Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The opposition's stance is clearest in energy and climate policy: criticism directed at the speed of the government's green transition and subsidies for offshore wind farms, with emphasis placed on transparency, protecting consumer prices, and controlling the burden on taxpayers. A direct motion of no-confidence is being filed against Climate Minister Yoko Alender, and the factions demand the removal of Maar from office and thorough reviews of non-corruption-related risks. The position is strongly confrontational and fundamental: control over resource allocation based on democracy and public interest, and ensuring clarity regarding areas of responsibility. The factions (Centre Party and EKRE) see the need to make the feasibility of decisions public and to end decisions formulated through "backroom" processes.

The speakers demonstrated their knowledge of energy policy and its economic impacts: they referenced the 2.6 billion euro application for offshore wind farms, discussed national security of supply and electricity prices, and stressed the importance of the development plan and public calculations. The presenters cited the National Audit Office, Transparency International Estonia (Korruptsioonivaba-Eesti), and "climate corruption" as areas of concern, and highlighted the need for transparency in price models and calculations. Technical specifications mentioned included adherence to the development plan, budget flows, and the impact on taxpayers.

The tone of the discourse is predominantly combative and accusatory. Rhetorical questions and pointed visual criticism are frequently employed: "why," "how," "what is being hidden," and the stances of Corruption-Free Estonia and the National Audit Office are emphasized. The text includes an emotional appeal directed toward the public and against the government, generalizing a negative assessment of the coalition's activities. It relies on fact-based references and a critical narrative designed to awaken public sentiment.

The first statement was made within a single day and points to persistent disputes concerning energy policy issues and the verification of items included on the agenda. It mentions the special committee sessions held "last week," the absence of the minutes (protocol), and the subsequent approval of the agenda. The text also refers to repeated observations regarding the inclusion of the public and the Riigikogu, as well as the activities of the Special Committee against Corruption.

The main line of criticism is directed at the coalition and the government: the rushing of decisions, backroom approvals, and a lack of transparency, which speakers view as corruption risks. The primary targets are Climate Minister Yoko Alender and the coalition, including the PM and Keit Kasemets, and the overarching tone is one of distrust and a demand for resignation. Additionally, accusations of manipulation by other political parties are raised, and the necessity of protecting democracy and the public interest is emphasized.

Partnership-based and multi-party cooperation has been confirmed: the statement, "The Centre Party and EKRE factions express no confidence," demonstrates the formation of a united front. There are hints of consultations with other parties (e.g., Kristen Michal) and considerations regarding the factors influencing debates held in the Riigikogu, but the primary emphasis is on comprehensive anti-coalition coordination and the utilization of special committees to address corruption issues.

Not enough data

Economically, the focus is on protecting consumer prices and the taxpayer burden. It is argued that energy prices will rise and that costs will be covered by taxpayers through the budget, rather than by companies or shareholder expectations. Furthermore, the lack of transparency and control regarding large investments (such as the 2.6 billion for offshore wind farms) is highlighted. The government's risk-taking is criticized, and accountability is demanded concerning the economic and budgetary rationale of these investments.

Not enough data

Key priorities include expressing a vote of no confidence and taking the necessary steps to open up software and data to the public. Furthermore, there is a demand for the initiation of a criminal case, an open debate in the Riigikogu, and the proper sharing of minutes. At the same time, the need is emphasized to discuss and correct energy development plans and to conduct the review in a way that avoids burdening consumers and taxpayers.