By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas
Total Sessions: 93
Fully Profiled: 93
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition, who stand accused of emotional callousness regarding the issue at hand. The criticism is highly intense and contains a moral judgment, expressing the hope that the politicians will have a change of heart.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is aimed at the current unequal support system for farmers and the ineffective design of regional measures, which prevents more remote areas from absorbing the necessary funds. There is also a warning against a populist funding approach, where people want everything but are unwilling to contribute themselves. The criticism is policy-based, not personal.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The criticism is aimed at the government and the prime minister, focusing on procedural failures and the slow pace of implementing the infrastructure project. The attack centers on policy execution, questioning why construction work has not begun a year after the funds were allocated. The demands are intense and aimed at accelerating the process.
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Data is scarce
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
He strongly opposes populists on tax issues, emphasizing the need to collect taxes to fund social services. He personally criticized his colleague Rain Epler for lying and unethical conduct during the local elections, labeling it "incompetent conduct." He is also critical of tax breaks that allow companies to avoid supporting national defense (specifically citing the purchase of speedboats).
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main confrontation is aimed at the government and the finance minister, who are being criticized for the poor state of the nation's finances and unfair tax policies. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of handing out 114 million euros to the wealthy and warning of the extremism that could result from these policies. Furthermore, the value of the high rating from the Tax Foundation, which the government has been emphasizing, is being dismissed.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party-led coalition regarding their tax policy, specifically for linking the abolition of the income tax hump to the introduction of the car tax. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of providing an unnecessary "gift" to high-earners. The speaker categorically rejects the falsehood presented by Aivar Kokk from the podium and criticizes former Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev for disregarding proposals.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The primary criticism targets the government and the minister for their inaction in resolving crises and the absence of long-term plans. Specifically, the coalition partner, the Reform Party, is being criticized for opposing the reduction of VAT on foodstuffs. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, demanding swift and clear communication from the state.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the government and the prime minister, who face sharp criticism over their illogical budget priorities. This criticism is intense and policy-driven, calling into question the administration's fundamental economic and social logic, particularly regarding funding decisions.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister, accusing them of creating the impression of a superhuman effort regarding wage increases, while in reality, a tax gift is being handed to the wealthier segment of the population. The criticism is directed at political priorities and unfair distribution, not at individuals.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is directed at the Centre Party. While acknowledging their good proposals, it strictly demands the presentation of their funding sources. The disagreement is primarily rooted in issues of fiscal discipline and procedural correctness, rather than being personal.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the actions of the President of the Republic, who rejected the Parliament’s attempt to exempt vehicles belonging to people with special needs from taxation, calling it an incomprehensible act. Indirect criticism is also aimed at those responsible for amending the protection regulations concerning small forest owners, which the speaker refers to as violence.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed at the Ministry of Culture's centralization policy, which is criticized as regionally destructive and poorly coordinated. The criticism is intense and policy-based, culminating in the clear opposition of the Social Democratic Party faction to the amendment of the public libraries act. The ministry's attitude towards the local residents of Nursipalu is also criticized.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The criticism is directed at irresponsible quick loan providers, who are widely regarded as causing significant societal damage. The speaker proposes holding them fully responsible for debt recovery, thereby alleviating the burden currently placed on employers and the social welfare system.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The criticism targets the actions of the Minister of Health and the lack of transparency within the Health Insurance Fund, specifically focusing on failures in policy and administration. Furthermore, there is an adversarial attitude directed at those who sought to reject the draft legislation, demanding that they provide both explanations and quantifiable metrics.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the actions of the Minister/executive power in resolving the Nursipalu issue, particularly regarding the consideration of local opinion and court rulings. The speaker emphasizes that their previous criticism was confirmed by the court decision, which provides a stronger foundation for the critique.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main confrontation is with the Centre Party, who are being criticized for dealing with internal political issues (the Social Democrats are the problem) instead of the concerns of the Estonian people. The criticism focuses on their priorities and focus, rather than the substance of their policies.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Criticism is directed at specific government agencies and ministers (the Ministry of Climate, the Environmental Board, and the Minister of Education and Research). The criticism is primarily procedural and policy-based, accusing the ministries of unlawful activity (changing conservation regulations) and irresponsible budget management (large surpluses during periods of budget cuts).
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the government's inaction in alleviating social difficulties (specifically, the postponement of the subsistence minimum) and in coordinating anti-fraud activities. Strong opposition is directed at populism and the Isamaa faction, accusing them of ignoring public finance problems and failing to provide a debt repayment plan. The critique also targets the actions of the previous finance minister during the processing of the car tax bill, where key contentious issues were simply swept under the rug.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the state's current regulatory framework or its inaction, which forces employers to deal with their employees' payday loan problems. The speaker opposes the view that this burden should fall on businesses, demanding that the state fulfill its obligations.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the coalition, which is pushing through the competition law, as well as the minister who is directly linked to serving business interests. The criticism is both policy-based and ethics-based, accusing the government of prioritizing narrow interests over the public good. The intensity of the criticism is high, suggesting a possible motion of no confidence.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is sharply criticizing the ruling parties for ignoring social problems and using populism to drive the country into a dire state. He accuses Isamaa of using smoke and mirrors and fueling inflation, and faults the Centre Party for constantly pointing fingers and refusing to cooperate instead of joining forces with the opposition. The criticism targets both specific policy choices (taxes, the subsistence minimum) and political conduct (lying, unwillingness to work together).
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The main targets of criticism are the minister and the Council for the Administration of Courts. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the minister of omitting important facts (the possibility of challenging an administrative fine) and simplifying the issue. Transparency is demanded from the Council for the Administration of Courts regarding the arguments for closing the Põlva courthouse.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the government and the coalition, who face criticism for their irresponsible attitude and failure to grasp the structural problem. The Prime Minister is accused of offering only ideological responses and for the improper procedure used to strip the police of their tools. The criticism is intense and focuses on both policy matters (taxation) and procedural issues (failure to consult).
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is Isamaa, which is being blamed for both historical political errors (the creation of the tax structure) and hypocrisy regarding the raising of land tax in municipalities governed by Isamaa. The criticism is intense and includes direct accusations that Isamaa "says one thing and does another."
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The main criticism is directed at the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of creating an unfair tax system and failing to help people during the crisis. The criticism is policy-based and systemic, demanding fundamental change because the current tax hikes are no longer working. The opposition is intense, questioning why the government refuses to acknowledge reality.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Lack of data
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The criticism is aimed at the government's actions and procedures, especially regarding the long-standing illogical financing practices (the use of reserves) and the lack of budgetary discipline. The criticism is intense and calls for the correction of systemic errors, not just the blaming of individuals.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The confrontation is aimed at the government and the minister in charge, who are being criticized for the lack of a long-term strategy and the delay of decisions within the energy sector. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the government's inability to take responsibility and set clear objectives.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary conflict centers on the Minister of Finance and the government's tax policy. The criticism is both substantive (specifically, tax breaks for businesses) and procedural, accusing the minister of repeatedly failing to address core questions. The confrontation is high-intensity and focuses on the inefficiency of the minister's actions.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main criticism is directed at the Ministry of Climate and the Environmental Board, accusing them of violating the law, failing to engage stakeholders, and unlawfully restricting the rights of landowners. The government is also criticized for lacking a "big picture" strategy regarding energy policy and for turning the issue into a matter of faith. The criticism is intense and centers on procedural and ethical failures.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the actions of the government and the Ministry of Education and Research, especially regarding teachers' salaries and the absence of a regional dimension in the vocational education reform. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, alleging haste, the disregard of socio-economic impacts, and the insufficient valuation of teachers.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the officials and minister of the Ministry of Climate, who are sharply criticized for procedural incompetence and causing confusion. Criticism is leveled against the premature implementation of restrictions (one and a half years) without initiating the amendment of conservation management plans. The criticism targets the wrong direction the process has taken and the resulting legal ambiguity.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The main opponents are the government (the Prime Minister) and the Environmental Board, whose procedural practices are being sharply criticized. The criticism is intense and substantive, accusing the state of robbing rural residents of their property and acting without consultation. Particular criticism is directed at the practice that originated when the current Prime Minister held the position of Climate Minister.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the Centre Party and the Reform Party. The Centre Party is criticized for historical mistakes and its belated "enlightenment" regarding the oil shale issue, which constitutes a motivated attack. The policy of the government (the Reform Party) is criticized because the funding for school meals is unclear and the method for transitioning away from oil shale is too expensive and complicated for the taxpayer.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at colleagues in the Center Party, questioning their understanding of the value of money in Southeast Estonia. Furthermore, there is opposition to Varro Vooglaid's stance on the availability of weapons, which is deemed a dangerous "American-style model" that results in school shootings.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Climate and other responsible ministries, which are deemed to have failed due to the absence of necessary energy calculations. It also expresses opposition to those who seek to impede economic development, considering such actions to be populism.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which faces intense criticism over its tax policy and for exacerbating the country’s structural deficit. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the party of being obstinate regarding fair taxation and effectively holding the state hostage. Separately, the Minister of Finance is criticized for attempting to frame progressive taxation as a form of punishment.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Criticism is directed towards the government's leading party and the minister, citing their hesitant tone and reluctance to support regional policy, especially concerning the implementation of the Robin Hood measure. Strong opposition is aimed at the banks' activities, which involve closing offices in county centers while simultaneously earning colossal profits, necessitating "very serious negotiations" with them.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No direct opponent is criticized, but the current political system is indirectly targeted for placing the responsibility of maintaining cultural life—with insufficient resources—on the shoulders of local municipalities. The criticism is aimed at systemic inefficiency, which fails to ensure the sustainability of cultural life.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The primary criticism is aimed at the state's decisions and actions, particularly those of the Environmental Board and the previous and current ministers responsible for the sector, who are accused of unfair treatment of landowners. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, focusing on the state's efforts to avoid providing fair compensation.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary conflict is with the government, which is accused of consistently prioritizing the business interests of specific companies over broader public interests. The criticism is rooted in policy and values, focusing specifically on the forced adoption of the competition law.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at "a certain political force," which is accused of arrogance and overconfidence stemming from an overly large mandate. The criticism is both behavioral and policy-based, as the opposing side conceals its actions behind the demand for simple, uniform, and easily implementable taxes.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes the opposition parties (Isamaa, EKRE) and the Reform Party for their historical and current fiscal irresponsibility and populism ("mumbo-jumbo"). The criticism is aimed at the political content, such as unrealistic promises regarding paving roads with asphalt, and he warns that such policies will lead to talk of cutting pensions and teachers' salaries. He accuses them of having completely lost touch with reality.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are Mart Võrklaev and his home party, who are being criticized for stubbornly ignoring reasonable proposals during the drafting of the car tax. Broader criticism is aimed at Isamaa and the Reform Party for decades of living in debt and failing to undertake necessary actions, which has had a catastrophic impact on the development of society.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the insufficiency or lack of clarity in the draft bill's justifications, not at specific individuals. The speaker is demanding clarification regarding the specific problems the proposed amendment addresses, which suggests skepticism about its overall necessity.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker opposes the government's socio-political agenda, criticizing the Prime Minister for neglecting issues of economic hardship. The criticism targets existing policies and the lack thereof, demanding immediate intervention from the new administration.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The objection is aimed at the manner in which the draft bill was presented and the specific description concerning the events in Ukraine. The criticism is both procedural and ethical, as it stirs up unnecessary conflict within society.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The criticism is aimed at the government (the Prime Minister and Mr. Pevkur), focusing specifically on their ineffective handling of the speed and methodology chosen for defense procurements. The speaker challenges the government's attempt to dismiss expert criticism as uninformed, thereby making the criticism centered on both policy and procedure. The intensity of the attack is moderate, yet demanding.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the unfair structure of the current system for financing political parties, not at specific opponents. This is procedural and policy-based criticism that contains no personal attacks.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the former Minister of Finance, Mr. Võrklaev, and the process he managed, which stressed the absence of differentiation. This criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the procedural and substantive flaws in the previous legislative process that resulted in unjust outcomes.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No direct criticism or opposition is voiced; instead, a question is posed to the head of government regarding the presentation's focus, seeking clarification on the sustainability of academic staff salaries.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Strong and intense opposition has arisen against the Isamaa Party, whose bill to abolish the car tax is being labeled as irresponsible populism. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the lack of alternative revenue streams and the fear that poorer people will be taxed even more, citing previous Isamaa policies.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposing party is identifiable as a message originating "from the other side of the hall," which claims that production is being obstructed. The speaker refutes this narrative, arguing that production is taking place, but market access is being hindered due to pricing. The criticism is directed at the political narrative, not at individuals.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is no direct criticism aimed at specific opponents, but he/she calls into question the regional policy decision by the government or ministry to close the Põlva courthouse. He/she criticizes this decision due to its extremely negative regional policy impact, which sends a poor message to the small county center.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The confrontation is directed against the opposition's general populist approach, which promises to simultaneously increase benefits and reduce taxes. The speaker considers such an approach unrealistic and impossible, given its lack of accountability.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at those who fail to delve into or understand the significant financial damage resulting from excessive alcohol consumption, citing Urmas Reinsalu as an example. The critique is policy- and awareness-based, not personal, and focuses on the underestimation of the topic's importance.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the elected representatives who stubbornly cast doubt on the statements made by scientists, labeling this a futile and dangerous endeavor. The criticism specifically targets the lack of intellectual integrity and the disregard for scientific consensus.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no direct opposition or criticism aimed at specific opponents or political groups. The questions are focused on clarifying the implementation of the policy and addressing data deficiencies, rather than engaging in personal attacks.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The opposition's stance is mentioned for context, referencing their contradictory criticism regarding both spending and cuts. The speaker himself does not launch direct attacks, but rather uses the opposition's criticism as an introduction to his question.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the ministries concerning the unsuccessful implementation of activity-based budgeting and the lack of efficiency in public spending. The criticism is substantive and substantiated by the State Audit Office's audit, but at the same time, a warning was issued against rushing headlong back to the old system. Furthermore, one person present in the hall was criticized for impolite behavior (finger-pointing).
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is no direct confrontation or criticism aimed at political opponents. The indirect opposition is directed at those who use the term "ugly earmarks" in a negative context when the funding is actually intended to satisfy the needs of state institutions.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at a systemic shortfall in social welfare funding, rather than being directed against specific individuals. The speaker calls into question the effectiveness of cooperation between the state and local authorities in ensuring the pensioner's livelihood.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is primarily directed at the state’s chronic failure to guarantee equal conditions for entrepreneurship and housing development in rural areas, labeling the situation as one "deserving a serious reckoning." Also criticized are ministers from previous governments who claimed that local municipalities were wealthy and extravagant—a notion that was proven false during budget negotiations.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the government's policy regarding the excessively strict implementation of the motor vehicle tax for vehicles with cancelled registration entries. The criticism is policy-based and centers on the fact that the draft bill is causing discontent within the community of owners of vintage vehicles and vehicles of historical value.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the actions taken by the government or responsible officials concerning the poor presentation and accessibility of public study results. The criticism is procedural, focusing on shortcomings in transparency, particularly regarding the data from the noise survey.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The opposition is facing sharp criticism, with accusations leveled against "at least one opposition party" for years of state underfunding and "wearing the country down to the bone." The criticism operates on a political level, asserting that the opposition's actions have forced the ruling coalition to implement the car tax. However, it is also admitted that even among the Social Democrats, there are no cheers regarding the new car tax.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
Criticism is aimed at the actions of previous governments that prioritized popular decisions over responsible ones. The opposition is directed at populism and short-sighted governance, which has driven the country into an economic slump.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker criticized the overall tone of the debate, accusing it of demagoguery and populism. He/She also criticized previous state actions which failed to carry out the regular land valuation for 21 years, thereby creating the current problem with the revenue base for local municipalities. The criticism is aimed at political irresponsibility and procedural errors.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The criticism targets policies that generate socio-economic debt and a deceptively low tax burden, highlighting the damage that will be incurred in the future. No specific opponents or political parties are named; the critique is aimed instead at the overall fiscal policy approach.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the Isamaa party, accusing them of "genuine populism" regarding the issue of local government funding. Furthermore, it criticizes previous compositions of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) for their inaction concerning the impoverishment of peripheral areas, and expresses strong skepticism regarding the influence of nuclear energy lobby groups.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The criticism is aimed at the state's current economic and tax policy, which is suspected of undermining competitiveness. The opposition is policy-driven, as clarification is being demanded regarding whether the relevant analysis has been conducted, but specific opponents are not being named.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed more towards previous political shortcomings and economic problems (the inability to support energy-intensive companies during high prices), rather than specific political opponents.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The primary confrontation is aimed at the aggressor state (Russia), which is harshly condemned for disregarding the rules of war and humanitarian principles. The aggressor and its supporters are held solely responsible for the resulting damages. Domestic political opponents are not criticized in the addresses.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker avoids criticizing any specific group and does not directly oppose government policy; instead, they politely inquire with the minister regarding progress. There is insufficient data available to determine the style or intensity of their opposition.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at systemic issues, primarily Estonia's tax environment and excessive domestic administrative activity, which places a significant burden on farmers. No specific opponents or political groups are being criticized; instead, the focus is on the need to improve the regulatory environment.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the bill's proponents and the political system more broadly, which has for decades avoided providing a genuine solution for funding small schools. The critique is policy-driven, focusing on questioning the sincerity of the bill's objectives and the inefficiency of the proposed funding mechanism. The opposition is moderate, given that an alternative solution is being proposed.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is directed against the government’s economic policy, criticizing the state’s decision to reduce investments during the economic downturn. The criticism is policy-based and moderately intense, expressing disappointment over the lack of expected stability and counter-cyclical behavior.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary conflict centers on the EKRE faction, whose proposed bill has been branded as populist and hypocritical. The criticism is aimed directly at specific individuals, citing the high expense allowances claimed by EKRE members (Martin Helme and Rain Epler) and previous scandals (such as the notorious "bottomless car tanks" incident). The speaker accuses the opposition of deceiving the public and destroying the reputation of the Riigikogu.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The speaker is taking an oppositional stance, criticizing the legislative consistency of the presenter’s party regarding the draft bill banning electoral alliances. He/She warns that the opposition (in the local councils) could constantly exploit the low 10% initiative threshold to impose measures against those currently in power, thereby rendering the criticism politically motivated.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at previous inaction in a crucial sector, noting that the government has "finally" started making decisions. The current stance is more procedural and inquisitive, rather than directly confrontational.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the central government's education reform policy and methodology, which critics denounce as a "one-size-fits-all logic" and an excessive reliance on centralized Excel spreadsheets. The criticism is intense and strictly focused on policy and procedure, accusing the approach of destroying local regions.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed at the bill's proponents—specifically the Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE)—and historically also the Centre Party and the Reform Party, who have previously attempted to implement similar restrictions. The criticism is intense, accusing the opponents of fearing fair competition and restricting democratic rights in an effort to secure their own election results.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the state's general policy concerning the imposition of excessive regulations (or "overregulation," often referred to as "going overboard") and tax increases. The opposition is policy-driven and centers on the question of why competition is failing and what steps should be taken to improve it.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Criticism is directed at the tax policy presented by the government, highlighting the economic and national security shortcomings of the draft bill. The objection is rooted in policy, focusing specifically on the unrealistic nature of the forecasts and the potential damage to national defense readiness. The rationale behind the bill was strongly contested.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary confrontation is directed against Russia’s military objectives in Ukraine, emphasizing the refusal to accept them. Domestic political opponents or criticism are not addressed in this speech.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the substance and timing of Draft Bill 124, as it fails to offer a comprehensive solution and duplicates the work of the government. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing the unreasonableness of dividing responsibilities among ministries and questioning the role of the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture in fulfilling a national defense mandate. The committee proposed rejecting the draft bill.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The resistance is aimed at the black-and-white narrative of school reform being disseminated at the state level, a narrative criticized for having a devastating impact on rural life. This criticism is policy- and value-based, standing in opposition to the idea of forced consolidation.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker takes a stand against the bill's initiators, criticizing their actions as impractical and hazardous to society, as they risk generating new tensions. The critique is aimed at a political approach that lacks "common sense," and any compromise on supporting the draft legislation is entirely ruled out.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
No data available