Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
2025-09-22
Political Position
The speaker's core position is that the 25 kg limit set by the e-scooter traffic insurance law unfairly targets a single market participant (Bolt) and is therefore unacceptable. He believes the decision was influenced by political donations and lobbying efforts, and that, if necessary, equal regulation must be ensured across all rental services; emphasizing consumer protection and market fairness. Furthermore, his stance focuses on anti-corruption oversight and the protection of public funds and public health, rather than prioritizing the interests of a single company.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
He clearly uses examples and data (e.g., 42% of accidents with Bolt, 13.68% regarding Tuul scooters) to argue the impact of insurance and regulation. He highlights the role of ministries, the Competition Authority, and the Health Insurance Fund, and discusses the problems of the legislative approach and market balance. Demonstrative, data-backed regulatory analysis, along with attention to the context of safety and consumer protection.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The emphasis is combative and critical. It utilizes an emotional and accusatory tone, referencing lobbying and donations, and employs rhetorical questions to raise issues concerning the law's objectives and transparency. Anecdotal and statistical evidence supports the skepticism and demands.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively involved in the work of plenary sessions and committees; regularly referring to committee discussions and directives, and offering criticism regarding the relevant regulation. They deliver multiple speeches throughout the same day; emphasizing visible factual and political maneuvering, and pointing to cooperative mechanisms at the level of regulators and agencies.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Highly critical of the coalition parties (Reform Party, Eesti 200, Social Democrats), and accusing a decision—which is viewed as serving their specific interests—of being supported by donations. It champions alternative, unified regulation and consumer protection principles; the criticism emphasizes the utilization of political influence and leverage.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Data unavailable
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
No data available.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economically, he is critical of unequal regulation that could favor a single company and increase the burden on the taxpayer, and he stresses the necessity of a level playing field in the market. He prioritizes consumer protection and reducing the costs borne by the end-user in the market.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The core focus is the protection of consumers, human health, and safety; it stresses that unregulated or inconsistent regulation compromises safety and results in further costs for consumers and taxpayers.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main priority is bringing the draft law to the budgetary and regulatory level, where all rental services would be covered by an insurance requirement; it emphasizes the need for unified regulation and discussion within committees, and draws attention to the fact that the decision was made in favor of a single company.
4 Speeches Analyzed