbalance, and demands clarification and subsequent changes.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Critical of the draft bill; highlights the lack of an impact assessment and the need for coordination; does not support the current form.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The core argument: an oppositional stance regarding the draft legislation; they are strongly against it and call for its withdrawal, advocating for alternative solutions (specifically, utilizing misdemeanor proceedings). The opposition criticizes the government, boldly asserting the necessity of compliance with the European Union directive, but does not support a parallel system.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Clearly oppositional; critical of the government's tax policy and proposed legislation; employs stronger rhetoric, emphasizing fairness and highlighting a range of risks concerning Europe and the constitution; refuses to make even a superficial compromise on the bills.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Stance: strong opposition; against the draft bill and a desire to reject the bill; criticism focuses on the impact of excessive requirements and rapid regulation, as well as the alleged objective of market cleansing.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main focus of criticism is the government's tax policy (especially the car tax) and its failure to deliver on promises; as well as criticism regarding the coalition's structure and the governance mechanisms of local municipalities. The tone is intense and strongly adversarial; the capacity for compromise is limited, and blame is squarely placed on the government and the nation's leadership.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary narrative casts the government coalition and ministers as irresponsible and incompetent. They are accused of breaking promises and of inadequate implementation of proposed policies. Additionally, criticism is leveled against local governments (including Tallinn), often involving accusations and false figures. The tone is intense and strongly critical, intended to compel them to take responsibility.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary area of opposition is criticism of the government's tax policy; the criticism is purposefully directed largely at the sugar tax and broader tax-related policies; the attack is policy-based, but does not rule out the need to advocate for social measures, with an emphasis on alternatives and draft legislation/bills.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
A direct and strongly worded opposition to the car tax; it accuses the government of the bill being in conflict with both European Union law and the constitution. The tone of the address is critical and does not automatically offer options for cooperation, but rather emphasizes the need for immediate retraction and legal protection for vulnerable groups.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Clearly oppositional: characterized by strong political criticism directed at the government and the coalition; it accuses the authorities and local governments of failing to deliver on promises made or pledged, and therefore holds them accountable. It partially supports alternative solutions, but primarily emphasizes the divide and resistance to the government's policies.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The opposition is focusing its criticism on the car tax, accusing the government and the ministry of negligence and generating additional costs. It stresses that the draft bill fails to address social problems and must be withdrawn.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the taxation policy of the government and the Reform Party, as well as their priorities for healthcare funding. Critics argue that taxes alone do not address health risks, and there is a lack of a comprehensive approach (specifically, the absence of supplementary measures to promote school lunches, physical activity, and nutrition). The strong criticism centers on the government using taxes primarily to meet state financing needs rather than to genuinely improve public health.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The criticism centers on the government's proposed measures: regarding the car tax, the entity opposes the plan, highlighting insufficient exemptions for disabled individuals and citing risks to the constitutional and legal systems. Concerning the draft bill on administrative fines, the opposition is direct, accusing the government of infringing upon the principles of the rule of law and overstepping the established boundaries. Across all leading columns, the focus has been on robust resistance and the criticism of a justified inability to compromise.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is criticized regarding the negative impact of its policies and forced measures; strong critical positions are adopted concerning the government's social policy and tax policy. In the background, there is a fierce struggle over the car tax; it is emphasized that the need to create special benefits for large families and single parents is associated with the opposition, and an excess profit tax on banks is offered as an alternative.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Key Opposition Statement: The government and the prime minister are under fire; the criticism centers on the introduction of the car tax, its impact, and the inadequate answers provided to questions. A powerful opposition assault targets the fiscal and procedural approach, declaring opposition, emphasizing the injustice and the need for changes and thorough analysis.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main object of the opposition campaign is the government's car tax bill; the criticism is policy-driven and tied to popular acceptance. The focus is on the unequal burden, especially for rural areas and the poorer segments of society, and a compromise is sought regarding the taxation of banks' excess profits. The intensity is high, and a compromise or cessation of the conflict has not been explicitly ruled out; it is emphasized that the government is not listening to public opinion.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary sentiment is opposition to the car tax; the tax structure is criticized for burdening consumers and curtailing investments; the intensity of the conflict is political and primarily domestic, not personal.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The letter constitutes a clear challenge to the government's plan; the arguments center on criticizing the magnitude of the tax burden and the inefficiency of public spending. It advocates for rural mobility and emphasizes that the proposed tax program will not deliver the intended benefits; it would favor measures that enhance mobility options, rather than restrict them. The stance is strictly policy-based, not personally biased, though the criticism is delivered with high intensity.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Juxtaposed criticism is being presented regarding EKRE's draft bill: it is radical due to excessive restrictions and is impractical. The criticism is based primarily on political and policy levels (quotas for English-language curricula), not on personal claims. The intensity is strong, and compromise is not ruled out, though only concerning certain topics.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opposition is directed at the PM's road policy and the plan to reduce road maintenance expenditures, along with the possibility of using a car tax to influence the state budget. This intense, policy-centric criticism emphasizes the legal and economic negative impacts. A compromise is not being confirmed; instead, there is a call for clarification and public debate.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Intense opposition to the government's tax amendments; the focus is on the decisions being made without impact assessments and posing regional damage; calls for the reversal of the tax proposals, stressing that the taxes could scare tourists away. An intense, yet non-personal, confrontation.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
A strong opposition position regarding rushed legislation; the core of the criticism centers on procedural and legal propriety (specifically, the absence of a drafting intent and impact analysis, and the disregard for constitutional compliance checks). [The opposition] criticizes the interpretations offered by the coalition and its leaders, demanding stricter oversight and transparency in the legislative process. A dominant stance—growing resistance to the fast-track procedure.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The opposition's stance against the government: The primary critique centers on the fact that state resources and education funding are not being properly channeled, and that demagogic rhetoric coupled with a lack of compensatory funding is exacerbating the situation. The speaker demands answers, specifically the opportunity to reclaim the funds and appeal to the administrative court, and stresses that a thorough legal analysis must be employed to achieve this. This demonstrates powerful, forceful criticism and an unwillingness to accept the current methods.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
A critique aimed at the government and ministers, particularly regarding plans to reallocate funding across various sectors to cover teachers' salaries—a move presented as potentially damaging to general education, science, and higher education institutions. It highlights specific objections concerning the failure to deliver on promises and the segmentation of budgets; the tone of the address is critical but non-populist, aiming for a broad-based consensus.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism leveled against the coalition centers on its past voting record concerning similar legislative drafts. It is pointed out that the coalition has previously dismissed the very positions now being adopted by the critics. The criticism is policy-driven, not personal, and underscores the necessity of reaching a compromise.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Critical of the government and the coalition, particularly regarding inconsistent messaging and political behavior; while simultaneously emphasizing the need for cooperation and compromise.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Critical of the coalition and their plans regarding the draft bill; emphasizes the protection of institutional independence and the fear of politically motivated interference through the Ministry of Justice. Does not support underhanded maneuvers against the draft bills, and stresses the need to ensure the principles of the rule of law. Not enough data on the extent of direct confrontation outside these points.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
A critical, opposition-style tone is directed at the coalition; questions and concerns are being raised regarding the execution of major projects and the risks associated with nuclear energy. To describe it better, the attitude is skeptical and focused on oversight, even if no direct, unannounced compromise is explicitly stated.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no obvious opposition or personal attack; the criticism is confined to the form of questions and the demand for clarification of specific reasons.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main resistance is focused on tax increases and the government's economic policy; it is being argued that taxes will not solve rising inflation or industrial instability, and demands are being made for investments that stimulate the economy and for transparent development plans. The criticism is strong, and virtually no cooperative compromise is being expressed without concrete economic measures and budget changes.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Critical of the current approach and the division of roles between the state and local authorities: shifting the blame to local authorities is not sufficient, and the state must allocate adequate funds for education. Although he/she visibly does not personally attack individuals, he/she is relatively at odds with the existing framework and emphasizes the need for shared responsibility and cooperation.