Session Profile: Anti Allas

The political focus is currently on the failure of the state budget reform, particularly the deficiencies in implementing Activity-Based Budgeting (ABB), which have resulted in increased confusion and higher costs. The speaker adopts a critical position, concurring with the findings of the National Audit Office, and stresses the necessity for responsible action. The proposed solution is a combination of cost-based and activity-based budgeting, though the primary emphasis would remain on the cost-based approach. This stance is strongly policy- and performance-driven, demanding clarity regarding the use of taxpayer funds.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in state budget methodology and auditing, detailing the differences between cost-based and activity-based budgeting, as well as issues concerning the accuracy of performance metrics. This expertise stems from a thorough analysis of the National Audit Office report and participation in the discussions of the special committee for state budget control. Technical terminology is employed, referencing parallel budgets and the efficiency of public expenditure.

The style is predominantly formal, analytical, and critical, emphasizing logical argumentation and relying on the conclusions of the National Audit Office. The overall tone is one of concern, describing the country's situation as "grim" and demanding clear action from the Government of the Republic. There is also a brief, personal interjection focusing on the internal culture and decorum of the chamber, specifically criticizing finger-pointing.

The Member is active in plenary sessions, posing questions to the National Audit Office and participating in debates concerning budget control. Their activity patterns indicate specialization, as the Member frequently refers to repeated participation in the discussions of the special committee for state budget control.

The main criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the ministries concerning the unsuccessful implementation of activity-based budgeting and the lack of efficiency in public spending. The criticism is substantive and substantiated by the State Audit Office's audit, but at the same time, a warning was issued against rushing headlong back to the old system. Furthermore, one person present in the hall was criticized for impolite behavior (finger-pointing).

The collaborative approach is open to expert opinions, strongly supporting the criticism leveled at the government by the National Audit Office and other specialists in the field. The speaker advocates for a responsible, combined solution (a hybrid budget), demonstrating a willingness to compromise between extreme political choices.

Not enough data

Economic perspectives focus on the efficiency, transparency, and accountability of public spending, criticizing the expense and complexity associated with activity-based budgeting. The preference is for a budget model that ensures a clear understanding of the links between expenditures and objectives, with a strong emphasis on cost control.

The only social issue raised concerns the internal culture and decorum of the parliament, criticizing the practice of pointing fingers in the chamber, particularly when directed at an older female member. This emphasizes the importance of respect and ethical conduct.

The legislative focus is on reforming the State Budget Act and the methodology for its implementation, in response to the negative audit findings of the National Audit Office. The speaker is a critical analyst and proposes a specific policy direction—the combination of cost-based and activity-based budgeting.